Guest trippy Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 In article <LqqdnTrWnpAtWgDbnZ2dnUVZ_qzinZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... > trippy wrote: > > > In article <kKydnb0BT6uhPADbnZ2dnUVZ_vm3nZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > > "Oh Wow"... > > > >> trippy wrote: > >> > >> > In article <7aidnbkHC-IeEQDbnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > >> > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > >> > "Oh Wow"... > >> > > >> >> trippy wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto > >> >> > von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I > >> >> > said "Oh Wow"... > >> >> > > >> >> >> trippy wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq 2008 > >> >> >> > took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said "Oh > >> >> >> > Wow"... > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory > >> >> >> >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around > >> >> >> >> the world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by > >> >> >> >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - > >> >> >> >> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hillary will not be president! > >> >> > > >> >> > Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. > >> >> > > >> >> > Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. > >> >> > >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=ADFA+BCCI > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > I have no idea what you're on about and your nutter links aren't > >> > shedding much light on the subject. Why don't you just give me the > >> > Reader's Digest condensed version as filtered through you. > >> > >> Slick and The Bitch are members of the Bush Mob. George Herbert Walker > >> Bush > >> is a mobster from hell. He called the shots in Dealey Plaza. > >> > >> http://www.google.com/search?q=Zapata-Off-shore+JFK > >> > >> Iran Contra was not the exposure. Iran Contra was the cover up. Slick > >> and The Bitch were fully involved in the biggest drug running operation > >> in the US. > >> > >> You'll just have to dig. I checked enough tail numbers and alternative > >> sources to convince myself that there is more than a little truth to all > >> of this. Bear in mind that Washington Post Managing Editor, Bob Kaiser, > >> as well as John Kerry are members of the Skulls on Boners cult to which > >> both > >> Poppy and Dubya belong. If you think that blowjob in the White House was > >> the scandal, you got some news headed your way. Asa and Tim Hutchinson > >> had a powerful motive for directing the public's attention to the > >> President's penis, and away from a little mountain town in Arkansas. > >> > >> And then there's Bill Buford and Waco, Andreas Strassmeir and OKC, Emad > >> A. Salem and WTC 93, but I digress.... > >> > > > > Not buying it. By the time Bill and Hillary even got close to it, it had > > imploded. > > What? The Mena drug trade? What's the connection between Slick and The > Bitch and Mohammed Atta? > > Anything to do with Iran Contra. It had imploded by '88 long before Bill and Hillary could ever get their hands on it. How are they running drugs in connection with it? -- trippy mhm31x9 Smeeter#29 WSD#30 sTaRShInE_mOOnBeAm aT HoTmAil dOt CoM http://www.myspace.com/starshine_moonbeam NP: "Goldeneye" -- Tina Turner "What did I tell the kid. It's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. It's about how much you can take, and keep moving forward. Get up." -- Sylvester Stallone "Rocky Balboa" Quote
Guest Hatto von Aquitanien Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 trippy wrote: > In article <LqqdnTrWnpAtWgDbnZ2dnUVZ_qzinZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said > "Oh Wow"... > >> trippy wrote: >> >> > In article <kKydnb0BT6uhPADbnZ2dnUVZ_vm3nZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto von >> > Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I said >> > "Oh Wow"... >> > >> >> trippy wrote: >> >> >> >> > In article <7aidnbkHC-IeEQDbnZ2dnUVZ_u3inZ2d@speakeasy.net>, Hatto >> >> > von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I >> >> > said "Oh Wow"... >> >> > >> >> >> trippy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article <U6OdnSbuj5GS7gDbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@speakeasy.net>, >> >> >> > Hatto von Aquitanien took the hamburger meat, threw it on the >> >> >> > grill, and I said "Oh Wow"... >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> trippy wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > In article <Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131>, Iraq >> >> >> >> > 2008 took the hamburger meat, threw it on the grill, and I >> >> >> >> > said "Oh Wow"... >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >> >> >> >> >> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around >> >> >> >> >> the world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >> >> >> >> >> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and >> >> >> >> >> finally - 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on >> >> >> >> >> attacking the US >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What does that spell for the democrats in 2012? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 1. The End of the Democratic Party (as we know it today) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Hillary supported the war. She won't pull out. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hillary will not be president! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Primaries are what a few months away? Hill's got the nice lead. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Can't dismiss the possibility at this point. >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=ADFA+BCCI >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > I have no idea what you're on about and your nutter links aren't >> >> > shedding much light on the subject. Why don't you just give me the >> >> > Reader's Digest condensed version as filtered through you. >> >> >> >> Slick and The Bitch are members of the Bush Mob. George Herbert >> >> Walker Bush >> >> is a mobster from hell. He called the shots in Dealey Plaza. >> >> >> >> http://www.google.com/search?q=Zapata-Off-shore+JFK >> >> >> >> Iran Contra was not the exposure. Iran Contra was the cover up. Slick >> >> and The Bitch were fully involved in the biggest drug running >> >> operation in the US. >> >> >> >> You'll just have to dig. I checked enough tail numbers and >> >> alternative sources to convince myself that there is more than a >> >> little truth to all of this. Bear in mind that Washington Post >> >> Managing Editor, Bob Kaiser, as well as John Kerry are members of the >> >> Skulls on Boners cult to which both >> >> Poppy and Dubya belong. If you think that blowjob in the White House >> >> was >> >> the scandal, you got some news headed your way. Asa and Tim >> >> Hutchinson had a powerful motive for directing the public's attention >> >> to the President's penis, and away from a little mountain town in >> >> Arkansas. >> >> >> >> And then there's Bill Buford and Waco, Andreas Strassmeir and OKC, >> >> Emad A. Salem and WTC 93, but I digress.... >> >> >> > >> > Not buying it. By the time Bill and Hillary even got close to it, it >> > had imploded. >> >> What? The Mena drug trade? What's the connection between Slick and The >> Bitch and Mohammed Atta? >> >> > > Anything to do with Iran Contra. It had imploded by '88 long before Bill > and Hillary could ever get their hands on it. How are they running drugs > in connection with it? http://www.google.com/search?q=Mena+Iran-Contra But that is, by no means, the whole picture. -- http://911research.wtc7.net http://vehme.blogspot.com Virtus Tutissima Cassis Quote
Guest Vandar Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Ben Turner wrote: > Vandar wrote: > > >>No oil and no rare minerals? You'd better re-check your information. > > > > > Excellent pipeline route. Seriously massive quantities of opium poppies > now being grown. > > What else? All sorts of crap. Natural gas, petroleum, coal, marble, copper, chromite, talc, barites, sulfur, lead, zinc, iron ore, salt, and precious and semi-precious stones. In March, the US Geological Survey and the Afghan Ministry of Mines and Industry reported that Afghanistan Quote
Guest Vandar Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Perseid wrote: > After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Ben Turner > <BenTurner@notvalid.address> Spat the Words > > >>Vandar wrote: >> >>>No oil and no rare minerals? You'd better re-check your information. >> >>Excellent pipeline route. Seriously massive quantities of opium poppies >>now being grown. >> >>What else? >> > > > Maybe he thinks heroin is a rare mineral. Maybe I just know that people who think Afghanistan has no oil or rare minerals are ignorant fools. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message news:Yebni.9242$zA4.5244@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > In News f7jf15025g4@news5.newsguy.com,, Joe S. at noname@nosuch.net, typed > this: > >> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >> news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in >>> news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: >>>> >>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>>> >>>> rofl Another deluded republican. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return >>> after Hillary pulls out of there too... >> >> You ever been to Afghanistan?? >> >> I have. Amazing scenery. No oil. No rare minerals. Not a strategic >> chokepoint. The Taliban can have it. > > Exactly. Our entire mission in Afghanistan should have been, go in, > crack only enough heads as necessary to get Bin Laden and destroy any Al > Qaeda presence we found, get out. Fuck all this nation building > bullshit. If the Afghani people wanted different leadership, let them > have a revolution. WTF..? What part of Al Qaeda would simply return, set up shop, train and plan the next 9/11 do you not understand? I mean, shit. Just look at what happened in Pakistan. Are you retarded or something? Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9970A27C44385Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in > news:Yebni.9242$zA4.5244@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net: > >> In News f7jf15025g4@news5.newsguy.com,, Joe S. at noname@nosuch.net, >> typed this: >> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns997073CA2C9B3Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>> "Server 13" <its@casual.com> wrote in >>>> news:f7j0qm$k12$1@news.ks.uiuc.edu: >>>>> >>>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:Xns9970713502798Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>>>> 1. The terrorists will claim victory >>>>>> 2. There will be dancing in the streets by Muslims all around the >>>>>> world 3. Bloody civil war will rage in Iraq followed by >>>>>> 4. The eventual rise of a militant Islamic state - and finally - >>>>>> 5. The focus of militant Islam will be back on attacking the US >>>>> >>>>> rofl Another deluded republican. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Same goes for Afghanistan... A Taliban-style of Islam will return >>>> after Hillary pulls out of there too... >>> >>> You ever been to Afghanistan?? >>> >>> I have. Amazing scenery. No oil. No rare minerals. Not a >>> strategic chokepoint. The Taliban can have it. >> >> Exactly. Our entire mission in Afghanistan should have been, go in, >> crack only enough heads as necessary to get Bin Laden and destroy any >> Al Qaeda presence we found, get out. Fuck all this nation building >> bullshit. If the Afghani people wanted different leadership, let them >> have a revolution. >> >> >> > > Yes, I am sure Hillary will think just like you; she will stick her head > in the sand, permit the terrorist training camps to return, permit the > Jihadists to refocus thier efforts on attacking the US until the next 9- > 11... Of course! WTF is wrong with these people? I mean, it's impossible to be THAT stupid. You'd be a vegetable laid up in a hospital bed some place unable to type. Un-fucking-believable.. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com... > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > >>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >> >> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here > > How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the US? > Explain. You're a moron. What else would you like to know, Welch? Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message news:%Rbni.8616$Od7.8527@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net... > In News Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at > iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: > >> "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in >> news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com: >> >>> >>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>> >>>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>>> >>>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >>> >>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the >>> US? Explain. >>> >> >> You need me to spell it out? As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's >> efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan, once the US pulls out and it's >> dominance, or that of a similar ideology is fully established, they >> will focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. > > That has recently been found to be false. A report issued late last week > by Bush's own national security analysts clearly demonstrated that Al > Qaeda is as strong as ever, and are now focusing time, money, and > attention into another domestic U.S. attack. The report said: Because they have set up shop in remote Pakistan, now you want to hand them Iraq in addition as a solution. Goddamn you're an idiot, Andreaphus. No shit. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message news:Ppcni.7996$rR.7568@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... > In News Xns9970A4F0B50ECIraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at > iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: > >> "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in >> news:%Rbni.8616$Od7.8527@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net: >> >>> In News Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at >>> iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: >>> >>>> "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in >>>> news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>>> >>>>>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>>>>> >>>>>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >>>>> >>>>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in >>>>> the US? Explain. >>>>> >>>> >>>> You need me to spell it out? As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's >>>> efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan, once the US pulls out and it's >>>> dominance, or that of a similar ideology is fully established, they >>>> will focus thier attacks on the US and its allies. >>> >>> That has recently been found to be false. A report issued late last >>> week by Bush's own national security analysts clearly demonstrated >>> that Al Qaeda is as strong as ever, and are now focusing time, money, >>> and attention into another domestic U.S. attack. The report said: >>> >>> "...we assess that al-Qaida will probably seek to leverage the >>> contacts and capabilities of al-Qaida in Iraq (AQI), its most visible >>> and capable affiliate and the only one known to have expressed a >>> desire to attack the homeland." >>> >>> http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20070717/469c3ec0_3ca6_ >>> 1552 620070717-916732413 >>> >>> . >> The article you reference only confirms my post. Clearly, > > Actually, it is in direct contradiction to your point. No, it affirms his point. Musharraf pulled his troops out of remote Pakistan and Al Qaeda moved right in. Same would happen in Iraq should the government fall there. It's simply a non-arguable no-brainer. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "CoriousAboutBahai" <idontgiveoutmy@email.com> wrote in message news:Xns9970AC21BEC5Fidontgiveoutmyemailc@216.196.97.131... >>> As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's efforts on Iraq and >>> Afghanistan >> >> How the fuck do YOU know? > > Um, maybe because the fact is that we are fighting them there and not > here? We're fighting them all over the world you ignorant unAmerican right-wing nitwit fuckhead. And we weren't fighting them in Iraq at all - because THEY WEREN'T FUCKING THERE. > Do facts mean nothing to you? Feel free to provide some. >> And if we already had Afghanistan - why did we need to invade Iraq? >> > > Already answered. Fucking bullshit. Damn, you unAmerican terrorist-loving radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:139qkesorpqkl4e@corp.supernews.com... > > "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... > >>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the >>> US? Explain. >>> >> >> You need me to spell it out? > > Yes. > >> As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan > > How the fuck do YOU know? WTF? You are unaware of Al Qaeda in Iraq? What, the DNC didn't tell you? > And if we already had Afghanistan - why did we need to invade Iraq? Because it was believed Saddam had WMDs and could pass them on to terrorists. Get yourself a TV or a subscription to a newspaper or something for god's sake. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9PAIyRP3qhU Quote
Guest J Carroll Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Mike Flannigan wrote: > "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in message > news:Ppcni.7996$rR.7568@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> In News Xns9970A4F0B50ECIraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at >> iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: >> >>> "Andrealphus" <NOTAREALEMAIL_1@FAM.NET> wrote in >>> news:%Rbni.8616$Od7.8527@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net: >>> >>>> In News Xns9970A1E236F27Iraq2008@216.196.97.131,, Iraq 2008 at >>>> iraq2008@noemail.com, typed this: >>>> >>>>> "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in >>>>> news:139qekj6ej3sl0d@corp.supernews.com: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Iraq 2008" <iraq2008@noemail.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:Xns997073438B707Iraq2008@216.196.97.131... >>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >>>>>> >>>>>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in >>>>>> the US? Explain. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> http://enews.earthlink.net/article/top?guid=20070717/469c3ec0_3ca6_ >>>> 1552 620070717-916732413 >>>> >>>> . >>> The article you reference only confirms my post. Clearly, >> >> Actually, it is in direct contradiction to your point. > > No, it affirms his point. Musharraf pulled his troops out of remote > Pakistan and Al Qaeda moved right in. Same would happen in Iraq > should the government fall there. It's simply a non-arguable > no-brainer. It is a no brainer alright Mike, as in - there is no way on Earth Iran or Saudi Arabia would tolerate it. You'd better have Fran Townsend come up with something scarier than the "fight them there or fight them here" lie. We'll either have to fight them here or we won't regardless the outcome in Iraq. You talk about an Iraq "government", what a joke. -- John R. Carroll http://www.machiningsolution.com Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:carni.407$yW2.74@bignews3.bellsouth.net... >>> As of today, Al Qaeda is focusing it's efforts on Iraq and Afghanistan >> >> How the fuck do YOU know? > > WTF? You are unaware of Al Qaeda in Iraq? I am. I am also aware of Al Queda linked attacks elsewhere in the world - including Europe. So called "Al Queda in Iraq" is a loose group of gangs and thugs, well supplied by raids on our own troops. While they are IN Iraq (they weren't before), they aren't "focusing" there - they are focused on destruction world-wide. Much more so than before Bush's disastrous foreign policy, you ignorant right-wing cocksucker. >> And if we already had Afghanistan - why did we need to invade Iraq? > > Because it was believed Saddam had WMDs and could pass them on to > terrorists. No, it wasn't believed that Saddam had WMD's - Bush WANTED it to be true so that he could proceed to help the terrorists by opening the Iraqi territory and resources to them, you fucking traitor. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:e_qni.398$yW2.198@bignews3.bellsouth.net... >>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>> >>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >> >> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the US? >> Explain. > > You're a moron. Can't answer the question, eh traitor? > What else would you like to know, Welch? I'd like you to answer the question that I asked, you fucking coward. How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the US? Explain. If you have the balls. You sure as hell don't have the brains. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:2Vqni.395$yW2.215@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > WTF..? What part of Al Qaeda would simply return, set up shop, train and > plan the next 9/11 do you not understand? The part where that's completely fucking ridiculous. Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles etc. Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:BXqni.396$yW2.144@bignews3.bellsouth.net... >> Yes, I am sure Hillary will think just like you; she will stick her head >> in the sand, permit the terrorist training camps to return, permit the >> Jihadists to refocus thier efforts on attacking the US until the next 9- >> 11... > > Of course! WTF is wrong with these people? I mean, it's impossible to be > THAT stupid. You'd be a vegetable laid up in a hospital bed some place > unable to type. Un-fucking-believable.. Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles etc. Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:JJ8ni.42$wH1.30@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > look at the "results" of Musharraf pulling troops out of remote Pakistan. Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles etc. Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:Ri9ni.41$wV4.33@bignews2.bellsouth.net... >> rofl You mean the results no one but wacko republicans predict? Oh, >> right, I see them in your original post. > > It's simple common sense, so it's beyond your ability to comprehend.. Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles etc. Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:Sq9ni.46$wV4.30@bignews2.bellsouth.net... > On a related note.. Have you ever noticed that these kooks simultaneously > believe that the resurgence of Al Qaeda is the fault of Bush and Iraq, Uh - "these kooks" apparently include our own government. The resurgence of Al Queda IS the fault of Bush and Iraq, you stupid fuck. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message news:I5rni.403$yW2.358@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > No, it affirms his point. Musharraf pulled his troops out of remote > Pakistan and Al Qaeda moved right in. Same would happen in Iraq should the > government fall there. It's simply a non-arguable no-brainer. Only if you have no brain. Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles etc. Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:139sg6pcbpq874f@corp.supernews.com... > > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message > news:e_qni.398$yW2.198@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > >>>>> 1. U.S. troops will stop dying there >>>> >>>> You mean more US Civilians will start dying here >>> >>> How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the US? >>> Explain. >> >> You're a moron. > > Can't answer the question, eh traitor? > >> What else would you like to know, Welch? > > I'd like you to answer the question that I asked, you fucking coward. > > How will pulling out of Iraq cause more civilians to die here in the US? > Explain. > > If you have the balls. You sure as hell don't have the brains. I did answer the question. The explanation is that you are a moron. It's like asking someone to explain why 2 + 2 = 4. If you have to ask, you are obviously too stupid to understand the answer. So the explanation is that you are a moron. Understand? Oops, that's right. You can't. You're a moron. Bawhahahahah! Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:139sghhjdb6o233@corp.supernews.com... > > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message > news:BXqni.396$yW2.144@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > >>> Yes, I am sure Hillary will think just like you; she will stick her head >>> in the sand, permit the terrorist training camps to return, permit the >>> Jihadists to refocus thier efforts on attacking the US until the next 9- >>> 11... >> >> Of course! WTF is wrong with these people? I mean, it's impossible to be >> THAT stupid. You'd be a vegetable laid up in a hospital bed some place >> unable to type. Un-fucking-believable.. > > Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out > all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence > gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles > etc. > > Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. Hillary is advocating a complete pullout, slingshit. Yeah, I know. Bush was asked if he saw a day when there would be "no" troops in Iraq and CBS headlined it as Bush says no pull out during his administration. So Hillary picks up the ball and puts on a "I'm outraged that Bush says he's going hand the war to a successor" song and dance for her idiot supporters. Then, a few weeks later she says that she would leave "some" troops in Iraq. Now she says complete withdrawal. What day is it? Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:139sggspjl1dk25@corp.supernews.com... > > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message > news:2Vqni.395$yW2.215@bignews3.bellsouth.net... > >> WTF..? What part of Al Qaeda would simply return, set up shop, train and >> plan the next 9/11 do you not understand? > > The part where that's completely fucking ridiculous. Yes, the democrats are completely fucking ridiculous. > Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out > all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence > gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles > etc. The bill that the democrats sponsored and just went down to defeat called for a COMPLETE pullout, dipshit. Any stupid-thing-else you'd like to embarrass yourself by saying, mow-ron? > Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. Oh, I see what your problem is. You're still fuming over the fact that I fucked your mom. Well, I've told you. She begged and begged me. And besides, I was drunk at the time.. Quote
Guest Mike Flannigan Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:139sgimt30tco4b@corp.supernews.com... > > "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message > news:JJ8ni.42$wH1.30@bignews8.bellsouth.net... > >> look at the "results" of Musharraf pulling troops out of remote Pakistan. > > Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull out > all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all intelligence > gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, decommission cruise missiles > etc. > > Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. Pssst... Hey dumbass. "Senate Republicans sunk a Democratic plan that would have required troops to begin coming home within 120 days, with a complete pullout by April 20, 2008." What's that word up there? "Complete"? Wonder what that means.. Any idea? Well, here's a clue... It means you're a MORON! Bawhahahahah! http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/politics/bal-campaign0718,0,4662505.story Quote
Guest Sid9 Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Mike Flannigan wrote: > "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:139sgimt30tco4b@corp.supernews.com... >> >> "Mike Flannigan" <mflannigan@yomoashouse.com> wrote in message >> news:JJ8ni.42$wH1.30@bignews8.bellsouth.net... >> >>> look at the "results" of Musharraf pulling troops out of remote >>> Pakistan. >> >> Pulling out tens of thousands of ground troops doesn't mean we pull >> out all troops, end satellite surveillance, eliminate all >> intelligence gathering, stop flyovers or bombing sorties, >> decommission cruise missiles etc. >> >> Damn, you radical right-wing traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. > > Pssst... Hey dumbass. > > "Senate Republicans sunk a Democratic plan that would have required > troops to begin coming home within 120 days, with a complete pullout > by April 20, 2008." > > What's that word up there? "Complete"? > > Wonder what that means.. Any idea? Well, here's a clue... > > It means you're a MORON! > > Bawhahahahah! > > http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nation/politics/bal-campaign0718,0,4662505.story bush,jr Republican supporters trying to string this fisco out so that bush,jr's successor needs to deal with the mess. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.