Anna Perenna EXPOSED!!!! Worthless 25 year old *****.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anna Perenna

New member
How does one get so popular and ever so lucky? :rolleyes:
It's quite simple, really.

Upset a moderator with too much time on his hands and no life outside of the forum, and he'll quickly become obsessed with you.

 

Pinky

New member
It's quite simple, really.
Upset a moderator with too much time on his hands and no life outside of the forum, and he'll quickly become obsessed with you.
Ownage dispensed.

CES proves himself to be among the saddest, most depraved Anna-stalkers of all time.

 

builder

New member
Ownage dispensed.
CES proves himself to be among the saddest, most depraved Anna-stalkers of all time.
It's a serial offender you are discussing here. You might have just pencilled yourself in for the next target. :p

 

Cogito Ergo Sum

New member
LMAO.

Anna my dear...

The day your pathetic 25 year old puke Australian ***** life has even a semblance of value to me in my life is the day the Earth will stand still. I spend about as much time on you as I do taking my morning **** and give you about as much value.

You flatter yourself way too much.

In reality, you just happened to be the convenient chew toy of the moment, although now that you are no longer Ms. Enigmatic, quite frankly you're boring as **** and I have lost all interest in you.

Have a nice life.

 

Lethalfind

New member
It's quite simple, really.
Upset a moderator with too much time on his hands and no life outside of the forum, and he'll quickly become obsessed with you.

Anna, I didn't have a problem with you and still don't but lets keep your insults on point here.

If you were talking about Cogito with this statement, you can't be more wrong, he is Mr. Mom to how many boy? 3-4.

(CES says: Just 3)

Anyone with that going on definetly has a life outside of the forum.

To be frank the more intense life gets outside the more I enjoy coming on here and talking **** and reading what other people say, it takes my mind off things. On the other hand we have some people who derive their own personal worth off places like this. Its sad but true.

 

Pinky

New member
I don't quite understand the whole Anna hatred here (although I admit I wasn't really paying attention to the specific goings-ons at GF when Anna first came here).

First, I don't understand where the whole "Anna has no life" statements come here. The people saying that are the ones with post counts in the thousands. By contrast, Anna only posts here a couple times a week.

Additionally, any statements demeaning her intellectual capacity are blatently false. Only an idiot blinded by rage would have a hard time admitting that her serious-minded posts are actually well-researched and articulate.

I think that, despite their claims to the contrary, most of the people who hate Anna are jealous of her.

Grow up.

 

Lethalfind

New member
The more I read her posts the less connected her personality becomes to me, I don't get the ebb and flow like I do with AIG or MRIH.
 

Lethalfind

New member
Maybe I'm just incredibly observant but I really don't see Cogito being obsessed with someone as OBVIOUS as yourself.

It really doesn t count as stalking if you were the dumbass who posted the pictures to begin with. If you don't want them seen, then why would you put them on the internet for Gods Sake.

"Stalking is repeated harassing or otherwise intruding upon a person's privacy in a manner that causes fear, commonly exemplified by acts such as following or observing a person persistently and surreptitiously. ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking"

The key words are "a person's privacy" When your on the internet, or your pictures you have no "expectation of privacy", therefore nothing you say or post in the way of pictures can be construed as private. Therefore your privacy has not been invaded by anyone. Has Cogito been down under to follow you? If so then Cogito, why didn't you bring me a present, lololol.

 

Pinky

New member
Maybe I'm just incredibly observant but I really don't see Cogito being obsessed with someone as OBVIOUS as yourself. It really doesn t count as stalking if you were the dumbass who posted the pictures to begin with. If you don't want them seen, then why would you put them on the internet for Gods Sake.

"Stalking is repeated harassing or otherwise intruding upon a person's privacy in a manner that causes fear, commonly exemplified by acts such as following or observing a person persistently and surreptitiously. ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking"

The key words are "a person's privacy" When your on the internet, or your pictures you have no "expectation of privacy", therefore nothing you say or post in the way of pictures can be construed as private. Therefore your privacy has not been invaded by anyone. Has Cogito been down under to follow you? If so then Cogito, why didn't you bring me a present, lololol.
I reject this argument. When someone posts their picture on the internet, they usually do so with the assumption that it'll only be viewed by their friends/family/trusted contacts... or at the least, by neutral and psychologically-balanced strangers.

Strictly speaking, you're correct that once your picture graces the internet, your reasonable expectation of privacy plummets. Nonetheless, it's perfectly reasonable for Anna to be annoyed with the asshats both here and on Off Topic Forum who tracked down her personal information and spewed it all over the place. Why? Because I strongly doubt she posted her information with the intent of having jealous, foaming-at-the-mouth nutcases on debate forums posting it all over the place. I mean, if you put a picture of your kids on the web, and an insane *** offender gets ahold of said picture and jacks off to it for 6 hours a day (I'm looking at you, OCP), does that mean you're not allowed to be mortified since "hey... you posted it on the internet, no expectation of privacy"? Of course not.

 

Cogito Ergo Sum

New member
I reject this argument. When someone posts their picture on the internet, they usually do so with the assumption that it'll only be viewed by their friends/family/trusted contacts... or at the least, by neutral and psychologically-balanced strangers.
Strictly speaking, you're correct that once your picture graces the internet, your reasonable expectation of privacy plummets. Nonetheless, it's perfectly reasonable for Anna to be annoyed with the asshats both here and on Off Topic Forum who tracked down her personal information and spewed it all over the place. Why? Because I strongly doubt she posted her information with the intent of having jealous, foaming-at-the-mouth nutcases on debate forums posting it all over the place. I mean, if you put a picture of your kids on the web, and an insane *** offender gets ahold of said picture and jacks off to it for 6 hours a day (I'm looking at you, OCP), does that mean you're not allowed to be mortified since "hey... you posted it on the internet, no expectation of privacy"? Of course not.
You are young and stupid, so I'll help you out here.

PRIVACY, ends at your front door.

Anybody who thinks that it exists at all on the Internet, is a complete idiot.

It's that simple.

 

skategreen

New member
I don't quite understand the whole Anna hatred here (although I admit I wasn't really paying attention to the specific goings-ons at GF when Anna first came here).
Go to her user profile and find the earliest posts. (they are many and pedestrian) It was a tiresome advent onto GF. I don't think it engendered "hate", more rather a gnat like annoyance.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom