The Satanic Approach: When One cannot attack the Message, Must Not One Attack the Messenger?

[Guest Raymond Karczewski]

The Satanic Approach: When One cannot attack the Message, Must Not

One Attack the Messenger?

 

TimWingate wrote:

 

Raymond Karczewski (arkent3@earthlink.net) wrote:

 

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:32 pm

 

tw: > Ray, to answer your question. No, one must not attack the

messenger. To be clear, I did not attack you. I have not called you

names. I have made no inferences about your motivations nor your

character. I have not associated you, your character or motivations

with any believed to be true or mythological deities, demigods, or

spirits. I have simply posted contrary opinions to your claims within

your "message." That is not even "attacking" the message but an

examination of the message in contrast to the light of truth held by

other beings.

 

rk: Tim, by posting the opinions of others attacking the message, and

not rendering your own opinion, are you not evading responsibility for

inferences you construct, which cannot be directly traceable to you?.

 

 

rk: In my book, that, stands proof of misdirection at least,

deception at best.

 

rk: Why have you taken on the seeming duty of standing in as a third

party intervener and contraster of the opinion of others when you

claim you have nothing of your own to say?

 

rk: That's as slick and as lawyerly as one can get. It is not?

 

Raymond Ronald Karczewski