How does one get so popular and ever so lucky?And a whole new page devoted to Anna Perenna.
Nice one.
It's quite simple, really.How does one get so popular and ever so lucky?
Yeah, he seems quite taken with you, Anna. I still say his problem is NPD, and the only time he feels alive is when he is obsessing.Thanks Mbongo!
Ownage dispensed.It's quite simple, really.
Upset a moderator with too much time on his hands and no life outside of the forum, and he'll quickly become obsessed with you.
It's a serial offender you are discussing here. You might have just pencilled yourself in for the next target.Ownage dispensed.
CES proves himself to be among the saddest, most depraved Anna-stalkers of all time.
I'm trembling in my moon boots.It's a serial offender you are discussing here. You might have just pencilled yourself in for the next target.
It's quite simple, really.
Upset a moderator with too much time on his hands and no life outside of the forum, and he'll quickly become obsessed with you.
Wanna try for 2?It's quite simple, really.
Upset a moderator with too much time on his hands and no life outside of the forum, and he'll quickly become obsessed with you.
I reject this argument. When someone posts their picture on the internet, they usually do so with the assumption that it'll only be viewed by their friends/family/trusted contacts... or at the least, by neutral and psychologically-balanced strangers.Maybe I'm just incredibly observant but I really don't see Cogito being obsessed with someone as OBVIOUS as yourself. It really doesn t count as stalking if you were the dumbass who posted the pictures to begin with. If you don't want them seen, then why would you put them on the internet for Gods Sake.
"Stalking is repeated harassing or otherwise intruding upon a person's privacy in a manner that causes fear, commonly exemplified by acts such as following or observing a person persistently and surreptitiously. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalking"
The key words are "a person's privacy" When your on the internet, or your pictures you have no "expectation of privacy", therefore nothing you say or post in the way of pictures can be construed as private. Therefore your privacy has not been invaded by anyone. Has Cogito been down under to follow you? If so then Cogito, why didn't you bring me a present, lololol.
You are young and stupid, so I'll help you out here.I reject this argument. When someone posts their picture on the internet, they usually do so with the assumption that it'll only be viewed by their friends/family/trusted contacts... or at the least, by neutral and psychologically-balanced strangers.
Strictly speaking, you're correct that once your picture graces the internet, your reasonable expectation of privacy plummets. Nonetheless, it's perfectly reasonable for Anna to be annoyed with the asshats both here and on Off Topic Forum who tracked down her personal information and spewed it all over the place. Why? Because I strongly doubt she posted her information with the intent of having jealous, foaming-at-the-mouth nutcases on debate forums posting it all over the place. I mean, if you put a picture of your kids on the web, and an insane *** offender gets ahold of said picture and jacks off to it for 6 hours a day (I'm looking at you, OCP), does that mean you're not allowed to be mortified since "hey... you posted it on the internet, no expectation of privacy"? Of course not.
Go to her user profile and find the earliest posts. (they are many and pedestrian) It was a tiresome advent onto GF. I don't think it engendered "hate", more rather a gnat like annoyance.I don't quite understand the whole Anna hatred here (although I admit I wasn't really paying attention to the specific goings-ons at GF when Anna first came here).