Al Gore plagiaried and lied about AGW

[hanson]

"V-for-Vendicar" said:
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote Absolutely nothing [except that ]
>
Gauche & loud communist, US-expatriate & pauper Scott Nudds
with his red pants on fire... ahahahaha... HAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
aka "VD-for-Vendicar" <Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> aka
VD Scotty who bragged that he never drove and much less
owned an automobile cranked himself grievously and then he
Scuttled his Nutts and as usual fantasized and lied:
>
"James" <kingkongg@iglou.com> wrote Absolutely nothing.
[said VD Scotty. But watch how VD-Scotty lies.... ahahaha]
>
VD Scotty said:
Libertarian Cato is found to have lied in every instance.
Concludion. Libertarian Cato is a Liar.
Hardly a surprise as I have never encounterd a Libertairan
who wasn't a perpetual liar.
>
hanson wrote:
But you have, VD-Scotty, you have and you are... Look into
the mirror and your old posts where YOU said about yourself:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.impeach.bush/msg/920496e1657a9c92
::VD:: I'm Libertarian.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism.children/msg/808fe1a32a9bec99
::VD:: Those who love liberty vote Libertarian.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.america/msg/e3bcc30e30f20b41
::VD:: I am a Libertarian.
>
AHAHAHAHA... AHAHAHA... thanks for the laughs, LIAR-Scotty.
ahahaha... ahahanson
>
.... and here is the recent post that cranked VD Scotty to no end:
< http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/d6e90d1f079c2857 >

 

[hanson]

"V-for-Vendicar" said:
"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote Absolutely nothing [except that ]
>
Gauche & loud communist, US-expatriate & pauper Scott Nudds
with his red pants on fire... ahahahaha... HAHAHAHA... ahahaha...
aka "VD-for-Vendicar" <Just...@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> aka
VD Scotty who bragged that he never drove and much less
owned an automobile cranked himself grievously and then he
Scuttled his Nutts and as usual fantasized and lied:
>
"James" <kingkongg@iglou.com> wrote Absolutely nothing.
[said VD Scotty. But watch how VD-Scotty lies.... ahahaha]
>
VD Scotty said:
Libertarian Cato is found to have lied in every instance.
Concludion. Libertarian Cato is a Liar.
Hardly a surprise as I have never encounterd a Libertairan
who wasn't a perpetual liar.
>
hanson wrote:
But you have, VD-Scotty, you have and you are... Look into
the mirror and your old posts where YOU said about yourself:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.impeach.bush/msg/920496e1657a9c92
::VD:: I'm Libertarian.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism.children/msg/808fe1a32a9bec99
::VD:: Those who love liberty vote Libertarian.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.america/msg/e3bcc30e30f20b41
::VD:: I am a Libertarian.
>
AHAHAHAHA... AHAHAHA... thanks for the laughs, LIAR-Scotty.
ahahaha... ahahanson
>
.... and here is the recent post that cranked VD Scotty to no end:
< http://groups.google.com/group/alt.global-warming/msg/d6e90d1f079c2857 >

 

[V-for-Vendicar]

"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote Absolutely nothing

Meanwhile...



Climate Models Match Well With Current Observations
Posted April 15, 2008

More than a dozen centers around the world develop climate models to
enhance
our understanding of climate change and serve as the basis for policy
decisions.
But just how good are those models, and can they truly be relied upon? A new
study by meteorologists at the University of Utah shows that current climate
models are quite accurate and can be valuable tools for those seeking
solutions
to global warming trends.

This coupled climate model of Earth uses of data from the NCAR Community
Climate
Model, the Los Alamos National Laboratory Parallel Ocean Program, and the
Naval
Postgraduate School sea-ice model.

"Coupled models are becoming increasingly reliable tools for understanding
climate and climate change, and the best models are now capable of
simulating
present-day climate with accuracy approaching conventional atmospheric
observations," said Thomas Reichler of Utah's Department of Meteorology. "We
can
now place a much higher level of confidence in model-based projections of

climate change than in the past."

Reichler and his colleague Junsu Kim compared the output of about 50
different
national and international models against real, observed present climate.
The
simulations were developed over the past two decades at major climate
research
centers in China, Russia, Australia, Canada, France, Korea, Great Britain,
Germany, and the United States and included those used for the 2007 report
of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Most of those models project a global warming trend that amounts to about 7
degrees Fahrenheit over the next 100 years.

Coupled climate models factor in several physical characteristics that
affect
climate, such dynamics of the atmosphere, oceans, land surface, living
things,
sea ice, and energy from the Sun. Reichler and Kim chose 14 different
variables
to evaluate model performance, including atmospheric pressure at sea level,
air
temperature, wind, precipitation, snow cover and ocean salinity.

The most complex models are so elaborate they must be run on supercomputers.
A
commonly used model, known as the Community Climate System Model, is so
complex
it requires about 3 trillion computer calculations to simulate a single day
of
global climate. According to the researchers, improvements in modern-day
models
resulted from not only better computing power but more comprehensive data
collection and a more sophisticated understanding of climate processes.

Although model-based projections of future climate are now more credible
than
ever, the study was designed to see how well the models stack up to current
climate, which is reliably observed and recorded. The "underlying
assumption,"
the scientists say, is that a model that accurately describes present
climate
will make a better projection of the future. Still, they admit there too
many
unknowns involved in the evolution of future climate, such as how much
humans
will curb their greenhouse gas emissions.

The study, "How Well do Coupled Models Simulate Today's Climate?," was
published
April 4, 2008, in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation and the
National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
-Leslie Fink/NSF

This report is provided by the National Science Foundation, an independent
federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all
fields of science and engineering, in partnership with U.S. News and World
Report.

 

[V-for-Vendicar]

"hanson" <hanson@quick.net> wrote Absolutely Nothing

Meanwhile...



Climate Models Match Well With Current Observations
Posted April 15, 2008

More than a dozen centers around the world develop climate models to
enhance
our understanding of climate change and serve as the basis for policy
decisions.
But just how good are those models, and can they truly be relied upon? A new
study by meteorologists at the University of Utah shows that current climate
models are quite accurate and can be valuable tools for those seeking
solutions
to global warming trends.

This coupled climate model of Earth uses of data from the NCAR Community
Climate
Model, the Los Alamos National Laboratory Parallel Ocean Program, and the
Naval
Postgraduate School sea-ice model.

"Coupled models are becoming increasingly reliable tools for understanding
climate and climate change, and the best models are now capable of
simulating
present-day climate with accuracy approaching conventional atmospheric
observations," said Thomas Reichler of Utah's Department of Meteorology. "We
can
now place a much higher level of confidence in model-based projections of

climate change than in the past."

Reichler and his colleague Junsu Kim compared the output of about 50
different
national and international models against real, observed present climate.
The
simulations were developed over the past two decades at major climate
research
centers in China, Russia, Australia, Canada, France, Korea, Great Britain,
Germany, and the United States and included those used for the 2007 report
of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Most of those models project a global warming trend that amounts to about 7
degrees Fahrenheit over the next 100 years.

Coupled climate models factor in several physical characteristics that
affect
climate, such dynamics of the atmosphere, oceans, land surface, living
things,
sea ice, and energy from the Sun. Reichler and Kim chose 14 different
variables
to evaluate model performance, including atmospheric pressure at sea level,
air
temperature, wind, precipitation, snow cover and ocean salinity.

The most complex models are so elaborate they must be run on supercomputers.
A
commonly used model, known as the Community Climate System Model, is so
complex
it requires about 3 trillion computer calculations to simulate a single day
of
global climate. According to the researchers, improvements in modern-day
models
resulted from not only better computing power but more comprehensive data
collection and a more sophisticated understanding of climate processes.

Although model-based projections of future climate are now more credible
than
ever, the study was designed to see how well the models stack up to current
climate, which is reliably observed and recorded. The "underlying
assumption,"
the scientists say, is that a model that accurately describes present
climate
will make a better projection of the future. Still, they admit there too
many
unknowns involved in the evolution of future climate, such as how much
humans
will curb their greenhouse gas emissions.

The study, "How Well do Coupled Models Simulate Today's Climate?," was
published
April 4, 2008, in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.
This research was supported by the National Science Foundation and the
National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
-Leslie Fink/NSF

This report is provided by the National Science Foundation, an independent
federal agency that supports fundamental research and education across all
fields of science and engineering, in partnership with U.S. News and World
Report.

 

[Lloyd]

On Apr 19, 4:12 pm, "Tom" <Nos...@eatme.com> wrote:
> Or This http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J2sPcYl0jI&feature=related
>
> "Cato" <caton...@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>
> news:f75424b9-724d-4004-836f-95d3b484aabd@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> ERROR 1
>
> Sea level "rising 6 m"
>

If trends continue ... Gore didn't say next year.

> ERROR 2
>
> Pacific islands "drowning"
>

Ditto.

> ERROR 3
>
> Thermohaline circulation "stopping"
>

Ditto

> ERROR 4
> CO2 "driving temperature"
>

You are lying -- this is true.

> ERROR 5
>
> Gore says