Ron Paul is no solution when he's part of the problem

[Guest JC]

Your repitition is boring!!!

 

 

P L O N K !!!

 

 

"jetgraphics" <jetgraphics@gmail.com> wrote in message news:f483b311-d652-4b15-946a-2b6d4990eabb@n20g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> On Nov 30, 3:43 pm, Midex <jbmccr...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> even if one does not borrow money, one is still indentured to the

>> time-value of money which is

>> part and parcel of the usery system.

>>

>> They tried to ban the jews in england from introducing usury in the

>> Magna Carta. Look up Magna Carta and the Jews.

>

> JG: Usurers are not limited to any ethnic or religious group. All

> religions denounced usury. However, at this time, only Islam

> categorically forbids usury. This may be one of the reasons why the

> "free world" (enslaved to usurers) wage war on Islamic governments.

>

> Which poses the question - what do you think would happen if the U.S.

> government (or its people) repudiated usury?

> Would the usury dominated world turn upon the U.S.A.?

>

> We don't need usury for prosperity

>

> Prosperity is not generated by a large supply of money tokens.

> Prosperity is generated by the creation, exchange and transportation

> of surplus usable goods and services. Money is merely a medium of

> exchange to facilitate the trade of that surplus. America has been

> gutted because people have forgotten that wealth is the result of

> production, not manipulation of money tokens via usury. Instead of

> mighty factories and skilled workforce gainfully employed, we have

> plutocrats filling their pockets via every scheme and scam under the

> sun; usury, limited liability, bribery, corruption, gambling, and

> other abominations notwithstanding.

>

> Alternately, there are reforms that would eliminate the power of

> usurers.

>

> 1. Eliminate scarce money tokens.

> 2. Promote the private promissory note money system.

> 3. Do not protect usurers nor enforce their contracts in courts of

> law.

>

> Scarcity of money drives demand for credit, which enriches usurers.

> Bankers fear free and unlimited money creation. In the 1870s, the U.S.

> silver output threatened the international bankers so much, that they

> had their puppet Congress demonetize silver despite the constitutional

> requirement for silver coin.

> (See "Cross of Gold" speech by William Jennings Bryan)

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_of_1873

> The consequence was an economic mess that lead up to the scam of an

> "elastic currency" via the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

>

> Private promissory notes (not unlike coupons) if circulated as tender,

> would relieve the scarce money token issue that plagues many

> communities. Since they are not borrowed into existence, they do not

> enrich usurers. In fact, the fine print on many coupons recite "cash

> value 1/20 of a cent" to discourage the idea that they can circulate

> with the face value of the item in question. Many communities have

> created alternative money token systems independent of usury.

> (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ithaca_hours)

> The basic idea is that only producers of goods and services should

> have the authority to create the medium of exchange necessary for

> trade. Consumers / parasites like government or usurers should never,

> ever have the power to create money tokens. (Technically speaking, the

> U.S. Congress has no power to "create" money. It is delegated the

> power to COIN money, stamped from bullion. There is no power to create

> bullion.)

>

> Banning contracts for usury from enforcement in courts of law, and not

> protecting usurers who were injured by their victims would go a long

> way to curing the problem. Since usurers are felons under a death

> sentence (see Ezekiel 18:13 KJV), it is an axiom of law that felons

> are responsible for injuries they suffer in the course of their

> criminal activity. Unfortunately, the U.S. Constitution enshrined

> usury, via the bankruptcy protection power. Remember, though states

> are barred from impairing the obligations of contracts, the bankruptcy

> protection IS a violation of a contract. There is no moral imperative

> to deny a legitimate creditor his due. But thanks to usury, and the

> mathematical certainty that a proportion of debtors would fail due to

> the lack of money, the bankruptcy protection was a "safety valve".

> Thus no victim of usury would feel that his only recourse was to

> summarily execute the usurers who plagued him. This fact illustrates

> that the U.S. Constitution had nothing to do with God or morality.

> Anyone assuming that it was a divinely inspired document is woefully

> misled. Jesus never preached, "Bless those who screw their

> creditor..."

>

> When Ron Paul advocates the repeal of the Federal Reserve Act,

> abolishes the fraudulent national debt, and repeals national socialism

> (Social Security Act), then he's a solution and not part of the

> problem.