Three more American lives wasted in bush,jr's fiasco: U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

August 4, 2007

"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hal.i.burton-0973DE.07213603082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <jbzsi.1196$qa3.273@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,

> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

>

>> you're a sorry maggot burton, a real hillbilly work

>

> Would you like some cheese with that whine?

wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,

can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober

August 4, 2007

"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,

>

> Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.

damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no

intelligent content

August 4, 2007

In article <GsSsi.12567$eY.269@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,

>

> can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober

Would you like some cheese with that whine?

August 4, 2007

In article <QuSsi.12569$eY.672@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> > In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,

> >

> > Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.

>

> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no

> intelligent content

I also have the record for getting the most responses with no

intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.

August 4, 2007

"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hal.i.burton-D1B4E7.23415003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <QuSsi.12569$eY.672@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

>

>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

>> > In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,

>> >

>> > Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.

>>

>> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no

>> intelligent content

>

> I also have the record for getting the most responses with no

> intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.

LMAO,

you couldn't calculate an average with a super computer gomer,

you're more like that hertz donut faggot and his 142:1 American kill ratio

also, why is your fat, yellow ass not in iraq, and why haven't you died

to protect me yet,

I'm looking forward to seeing your hillbilly name on a KIA list

fewer hillbilly pigs feeding on us taxpayers funded troughs

August 4, 2007

"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hal.i.burton-462713.23400003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <GsSsi.12567$eY.269@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

>

>> wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,

>>

>> can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober

>

> Would you like some cheese with that whine?

and then the stupid gomer repeats it and proves me wrong,

I admit, I was wrong, you can get more ignorant

August 4, 2007

Harold Burton wrote:

> In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,

> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>

>>Sid9 wrote:

>>

>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>>>

>>>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,

>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,

>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,

>>>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,

>>>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007

>>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

>>>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

>>>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the

>>>>>>>>>>>U.S. military

>>>>>>>>>>>have died...

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow

>>>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American

>>>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his

>>>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA

>>>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,

>>>>>>>10,000, 33,000?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves

>>>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war

>>>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs

>>>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been

>>>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in

>>>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a

>>>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World

>>>>>>>War I!

>>>>>>

>>>>>>You didn't answer my question.

>>>>>

>>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue

>>>>>at hand.

>>>>>

>>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no

>>>>>answers, then a diversion it is.

>>>>>

>>>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been

>>>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think

>>>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this

>>>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost

>>>>>exclusive collection of them.

>>>>>

>>>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

>>>>

>>>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the

>>>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

>>>

>>>Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship

>>>

>>

>> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing in

>>Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.

>>

>> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a huge

>>success as there was not a single loss.

>

> Wrong.

I suppose it's rediculous to ask why as you haver given any reasons for

any of your other statements.

We'll just sum up your logic to George W Bush good (it's what you

hear on hate radio), Clinton bad, Truman bad, FDR bad, and that ultimate

evil doer, Woodrow Wilson bad.

You're a real piece of work Harold.

Jeff

August 4, 2007

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net>

Spat the Words

>

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:hal.i.burton-462713.23400003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

>> In article <GsSsi.12567$eY.269@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

>> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

>>

>>> wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,

>>>

>>> can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober

>>

>> Would you like some cheese with that whine?

>

> and then the stupid gomer repeats it and proves me wrong,

>

> I admit, I was wrong, you can get more ignorant

Haliburton Harold Burton gives you that evil cheney sneer and

hopes you'll be intimidated.

August 4, 2007

After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Harold Burton

<hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> Spat the Words

> In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,

> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>

>> Harold Burton wrote:

>>

>> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,

>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >

>> >>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >>

>> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >>>

>> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >>>>

>> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,

>> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>>>August 2, 2007

>> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

>> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

>> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET

>> >>>>>>

>> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.

>> >>>>>>military

>> >>>>>>have died...

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow

Wilson,

>> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.

>> >>>>

>> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?

>> >>>

>> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American

lives

>> >>>lost in those fiascos.

>> >>

>> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his predecessor

>> >>was the democrat FDR.

>> >>

>> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA

level

>> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000,

33,000?

>> >>

>> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves left

to

>> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is

$450

>> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment

>> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off into

>> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One Trillion

>> >>dollars.

>> >>

>> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a fiasco?

>> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!

>> >

>> > You didn't answer my question.

>>

>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue at

hand.

>>

>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no answers,

>> then a diversion it is.

>>

>> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been fiascos, I

>> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have been

>> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war has

>> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection of

them.

>>

>> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

>

> If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the

> fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

I'm sure it would grow by several orders of magnitude if you were

to have a personal stake in it. Am I right Haliburton ?

You just need a little incentive to get a proper perspective on this

whole war thing.

August 4, 2007

In article <4eTsi.12584$eY.7784@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:hal.i.burton-D1B4E7.23415003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> > In article <QuSsi.12569$eY.672@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

> > "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> >

> >> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> >> news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> >> > In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,

> >> >

> >> > Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.

> >>

> >> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no

> >> intelligent content

> >

> > I also have the record for getting the most responses with no

> > intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.

>

> LMAO,

>

> you couldn't calculate an average with a super computer gomer,

>

> you're more like that hertz donut faggot and his 142:1 American kill ratio

>

> also, why is your fat, yellow ass not in iraq, and why haven't you died

> to protect me yet,

>

> I'm looking forward to seeing your hillbilly name on a KIA list

>

> fewer hillbilly pigs feeding on us taxpayers funded troughs

You've upped it again.

August 4, 2007

In article <3fTsi.12585$eY.4347@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:hal.i.burton-462713.23400003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> > In article <GsSsi.12567$eY.269@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

> > "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> >

> >> wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,

> >>

> >> can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober

> >

> > Would you like some cheese with that whine?

>

> and then the stupid gomer repeats it and proves me wrong,

>

> I admit, I was wrong, you can get more ignorant

Would you like some cheese with that whine?

August 4, 2007

In article <13b819cin0a6i9d@corp.supernews.com>,

Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:

>

> > In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,

> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >

> >>Sid9 wrote:

> >>

> >>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >>>

> >>>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,

> >>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >>>>

> >>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >>>>>

> >>>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,

> >>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,

> >>>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,

> >>>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007

> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

> >>>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

> >>>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET

> >>>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the

> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. military

> >>>>>>>>>>>have died...

> >>>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow

> >>>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.

> >>>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>>So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?

> >>>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American

> >>>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his

> >>>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>>So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA

> >>>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,

> >>>>>>>10,000, 33,000?

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves

> >>>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war

> >>>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs

> >>>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been

> >>>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in

> >>>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.

> >>>>>>>

> >>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a

> >>>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World

> >>>>>>>War I!

> >>>>>>

> >>>>>>You didn't answer my question.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue

> >>>>>at hand.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no

> >>>>>answers, then a diversion it is.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been

> >>>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think

> >>>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this

> >>>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost

> >>>>>exclusive collection of them.

> >>>>>

> >>>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

> >>>>

> >>>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the

> >>>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

> >>>

> >>>Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship

> >>>

> >>

> >> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing in

> >>Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.

> >>

> >> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a huge

> >>success as there was not a single loss.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> > Wrong.

> I suppose it's rediculous to ask why as you haver given any reasons for

> any of your other statements.

So all those bombs didn't kill anyone?

Funny how leftards chant their mantra about President Bush's "illegal

war" but have no problem with Clinton's

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_of_NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia>

August 4, 2007

"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hal.i.burton-8D4135.09192504082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <13b819cin0a6i9d@corp.supernews.com>,

> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>

>> Harold Burton wrote:

>>

>> > In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,

>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >

>> >>Sid9 wrote:

>> >>

>> >>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >>>

>> >>>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >>>>

>> >>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >>>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,

>> >>>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>> >>>>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007

>> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

>> >>>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

>> >>>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET

>> >>>>>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the

>> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. military

>> >>>>>>>>>>>have died...

>> >>>>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow

>> >>>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.

>> >>>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>>So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?

>> >>>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American

>> >>>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.

>> >>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his

>> >>>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.

>> >>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>>So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA

>> >>>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,

>> >>>>>>>10,000, 33,000?

>> >>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves

>> >>>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war

>> >>>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs

>> >>>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been

>> >>>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in

>> >>>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.

>> >>>>>>>

>> >>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a

>> >>>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World

>> >>>>>>>War I!

>> >>>>>>

>> >>>>>>You didn't answer my question.

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue

>> >>>>>at hand.

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no

>> >>>>>answers, then a diversion it is.

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been

>> >>>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think

>> >>>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this

>> >>>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost

>> >>>>>exclusive collection of them.

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

>> >>>>

>> >>>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than

>> >>>>the

>> >>>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

>> >>>

>> >>>Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship

>> >>>

>> >>

>> >> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing in

>> >>Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.

>> >>

>> >> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a huge

>> >>success as there was not a single loss.

> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>

>> > Wrong.

>

>> I suppose it's rediculous to ask why as you haver given any reasons for

>> any of your other statements.

>

> So all those bombs didn't kill anyone?

>

> Funny how leftards chant their mantra about President Bush's "illegal

> war" but have no problem with Clinton's

>

> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_of_NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia>

Another neo-CON the can't tell the difference between what Clinton did in

Yugoslavia( not losing a single American soldiers life) and the biggest

heist in world history.

Main Entry: 1heist

Pronunciation: 'hIst

Function: transitive verb

Etymology: variant of 1hoist

1 chiefly dialect : HOIST

2 a : to commit armed robbery on b : STEAL 1a

August 4, 2007

In article <Se%si.53457$5y.11880@newsfe18.lga>,

"chess" <chess88@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:hal.i.burton-8D4135.09192504082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> > In article <13b819cin0a6i9d@corp.supernews.com>,

> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >

> >> Harold Burton wrote:

> >>

> >> > In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >

> >> >>Sid9 wrote:

> >> >>

> >> >>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >>>

> >> >>>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> >>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >>>>

> >> >>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> >>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> >>>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >>>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >>>>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,

> >> >>>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> >> >>>>>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. military

> >> >>>>>>>>>>>have died...

> >> >>>>>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow

> >> >>>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.

> >> >>>>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>>So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?

> >> >>>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American

> >> >>>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.

> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his

> >> >>>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.

> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>>So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA

> >> >>>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,

> >> >>>>>>>10,000, 33,000?

> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves

> >> >>>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war

> >> >>>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs

> >> >>>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been

> >> >>>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in

> >> >>>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.

> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a

> >> >>>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World

> >> >>>>>>>War I!

> >> >>>>>>

> >> >>>>>>You didn't answer my question.

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue

> >> >>>>>at hand.

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no

> >> >>>>>answers, then a diversion it is.

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been

> >> >>>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think

> >> >>>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this

> >> >>>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost

> >> >>>>>exclusive collection of them.

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

> >> >>>>

> >> >>>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than

> >> >>>>the

> >> >>>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

> >> >>>

> >> >>>Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship

> >> >>>

> >> >>

> >> >> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing in

> >> >>Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.

> >> >>

> >> >> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a huge

> >> >>success as there was not a single loss.

> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> >

> >> > Wrong.

> >

> >> I suppose it's rediculous to ask why as you haver given any reasons for

> >> any of your other statements.

> >

> > So all those bombs didn't kill anyone?

> >

> > Funny how leftards chant their mantra about President Bush's "illegal

> > war" but have no problem with Clinton's

> >

> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_of_NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia>

>

> Another neo-CON the can't tell the difference between what Clinton did in

> Yugoslavia( not losing a single American soldiers life)...

....but murdering lots of foreigners (so it's OK according to leftards)

with illegal bombing of civilians.

August 4, 2007

"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hal.i.burton-FA9ECA.09392304082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <Se%si.53457$5y.11880@newsfe18.lga>,

> "chess" <chess88@yahoo.com> wrote:

>

>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:hal.i.burton-8D4135.09192504082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

>> > In article <13b819cin0a6i9d@corp.supernews.com>,

>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >

>> >> Harold Burton wrote:

>> >>

>> >> > In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >> >

>> >> >>Sid9 wrote:

>> >> >>

>> >> >>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >> >>>

>> >> >>>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >> >>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >> >>>>

>> >> >>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >> >>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,

>> >> >>>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. military

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>>have died...

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>Woodrow

>> >> >>>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.

>> >> >>>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>>So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?

>> >> >>>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those

>> >> >>>>>>>>American

>> >> >>>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.

>> >> >>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his

>> >> >>>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.

>> >> >>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>>So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a

>> >> >>>>>>>KIA

>> >> >>>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,

>> >> >>>>>>>10,000, 33,000?

>> >> >>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves

>> >> >>>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the

>> >> >>>>>>>war

>> >> >>>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such

>> >> >>>>>>>costs

>> >> >>>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have

>> >> >>>>>>>been

>> >> >>>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in

>> >> >>>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.

>> >> >>>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a

>> >> >>>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but

>> >> >>>>>>>World

>> >> >>>>>>>War I!

>> >> >>>>>>

>> >> >>>>>>You didn't answer my question.

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue

>> >> >>>>>at hand.

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no

>> >> >>>>>answers, then a diversion it is.

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been

>> >> >>>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't

>> >> >>>>>think

>> >> >>>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as

>> >> >>>>>this

>> >> >>>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost

>> >> >>>>>exclusive collection of them.

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

>> >> >>>>

>> >> >>>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than

>> >> >>>>the

>> >> >>>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

>> >> >>>

>> >> >>>Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship

>> >> >>>

>> >> >>

>> >> >> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing

>> >> >> in

>> >> >>Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.

>> >> >>

>> >> >> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a

>> >> >> huge

>> >> >>success as there was not a single loss.

>> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>> >

>> >> > Wrong.

>> >

>> >> I suppose it's rediculous to ask why as you haver given any reasons

>> >> for

>> >> any of your other statements.

>> >

>> > So all those bombs didn't kill anyone?

>> >

>> > Funny how leftards chant their mantra about President Bush's "illegal

>> > war" but have no problem with Clinton's

>> >

>> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_of_NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia>

>>

>> Another neo-CON the can't tell the difference between what Clinton did in

>> Yugoslavia( not losing a single American soldiers life)...

>

> ...but murdering lots of foreigners (so it's OK according to leftards)

> with illegal bombing of civilians.

And HOW MANY Iraqi and Afghani women and children has shrub killed? Oh I

forgot they are not important enough for the neo-CONS to count.

August 4, 2007

"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:hal.i.burton-2906BD.09130904082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <4eTsi.12584$eY.7784@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

>

>> >> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no

>> >> intelligent content

>> >

>> > I also have the record for getting the most responses with no

>> > intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.

>>

>> LMAO,

>>

>> you couldn't calculate an average with a super computer gomer,

>>

>> you're more like that hertz donut faggot and his 142:1 American kill

>> ratio

>>

>> also, why is your fat, yellow ass not in iraq, and why haven't you died

>> to protect me yet,

>>

>> I'm looking forward to seeing your hillbilly name on a KIA list

>>

>> fewer hillbilly pigs feeding on us taxpayers funded troughs

>

> You've upped it again.

another hillbilly response, evade the question and post bullshit instead,

like your bush and Cheney cocksuckers, yellow, gutless faggots,

you're a good follower gomer, stay on your knees to your wealthy,lying,

retarded masters

August 4, 2007

In article <Hw%si.53459$5y.44462@newsfe18.lga>,

"chess" <chess88@yahoo.com> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:hal.i.burton-FA9ECA.09392304082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> > In article <Se%si.53457$5y.11880@newsfe18.lga>,

> > "chess" <chess88@yahoo.com> wrote:

> >

> >> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> >> news:hal.i.burton-8D4135.09192504082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> >> > In article <13b819cin0a6i9d@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >

> >> >> Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >>

> >> >> > In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >> >

> >> >> >>Sid9 wrote:

> >> >> >>

> >> >> >>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >> >>>

> >> >> >>>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> >> >>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >> >>>>

> >> >> >>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >> >>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> >> >>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >> >>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,

> >> >> >>>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> >> >> >>>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>U.S. military

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>have died...

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>Woodrow

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>>So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?

> >> >> >>>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those

> >> >> >>>>>>>>American

> >> >> >>>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.

> >> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his

> >> >> >>>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.

> >> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>>So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a

> >> >> >>>>>>>KIA

> >> >> >>>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,

> >> >> >>>>>>>10,000, 33,000?

> >> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves

> >> >> >>>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the

> >> >> >>>>>>>war

> >> >> >>>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such

> >> >> >>>>>>>costs

> >> >> >>>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have

> >> >> >>>>>>>been

> >> >> >>>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in

> >> >> >>>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.

> >> >> >>>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a

> >> >> >>>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but

> >> >> >>>>>>>World

> >> >> >>>>>>>War I!

> >> >> >>>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>>You didn't answer my question.

> >> >> >>>>>

> >> >> >>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue

> >> >> >>>>>at hand.

> >> >> >>>>>

> >> >> >>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no

> >> >> >>>>>answers, then a diversion it is.

> >> >> >>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been

> >> >> >>>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't

> >> >> >>>>>think

> >> >> >>>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as

> >> >> >>>>>this

> >> >> >>>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost

> >> >> >>>>>exclusive collection of them.

> >> >> >>>>>

> >> >> >>>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

> >> >> >>>>

> >> >> >>>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than

> >> >> >>>>the

> >> >> >>>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

> >> >> >>>

> >> >> >>>Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship

> >> >> >>>

> >> >> >>

> >> >> >> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing

> >> >> >> in

> >> >> >>Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.

> >> >> >>

> >> >> >> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a

> >> >> >> huge

> >> >> >>success as there was not a single loss.

> >> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> >> >

> >> >> > Wrong.

> >> >

> >> >> I suppose it's rediculous to ask why as you haver given any reasons

> >> >> for

> >> >> any of your other statements.

> >> >

> >> > So all those bombs didn't kill anyone?

> >> >

> >> > Funny how leftards chant their mantra about President Bush's "illegal

> >> > war" but have no problem with Clinton's

> >> >

> >> > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legitimacy_of_NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia>

> >>

> >> Another neo-CON the can't tell the difference between what Clinton did in

> >> Yugoslavia( not losing a single American soldiers life)...

> >

> > ...but murdering lots of foreigners (so it's OK according to leftards)

> > with illegal bombing of civilians.

>

> And HOW MANY Iraqi and Afghani women and children has shrub killed?

None.

August 4, 2007

In article <j01ti.12623$eY.1117@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:hal.i.burton-2906BD.09130904082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> > In article <4eTsi.12584$eY.7784@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,

> > "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> >

> >> >> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no

> >> >> intelligent content

> >> > I also have the record for getting the most responses with no

> >> > intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.

> >> LMAO,

> >>

> >> you couldn't calculate an average with a super computer gomer,

> >>

> >> you're more like that hertz donut faggot and his 142:1 American kill

> >> ratio

> >>

> >> also, why is your fat, yellow ass not in iraq, and why haven't you died

> >> to protect me yet,

> >>

> >> I'm looking forward to seeing your hillbilly name on a KIA list

> >>

> >> fewer hillbilly pigs feeding on us taxpayers funded troughs

> > You've upped it again.

> another hillbilly response, evade the question and post bullshit instead,

>

> like your bush and Cheney cocksuckers, yellow, gutless faggots,

>

> you're a good follower gomer, stay on your knees to your wealthy,lying,

> retarded masters

And again.

August 5, 2007

Cpl. Jason Kessler was my best friend and the most intellegent,

noble,

and trustworthy man that I have ever had the priviledge to know.

This

post is full of ranting self-promoting bullshit and not one of you

has

had the decency to state that you are sorry for the loss of this life

regardless of the cause for which it was lost, whether worthy or

unworthy in your minds. Jason Kessler enlisted for a very dangerous

and difficult job, his death deserves to be treated with respect, not

be used as a flag for either side to grandstand about how right they

have been all along. Jason you will be very sorely missed.

Andy

Sign In

Three more American lives wasted in bush,jr's fiasco: U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

Recommended Posts

Guest Al E. Gator

Popular Days

Popular Days

Guest Al E. Gator

Guest Harold Burton

Guest Harold Burton

Guest Al E. Gator

Guest Al E. Gator

Guest Jeff

Guest Perseid

Guest Perseid

Guest Harold Burton

Guest Harold Burton

Guest Harold Burton

Guest chess

Guest Harold Burton

Guest chess

Guest Al E. Gator

Guest Harold Burton

Guest Harold Burton

Guest Andy

Join the conversation

Browse

Activity

Support