Anti-War Mutt Cindy Sheehan Quits as 'Face' of Anti-War Movement

[Ratchet Up One more]

You mean like your Obsessive post trying to discredit people posting
evidence and information about 911.

Talk about Obsessive Pussies, you're the most obsessive ***** poster in this
conspiracy forum. You're probably a lonely disgusting human being who jerks
off to American Idol and other reality shows.

"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:twj7i.9450$ya1.4815@news02.roc.ny...
> Obsessive *****
>

 

[Vandar]

Ratchet Up One more wrote:

> You mean like your Obsessive post trying to discredit people posting
> evidence and information about 911.

"information", he calls it.

> Talk about Obsessive Pussies, you're the most obsessive ***** poster in
> this conspiracy forum. You're probably a lonely disgusting human being
> who jerks off to American Idol and other reality shows.

Speculate much?

 

[neoconis_ignoramus]

On May 30, 12:35 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> neoconis_ignoramus wrote:
> > On May 30, 11:38 am, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>Obsessive *****
>
> > "I tend not to discuss the show. The show sucks. "
>
> > I guess 1700 posts is in conworld "tending to not discuss the show".
>
> You'd be surprised at the discussions that take place in that group...
> obviously.
> A small sample of current topics are Cindy Sheehan, belief in ghosts,
> and Iraq.
> The discussions there are FAR more intelligent than any discussion here.
>
> > I don't know what I find funnier: That Vandar is a complete liar
>
> Even though he isn't.
>
> > or that the tool is actually posting on american idol.
>
> Made a couple of posts today as well, and AI isn't even on any more. Go
> figure.
>
> By the way, genius, I'm not posting "on American Idol". I'm posting in a
> group named after it. Those posting on American Idol are at the American
> Idol website.

Oh, thanks for the clarification on posting to a group named after AI
vs. the actual website for the show. Given that I'm able to read, I
was able to decipher that it was an AI group, not the AI site. I'll
try to be more explicit when discussing where you like to satiate your
childlike infatuation with a karaoke show. The old Playboy excuse:
"I just read it for the articles".

You're right, though - I wouldn't know what's on it, as I wouldn't
bother going to a group with that name. Matter of fact, most people
a) not female AND b) over the age of 14 would avoid it also. Funny
how you just stumbled upon it.

 

[ctyguy]

"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote in message
news:1180557867.093098.269080@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 1:47 am, "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am in the 98th percentile with an IQ of 131. It places me in the
>> "Very Superior" classification. It also means, if I bothered to, I
>> could join Mensa.
>
> Riiiight.
> However if you really were as you claim you'd know that IQs
> are not reported as a definite number but rather over a range..
>
No, all IQ tests result in a number. The are other tests Mensa will accept,
i.e. GCT from the military, an example, but still is based on numbers.

You may be thinking of: "the only qualification for Mensa Membership is a
score at or above the 98th percentileof any of a number of standardized
intelligence tests", but still based on specific numbers.

 

[seon ferguson]

"Ratchet Up One more" <user200128-US@startfirst.net> wrote in message
news:ZLKdnW5D750jdsDbnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d@adelphia.com...
> You mean like your Obsessive post trying to discredit people posting
> evidence and information about 911.
>
What about the evidence that you people cover up which would disprove your
wacky conspiracy theories?

Lol this post is amusing. Am I the only one who laughs at these kooks
constant attempts to smear vandar, gov shill etc? Some people just need to
get a life lol

 

[GovShill]

On May 31, 9:34 am, "seon ferguson" <s...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
> "Ratchet Up One more" <user200128...@startfirst.net> wrote in messagenews:ZLKdnW5D750jdsDbnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d@adelphia.com...> You mean like your Obsessive post trying to discredit people posting
> > evidence and information about 911.
>
> What about the evidence that you people cover up which would disprove your
> wacky conspiracy theories?
>
> Lol this post is amusing. Am I the only one who laughs at these kooks
> constant attempts to smear vandar, gov shill etc? Some people just need to
> get a life lol

No, you're not the only one. We are all laughing at the truthers! They
are as funny as chemtrail, God, or Bigfoot Believers.

Shill #312

 

[Tom Sr.]

On May 30, 7:06 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
wrote:
> "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1180527900.388733.107640@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 29, 8:26 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> I'm quite certain that I'm your intellectual superior.
> > --
> > My IQ is 131, possibly higher. Article about me at BBC Online.
> > Quoted a great number of times, sometimes repeatedly and at great
> > length, in about 5-6 different books and a number of newspaper
> > articles, also am acknowledge in about 12 other book and a number of
> > movies on DVD. Was a judge for 8 year for a national literary award.
> > Was interviewed on CBC's "As It Happens". Was a biographee in "Who's
> > Who in the East". Have very often spoken at many different literary
> > conventions in front of audiences of up to 1,000 people. Am listed at
> > the IMDB.com. Google Web turns up about 250+ links about me. Have a
> > 5-year collection of my papers as part of the library's collection at
> > a major Ivy League university with much more to go there which they
> > very much want. Am currently writing a book on film and TV
> > productions that I have researched (and still am) for about 10+ years
> > now. Have already had a numbers of articles and reviews published.
>
> 100% fantasy horseshit.

Why, thank you, PG! That just confirms for everyone else who isn't a
moronic fool reading this thread that everything I wrote is true.

Which it is. I could have written even more, like about the Salon.com
I was interviewed for and quoted in.

But you've never been one to be able to deal with facts and the truth,
PG, because they just don't fit into your ultra-right-wingnut,
delusional, narrow, neocon-fantasy world.

If you were not a sociopath, PG, I might actually have told you my
real name. But I use an alias here in the political groups just
because there is a LOT of information about me on the 'net because of
all I have accomplished -- and I don't want psychopaths like you to
have access to it.

You just so very pitiful, PG.

-Tom Sr.

 

[Tom Sr.]

On May 30, 3:35 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> neoconis_ignoramus wrote:
> > On May 30, 11:38 am, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>Obsessive *****

This, from you? I don't have nearly 1,700 post to the AMERICAN IDOL
newsgroup!

> > "I tend not to discuss the show. The show sucks. "
> > I guess 1700 posts is in conworld "tending to not discuss the show".
>
> You'd be surprised at the discussions that take place in that group...
> obviously.

Come now, Mr. Vandar, surely (well, maybe not) you have enough sense
not to challenge me to go digging into any more of your 1,700 posts
to alt.tv.american-idol?!

I am sure there are a great many absolutely hysterical ones there for
me to post in these newsgroup for others to read. Hmm, maybe I should
increase the number of newsgroups this topic is going to, so more of
your "fans" can know about you.

You've already been shown to be a fool, do you really want to add
"laughing-stock" to that as well? Do you truly want to be the next
American Idiot?

-Tom Sr.

 

[Tom Sr.]

On May 30, 7:06 am, "Patriot Games" <Crazy_Bastard@The_Beach.com>
wrote:
> "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1180527900.388733.107640@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 29, 8:26 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> I'm quite certain that I'm your intellectual superior.
> > --
> > My IQ is 131, possibly higher. Article about me at BBC Online.
> > Quoted a great number of times, sometimes repeatedly and at great
> > length, in about 5-6 different books and a number of newspaper
> > articles, also am acknowledge in about 12 other book and a number of
> > movies on DVD. Was a judge for 8 year for a national literary award.
> > Was interviewed on CBC's "As It Happens". Was a biographee in "Who's
> > Who in the East". Have very often spoken at many different literary
> > conventions in front of audiences of up to 1,000 people. Am listed at
> > the IMDB.com. Google Web turns up about 250+ links about me. Have a
> > 5-year collection of my papers as part of the library's collection at
> > a major Ivy League university with much more to go there which they
> > very much want. Am currently writing a book on film and TV
> > productions that I have researched (and still am) for about 10+ years
> > now. Have already had a numbers of articles and reviews published.
> =
> 100% fantasy horseshit.

Why, thank you, PG! That just confirms for everyone else who isn't a
moronic fool reading this thread that everything I wrote is true.

Which it is. I could have written even more, like about the Salon.com
I was interviewed for and quoted in.

But you've never been one to be able to deal with facts and the truth,
PG, because they just don't fit into your ultra-right-wingnut,
delusional, narrow, neocon-fantasy world.

If you were not a sociopath, PG, I might actually have told you my
real name. But I use an alias here in the political groups just
because there is a LOT of information about me on the 'net because of
all I have accomplished -- and I don't want psychopaths like you to
have access to it.

You are just so very pitiful, PG.

-Tom Sr.

 

[seon ferguson]

"GovShill" <Gov.Shill@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1180568809.293881.23950@q19g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 9:34 am, "seon ferguson" <s...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>> "Ratchet Up One more" <user200128...@startfirst.net> wrote in
>> messagenews:ZLKdnW5D750jdsDbnZ2dnUVZ_v6tnZ2d@adelphia.com...> You mean
>> like your Obsessive post trying to discredit people posting
>> > evidence and information about 911.
>>
>> What about the evidence that you people cover up which would disprove
>> your
>> wacky conspiracy theories?
>>
>> Lol this post is amusing. Am I the only one who laughs at these kooks
>> constant attempts to smear vandar, gov shill etc? Some people just need
>> to
>> get a life lol
>
> No, you're not the only one. We are all laughing at the truthers! They
> are as funny as chemtrail, God, or Bigfoot Believers.
>
Good I thought I was the only one. Yeah-right "truthers" even though they
cover up the facts that would disprove their conspiracy theory.

 

[BDK]

In article <D2m7i.9397$B25.4891@news01.roc.ny>, vandar69@yahoo.com
says...
> Ratchet Up One more wrote:
>
> > You mean like your Obsessive post trying to discredit people posting
> > evidence and information about 911.
>
> "information", he calls it.
>
> > Talk about Obsessive Pussies, you're the most obsessive ***** poster in
> > this conspiracy forum. You're probably a lonely disgusting human being
> > who jerks off to American Idol and other reality shows.
>
> Speculate much?
>
>

Dayum Vandy, what did you do to get the venom flowing your way?

Make some comment about Paula Abdul?

BDK

 

[Vandar]

BDK wrote:

> In article <D2m7i.9397$B25.4891@news01.roc.ny>, vandar69@yahoo.com
> says...
>
>>Ratchet Up One more wrote:
>>
>>
>>>You mean like your Obsessive post trying to discredit people posting
>>>evidence and information about 911.
>>
>>"information", he calls it.
>>
>>
>>>Talk about Obsessive Pussies, you're the most obsessive ***** poster in
>>>this conspiracy forum. You're probably a lonely disgusting human being
>>>who jerks off to American Idol and other reality shows.
>>
>>Speculate much?
>>
>>
>
>
> Dayum Vandy, what did you do to get the venom flowing your way?
>
> Make some comment about Paula Abdul?

I called "Tom Sr" a *****. He didn't like that very much, so he tried to
counter it by claiming he has an IQ of 131 and has been on the cover of
STAR magazine (yes, the supermarket tabloid).
When I told him I wasn't impressed with either his slightly above
average IQ or his being associated with three-headed alien babies, he
proceeded to demonstrate his "superior intellect" by verbally attacking
my daughter. I gave him a hearty "**** you" in response and this is the
result.
Apparently, when you call "Tom Sr" a *****, he's more than willing to
demonstrate that he indeed is one of the biggest pussies on usenet.

 

[Tom Sr.]

On May 31, 12:49 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> BDK wrote:
> >>>Talk about Obsessive Pussies, you're the most obsessive ***** poster in
> >>>this conspiracy forum. You're probably a lonely disgusting human being
> >>>who jerks off to American Idol and other reality shows.
> =
> >>Speculate much?
> =
> > Dayum Vandy, what did you do to get the venom flowing your way?
> > Make some comment about Paula Abdul?
>
> I called "Tom Sr" a puss...
....blab, blab. Blab, blab, blab-blab. Blab, blab-blab-blab-BLAB.
Blab, blab-blab, blab!

Oh, just DEAL with it, Vandar. You cannot accept the fact that every
time you tried to insult me, I came back and proved you for the stupid
fool you were.

Do you think you're calling me a "*****" bothers me in the least?
That is SO 3rd grade, Mr. Vandar! My knowledge, learning, and
maturity is WAY beyond that -- and seeming you as well.

I'm an adult, Mr. Vandar, being taunted by a Usenet K00K -- who has
1,700 posts to alt.tv.american-idot -- with grade school insults!

Ha ha ha ha ha haha ha haha hahaha
hahaha ha haha hahaha ha ha HA ha
haha HAHA HA HA HAHA HAHA HA
HA HA HAHAHAHA HA HA HA HAHA
HAHA HAHAHA HAHA HAHA HAHA
HAHAHA HAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHA hahahaha haha ha hahahaha
hahaha hahahahaha hahahaha haha hahaha
ha ha hee!

Just go back to alt.conspiracy and alt.tv.american-idol and post
another 1,700 to both groups. I am sure if you work hard at it, you
could finish over this weekend.

You are nothing but a K00K and a fool, Mr. Vandar.

In addition to that in, what?, 2-3 days, you are now just BOR-ING!

Go play with the truthers and the AI groupies in Usenet's La-La Land.
You are way out of league in alt.politics.

And, as I said, if you don't get a ****ing clue now , I'm start
posting some of your more "amusing" of your 1,700 post to a.t.a-i.

Please note additional newsgroups being cross-posted to.

-Tom Sr.

 

[Vandar]

Tom Sr. wrote:

> On May 31, 12:49 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>BDK wrote:
>>
>>>>>Talk about Obsessive Pussies, you're the most obsessive ***** poster in
>>>>>this conspiracy forum. You're probably a lonely disgusting human being
>>>>>who jerks off to American Idol and other reality shows.
>>
>> =
>>
>>>>Speculate much?
>>
>> =
>>
>>>Dayum Vandy, what did you do to get the venom flowing your way?
>>>Make some comment about Paula Abdul?
>>
>>I called "Tom Sr" a puss...
>
> ...blab, blab. Blab, blab, blab-blab. Blab, blab-blab-blab-BLAB.
> Blab, blab-blab, blab!
>
> Oh, just DEAL with it, Vandar. You cannot accept the fact that every
> time you tried to insult me, I came back and proved you for the stupid
> fool you were.

No, *****. What you did was went after a kid, just like the
intellectually inferior ***** you claim you aren't.

 

[tomswiftsenior@gmail.com]

On May 31, 3:34 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> What you did was went after a kid, just like the
> intellectually inferior ***** you claim you aren't.

You are just ****ing thick, aren't you?

Read the **** what I wrote for a change, you ridiculous jerk.

I wrote "seemingly stupid kid" -- and the rest of what I wrote said
he was that way because he was ENCOURAGED by a stupid father (that is
YOU) to watch a extremely stupid TV series with his father (YOU again)
-- who has 1.700 posts to a.tv.a-i (a show you stated earlier
"sucked") -- who was ENCOURAGING the dumbing-down of his kid.

Ye gods, I pity your poor son, with such a fool for his father.

I was saying I felt sorry for your kid because he was being raised by
his father to be just one more of tens of millions made stupid by
watching and being encouraged and even supported by his ****ing idiot,
K00K father -- you, Vandar, you idiotic, moronic, imbecilic asshole.

In other words, Vandar, I was saying you are a really lousy parent.
But you were so ****ing dumb, you could understand that.

Go away, little man. Spend more time with your kid, doing things like
reading books to him that are slightly above his age level, so he
grows up with brains that haven't been turned to much by stupid shows
like "American Idol". Teach him some independence of intellect and
not just to become another AI couch potato.

But given the bad father he has, I think very sadly that won't be
happening.

Go way, you boring, stupid K00K. Go be a BETTER father to you son.
And spend more time talking with and teaching him than wasting your
time posting yet another 1,700 messages to the "American Idol"
newsgroup.

I consider you a lost cause as a human being.

As of now, Vandar, you are dead to me.

-Tom Sr.

 

[Tom Sr.]

On May 31, 3:34 pm, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote: --
> What you did was went after a kid, just like the
> intellectually inferior ***** you claim you aren't.

You are just ****ing thick, aren't you?

Go back and READ what the **** I wrote for a change, you ridiculous
jerk.

Gods in heavens, this entire, ongoing childish tantrum is because
you either did not actually read what I wrote -- or you lack the
reading compression to understand it!

I wrote "seemingly stupid kid" -- and the rest of what I wrote said
he was that way because he was ENCOURAGED by a stupid father (that is
YOU) to watch a extremely stupid TV series with his father (YOU
again)
-- who has 1.700 posts to a.tv.a-i (a show you stated earlier
"sucked") -- who was ENCOURAGING the dumbing-down of his kid.

Ye gods, I pity your poor son, with such a fool for his father.

I was saying I felt sorry for your kid because he was being raised by
his father to be just one more of tens of millions made stupid by
watching and being encouraged and even supported by his ****ing
idiot,
K00K father -- you, Vandar, you idiotic, moronic, imbecilic asshole.

In other words, Vandar, I was saying you are a really lousy parent.
But you were so ****ing dumb, you could not understand that.



Go away, little man. Spend more time with your kid, doing things
like
reading books to him that are slightly above his age level, so he
grows up with brains that haven't been turned to much by stupid shows
like "American Idol". Teach him some independence of intellect and
not just to become another AI couch potato.

But given the bad father he has, I think very sadly that won't be
happening.

Go way, you boring, stupid K00K. Go be a BETTER father to you son.
And spend more time talking with and teaching him than wasting your
time posting yet another 1,700 messages to the "American Idol"
newsgroup.

I consider you a lost cause as a human being.

As of now, Vandar, you are dead to me.

-Tom Sr.

 

[ctyguy]

"george" <gblack@hnpl.net> wrote in message
news:1180557867.093098.269080@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On May 31, 1:47 am, "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am in the 98th percentile with an IQ of 131. It places me in the
>> "Very Superior" classification. It also means, if I bothered to, I
>> could join Mensa.
>
> Riiiight.
> However if you really were as you claim you'd know that IQs
> are not reported as a definite number but rather over a range..
>
No, all IQ tests result in a number. The are other tests Mensa will accept,
i.e. GCT from the military, an example, but still is based on numbers.

You may be thinking of: "the only qualification for Mensa Membership is a
score at or above the 98th percentileof any of a number of standardized
intelligence tests", but still based on specific numbers.

 

[george]

On May 31, 11:28 am, "ctyguy" <cty...@hotcoolmail.com> wrote:
> "george" <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote in message
>
> news:1180557867.093098.269080@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...> On May 31, 1:47 am, "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I am in the 98th percentile with an IQ of 131. It places me in the
> >> "Very Superior" classification. It also means, if I bothered to, I
> >> could join Mensa.
>
> > Riiiight.
> > However if you really were as you claim you'd know that IQs
> > are not reported as a definite number but rather over a range..
>
> No, all IQ tests result in a number. The are other tests Mensa will accept,
> i.e. GCT from the military, an example, but still is based on numbers.
>
> You may be thinking of: "the only qualification for Mensa Membership is a
> score at or above the 98th percentileof any of a number of standardized
> intelligence tests", but still based on specific numbers.

In a word.
No!

 

[george]

On May 31, 11:28 am, "ctyguy" <cty...@hotcoolmail.com> wrote:


> No, all IQ tests result in a number. The are other tests Mensa will accept,
> i.e. GCT from the military, an example, but still is based on numbers.
>
> You may be thinking of: "the only qualification for Mensa Membership is a
> score at or above the 98th percentileof any of a number of standardized
> intelligence tests", but still based on specific numbers.

In a word.
No!

 

[george]

On May 31, 11:28 am, "ctyguy" <cty...@hotcoolmail.com> wrote:
> "george" <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote in message
>
> news:1180557867.093098.269080@z28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...> On May 31, 1:47 am, "Tom Sr." <tomswif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I am in the 98th percentile with an IQ of 131. It places me in the
> >> "Very Superior" classification. It also means, if I bothered to, I
> >> could join Mensa.
>
> > Riiiight.
> > However if you really were as you claim you'd know that IQs
> > are not reported as a definite number but rather over a range..
>
> No, all IQ tests result in a number. The are other tests Mensa will accept,
> i.e. GCT from the military, an example, but still is based on numbers.
>
> You may be thinking of: "the only qualification for Mensa Membership is a
> score at or above the 98th percentileof any of a number of standardized
> intelligence tests", but still based on specific numbers.

In a word.
No!