Guest Mavisbeacon Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 "droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message news:ut50m3tshsoh7tu9c3iahufonad814vkuv@4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:38:04 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" > <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >>Muslims are not opposed to the West. > > > LIAR! > > http://www.contenderministries.org/islam/jihad.php > > Since 9/11, the word "Jihad" has become a household word. Jihad > literally means "struggle" in Arabic. Among conservative Muslims, the > word has come to mean "holy war". > > There are actually two kinds of Jihad. There is the Greater Jihad, > which is the inner struggle for sanctity. Then there is the Lesser > Jihad, or an actual fight against infidels, or non-Muslims. For our > purposes, we will discuss only the Lesser Jihad. After all, this is > the Jihad that has resulted in countless attacks against U.S. and > Israeli interests. The Muslim scripture - the Qur'an - refers to Jews > and Christians specifically as infidels. Therefore, it should be no > surprise that Israel and the U.S. (a nation at least founded as a > Christian nation) would be the primary targets of the Jihad. > > Many would say that only "radical" Muslims espouse Jihad. If that is > so, then every Muslim who believes in the Qur'an must be radical. As > you shall see, the Qur'an specifically makes a case for waging Jihad > against infidels. The following are quotes from the Qur'an: [snip] AS can every fundamentalist Christian! And there are ample similar quotes in the Bible! Quote
Guest Mavisbeacon Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 "droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message news:q260m3lv34gpqk1tdbighretki06atipg0@4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:38:04 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" > <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >>Wrong! > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,779359,00.html > > A radical armed Islamist group with ties to Tehran and Baghdad has > helped al-Qaida establish an international terrorist training camp in > northern Iraq, Kurdish officials say. > Intelligence officers in the autonomous Kurdish region of Iraq told > the Guardian that the Ansar al-Islam (supporters of Islam) group is > harbouring up to 150 al-Qaida members in a string of villages it > controls along the Iraq-Iran border. > [snip - already dealt with above] Quote
Guest Mavisbeacon Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 "droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message news:g260m3he1ovingqqvisjls1h2oss98n0dg@4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:38:04 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" > <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >>[snip > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,779359,00.html > [snip - if you have any counter argument to the already given reply to this then please make it instead of spamming back your original rebutted source] Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:21:03 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >"Mavisbaconator" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> wrote in message >news:vKP7j.95$R94.30@amsnews12... http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/15996.htm Silence by Murder For more than 20 years, Saddam Hussein has executed perceived opponents without respect for rule of law. Saddam Hussein silences these alleged dissidents because he believes that their political beliefs, faith, ethnic background, family members or acquaintances are a threat to his power. Some are first taken as political prisoners before being executed. In February 1998, 400 prisoners at Abu Gharaib prison were executed summarily. Two months later, 100 detainees from Radwaniyah Prison were buried alive in a pit in Ramadi province. These killings were supposed to "clean out" the prisons. More than 3,000 people have been killed in a similar manner since 1997. Summary executions in Iraq take many cruel forms. A quick yet effective method is to line up the entire male population of a village and shoot them systematically, one at a time, in order to eliminate the village. Saddam Hussein?s regime, however, often prefers methods that take more time, and inflict more pain on the victim and the victim?s family. His regime has poisoned political prisoners by giving them a slow-acting poison, thallium, which slowly infiltrates the system and takes several days to bring death. Iraqi citizens are often decapitated in front of family members, and at other times, they are shot in front of family members and the family is charged for the cost of the bullet. Saddam Hussein has perfected many of these methods of murder on Kurds in Northern Iraq and religious leaders from the Shi?a community, claiming that they are disloyal to the Government. Once murdered, many Iraqis are buried in unmarked graves so that their family members cannot visit them. "It has been the Iraqi regime?s policy to change the demography of Iraq, by eradicating the Kurdish population from areas that are deemed important in the north of the country. The regime has done this through forced deportation, arbitrary arrests, and systematic torture." ? Paiman Halmat, teacher, former Iraqi citizen As a particularly brutal example of silencing political opposition, it is estimated that at least 30,000 to 60,000 members of the Shi?a community were killed during their post-Gulf war political insurrection in southern Iraq. Silence Through Torture Under Saddam Hussein?s orders, the security apparatus in Iraq routinely and systematically tortures its citizens. Beatings, rape, breaking of limbs and denial of food and water are commonplace in Iraqi detention centers. Saddam Hussein?s regime has also invented unique and horrific methods of torture including electric shocks to a male?s genitals, pulling out fingernails, suspending individuals from rotating ceiling fans, dripping acid on a victim?s skin, gouging out eyes, and burning victims with a hot iron or blowtorch. Gwynne Roberts, a reporter for the London-based Independent, describes her experience in a torture center in Northern Iraq: In one cell pieces of human flesh ? ear lobes ? were nailed to the wall, and blood spattered the ceiling. A large metal fan hung from the ceiling and my guide told me prisoners were attached to the fan and beaten with clubs as they twirled. There were hooks in the ceiling used to suspend victims. A torture victim told me that prisoners were also crucified, nails driven through their hands into the wall. A favorite technique was to hang men from the hooks and attach a heavy weight to their testicles. ? Independent, March 29, 1991 Foreign citizens are not spared the brutality either. Large numbers of Kuwaiti citizens were murdered, tortured and raped during the Gulf War. More than two dozen torture centers in Kuwait City have been discovered, and photographic evidence confirms reports of electric shocks, acid baths, summary execution and the use of electric drills to penetrate a victim?s body. Many innocent civilian citizens were also used as human shields. Branding and amputations have been routine in Iraqi hospitals. In 1994, the Iraqi government issued at least nine decrees that established cruel penalties such as branding. Amputation has been used against citizens convicted of military desertion. One citizen whose hand was cut off was paraded on national television as a method of instilling fear in the people. In 1994 and 1995 alone, large numbers of soldiers had portions of their ears cut off for deserting the army. The government branded an "X" on the foreheads of these soldiers so that Iraqi citizens did not think that these soldiers were wounded war heroes. Doctors who refused to perform the operations were threatened with reprisals, and many have been arrested and detained. The Iraqi authorities also issued a decree in 1994 making it illegal for doctors to perform plastic or corrective surgery for victims of branding and amputation. In 2000, a new Iraqi decree was issued authorizing the government to amputate the tongues of citizens who criticize Saddam Hussein or his government. Torture Methods in Iraq Medical experimentation Beatings Crucifixion Hammering nails into the fingers and hands Amputating the penis or breasts with an electric carving knife Spraying insecticides into a victim?s eyes Branding with a hot iron Committing rape while the victim?s spouse is forced to watch Pouring boiling water into a rectum Nailing the tongue to a wooden board Extracting teeth with pliers Using bees and scorpions to sting naked children in front of their parents Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:21:03 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message >news:ut50m3tshsoh7tu9c3iahufonad814vkuv@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:38:04 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" >> <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >> >>>Muslims are not opposed to the West. >> >> >> LIAR! >> >> http://www.contenderministries.org/islam/jihad.php >> >> Since 9/11, the word "Jihad" has become a household word. Jihad >> literally means "struggle" in Arabic. Among conservative Muslims, the >> word has come to mean "holy war". >> >> There are actually two kinds of Jihad. There is the Greater Jihad, >> which is the inner struggle for sanctity. Then there is the Lesser >> Jihad, or an actual fight against infidels, or non-Muslims. For our >> purposes, we will discuss only the Lesser Jihad. After all, this is >> the Jihad that has resulted in countless attacks against U.S. and >> Israeli interests. The Muslim scripture - the Qur'an - refers to Jews >> and Christians specifically as infidels. Therefore, it should be no >> surprise that Israel and the U.S. (a nation at least founded as a >> Christian nation) would be the primary targets of the Jihad. >> >> Many would say that only "radical" Muslims espouse Jihad. If that is >> so, then every Muslim who believes in the Qur'an must be radical. As >> you shall see, the Qur'an specifically makes a case for waging Jihad >> against infidels. The following are quotes from the Qur'an: >[snip] > >AS can every fundamentalist Christian! And there are ample similar quotes in >the Bible! You INSOLENT MORON! Christians are not enagged in Jihad and head chopping! http://hindutva.org/quran.html The Muslims are commanded to wage an everlasting war against the unbelievers and are assured victory in the struggle. Surely, the Marxist social philosophy is an extension of the Koranic doctrine. To realize the significance of this statement, one ought to read the following: 1. On unbelievers is the curse of Allah. (The Cow: 161 ) 2. Allah is an enemy to unbelievers. ( The Cow: 15 ) 3. The worst of beasts in Allah's sight are the ungrateful, who will not believe. (Spoils of War: 55) 4. Oh ye who believe! the non-Muslims are unclean. (Repentance:17) 5. Oh ye who believe! Murder those of the disbelievers and let them find harshness in you. (Repentance: 123) 6. Oh believers, do not treat your fathers and mothers as your friends, if they prefer unbelief to belief, whosoever of you takes them for friends, they are evil-doers. (Repentance: 20) 7. Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute. ( Repentance: 29 ) Through the doctrine of hatred, Islam incites Muslims against non-Muslims and proposes Jehad as the solution to make Islam the dominant faith. What is Jehad? It is the battle against unbelievers such as the Hindus, the Christians, the Jews, the atheists - in fact, unbelievers of all sorts. Jehad is nothing but an Inducement to Murder and Plunder non-Muslims for their Sheer Crime of Not Believing in Muhammad Since humans do not like harming innocent people, Jehad is nothing but an inducement to murder and plunder non-Muslims for the sheer crime of not believing in Muhammad. It is called a "holy war." Those who return home victoriously, come laden with booty, which includes wealth and non-Muslim women for concubinage and free seduction but those "crusaders" who are killed "in the way of Allah" go straight to paradise where ever-young virgins of exquisite beauty and pretty boys anxiously wait to serve them! Even more stunning is the fact that while every code of moral conduct treats murder, rape, plunder, lechery as sins, Islam counts them as acts of piety. Islamic Jehad is a Perpetual Declaration of War on Non-Muslims Islam, in fact, is a perpetual declaration of war against all those, who do not believe in Muhammad. This war is not confined to words but it is really brutish, barbaric and bewildering. It makes society a hot bed of mutual hatred based on discrimination of Momin (Muslim) and Kafir (non-Muslim). Thus, it ignites the flame of eternal conflict far more dangerous, debilitating and devastating than Karl-Marx could ever visualize: "They (unbelievers) are Satan's party they are the losers.... Those (the Muslims) are God's party....they are the prosperers." (LVIII The Disputer: 20) Islam is basically a medium of Arab Imperialism - Military, Political, Economic and Cultural Anwar Shaikh, a scholar of Islam writes the following in his essay entitled ISLAM - The Arab National Movement, about how and why Islam is basically a medium of Arab Imperialism - Military, Political, Economic and Cultural. In the words of Anwar Shaikh: "1. The Prophet declared that he was the best individual of all humans; the Koresh, his tribe were the best of all Arabian tribes and Arabs were the best of all nations. 2. For this purpose, he used the oldest Semitic device of revelation to declare himself a prophet, who is supposed to have no axe of his own to grind but does what he is told by God. 3. As the Jews had a national God called "Yahwe," the Prophet chose Allah, the Lord of Kaaba, an idol of his own tribe, and raised it to the dignity of the one supreme God. 4. The Prophet made Kaaba, the sacred shrine of the Arabs as the holiest place of Islam so that whoever believes in Islam must also acknowledge the greatness of Arabia and its people. 5. The Prophet Mohammed made Haj, i.e. pilgrimage to the Kaaba, an old pre-lslamic Arab rite, a basic tenet of his religion to impress upon foreign (non-Arab) Muslims the sanctity of Arabia, and create an everlasting source of income for the Arabs. 6. He insisted that God's covenant was not with Abraham and Isaac but with Abraham and Ishmael. It is universally known that Ishmael was the direct ancestor of the Arabs. Thus, one can clearly see that the purpose of Islam is glorification of the Arab nationalism. 7. The Kaaba serves a much greater national purpose of the Arabs than that which Jerusalem renders to the Jews or Rome to the Christians (Catholics). It is guardian of the Arab nationalism at the expense of the national conscience of the non-Arab Muslims who believe that they have no individual nationality of their own, and prefer to be called Muslims. Thus the Arabs have achieved the status of a nucleus whereas the non-Arab Muslims have gladly become their satellites in the hope of gaining paradise. It ought to be remembered that the Prophet shall not open the gates of paradise to those Moslems who are not friendly with the Arabs. The Prophet said: a. "May Allah humiliate those who seek to humiliate the Quresh (his tribe)." Sahih Tirmzi Vol. 2 p.335) b. The Prophet said to Sulaiman Farsee (the Persian Convert), "If you bear odium against the Arabs, you bear odium against me." (Sahih Tirmzi Vol.2. p.840) c. The Prophet said: "I will not intercede for those or love them who are not fair with the Arabs." (Sahih Tirmzi Vol . 2 p.840 ) Of course, there is a difference of opinion about the degree of accuracy about these Hadiths i.e. the Prophet's sayings, yet they are there. If they were inappropriate they would have been expunged. They are correct because they correspond with the Arabic ethos of Islam. 8. The Prophet built the structure of Islam around the sanctity of his own person by declaring himself: a. the Intercessor, b. the blessing for the mankind, and c. the model of actions for all faithful. 9. Since Muhammad preferred Arabs to other nations, love of the Arabs becomes a prerequisite of Islam. 10. Since faith means belief in both Allah and Muhammad, the Islamic God represents duality as the Christian doctrine of Trinity represents Three- in-one. Not only Muhammad was an Arab, Allah, the Lord of the Kaaba, was also an Arab statue. Thus Islam is there to serve the Arab cause. 11. The Koran is an Arabic document. It is primarily a book for the understanding and guidance of the Arabs. Calling it a universal message is just an innovation for subjugating the non-Arab Muslims to the national hegemony of the Arabs. Illegitimate Sex Amongst Muslims is Haram, but for a Mujahid Taking Up Non-Muslim Women as Concubines in a Jehad is Legitimate Carnal gratification, man's greatest desire, is the first temptation that the concept of Jihad carries. A Mujahid i.e. the Islamic warrior, who at that time suffered pangs of sexual starvation in the torrid land of Arabia, was promised plenty of sensual enjoyment as a reward for participating in the carnage whether or not he survived the rigors of the battlefield. If he (a Mujahid - Islamic warrior) got killed, he was assured that the houris waited for his glorious company in Jannnat i.e. paradise, and if he survived, he had a share in the plunder, which included women of the infidels. Islam has prescribed flogging, and death-by-stoning for sexual offenses such as fornication and adultery because it holds such acts as unlawful when committed out of wedlock but when a Muslim "fights in the way of Allah" to murder the infidels and plunder their property, then the Koran relaxes this rule: "And anyone of you who has not the affluence to be able to marry believing free women in wedlock, let him take believing handmaids that your right hand owns ......So marry them, with their people's leave, and give them their wages honorably as women in wedlock, not as in license or taking lovers." (Women, IV: 25) These verses demonstrate beyond a shadow of doubt that amongst Muslims, the Koran forbids sexual intercourse outside wedlock: marriage is a must for the fulfillment of sensual desires, but this law is blown off by the wind of change when it comes to a Mujahid (the Holy warrior): During the battle of Autas, the Muslims captured some women along with their husbands. Though earlier, a Muslim had been forbidden sexual intercourse with an unbelieving married woman, at this occasion, it was revealed to the Prophet that Allah had relaxed this restriction and permitted copulation to the warrior if she had fallen to his lot in the battle and thus became his property. ( TIRMZI, vol. one, P 417 ) In the Islamic Jehad, sex was a big bait to attract followers, and eventually, make them sincere devotees. After the people of Taif - the last major Arab City to resist Islam - surrendered in February, 631 C.E., to escape horrors of the siege, Muhammad was presented with three beautiful women; he gave one of them "to Ali, another to Usman and the third to Omar." To realize the significance of this episode, one ought to remember that both Ali and Usman were his sons-in-law and Omar was his father-in-law. The holy warriors of Islam have been given an unusual privilege of sexual merriment. If they survive the battle, they secure concubines but if they fall, they are sure to enter paradise full of houris (beautiful maidens to be turned into concubines), living in the most luxurious environment. " For them (the Muslims) is reserved a definite provision, fruit and a great honor in the Gardens of bliss reclining upon couches arranged face to face, a cup from a fountain being passed round to them, while, a pleasure to the drinkers ..... and with them wide eyed maidens flexing their glances as if they were slightly concealed pearls. (The Rangers, 40-45) "Surely for the God-fearing awaits a place of security gardens and vineyards and maidens with swelling bosoms." (The Tidings: 30) The houris are ever-young women who have wide eyes, flexing glances and swelling bosoms. Fancy the modesty of Allah and holiness of His manners. Can anyone honestly say that it is not a lure to attract followers? The Motivation for Plunder, Loot and Booty in the Koran The Koran also legitimizes booty and loot secured from non-Muslims during a religious war - Jehad: "Eat of what you have taken as booty, such is lawful and good. " (The Spoils, VIII: 70) To make his followers, the merciless looters, he thoroughly drilled them in hatred of non-Muslims, the potential victims: 1. "Surely the worst of beasts in God's sight are the unbelievers." (The Spoils: VIII: 55) 2. " Certainly, God is an enemy to the unbelievers . " (The Cow: II: 90) 3. "Oh ye who believe! fight those of the unbelievers and let them find in you harshness." (Repentance: IX: 123) 4. "Humiliate the non-Muslims to such an extent that they surrender and pay tribute." ( Repentance IX: 29 ) Since it was plunder that paved the way to spread Islam, even those things that the Prophet himself had declared sacred, lost their sanctity when they proved inconvenient. For example, the Koran says: "Then, when the sacred months are drawn away, slay the idolaters (The non-Muslims) wherever you find them, and take them, and confine them, and lie in wait for them at every place of ambush" (Repentance, IX: 5) Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:21:03 GMT, "Mavisbaconator" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >[snip already dealt with - SNAP - back in your face! http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,779359,00.html A radical armed Islamist group with ties to Tehran and Baghdad has helped al-Qaida establish an international terrorist training camp in northern Iraq, Kurdish officials say. Intelligence officers in the autonomous Kurdish region of Iraq told the Guardian that the Ansar al-Islam (supporters of Islam) group is harbouring up to 150 al-Qaida members in a string of villages it controls along the Iraq-Iran border. Most of them fled Afghanistan after the US-led offensive, but officials from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), which controls part of north-east Iraq, claim an "abnormal" number of recruits are making their way to the area from Jordan, Syria and Egypt. "They are being trained for terrorist operations within the Kurdish region and beyond, possibly Europe," one said. Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:21:03 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message >news:q260m3lv34gpqk1tdbighretki06atipg0@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:38:04 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" >> <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >> >>>Wrong! >> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,779359,00.html >> >> A radical armed Islamist group with ties to Tehran and Baghdad has >> helped al-Qaida establish an international terrorist training camp in >> northern Iraq, Kurdish officials say. >> Intelligence officers in the autonomous Kurdish region of Iraq told >> the Guardian that the Ansar al-Islam (supporters of Islam) group is >> harbouring up to 150 al-Qaida members in a string of villages it >> controls along the Iraq-Iran border. >> > >[snip - already dealt with above] SNAP! Not. ....Most of them fled Afghanistan after the US-led offensive, but officials from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), which controls part of north-east Iraq, claim an "abnormal" number of recruits are making their way to the area from Jordan, Syria and Egypt. "They are being trained for terrorist operations within the Kurdish region and beyond, possibly Europe," one said. It was reported this week that the Bush administration contemplated a covert strike on Ansar-controlled territory because it suspected al-Qaida had set up a laboratory there to experiment with chemical or biological weapons. Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:22:48 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >"droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message >news:g260m3he1ovingqqvisjls1h2oss98n0dg@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:38:04 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" >> <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >> >>>[snip >> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,779359,00.html >> >[snip - SNAP! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3070394/ SARGAT, Iraq, April 4 - Preliminary tests conducted by MSNBC.com indicate that the deadly toxins ricin and botulinum were present on two items found at a camp in a remote mountain region of northern Iraq allegedly used as a terrorist training center by Islamic militants with ties to the al-Qaida terrorist network. The field tests used by MSNBC.com are only a first step in the evidentiary process and are typically followed by more precise laboratory testing that MSNBC.com has not conducted. U.S. intelligence agents were conducting their own tests in the same area and had not yet released their results, according to officials in northern Iraq. MSNBC.COM CONDUCTED the tests over a two-day period at Sargat, an alleged terrorist training camp a mile from the Iraq-Iran border. MSNBC.com purchased the test kits commercially. The field tests, developed by Osborn Scientific Group in Lakeside, Ariz., are regarded by some experts as very effective and have been used by U.N. weapons inspectors and federal government agents around the Sept. 11, 2001, attack site in New York City. The Sargat camp, set back in an isolated valley and surrounded by snow-capped peaks, was home to the radical Islamic militant group Ansar al-Islam, which counts among its some 700 followers scores of al-Qaida fighters. In a Feb. 5 speech to the U.N. Security Council, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell showed a satellite photo of the Sargat camp and described Ansar al-Islam as Quote
Guest Mavisbeacon Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 "droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message news:4360m3l8n1o06r26n6apjsq5gru2lfub7f@4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:59:58 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" > <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >>This is > > [snip - dealt with above] Quote
Guest Mavisbeacon Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 "droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message news:u570m3tnckajcnjonn52jfdpp0f963li2g@4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 16:30:26 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" > <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >>Evasion noted! > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,779359,00.html > [snip. dealt with already - reply to my rebuttal and please stop spamming back the rebutted so called "evidence"] Quote
Guest Mavisbeacon Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 "Merlin" <johndoe99@fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:19a765e5-ae7d-4d50-a867-636420ead2b2@q3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > On Dec 12, 11:30 am, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbea...@nospam.forme> wrote: > >> Are you now claiming that you NEVER claimed that in the part of Iraq >> controlled by Saddam there NEVER WERE any groups of Islamists training or >> being supported by Saddam or even ones he turned a blind eye to? > > I'm starting to think that you're perhaps insane. The tone of your > comments is so exaggerated, that it makes you appear to be a fanatic. When you can't actually deal with the points raised by others in relation to issues in hand do you always resort to the losers tactic of attacking the person making them? > > Yes, I can and will assert that I've NEVER, NOT ONCE, EVER said those > words. So then you do not believe that Saddam supported al Qaeda or any other Islamist group or provided training to them or even turned a blind eye to them? If that is the case then I have no argument with you about that and I accept your position that Saddam did not support such groups. > > Personally, yes, I strongly believe it VERY POSSIBLE that Saddam the > Madman supported terrorism. Ah1 Well then that is different! You DO believe Saddam supported terrorism. What is YOUR definition of "terrorism" by the way? >Note that I make no mention of Islamic > Terrorists. His own brand of terrorism was no less sadistic nor any > less in reality, MURDER of innocent civilians. He was PROVEN to have > done this and prosecuted, convicted and HUNG like the TERRORIST that > he was. I do not think you have looked into the topic? What was he charged with, or found guilty of for example? What do you define as "terrorism" in the case of Saddam? > > As for his supporting or sponsoring Islamic terrorists within the > COUNTRY that he was DICTATOR of, yes, he knew it was happening in the > north and made no concerted effort to eliminate it. This isn't true! In fact US security reports suggest he DID make an effort to attack Islamists in the north of Iraq. >He had the > capability and the time to do it, he just didn't. Therefor, by NOT > eliminating them from within the COUNTRY THAT HE CONTROLED VIA HIS > DICTATORSHIP, he DID SUPPORT THEM. In fact this is completly adverse to the FACTS! He made efforts to combat Islamists! Why wouldn't he? they threathened his dictatorship! He didnt want them at all! > > Now you can accurately claim that I've said that SADDAM HUSSIEN > SUPPORTED AND ALLOWED ISLAMIC TERRORISTS TO TRAIN AND OPERATE WITHIN > IRAQ. Yes. You just stated [your words] he DID SUPPORT THEM. [end quote] Didn't you? > > Now, Motherfucker, what else do you have to say? Well you could begin by asking me for support for my claims about Saddam opposing Islamists and when I supply the Us security and other sources you can admit that I have a supported position. But I don't think you will. Quote
Guest Mavisbeacon Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 "droll yankee" <stur@bridge.ma> wrote in message news:f360m31auoqmmpq6q13crt2qupkh4p1sd5@4ax.com... > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:59:58 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" > <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: > >>So show me three claims > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,779359,00.html > > A radical armed Islamist group with ties to Tehran and Baghdad has > helped al-Qaida establish an international terrorist training camp in > northern Iraq, Kurdish officials say. Already dealt with 1. Not in an area of Iraq controlled by Saddam. 2. Saddam nevertheless tried to combat them > Intelligence officers in the autonomous Kurdish region of Iraq told See? "autonomous region" > the Guardian that the Ansar al-Islam (supporters of Islam) group is > harbouring up to 150 al-Qaida members in a string of villages it > controls along the Iraq-Iran border. Yes . In non Sadam controlled Iraq. > > Most of them fled Afghanistan after the US-led offensive, but > officials from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), which controls > part of north-east Iraq, claim an "abnormal" number of recruits are > making their way to the area from Jordan, Syria and Egypt. "They are > being trained for terrorist operations within the Kurdish region and > beyond, possibly Europe," one said Yes but NOT by Saddam! > > http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-levitt020603.asp > > TERROR TO GO > Zarqawi's own movements are themselves telling. After being wounded in > the leg in Afghanistan, Zarqawi escaped to Iran. While there, he > dispatched two Palestinians and a Jordanian who entered Turkey > illegally from Iran on their way to conduct bombing attacks in Israel. > The three, members of Beyyiat el-Imam (a group linked to al Qaeda) who > fought for the Taliban and received terrorist training in Afghanistan, > were intercepted and arrested by Turkish police on February 15, 2002. Already dealt with dubious accounts of Turkish intel but where are the links to saddam? > > From Iran Zarqawi traveled to Iraq in May 2002, where his wounded leg > was amputated and the limb fitted with a prosthetic device. This just isnt supported by the facts! I have posted long tracts from several sources rebutting this. >He spent > two months recovering in Baghdad, at which time "nearly two dozen > extremists converged on Baghdad and established a base of operations > there." Powell informed that "these Al Qaida affiliates, based in > Baghdad, now coordinate the movement of people, money and supplies > into and throughout Iraq for his network, and they've now been > operating freely in the capital for more than eight months." It isnt supported . I posted the rebuttal and you got it from a cut and paste from one of your biased websites didnt you? > > http://www.cfr.org/publication/9513/ Okay! This is the FIRST decent source you produced. Fair play to you for finding and producing some proper research. http://www.cfr.org/thinktank/experts.html?groupby=1&page=1 it sems balanced > > Has Iraq sponsored terrorism? > Yes. Saddam Hussein's dictatorship provided headquarters, operating > bases, training camps, and other support to terrorist groups fighting > the governments of neighboring Turkey and Iran, as well as to > hard-line Palestinian groups. During the 1991 Gulf War, Saddam > commissioned several failed terrorist attacks on U.S. facilities. > Prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the State Department listed Iraq > as a state sponsor of terrorism. This deals with a period in 1991. i asked about JUST BEFORE the invasion of Iraq in 2003. > > What type of terrorist groups did Iraq support under Saddam Hussein?s > regime? > Primarily groups that could hurt Saddam's regional foes. Saddam has > aided the Iranian dissident group Mujahedeen-e-Khalq and the Kurdistan > Workers' Party (known by its Turkish initials, PKK), a separatist > group fighting the Turkish government. this isnt supporting International terror! The Us also supported opposition groups in iran. In fact they supported them recently in Venezuala! And the US supported Pinochet on 9/11 against the democratically elected Alende. they also supported Suharto noriega Mabutou and ahost of other dictators. They supported the MuJIHADeen and they even supported Saddam! >Moreover, Iraq has hosted > several Palestinian splinter groups that oppose peace with Israel , As did Saudi Arabia (pals of Bush) . But Saddam didnt do it in 2003 or 2002. > including the mercenary Abu Nidal Organization, whose leader, Abu > Nidal, was found dead in Baghdad in August 2002. Iraq has also > supported the Islamist Hamas movement and reportedly channeled money > to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. He didnt "channel money" ! He GAVE money to the widows of dead suicide bombers. that isnt supporting terrorism! > > http://www.frontpagemag.com/articles/Read.aspx?GUID={27E6CB2F-8494-4D5A-998B-AFECEBB84D54} > [snip] More frontpagemag cut and paste unsupported stuff The Prague meeting was not confirmed. > Hayes: It's a fascinating story. Five top Czech officials are on > record as confirming the meeting. Really? Who? >The Czechs have also reported to > the CIA that al Ani authorized a financial transfer to Atta from the > Iraqi Intelligence service to Atta. the US security people have stated this is UNSUPPORTED! Read the reports I gave you earlier in this thread! Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:51:07 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >[snip. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3070394/ SARGAT, Iraq, April 4 - Preliminary tests conducted by MSNBC.com indicate that the deadly toxins ricin and botulinum were present on two items found at a camp in a remote mountain region of northern Iraq allegedly used as a terrorist training center by Islamic militants with ties to the al-Qaida terrorist network. The field tests used by MSNBC.com are only a first step in the evidentiary process and are typically followed by more precise laboratory testing that MSNBC.com has not conducted. U.S. intelligence agents were conducting their own tests in the same area and had not yet released their results, according to officials in northern Iraq. MSNBC.COM CONDUCTED the tests over a two-day period at Sargat, an alleged terrorist training camp a mile from the Iraq-Iran border. MSNBC.com purchased the test kits commercially. The field tests, developed by Osborn Scientific Group in Lakeside, Ariz., are regarded by some experts as very effective and have been used by U.N. weapons inspectors and federal government agents around the Sept. 11, 2001, attack site in New York City. The Sargat camp, set back in an isolated valley and surrounded by snow-capped peaks, was home to the radical Islamic militant group Ansar al-Islam, which counts among its some 700 followers scores of al-Qaida fighters. In a Feb. 5 speech to the U.N. Security Council, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell showed a satellite photo of the Sargat camp and described Ansar al-Islam as Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:51:07 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >[snip - http://www.meforum.org/article/579 Months before the Iraq war of 2003, The New Yorker, Christian Science Monitor, and The New York Times published reports about Ansar al-Islam ("Partisans of Islam"), a brutal band of al-Qa?ida guerrillas based in a Kurdish area of northern Iraq near the Iranian border. U.S. officials pointed to Ansar al-Islam as the "missing link" between al-Qa?ida and Saddam Hussein. When Secretary of State Colin Powell made the U.S. case for war against Saddam at the United Nations on February 5, 2003, he cited Ansar al-Islam as a key reason for invasion. Powell drew links among the group, al-Qa?ida, and Saddam, citing Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) documents declassified upon the request of the White House.[1] Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:51:07 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >So then you do not believe that Saddam supported al Qaeda http://www.meforum.org/article/579 Ansar al-Islam announced its inception just days before the September 11 attacks on the United States. One month before, leaders of several Kurdish Islamist factions reportedly visited the al-Qa?ida leadership in Afghanistan[8] seeking to create a base for al-Qa?ida in northern Iraq.[9] Perhaps they knew that the base in Afghanistan would soon be targeted, following the impending terrorist attacks against U.S. targets. There were other clear indications that al-Qa?ida was behind the group's creation. The authors of a document found in Kabul vowed to "expel those Jews and Christians from Kurdistan and join the way of jihad, [and] rule every piece of land ? with the Islamic Shari'a rule."[10] The Los Angeles Times, based upon interviews with an Ansar prisoner, also corroborates this, noting that in October 2000, Kurdish Islamist leaders: sent a guerrilla with the alias Mala Namo and two bodyguards into Iran and then on to bin Laden's camps ? When teams began returning from the Afghan camps in 2001 ? they carried a message from bin Laden that Kurdish Islamic cells should unite. By that time, a number of al-Qaeda operatives had left Afghanistan and moved to northern Iraq ? militant leaders in Kurdistan were replicating al-Qaeda type camps on military training, terrorism, and suicide bombers.[11] According to several reports, Ansar al-Islam was started with $300,000 to $600,000 in al-Qa?ida seed money.[12] According to at least three journalistic sources, the group received money from a key cleric in the al-Qa?ida network, Abu Qatada, based in London. Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:51:07 GMT, "Mavisbeacon" <Mavisbeacon@nospam.forme> mumbled: >Really? Who? Milos Zeman, the Czech Republic's prime minister. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-48105037.html AP Online 11-10-2001 Title: Zeman: Atta Contacted Agent on Plot Czech Republic Prime Minister Milos Zeman tours the site of the World Trade Center disaster in New York, Friday, Nov. 9, 2001. (AP Photo/Doug Kanter, Pool) WASHINGTON (AP) _ Suspected terrorist Mohammed Atta contacted an Iraqi agent to discuss an attack on the Radio Free Europe building in Prague, just prior to the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the United States, Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman said. Zeman said Friday that Atta twice had met the Iraqi agent, Ahmad Khalil Ibrahim Samir Al-Ani, in the days before the attacks on ... Quote
Guest Don Homuth Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:24:04 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: > >http://www.meforum.org/article/579 > >Months before the Iraq war of 2003, The New Yorker, Christian Science >Monitor, and The New York Times published reports about Ansar al-Islam >("Partisans of Islam"), a brutal band of al-Qa?ida guerrillas based in >a Kurdish area of northern Iraq near the Iranian border. U.S. >officials pointed to Ansar al-Islam as the "missing link" between >al-Qa?ida and Saddam Hussein. When Secretary of State Colin Powell >made the U.S. case for war against Saddam at the United Nations on >February 5, 2003, he cited Ansar al-Islam as a key reason for >invasion. Powell drew links among the group, al-Qa?ida, and Saddam, >citing Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) documents declassified upon >the request of the White House.[1] And Colin Powell was wrong to do so. Saddam regularly bombed and attacked the high mountain valley that Ansar al-Islam had taken refuge in, and from which it mounted its own small attacks on occasion against Saddam's regime. Ansar al-Islam was a Kurdish group -- and like the other Kurdish groups didn't care for Saddam at all. We knew that, at the time. Apparently Dubya's spokesdroids were counting on the Ignorance of the Murken People -- which worked, but only for a while. Ansar al-Islam was never a friend of Saddam's. Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:44:35 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:24:04 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: > >> >>http://www.meforum.org/article/579 >> >>Months before the Iraq war of 2003, The New Yorker, Christian Science >>Monitor, and The New York Times published reports about Ansar al-Islam >>("Partisans of Islam"), a brutal band of al-Qa?ida guerrillas based in >>a Kurdish area of northern Iraq near the Iranian border. U.S. >>officials pointed to Ansar al-Islam as the "missing link" between >>al-Qa?ida and Saddam Hussein. When Secretary of State Colin Powell >>made the U.S. case for war against Saddam at the United Nations on >>February 5, 2003, he cited Ansar al-Islam as a key reason for >>invasion. Powell drew links among the group, al-Qa?ida, and Saddam, >>citing Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) documents declassified upon >>the request of the White House.[1] > >And Colin Powell was wrong to do so. > >Saddam regularly bombed and attacked the high mountain valley Trying to kill Kurds, his favorite sport over the years... Quote
Guest Don Homuth Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:24:04 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: > >http://www.meforum.org/article/579 > >Months before the Iraq war of 2003, The New Yorker, Christian Science >Monitor, and The New York Times published reports about Ansar al-Islam >("Partisans of Islam"), a brutal band of al-Qa?ida guerrillas based in >a Kurdish area of northern Iraq near the Iranian border. U.S. >officials pointed to Ansar al-Islam as the "missing link" between >al-Qa?ida and Saddam Hussein. When Secretary of State Colin Powell >made the U.S. case for war against Saddam at the United Nations on >February 5, 2003, he cited Ansar al-Islam as a key reason for >invasion. Powell drew links among the group, al-Qa?ida, and Saddam, >citing Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) documents declassified upon >the request of the White House.[1] http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9807EFD91538F931A35751C0A9659C8B63 Published: February 2, 2003 The Bush administration's efforts to build a case for war against Iraq using intelligence to link it to Al Qaeda and the development of prohibited weapons has created friction within United States intelligence agencies, government officials said. Some analysts at the Central Intelligence Agency have complained that senior administration officials have exaggerated the significance of some intelligence reports about Iraq, particularly about its possible links to terrorism, in order to strengthen their political argument for war, government officials said. At the Federal Bureau of Investigation, some investigators said they were baffled by the Bush administration's insistence on a solid link between Iraq and Osama bin Laden's network. ''We've been looking at this hard for more than a year and you know what, we just don't think it's there,'' a government official said.... But of course, this occurred at a time when the Dubya administration was busily cooking the Intel books on a whole raft of things that were to go into CP's UNSC speech. None of which turned out to be True. It was, all of it, Dead Wrong. Then and Now. Subsequent investigations into an alleged tie between Saddam and Ansar al-Islam turned up....nothing verifiable. Quote
Guest Don Homuth Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:55:48 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:44:35 -0800, Don Homuth ><dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: > >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:24:04 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: >> >>> >>>http://www.meforum.org/article/579 >>> >>>Months before the Iraq war of 2003, The New Yorker, Christian Science >>>Monitor, and The New York Times published reports about Ansar al-Islam >>>("Partisans of Islam"), a brutal band of al-Qa?ida guerrillas based in >>>a Kurdish area of northern Iraq near the Iranian border. U.S. >>>officials pointed to Ansar al-Islam as the "missing link" between >>>al-Qa?ida and Saddam Hussein. When Secretary of State Colin Powell >>>made the U.S. case for war against Saddam at the United Nations on >>>February 5, 2003, he cited Ansar al-Islam as a key reason for >>>invasion. Powell drew links among the group, al-Qa?ida, and Saddam, >>>citing Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) documents declassified upon >>>the request of the White House.[1] >> >>And Colin Powell was wrong to do so. >> >>Saddam regularly bombed and attacked the high mountain valley > >Trying to kill Kurds, his favorite sport over the years... Which likewise provides further Proof that Saddam and Ansar al-Islam had no operational ties. Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:58:07 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: >''We've been looking at >this hard for more than a year and you know what, we just don't think >it's there,'' a government official said.... "I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003 "Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." -- Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998 http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060915-4.html In February 2003, CIA Director George Tenet Testified That Iraq Had Links To Al Qaeda. TENET: "Iraq is harboring senior members of a terrorist network led by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, a close associate of al Qaeda. ... Iraq has in the past provided training in document forgery and bomb-making to al Qaeda. It has also provided training in poisons and gases to two al Qaeda associates. One of these associates characterized the relationship he forged with Iraqi officials as successful. ... I know that part of this - and part of this Zarqawi network in Baghdad are two dozen Egyptian Islamic jihad which is indistinguishable from al Qaeda - operatives who are aiding the Zarqawi network, and two senior planners who have been in Baghdad since last May. Now, whether there is a base or whether there is not a base, they are operating freely, supporting the Zarqawi network that is supporting the poisons network in Europe and around the world. So these people have been operating there. And, as you know - I don't want to recount everything that Secretary Powell said, but as you know a foreign service went to the Iraqis twice to talk to them about Zarqawi and were rebuffed. So there is a presence in Baghdad that is beyond Zarqawi." (George Tenet, Select Committee On Intelligence, U.S. Senate, Hearing, 2/11/03) Tenet Testified That Iraq Was Providing Safe Haven To Al Qaeda. SEN. CARL LEVIN (D-MI): "Would you say, Mr. Tenet, that the Zarqawi terrorist network is under the control or sponsorship of the Iraqi government?" TENET: "I don't know that, sir, but I know that there's a safe haven that's been provided to this network in Baghdad." LEVIN: "So you're not - well, you're saying that you don't know if they're under the support - that they are under the control or direction?" TENET: "Yes, sir. We have said - what we've said is Zarqawi and this large number of operatives are in Baghdad. They say the environment is good. And it is inconceivable to us that the Iraqi intelligence service doesn't know that they live there or what they're doing." (George Tenet, Select Committee On Intelligence, U.S. Senate, Hearing, 2/11/03) In March 2002, Tenet Testified On Iraq's Links To Al Qaeda. TENET: "We continue to watch Iraq's involvement in terrorists' activities. Baghdad has a long history of supporting terrorism, altering its targets to reflect changing priorities and goals. It is also had contacts with Al Qaeda." (George Tenet, Committee On Armed Services, U.S. Senate, Hearing, 3/19/02) Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:58:56 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:55:48 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: > >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:44:35 -0800, Don Homuth >><dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: >> >>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:24:04 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>http://www.meforum.org/article/579 >>>> >>>>Months before the Iraq war of 2003, The New Yorker, Christian Science >>>>Monitor, and The New York Times published reports about Ansar al-Islam >>>>("Partisans of Islam"), a brutal band of al-Qa?ida guerrillas based in >>>>a Kurdish area of northern Iraq near the Iranian border. U.S. >>>>officials pointed to Ansar al-Islam as the "missing link" between >>>>al-Qa?ida and Saddam Hussein. When Secretary of State Colin Powell >>>>made the U.S. case for war against Saddam at the United Nations on >>>>February 5, 2003, he cited Ansar al-Islam as a key reason for >>>>invasion. Powell drew links among the group, al-Qa?ida, and Saddam, >>>>citing Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) documents declassified upon >>>>the request of the White House.[1] >>> >>>And Colin Powell was wrong to do so. >>> >>>Saddam regularly bombed and attacked the high mountain valley >> >>Trying to kill Kurds, his favorite sport over the years... > >Which likewise provides further Proof that Saddam and Ansar al-Islam >had no operational ties. Incorrect. Quote
Guest Don Homuth Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:26:01 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:58:07 -0800, Don Homuth ><dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: > >>''We've been looking at >>this hard for more than a year and you know what, we just don't think >>it's there,'' a government official said.... > >"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence >back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from >gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up >and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense >William Cohen in April of 2003 If you recite a longish list of Folks Who Were Wrong, it won't ever convert them into being Right. They were Wrong. Dead Wrong -- about all of it. Quote
Guest Halsey Knox Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:57:22 -0800, Don Homuth <dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:26:01 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: > >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:58:07 -0800, Don Homuth >><dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: >> >>>''We've been looking at >>>this hard for more than a year and you know what, we just don't think >>>it's there,'' a government official said.... >> >>"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence >>back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from >>gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up >>and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense >>William Cohen in April of 2003 > >If you recite a longish list of Folks Who Were Wrong, it won't ever >convert them into being Right. > >They were Wrong. They were CONSISTENT! You go with the intel you have at the time! Quote
Guest Don Homuth Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:06:46 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: >On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:57:22 -0800, Don Homuth ><dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: > >>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 23:26:01 GMT, Halsey Knox <little@faus.and> wrote: >> >>>On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:58:07 -0800, Don Homuth >>><dhomuthoneatcomcast.net@> mumbled: >>> >>>>''We've been looking at >>>>this hard for more than a year and you know what, we just don't think >>>>it's there,'' a government official said.... >>> >>>"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence >>>back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from >>>gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up >>>and then moving those trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense >>>William Cohen in April of 2003 >> >>If you recite a longish list of Folks Who Were Wrong, it won't ever >>convert them into being Right. >> >>They were Wrong. > >They were CONSISTENT! Consistently Wrong. >You go with the intel you have at the time! They had no Intel at the time. The administration controlled all of it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.