Guest Michael Gray Posted October 28, 2007 Posted October 28, 2007 On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:47:32 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:15:36 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote: > >> >>"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>> >>> >>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>> >>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>> >> >>Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>However if this is beyond your capabilities... > >Yes, Carl, such is beyond your capabilities. Don't worry, myraid >other superstitious people have the same problem. : Carl is talking out of his rectum, and bases his absolute pronouncements of the subtelties of Hebrew translatation whilst admitting that he cannot read it, cannot write it, and cannot speak it!! Truly astounding! A 15 out of 10 on the hubris-o-meter!! Quote
Guest Michael Gray Posted October 28, 2007 Posted October 28, 2007 On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:47:32 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:15:36 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote: > >> >>"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>> >>> >>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>> >>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>> >> >>Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>However if this is beyond your capabilities... > >Yes, Carl, such is beyond your capabilities. Don't worry, myraid >other superstitious people have the same problem. : Carl is talking out of his rectum, and bases his absolute pronouncements of the subtelties of Hebrew translatation whilst admitting that he cannot read it, cannot write it, and cannot speak it!! Truly astounding! A 15 out of 10 on the hubris-o-meter!! Quote
Guest stoney Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:25:10 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 19:03:35 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 00:23:10 -0600, "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>"Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote in message >>>news:fe373r$ibn$1@news.utelfla.com... >>>> >>>> "Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>>> news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>>>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>>>> >>>>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>>> shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>>> However if this is beyond your capabilities... >>> >>>You mean the bible lies? >> >>From start to finish. > >One of my scores of bibles contains what I consider to be a truth of >sorts: >"Printed in the United States of America" That would be, then, the only truth it contained. Quote
Guest stoney Posted November 2, 2007 Posted November 2, 2007 On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:27:45 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:47:32 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: > >>On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:15:36 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote: >> >>> >>>"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>>news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>>> >>>> >>>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>>> >>>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>>> >>> >>>Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>>shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>>However if this is beyond your capabilities... >> >>Yes, Carl, such is beyond your capabilities. Don't worry, myraid >>other superstitious people have the same problem. > >: > >Carl is talking out of his rectum, and bases his absolute >pronouncements of the subtelties of Hebrew translatation whilst >admitting that he cannot read it, cannot write it, and cannot speak >it!! Normal for the Christian Bizarro World. So, he's a 'wise' 'man.' >Truly astounding! >A 15 out of 10 on the hubris-o-meter!! They don't get much humbler than this turkey. Question: What about the useage of slang during this time period? Quote
Guest Michael Gray Posted November 3, 2007 Posted November 3, 2007 On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:24:47 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:27:45 +1030, Michael Gray ><mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: > >>On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:47:32 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:15:36 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>>>news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>>>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>>>> >>>>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>>>shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>>>However if this is beyond your capabilities... >>> >>>Yes, Carl, such is beyond your capabilities. Don't worry, myraid >>>other superstitious people have the same problem. >> >>: >> >>Carl is talking out of his rectum, and bases his absolute >>pronouncements of the subtelties of Hebrew translatation whilst >>admitting that he cannot read it, cannot write it, and cannot speak >>it!! > >Normal for the Christian Bizarro World. So, he's a 'wise' 'man.' > > >>Truly astounding! >>A 15 out of 10 on the hubris-o-meter!! > >They don't get much humbler than this turkey. > >Question: What about the useage of slang during this time period? No 'slang' as we know the word today was transmitted in sacred stories and peoms. Quote
Guest stoney Posted November 6, 2007 Posted November 6, 2007 On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:50:58 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:24:47 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: > >>On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:27:45 +1030, Michael Gray >><mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >> >>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:47:32 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:15:36 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>>>>news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>>>>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>>>>shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>>>>However if this is beyond your capabilities... >>>> >>>>Yes, Carl, such is beyond your capabilities. Don't worry, myraid >>>>other superstitious people have the same problem. >>> >>>: >>> >>>Carl is talking out of his rectum, and bases his absolute >>>pronouncements of the subtelties of Hebrew translatation whilst >>>admitting that he cannot read it, cannot write it, and cannot speak >>>it!! >> >>Normal for the Christian Bizarro World. So, he's a 'wise' 'man.' >> >> >>>Truly astounding! >>>A 15 out of 10 on the hubris-o-meter!! >> >>They don't get much humbler than this turkey. >> >>Question: What about the useage of slang during this time period? > >No 'slang' as we know the word today was transmitted in sacred stories >and peoms. Interesting. Population density driven, perhaps? Quote
Guest Michael Gray Posted November 6, 2007 Posted November 6, 2007 On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:23:23 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:50:58 +1030, Michael Gray ><mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: > >>On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:24:47 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >> >>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:27:45 +1030, Michael Gray >>><mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:47:32 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:15:36 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>>>>>news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>>>>>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>>>>>shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>>>>>However if this is beyond your capabilities... >>>>> >>>>>Yes, Carl, such is beyond your capabilities. Don't worry, myraid >>>>>other superstitious people have the same problem. >>>> >>>>: >>>> >>>>Carl is talking out of his rectum, and bases his absolute >>>>pronouncements of the subtelties of Hebrew translatation whilst >>>>admitting that he cannot read it, cannot write it, and cannot speak >>>>it!! >>> >>>Normal for the Christian Bizarro World. So, he's a 'wise' 'man.' >>> >>> >>>>Truly astounding! >>>>A 15 out of 10 on the hubris-o-meter!! >>> >>>They don't get much humbler than this turkey. >>> >>>Question: What about the useage of slang during this time period? >> >>No 'slang' as we know the word today was transmitted in sacred stories >>and peoms. > >Interesting. Population density driven, perhaps? Not at all. Words were, and still are in primitive societies such as observant Jews, considered to have an existence of their own, a kind of power or memory. It is for this reason that when the Torah is recited, the word for their god YHWH, is pronounced as the generic (singular) term for a deity: Adonai, as the word JHWH holds a thoroughly juvenile magic for these superstitious meme carriers. To remind these mental infants that the word should be read differently, the consonants were written as YHWH, but the vowel (superscript & subscripts) were written AOAI, from Adonai. (A thoroughly uneducated German misreading of the Hebrew in the middle ages has delivered us the bastard word "Jehovah", the consonants of YHWH transliterated in German, and the vowels of Adonai mixed in together!!) Jehovah's Witnesses have named their cruel and moronic sect after a mistake that arose from pure biblical and linguistic ignorance. 100% appropriate, I think. Quote
Guest stoney Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:39:05 +1030, Michael Gray <mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:23:23 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: > >>On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:50:58 +1030, Michael Gray >><mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:24:47 -0800, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >>> >>>>On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:27:45 +1030, Michael Gray >>>><mikegray@newsguy.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:47:32 -0700, stoney <stoney@the.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:15:36 -0400, "Carl" <saints@nettally.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>"Denis Loubet" <dloubet@io.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:4MqdnUEZltfqqJnanZ2dnUVZ_s2tnZ2d@io.com... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All the theist has to do is edit the god's word to read "Thou shalt not >>>>>>>> MURDER!" and everything is magically cool. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Just interpret the bible, and you can justify anything. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Actually the proper and most accurate translation of the Hebrew is "Thou >>>>>>>shalt not murder." You could at least be intellectually honest about this. >>>>>>>However if this is beyond your capabilities... >>>>>> >>>>>>Yes, Carl, such is beyond your capabilities. Don't worry, myraid >>>>>>other superstitious people have the same problem. >>>>> >>>>>: >>>>> >>>>>Carl is talking out of his rectum, and bases his absolute >>>>>pronouncements of the subtelties of Hebrew translatation whilst >>>>>admitting that he cannot read it, cannot write it, and cannot speak >>>>>it!! >>>> >>>>Normal for the Christian Bizarro World. So, he's a 'wise' 'man.' >>>> >>>> >>>>>Truly astounding! >>>>>A 15 out of 10 on the hubris-o-meter!! >>>> >>>>They don't get much humbler than this turkey. >>>> >>>>Question: What about the useage of slang during this time period? >>> >>>No 'slang' as we know the word today was transmitted in sacred stories >>>and peoms. >> >>Interesting. Population density driven, perhaps? > >Not at all. >Words were, and still are in primitive societies such as observant >Jews, considered to have an existence of their own, a kind of power or >memory. >It is for this reason that when the Torah is recited, the word for >their god YHWH, is pronounced as the generic (singular) term for a >deity: Adonai, as the word JHWH holds a thoroughly juvenile magic for >these superstitious meme carriers. Forgot about how, in primitive societies, some words have 'power.' >To remind these mental infants that the word should be read >differently, the consonants were written as YHWH, but the vowel >(superscript & subscripts) were written AOAI, from Adonai. > >(A thoroughly uneducated German misreading of the Hebrew in the middle >ages has delivered us the bastard word "Jehovah", the consonants of >YHWH transliterated in German, and the vowels of Adonai mixed in >together!!) >Jehovah's Witnesses have named their cruel and moronic sect after a >mistake that arose from pure biblical and linguistic ignorance. >100% appropriate, I think. Indeed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.