Guest Sid9 Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-flaintel0718psjul18,0,3023095.story South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com Al-Qaida rebuilding, report says Intelligence agencies see evolving threat By Karen DeYoung and Walter Pincus The Washington Post July 18, 2007 Washington Al-Qaida has re-established its central organization, training infrastructure and lines of global communication over the past two years, putting the United States in a "heightened threat environment" despite expanded worldwide counterterrorism efforts, according to a new intelligence estimate. Intelligence officials attributed the al-Qaida gains primarily to establishment of a safe haven in ungoverned areas of northwestern Pakistan. Its affiliation with the Sunni insurgent group known as al-Qaida in Iraq, the report said, has helped it to "energize" extremists elsewhere and aided Osama bin Laden's recruitment and funding. The estimate concluded that "the U.S. Homeland will face a persistent and evolving terrorist threat over the next three years." Al-Qaida, it said, "is and will remain" the most serious element of that threat. The report stressed the effectiveness of counterterrorism measures, in cooperation with other countries, in disrupting terrorist networks and preventing attacks against the United States in the years immediately after Sept. 11, 2001. But it expressed concern that cooperation may wane as memories fade and perceptions of the nature and origin of the threat diverge. The assessment was released Tuesday in a two-page declassified summary of key judgments of a National Intelligence Estimate, titled "The Terrorist Threat to the U.S. Homeland." The estimate mentioned a number of possible threat sources, from Hezbollah in Lebanon to self-generating radical cells in Europe and this country. In a briefing for reporters Tuesday, senior intelligence officials said they expected al-Qaida to continue trying to "leverage" the contacts Al-Qaida in Iraq has established in Iraq. But they attributed the resurgence of bin Laden's organization to its haven among tribal groups in North Waziristan, part of the tribal areas in northwestern Pakistan. U.S. intelligence and military officials have expressed rising frustration with the government of Pakistan's president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf. Last September, Musharraf signed an agreement with tribal leaders allowing them to police the area. In the past week, the Bush administration said the agreement failed and officials Tuesday said that Musharraf had changed his policy. Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell said Tuesday that Musharraf was "moving forces, again, into that region to put pressure on al-Qaida." In separate remarks to an intelligence conference Tuesday, McConnell painted a picture of al-Qaida activities and the threat to the United States that went beyond the NIE judgments. "They're working as hard as they can in positioning trained operatives here in the United States...They have recruitment programs to bring recruits into...Pakistan, particularly those that speak the right language, that have the right skills, that have the right base that they could come to the United States, fit into the population...and carry out acts." Quote
Guest Go Mavz Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them invade Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US troop in to Pakistan soil... Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to see just how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 second long heart stoppage... "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:bonni.462$qe5.419@bignews5.bellsouth.net... > sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-flaintel0718psjul18,0,3023095.story > > South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com > Al-Qaida rebuilding, report says > Intelligence agencies see evolving threat > By Karen DeYoung and Walter Pincus > > The Washington Post > > July 18, 2007 > > Washington Al-Qaida has re-established its central organization, training > infrastructure and lines of global communication over the past two years, > putting the United States in a "heightened threat environment" despite > expanded worldwide counterterrorism efforts, according to a new > intelligence estimate. > > Intelligence officials attributed the al-Qaida gains primarily to > establishment of a safe haven in ungoverned areas of northwestern > Pakistan. Its affiliation with the Sunni insurgent group known as al-Qaida > in Iraq, the report said, has helped it to "energize" extremists elsewhere > and aided Osama bin Laden's recruitment and funding. > > The estimate concluded that "the U.S. Homeland will face a persistent and > evolving terrorist threat over the next three years." Al-Qaida, it said, > "is and will remain" the most serious element of that threat. > > The report stressed the effectiveness of counterterrorism measures, in > cooperation with other countries, in disrupting terrorist networks and > preventing attacks against the United States in the years immediately > after Sept. 11, 2001. But it expressed concern that cooperation may wane > as memories fade and perceptions of the nature and origin of the threat > diverge. > > The assessment was released Tuesday in a two-page declassified summary of > key judgments of a National Intelligence Estimate, titled "The Terrorist > Threat to the U.S. Homeland." The estimate mentioned a number of possible > threat sources, from Hezbollah in Lebanon to self-generating radical cells > in Europe and this country. > > In a briefing for reporters Tuesday, senior intelligence officials said > they expected al-Qaida to continue trying to "leverage" the contacts > Al-Qaida in Iraq has established in Iraq. But they attributed the > resurgence of bin Laden's organization to its haven among tribal groups in > North Waziristan, part of the tribal areas in northwestern Pakistan. > > U.S. intelligence and military officials have expressed rising frustration > with the government of Pakistan's president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf. Last > September, Musharraf signed an agreement with tribal leaders allowing them > to police the area. > > In the past week, the Bush administration said the agreement failed and > officials Tuesday said that Musharraf had changed his policy. Director of > National Intelligence Mike McConnell said Tuesday that Musharraf was > "moving forces, again, into that region to put pressure on al-Qaida." > > In separate remarks to an intelligence conference Tuesday, McConnell > painted a picture of al-Qaida activities and the threat to the United > States that went beyond the NIE judgments. "They're working as hard as > they can in positioning trained operatives here in the United > States...They have recruitment programs to bring recruits into...Pakistan, > particularly those that speak the right language, that have the right > skills, that have the right base that they could come to the United > States, fit into the population...and carry out acts." > > > > Quote
Guest salad Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Sid9 wrote: > sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-flaintel0718psjul18,0,3023095.story > > South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com > Al-Qaida rebuilding, report says > Intelligence agencies see evolving threat > By Karen DeYoung and Walter Pincus > > The Washington Post > > July 18, 2007 > > Washington Al-Qaida has re-established its central organization, training > infrastructure and lines of global communication over the past two years, > putting the United States in a "heightened threat environment" despite > expanded worldwide counterterrorism efforts, according to a new intelligence > estimate. > > Intelligence officials attributed the al-Qaida gains primarily to > establishment of a safe haven in ungoverned areas of northwestern Pakistan. > Its affiliation with the Sunni insurgent group known as al-Qaida in Iraq, > the report said, has helped it to "energize" extremists elsewhere and aided > Osama bin Laden's recruitment and funding. That's what happens when you have a Republican, living in la-la land, switch from fighting the enemy in Afghanistan to foresaking that fight and beating up on the Iraqis. We've seen the cowardice of Republicans. They avoid wars and expect others to fight for them. They're bullys. A bully beats up on others instead of standing up to real threats. Quote
Guest salad Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Go Mavz wrote: > Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them invade > Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US troop in to > Pakistan soil... > > Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to see just > how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 second long heart > stoppage... > I pity any person that takes over the pot of shit bush left stewing regardless of party. Correcting bush's fiascos will require the strength of Atlas. Quote
Guest Go Mavz Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message news:KCnni.8476$tj6.3275@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... > Sid9 wrote: > That's what happens when you have a Republican, living in la-la land, > switch from fighting the enemy in Afghanistan to foresaking that fight and > beating up on the Iraqis. If you read the story, it says North western Pakistan. Now I know you libs arent aware of Pakistan but its got a mighty large military, nukes, and has declared US forces cannot put one troop on its soil. So even if there were 200,000 troops in Afghanistan vs the 50 thousand that are currently there then it wouldnt f__king matter. You see why you libs arent trusted on foreign policy? 8 years of Clinton put us in this f__king mess in this first place... > > We've seen the cowardice of Republicans. They avoid wars and expect > others to fight for them. They're bullys. A bully beats up on others > instead of standing up to real threats. Quote
Guest Go Mavz Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message news:BGnni.8477$tj6.5306@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... > Go Mavz wrote: > >> Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them invade >> Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US troop in to >> Pakistan soil... >> >> Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to see >> just how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 second >> long heart stoppage... >> > > I pity any person that takes over the pot of shit bush left stewing > regardless of party. Correcting bush's fiascos will require the strength > of Atlas. Trust me when I say that us conservatives did not have smile on our faces after the 1993 bombing of the WTC's, the US Embassy bombings, the USS Cole bombing... in addition to Waco, the Oklahoma City Bombing, Columbine, Black Hawk Down, Mogadishu, Elian Gonzalez, Belgrade, Opperation Dessert Foxtrot, refusing chance to obtain OBL, recession that started as he was leaving office... etc etc etc.... Quote
Guest salad Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Go Mavz wrote: > "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message > news:KCnni.8476$tj6.3275@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... > >>Sid9 wrote: >>That's what happens when you have a Republican, living in la-la land, >>switch from fighting the enemy in Afghanistan to foresaking that fight and >>beating up on the Iraqis. > > If you read the story, it says North western Pakistan. Now I know you libs > arent aware of Pakistan but its got a mighty large military, nukes, and has > declared US forces cannot put one troop on its soil. > > So even if there were 200,000 troops in Afghanistan vs the 50 thousand that > are currently there then it wouldnt f__king matter. So to you, moving the fight two countries over to the west, makes the most sense. No wonder shit for brains Republicans screwed the pooch. > You see why you libs arent trusted on foreign policy? If Republicans are an example of understanding foreign policy (bush's was hunting pussy and cocaine in Mexican border towns) its understandable why we are in the mess we are in. Republicans applauded a rube in foreign policy back in 2000. It made them giddy that we'd have an idiot in office. > > 8 years of Clinton put us in this f__king mess in this first place... > Take Clinton's dick out of your mouth. Isn't getting fucked by bush enough for you? > > > > >>We've seen the cowardice of Republicans. They avoid wars and expect >>others to fight for them. They're bullys. A bully beats up on others >>instead of standing up to real threats. > > > Quote
Guest Go Mavz Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message news:mVnni.9389$zA4.395@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > So to you, moving the fight two countries over to the west, makes the most > sense. No wonder shit for brains Republicans screwed the pooch. Whent he Iraq war started, I was certain they had very little to do with the Taliban. Like Gerald Ford, I agreed Bush should have stated that we did not give a sh_t if they have wmd's or ties to terrorism. Simply violating the cease fire agreement and continuing a culture of human rights violations was enough to remove the crazy fugger. > If Republicans are an example of understanding foreign policy (bush's was > hunting pussy and cocaine in Mexican border towns) its understandable why > we are in the mess we are in. 9/11 was planned for 7 years while Clinton was playing with interns boobies. Quote
Guest salad Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Go Mavz wrote: > "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message > news:BGnni.8477$tj6.5306@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... > >>Go Mavz wrote: >> >> >>>Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them invade >>>Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US troop in to >>>Pakistan soil... >>> >>>Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to see >>>just how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 second >>>long heart stoppage... >>> >> >>I pity any person that takes over the pot of shit bush left stewing >>regardless of party. Correcting bush's fiascos will require the strength >>of Atlas. > > > Trust me when I say that us conservatives did not have smile on our faces > after > > the 1993 bombing of the WTC's, the US Embassy bombings, the USS Cole > bombing... > > in addition to Waco, the Oklahoma City Bombing, Columbine, Black Hawk Down, > Mogadishu, Elian Gonzalez, Belgrade, Opperation Dessert Foxtrot, refusing > chance to obtain OBL, recession that started as he was leaving office... > > etc etc etc.... > I am not happy about Reagan and bush the first arming Saddam with WMDs to use on Iranians. American arrogance now biting the US in the ass. And what kind of asshole takes on a paper tiger like Iraq without examining the consequences first? You'd think bush would have had some experience with fire ants. Quote
Guest Go Mavz Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Snap... I almost forgot... 2 million Rwandans died under Bill Clintons watch (dont worry, he said he was sorry) 300,000 Muslims were slaughtered in Kosovo under Bill Clintons watch 1.2 million North Koreans died of starvation under Bill Clintons watch 500 thousand Iraqi children under age 5 starved to death under Bill Clintons watch... to which his favorite apointee said "We think its worth it." 20 thousand by his worthless bombing campaign... those were the days.. Gosh I miss them... Quote
Guest salad Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Go Mavz wrote: > "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message > news:mVnni.9389$zA4.395@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... > >>So to you, moving the fight two countries over to the west, makes the most >>sense. No wonder shit for brains Republicans screwed the pooch. > > > Whent he Iraq war started, I was certain they had very little to do with the > Taliban. Like Gerald Ford, I agreed Bush should have stated that we did not > give a sh_t if they have wmd's or ties to terrorism. Simply violating the > cease fire agreement and continuing a culture of human rights violations was > enough to remove the crazy fugger. Refresh me on whatever cease fire agreement you are referring to. Just because you think it's OK to piss the tax payer money down a financial rathole and put American soldiers in harms way doesn't make the Iraq fiasco correct. >>If Republicans are an example of understanding foreign policy (bush's was >>hunting pussy and cocaine in Mexican border towns) its understandable why >>we are in the mess we are in. > > > 9/11 was planned for 7 years while Clinton was playing with interns boobies. > And Republicans did all they could to overthrow the government and fought Clinton tooth and nail on counter-terrorism. String the fucking Republican traitors up is what I say. Quote
Guest salad Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Go Mavz wrote: > Snap... I almost forgot... > > 2 million Rwandans died under Bill Clintons watch (dont worry, he said he > was sorry) The world should have interceded. > > 300,000 Muslims were slaughtered in Kosovo under Bill Clintons watch Thankfully we got involved in that and stopped the genocide. > > 1.2 million North Koreans died of starvation under Bill Clintons watch > I didn't know about that. A shame the world considers armaments sales as "foreign aid". > 500 thousand Iraqi children under age 5 starved to death under Bill Clintons > watch... to which his favorite apointee said "We think its worth it." Yes. Desert Storm destroyed the Iraqi infrastructure. In times past, we helped the enemy rebuild a country. We left them to die. And some fucking Republicans had the audacity to think Iraqis would strew rose pedals at our feet and call us liberators. > 20 thousand by his worthless bombing campaign... > > > > those were the days.. Gosh I miss them... > So do I. Quote
Guest Sid9 Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Every enemy isn't beaten by Armies. There are other means....bush,jr is an incompetent, a loser, a failure. Go Mavz wrote: > Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them invade > Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US troop in to > Pakistan soil... > > Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to > see just how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 > second long heart stoppage... > > > > > > "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote in message > news:bonni.462$qe5.419@bignews5.bellsouth.net... >> sun-sentinel.com/news/nationworld/sfl-flaintel0718psjul18,0,3023095.story >> >> South Florida Sun-Sentinel.com >> Al-Qaida rebuilding, report says >> Intelligence agencies see evolving threat >> By Karen DeYoung and Walter Pincus >> >> The Washington Post >> >> July 18, 2007 >> >> Washington Al-Qaida has re-established its central organization, >> training infrastructure and lines of global communication over the >> past two years, putting the United States in a "heightened threat >> environment" despite expanded worldwide counterterrorism efforts, >> according to a new intelligence estimate. >> >> Intelligence officials attributed the al-Qaida gains primarily to >> establishment of a safe haven in ungoverned areas of northwestern >> Pakistan. Its affiliation with the Sunni insurgent group known as >> al-Qaida in Iraq, the report said, has helped it to "energize" >> extremists elsewhere and aided Osama bin Laden's recruitment and >> funding. The estimate concluded that "the U.S. Homeland will face a >> persistent and evolving terrorist threat over the next three years." >> Al-Qaida, it said, "is and will remain" the most serious element of >> that threat. The report stressed the effectiveness of counterterrorism >> measures, >> in cooperation with other countries, in disrupting terrorist >> networks and preventing attacks against the United States in the >> years immediately after Sept. 11, 2001. But it expressed concern >> that cooperation may wane as memories fade and perceptions of the >> nature and origin of the threat diverge. >> >> The assessment was released Tuesday in a two-page declassified >> summary of key judgments of a National Intelligence Estimate, titled >> "The Terrorist Threat to the U.S. Homeland." The estimate mentioned >> a number of possible threat sources, from Hezbollah in Lebanon to >> self-generating radical cells in Europe and this country. >> >> In a briefing for reporters Tuesday, senior intelligence officials >> said they expected al-Qaida to continue trying to "leverage" the >> contacts Al-Qaida in Iraq has established in Iraq. But they >> attributed the resurgence of bin Laden's organization to its haven >> among tribal groups in North Waziristan, part of the tribal areas in >> northwestern Pakistan. U.S. intelligence and military officials have >> expressed rising >> frustration with the government of Pakistan's president, Gen. Pervez >> Musharraf. Last September, Musharraf signed an agreement with tribal >> leaders allowing them to police the area. >> >> In the past week, the Bush administration said the agreement failed >> and officials Tuesday said that Musharraf had changed his policy. >> Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell said Tuesday that >> Musharraf was "moving forces, again, into that region to put >> pressure on al-Qaida." In separate remarks to an intelligence conference >> Tuesday, McConnell >> painted a picture of al-Qaida activities and the threat to the United >> States that went beyond the NIE judgments. "They're working as hard >> as they can in positioning trained operatives here in the United >> States...They have recruitment programs to bring recruits >> into...Pakistan, particularly those that speak the right language, >> that have the right skills, that have the right base that they could >> come to the United States, fit into the population...and carry out >> acts." Quote
Guest Sid9 Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Go Mavz wrote: > Snap... I almost forgot... > > 2 million Rwandans died under Bill Clintons watch (dont worry, he > said he was sorry) > > 300,000 Muslims were slaughtered in Kosovo under Bill Clintons watch > > 1.2 million North Koreans died of starvation under Bill Clintons watch > > 500 thousand Iraqi children under age 5 starved to death under Bill > Clintons watch... to which his favorite apointee said "We think its > worth it." > 20 thousand by his worthless bombing campaign... > > > > those were the days.. Gosh I miss them... You didn't forget the standard RRR, bush,jr supporter tactic when you have no support for your case. Deletion and Diversion Quote
Guest Sid9 Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Go Mavz wrote: > "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message > news:mVnni.9389$zA4.395@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> So to you, moving the fight two countries over to the west, makes >> the most sense. No wonder shit for brains Republicans screwed the >> pooch. > > Whent he Iraq war started, I was certain they had very little to do > with the Taliban. Like Gerald Ford, I agreed Bush should have stated > that we did not give a sh_t if they have wmd's or ties to terrorism. > Simply violating the cease fire agreement and continuing a culture of > human rights violations was enough to remove the crazy fugger. > >> If Republicans are an example of understanding foreign policy >> (bush's was hunting pussy and cocaine in Mexican border towns) its >> understandable why we are in the mess we are in. > > 9/11 was planned for 7 years while Clinton was playing with interns > boobies. And...bush,jr upon his accession to the office stopped all counterterrorism work. He let politics get in the way of reason. Having no brain he used his gut. The man is an incompetent and a clown Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message news:4Nnni.6073$ct5.4900@trnddc06... > Trust me when I say that us conservatives You're no "conservative", you big-government loving, Constitution-hating, nanny-state loving, unAmerican terrorist-supporting traitor. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Bokonon Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message news:%5oni.2294$gC5.1245@trnddc04... > Snap... I almost forgot... > > 2 million Rwandans died under Bill Clintons watch (dont worry, he said he > was sorry) Yep, and the Republicans blocked any attempt to offer assistance there at every turn. > 300,000 Muslims were slaughtered in Kosovo under Bill Clintons watch Yep, and the Republicans blocked any attempt to offer assistance there at every turn - and screamed "cut and run" when military aid was offered. > 1.2 million North Koreans died of starvation under Bill Clintons watch Not because of anything that Clinton did - or didn't do. Damn, you unAmerican right-wing radical traitors are some stupid motherfuckers. -- "History! Read it and weep!" -Bokonon _______________________________________________ When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. Quote
Guest Al E. Gator Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message news:BGnni.8477$tj6.5306@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... > Go Mavz wrote: > >> Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them invade >> Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US troop in to >> Pakistan soil... >> >> Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to see >> just how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 second >> long heart stoppage... >> > > I pity any person that takes over the pot of shit bush left stewing > regardless of party. Correcting bush's fiascos will require the strength > of Atlas. no problem, we're talking the difference between a 55 IQ texass goober failure, and a highly intelligent liberal achiever whoever it is, however, has to mete out some serious punishment to the hillbillies, the greedy,selfish and cowardly wealthy who send poor kids to die in their fuckups,the hillbilly generals who have been lying and losing for 4 1/2 years, the corporations who have imported 20 million illegals, and other assorted losing,failing, cocksuckers Quote
Guest Jack Granade Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:139sgqn111mbgfd@corp.supernews.com... > > "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message > news:4Nnni.6073$ct5.4900@trnddc06... > >> Trust me when I say that us conservatives > > You're no "conservative", you big-government loving, Constitution-hating, > nanny-state loving, unAmerican terrorist-supporting traitor. > > -- > "History! Read it and weep!" > -Bokonon > _______________________________________________ > When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. >So much for tolerance and understanding. Stupid liberals all talk the same >trash with no real facts to show. Quote
Guest Sid9 Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Jack Granade wrote: > "Bokonon" <seattledemocracy@hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:139sgqn111mbgfd@corp.supernews.com... >> >> "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message >> news:4Nnni.6073$ct5.4900@trnddc06... >> >>> Trust me when I say that us conservatives >> >> You're no "conservative", you big-government loving, >> Constitution-hating, nanny-state loving, unAmerican >> terrorist-supporting traitor. -- >> "History! Read it and weep!" >> -Bokonon >> _______________________________________________ >> When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. >> So much for tolerance and understanding. Stupid liberals all talk >> the same trash with no real facts to show. Look who's talking! (if you can find it) Quote
Guest Lamont Cranston Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message news:4Nnni.6073$ct5.4900@trnddc06... > > "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message > news:BGnni.8477$tj6.5306@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> Go Mavz wrote: >> >>> Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them >>> invade Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US >>> troop in to Pakistan soil... >>> >>> Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to >>> see just how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 >>> second long heart stoppage... >>> >> >> I pity any person that takes over the pot of shit bush left stewing >> regardless of party. Correcting bush's fiascos will require the >> strength of Atlas. > > Trust me when I say that us conservatives did not have smile on our > faces after > > the 1993 bombing of the WTC's, the US Embassy bombings, the USS Cole > bombing... > > in addition to Waco, the Oklahoma City Bombing, Columbine, Black > Hawk Down, Mogadishu, Elian Gonzalez, Belgrade, Opperation Dessert > Foxtrot, refusing chance to obtain OBL, recession that started as he > was leaving office... > > etc etc etc.... "But, Clinton...but, Clinton..." Pitiful. rotfl Quote
Guest Lamont Cranston Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message news:%5oni.2294$gC5.1245@trnddc04... > Snap... I almost forgot... > > 2 million Rwandans died under Bill Clintons watch (dont worry, he > said he was sorry) > > 300,000 Muslims were slaughtered in Kosovo under Bill Clintons watch > > 1.2 million North Koreans died of starvation under Bill Clintons > watch > > 500 thousand Iraqi children under age 5 starved to death under Bill > Clintons watch... to which his favorite apointee said "We think its > worth it." > > 20 thousand by his worthless bombing campaign... "But, Clinton...but, Clinton..." lol > > > > those were the days.. Gosh I miss them... > > > > Quote
Guest Lamont Cranston Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message news:hInni.12954$LH5.6233@trnddc02... > > "salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message > news:KCnni.8476$tj6.3275@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> Sid9 wrote: >> That's what happens when you have a Republican, living in la-la >> land, switch from fighting the enemy in Afghanistan to foresaking >> that fight and beating up on the Iraqis. > > If you read the story, it says North western Pakistan. Now I know > you libs arent aware of Pakistan but its got a mighty large > military, nukes, and has declared US forces cannot put one troop on > its soil. > > So even if there were 200,000 troops in Afghanistan vs the 50 > thousand that are currently there then it wouldnt f__king matter. > > You see why you libs arent trusted on foreign policy? > > 8 years of Clinton put us in this f__king mess in this first > place... "But, Clinton...but, Clinton..." rotfl Quote
Guest bozo@theclown.net Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 On Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:34:08 GMT, "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote: > >"salad" <oil@vinegar.com> wrote in message >news:BGnni.8477$tj6.5306@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net... >> Go Mavz wrote: >> >>> Let's let the Democrats have office in 2008 and then let them invade >>> Pakistan (since thats what it would take) or send one US troop in to >>> Pakistan soil... >>> >>> Its time for the US to hit the ultimate rock bottom for America to see >>> just how dangerous Democrats have been since John Kennedy's 13 second >>> long heart stoppage... >>> >> >> I pity any person that takes over the pot of shit bush left stewing >> regardless of party. Correcting bush's fiascos will require the strength >> of Atlas. > >Trust me when I say that us conservatives did not have smile on our faces >after > >the 1993 bombing of the WTC's, the US Embassy bombings, the USS Cole >bombing... > >in addition to Waco, the Oklahoma City Bombing, Columbine, Black Hawk Down, >Mogadishu, Elian Gonzalez, Belgrade, Opperation Dessert Foxtrot, refusing >chance to obtain OBL, recession that started as he was leaving office... > >etc etc etc.... > Wow, let me guess, you think Bill O'Reilly is a newscaster and Rush Limbush is and anchorman and highly trained broadcaster! One cannot even begin to coutn the disaters underr the Bush banner. Can you say Katrina? Can you say OBL Determined to attack? Can you say Gas at $3 a gallon plus? Food prices out of the sky? Outing CIA Operatives? Mortgage rates through the ceiling? Gutted and raped park system? Health care system in the toilet. Taliban on the upswing again. 3500+ dead American soldiers for no reason, plus who knows how many Iraqis and contractors? Illiteracy at the highest level (meaning our pResident is illiterate and cannot form coherent English sentences)! Let us not even begin to mention the sex scandals of the Republican Party. There are just too many. Justify everything by blaming Clinton! Bush has had almost 7 years in office and has sent this country in to absolute ruin, but you think he is an excellent leader! You MUST own Halliburton stock in order to think so. Quote
Guest salad Posted July 18, 2007 Posted July 18, 2007 Bokonon wrote: > "Go Mavz" <GoMavz@GoMavz.com> wrote in message > news:%5oni.2294$gC5.1245@trnddc04... > >>Snap... I almost forgot... >> >>2 million Rwandans died under Bill Clintons watch (dont worry, he said he >>was sorry) > > > Yep, and the Republicans blocked any attempt to offer assistance there at > every turn. The Republicans were so busy attempting to overthrow the government they let the US down and focus on a blowjob instead of matters of state and foreign policy. Anybody with a lick of sense knows that. > > >>300,000 Muslims were slaughtered in Kosovo under Bill Clintons watch > > > Yep, and the Republicans blocked any attempt to offer assistance there at > every turn - and screamed "cut and run" when military aid was offered. They were so bid into dick sucking they forgot to do their jobs. GoMavs and his Republican buddies are anti-American fucks that let the US down. They should be strung up by their testacles. > > >>1.2 million North Koreans died of starvation under Bill Clintons watch > > > Not because of anything that Clinton did - or didn't do. > > Damn, you unAmerican right-wing radical traitors are some stupid > motherfuckers. > You gotta be a low-tier, low-IQ person like GoMavs to believe his BS. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.