ANOTHER Giuliani LIE Exposed!

[Freedom Fighter]

"Daniel L Bergman" <nightwind65@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21982baa7174f2c79896f4@useast.maximumusenet.com...
> In article <G%4Xi.48662$kj1.5531@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
> liberty@once.net says...
>> "Guy" <nospam@nospam.us> wrote in message
>> news:472bdf34$0$25711$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> >
>> > "Rudy Canoza" <pipes@thedismalscience.net> wrote in message
>> > news:13indgprp8hnec@corp.supernews.com...
>> >> Freedom Fighter wrote:
>> >>> "abracadabra" <abra@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>> news:472ba877$0$25675$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>> >>>> "Rudy Canoza" <pipes@thedismalscience.net> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:13in65oii40fce0@corp.supernews.com...
>> >>>>> Freedom Fighter wrote:
>> >>>>>> Prostates and Prejudices
>> >>>>> You're really afraid of Giuliani, aren't you, little hysterical
>> >>>>> lefty?
>> >>>> Only that he's more of a war monger than Bush.
>> >>>
>> >>> I've killfiled this Rudy Kazootie troll,
>> >>
>> >> Because you can't address the criticism I make of your paranoid
>> >> obsession
>> >> with Giuliani.
>> >
>> > If Giuliani is lying about the prostate cancer survival rate in the UK,
>> > calling him on it is effectively calling him on his values system. If
>> > he
>> > is deliberately lying about this just to get elected, what other lies
>> > is
>> > he willing to say to get elected or once he is elected? What does it
>> > say
>> > about the party of values if it condones this lying?
>> >
>> > Paranoid indeed! Giuliani is a LIAR. He is LYING. He will do anything,
>> > include LIE, to get elected. And when the lie is pointed out, he
>> > doesn't
>> > apologize, he just continues to repeat the same lie again and again.
>> > And
>> > you, Rootie Tootie, by supporting this, are saying you actually prefer
>> > lying politicians. But, of course, only if they're rightie tighties
>> > like
>> > you.
>>
>> "Rightie tighties" - funny!
>> These fascists and their apologists never have a sense of humor, do they?
>> I will happily continue to publicize Ghouliani's lies for all to see.
>>
> You know, you idiots consistently wrongly apply the word fascist in an
> attempt to make your invalid arguments. The problem you have is using
> inflammatory words like that only serve to discredit you and your cause.

"Inflammatory words" like "idiots?"
HYPOCRITE!

> Fascists would be the the definition of islamic fundamentalists who want
> to lop your head off simply because you're not Muslim. Or Iranians
> wanting to wipe Israel off the map because they are Jewish. Or Liberals
> who want to silence those who disagree with them as they tried to do
> with Rush a few weeks ago.

"Fascists" is quite appropriate to many in our present government that
perpetrate mass-murderous acts around the world.

> You morons should really get a life because when it comes to political
> arguments...you suck at it.

So where is your argument? You have not argued anything here, all you've
done is call people names like a frustrated child.
Can't refute our viewpoints with logic or facts, so all you are capable of
is childish mud-slinging. How TYPICAL of you apologists for fascism!

 

[Daniel L Bergman]

>
> "Inflammatory words" like "idiots?"
> HYPOCRITE!

LOL, Truth hurts doesn't it?

>
> > Fascists would be the the definition of islamic fundamentalists who want
> > to lop your head off simply because you're not Muslim. Or Iranians
> > wanting to wipe Israel off the map because they are Jewish. Or Liberals
> > who want to silence those who disagree with them as they tried to do
> > with Rush a few weeks ago.
>
> "Fascists" is quite appropriate to many in our present government that
> perpetrate mass-murderous acts around the world.

You apparently wouldn't know a fascist if he jumped up and slapped you
in the face. There is nobody in our government that I am aware of, on
either side, that has perpetrated mass murder anywhere. Maybe you had
better look up the word murder in the dictionary. It would help you to
better understand your own arguments and how off base they are.


>
> > You morons should really get a life because when it comes to political
> > arguments...you suck at it.
>
> So where is your argument? You have not argued anything here, all you've
> done is call people names like a frustrated child.

This is not an argument, it was a statement. I am amazed you don't know
the difference.

> Can't refute our viewpoints with logic or facts, so all you are capable of
> is childish mud-slinging. How TYPICAL of you apologists for fascism!

Another misuse of the word fascism proving you do not understand even
simple English when your fallacies have been clearly pointed out too
you. What would you call it, ad ignorantiam? LOL

--
Daniel L Bergman
nightwind65


"There is no vice... so contemptible; he who permits himself to
tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third
time, till at length it becomes habitual..." ---Thomas
Jefferson

 

[Georgio Salavantinizi]

"Daniel L Bergman" <nightwind65@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.21a1329bbaef69979896fd@useast.maximumusenet.com...
>
>>
>> "Inflammatory words" like "idiots?"
>> HYPOCRITE!
>
> LOL, Truth hurts doesn't it?
>
>>
>> > Fascists would be the the definition of islamic fundamentalists who
>> > want
>> > to lop your head off simply because you're not Muslim. Or Iranians
>> > wanting to wipe Israel off the map because they are Jewish. Or Liberals
>> > who want to silence those who disagree with them as they tried to do
>> > with Rush a few weeks ago.
>>
>> "Fascists" is quite appropriate to many in our present government that
>> perpetrate mass-murderous acts around the world.
>
> You apparently wouldn't know a fascist if he jumped up and slapped you
> in the face. There is nobody in our government that I am aware of, on
> either side, that has perpetrated mass murder anywhere. Maybe you had
> better look up the word murder in the dictionary. It would help you to
> better understand your own arguments and how off base they are.
>
>
>>
>> > You morons should really get a life because when it comes to political
>> > arguments...you suck at it.
>>
>> So where is your argument? You have not argued anything here, all you've
>> done is call people names like a frustrated child.
>
> This is not an argument, it was a statement. I am amazed you don't know
> the difference.
>
>> Can't refute our viewpoints with logic or facts, so all you are capable
>> of
>> is childish mud-slinging. How TYPICAL of you apologists for fascism!
>
> Another misuse of the word fascism proving you do not understand even
> simple English when your fallacies have been clearly pointed out too
> you. What would you call it, ad ignorantiam? LOL
>
> --
> Daniel L Bergman
> nightwind65
>
>
> "There is no vice... so contemptible; he who permits himself to
> tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third
> time, till at length it becomes habitual..." ---Thomas
> Jefferson

What's so bad about Guiliani? He might make a good president.