Back in the Dungeon -> Re: Big Eight hierarchy management transition

A

Aratzio

Guest
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>
>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>
>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>
>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>
>>>Already...?
>>>
>>><bounce>
>>>Send some
>>><bounce>
>>>more beer
>>><bounce>
>>>would you please...
>>><bounce>
>>>and some
>>><bounce>
>>>pretzels
>>><bounce>
>>
>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>
>/Me bows...

Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.

http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
# Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
# saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
of conspiracy and lying
# Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming

I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
properly.

Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
cowardly little wanker.

Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
Loop and that whiner saur.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
 
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
<a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>
>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>
>>>>Already...?
>>>>
>>>><bounce>
>>>>Send some
>>>><bounce>
>>>>more beer
>>>><bounce>
>>>>would you please...
>>>><bounce>
>>>>and some
>>>><bounce>
>>>>pretzels
>>>><bounce>
>>>
>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>
>>/Me bows...
>
>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>
>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>of conspiracy and lying
># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>
>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>properly.

Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
real world experience outside the ivory tower.

He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?

>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>cowardly little wanker.

I think we need to do something.

>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>Loop and that whiner saur.

Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...

Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.


--
Ak'toh'di
 
On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
<bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>
>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>Send some
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>more beer
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>would you please...
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>and some
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>pretzels
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>
>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>
>>>/Me bows...
>>
>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>
>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>of conspiracy and lying
>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>
>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>properly.
>
>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>
>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>
>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>cowardly little wanker.
>
>I think we need to do something.
>
>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>Loop and that whiner saur.
>
>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
>realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
>him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...
>
>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
>her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
>busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.

SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.

Flonk added.

Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.

<turns up volume>
HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
 
I will now respond to a post accessible as
news:7tnli21etd1a2jlakq90cmp7j0m8jt8lah@4ax.com by Aratzio
<a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>:

> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
> <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that
>>>>>>>>>>> includes you. I just wish that many of them could understand
>>>>>>>>>>> that it's possible to legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I
>>>>>>>>>> don't believe you (which is different from "you're lying.").
>>>>>>>>>> I mean, I believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't
>>>>>>>>>> believe the application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I
>>>>>>>>> don't think
>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really
>>>>>>>>> are willing to give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate
>>>>>>>>> disagreement.
>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of
>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's
>>>>>>>possible to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I
>>>>>>>don't know if that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your
>>>>>>>words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>
>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>
>>>>Already...?
>>>>
>>>><bounce>
>>>>Send some
>>>><bounce>
>>>>more beer
>>>><bounce>
>>>>would you please...
>>>><bounce>
>>>>and some
>>>><bounce>
>>>>pretzels
>>>><bounce>
>>>
>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>
>>/Me bows...
>
> Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>
> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
> # Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
> repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
> # saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
> of conspiracy and lying
> # Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>
> I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
> flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
> when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
> properly.
>
> Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
> cowardly little wanker.
>
> Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
> Loop and that whiner saur.

Hey! I want to be in Skirvin's little plonker lits. It looks fun.

--
Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
Grand Moff of Quelii Oversector
Administrator of Death Star VI
Former Planetary Governor of Selus
Master of Mindy (arf)

<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18
 
Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>, the painter of flag poles, affirmed:

> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
> <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>
>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>> <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>> <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>> <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>> <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>> tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that
>>>>>>>>>>> includes you. I just wish that many of them could
>>>>>>>>>>> understand that it's possible to legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I
>>>>>>>>>> don't believe you (which is different from "you're lying.").
>>>>>>>>>> I mean, I believe the principle you're espousing, but I
>>>>>>>>>> don't believe the application of it is actually extant in
>>>>>>>>>> any form.
>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I
>>>>>>>>> don't think that most of those that call themselves
>>>>>>>>> "detractors" really are willing to give us the benefit of
>>>>>>>>> acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of
>>>>>>> it is actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer
>>>>>>> to "it's possible to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear
>>>>>>> to me. I don't know if that's really what you meant, but I'll
>>>>>>> go by your words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>
>>>>> Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>
>>>> Already...?
>>>>
>>>> <bounce>
>>>> Send some
>>>> <bounce>
>>>> more beer
>>>> <bounce>
>>>> would you please...
>>>> <bounce>
>>>> and some
>>>> <bounce>
>>>> pretzels
>>>> <bounce>
>>>
>>> You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>
>> /Me bows...
>
> Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>
> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html

k0oKSITE!!!

> # Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
> repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
> # saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
> of conspiracy and lying
> # Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>
> I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
> flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
> when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
> properly.
>
> Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
> cowardly little wanker.
>
> Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
> Loop and that whiner saur.



--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005 and April 2006

"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion

Thou billowy-headed shoulder-clapper. Thou puking false-peer.
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:38:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
<grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> transparently proposed:

>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>news:7tnli21etd1a2jlakq90cmp7j0m8jt8lah@4ax.com by Aratzio
><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>:
>
>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>> <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that
>>>>>>>>>>>> includes you. I just wish that many of them could understand
>>>>>>>>>>>> that it's possible to legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't believe you (which is different from "you're lying.").
>>>>>>>>>>> I mean, I believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't
>>>>>>>>>>> believe the application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I
>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really
>>>>>>>>>> are willing to give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate
>>>>>>>>>> disagreement.
>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of
>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's
>>>>>>>>possible to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I
>>>>>>>>don't know if that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your
>>>>>>>>words.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>
>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>Send some
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>more beer
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>would you please...
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>and some
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>pretzels
>>>>><bounce>
>>>>
>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>
>>>/Me bows...
>>
>> Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>
>> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>> # Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>> repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>> # saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>> of conspiracy and lying
>> # Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>
>> I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>> flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>> when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>> properly.
>>
>> Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>> cowardly little wanker.
>>
>> Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>> Loop and that whiner saur.
>
>Hey! I want to be in Skirvin's little plonker lits. It looks fun.

Release the inner ****head and point out the unvarnished truth to
"TIMMAY! and the Rubber Stampers" (tm).

Here is a freebie, point out that soc.men.moderated is an utter
failure.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:44:19 +0000, Aratzio Has Frothed:

> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:56:34 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> transparently proposed:
>
>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>, the painter of flag poles, affirmed:
>
>>> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>
>>k0oKSITE!!!
>>
>>
> Hrmm, Looney Maroon kookish?

Looks like it to me. One has to be pretty "looney" to maintain a haet page
like that.

--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004

COOSN-266-06-25794
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>and some
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>
>>>>/Me bows...
>>>
>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>
>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>>of conspiracy and lying
>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>>
>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>properly.
>>
>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>
>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>
>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>
>>I think we need to do something.
>>
>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>>Loop and that whiner saur.
>>
>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
>>realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
>>him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...
>>
>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
>>her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
>>busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>
>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>
>Flonk added.
>
>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>
><turns up volume>
>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!

I thought Daev was in there permanent like.

Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
more.

Jade
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:40:59 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 05:38:36 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
><grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> transparently proposed:
>
>>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>>news:7tnli21etd1a2jlakq90cmp7j0m8jt8lah@4ax.com by Aratzio
>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>:
>>
>>> On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>> <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes you. I just wish that many of them could understand
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that it's possible to legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't believe you (which is different from "you're lying.").
>>>>>>>>>>>> I mean, I believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't think
>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really
>>>>>>>>>>> are willing to give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate
>>>>>>>>>>> disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of
>>>>>>>>> it is
>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's
>>>>>>>>>possible to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I
>>>>>>>>>don't know if that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your
>>>>>>>>>words.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>and some
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>
>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>
>>>>/Me bows...
>>>
>>> Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>
>>> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>> # Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>> repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>> # saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>> of conspiracy and lying
>>> # Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>>
>>> I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>> flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>> when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>> properly.
>>>
>>> Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>> cowardly little wanker.
>>>
>>> Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>> Loop and that whiner saur.
>>
>>Hey! I want to be in Skirvin's little plonker lits. It looks fun.
>
>Release the inner ****head and point out the unvarnished truth to
>"TIMMAY! and the Rubber Stampers" (tm).
>
>Here is a freebie, point out that soc.men.moderated is an utter
>failure.

Tim needs that pointed out to him?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

Jade
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:28 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk00ks.org>
wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>and some
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>>
>>>>>/Me bows...
>>>>
>>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>>>of conspiracy and lying
>>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>>>
>>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>>>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>>properly.
>>>
>>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>>
>>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>>
>>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>>
>>>I think we need to do something.
>>>
>>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>>>Loop and that whiner saur.
>>>
>>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
>>>realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
>>>him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...
>>>
>>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
>>>her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
>>>busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>>
>>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>>
>>Flonk added.
>>
>>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>>
>><turns up volume>
>>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!
>
>I thought Daev was in there permanent like.
>
>Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
>more.
>
>Jade

i got so under Skirges skin that hes permanently killfiled me, and he
didnt even want to admit it on his kooksite, killfile.org.

so under his skin that when i morphed 4 or 5 times over two days to
poke at jayne and him, he sent EIGHT netkkkoping emails to my NSP
demanding i be censured, cancelled, terminated.

i thought that was way, way funny.

--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"Quotes can't be forced. They just come to you, like diarrhea."
-Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:51:01 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local>
transparently proposed:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:44:19 +0000, Aratzio Has Frothed:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:56:34 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> transparently proposed:
>>
>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>, the painter of flag poles, affirmed:
>>
>>>> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>
>>>k0oKSITE!!!
>>>
>>>
>> Hrmm, Looney Maroon kookish?
>
>Looks like it to me. One has to be pretty "looney" to maintain a haet page
>like that.

(I was trying to be obtuse, I think KM meant the people on the page
were kooks)

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:28 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk00ks.org>
transparently proposed:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>and some
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>>
>>>>>/Me bows...
>>>>
>>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>>>of conspiracy and lying
>>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>>>
>>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>>>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>>properly.
>>>
>>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>>
>>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>>
>>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>>
>>>I think we need to do something.
>>>
>>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>>>Loop and that whiner saur.
>>>
>>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
>>>realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
>>>him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...
>>>
>>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
>>>her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
>>>busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>>
>>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>>
>>Flonk added.
>>
>>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>>
>><turns up volume>
>>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!
>
>I thought Daev was in there permanent like.
>
>Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
>more.
>
>Jade

They want to create news.groups.moderated

I blame us .


--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:34:54 -0400, dave hillstrom <dAvE@MeOw.oRg>
transparently proposed:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:28 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk00ks.org>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>and some
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>/Me bows...
>>>>>
>>>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>>>>of conspiracy and lying
>>>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>>>>
>>>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>>>>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>>>properly.
>>>>
>>>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>>>
>>>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>>>
>>>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>>>
>>>>I think we need to do something.
>>>>
>>>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>>>>Loop and that whiner saur.
>>>>
>>>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
>>>>realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
>>>>him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...
>>>>
>>>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
>>>>her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
>>>>busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>>>
>>>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>>>
>>>Flonk added.
>>>
>>>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>>>
>>><turns up volume>
>>>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!
>>
>>I thought Daev was in there permanent like.
>>
>>Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
>>more.
>>
>>Jade
>
>i got so under Skirges skin that hes permanently killfiled me, and he
>didnt even want to admit it on his kooksite, killfile.org.
>
>so under his skin that when i morphed 4 or 5 times over two days to
>poke at jayne and him, he sent EIGHT netkkkoping emails to my NSP
>demanding i be censured, cancelled, terminated.
>
>i thought that was way, way funny.

He is funny in that schoolmarmish manner he has. He just never quite
realizes how entertained by his antics we are.

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
 
I will now respond to a post accessible as
news:eggeit$gl1$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com by dave hillstrom
<dAvE@MeOw.oRg>:

> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:28 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk00ks.org>
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes you. I just wish that many of them could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand that it's possible to legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe you (which is different from "you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying."). I mean, I believe the principle you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espousing, but I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors"
>>>>>>>>>>>>> really are willing to give us the benefit of acknowledging
>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application
>>>>>>>>>>> of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to
>>>>>>>>>>>"it's possible to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear
>>>>>>>>>>>to me. I don't know if that's really what you meant, but
>>>>>>>>>>>I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>and some
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>/Me bows...
>>>>>
>>>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued
>>>>>accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling,
>>>>>flaming
>>>>>
>>>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like
>>>>>it when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>>>properly.
>>>>
>>>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>>>
>>>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>>>
>>>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>>>
>>>>I think we need to do something.
>>>>
>>>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke
>>>>>The Loop and that whiner saur.
>>>>
>>>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once
>>>>he realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to
>>>>get him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be
>>>>get...
>>>>
>>>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to
>>>>call her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and
>>>>she is busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>>>
>>>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>>>
>>>Flonk added.
>>>
>>>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>>>
>>><turns up volume>
>>>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!
>>
>>I thought Daev was in there permanent like.
>>
>>Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
>>more.
>>
>>Jade
>
> i got so under Skirges skin that hes permanently killfiled me, and he
> didnt even want to admit it on his kooksite, killfile.org.
>
> so under his skin that when i morphed 4 or 5 times over two days to
> poke at jayne and him, he sent EIGHT netkkkoping emails to my NSP
> demanding i be censured, cancelled, terminated.
>
> i thought that was way, way funny.

WHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA! What a DICK!

BTW, I like his PJR page:

"At heart, the problem is that Peter is upset because we created
soc.religion.asatru, which he thinks is a Neo-Nazi group. I think that
Jonathan's response still satisfies me - in short, Peter failed to show
anything of the sort during the discussion period, and really he still
hasn't. But he continues to use his impressions as a club."

Jackass Skirvin ----> T0RLL3D!

--
Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
Grand Moff of Quelii Oversector
Administrator of Death Star VI
Former Planetary Governor of Selus
Master of Mindy (arf)

<http://www.robertbuchanan.name/>
<http://www.simpy.com/user/rbuchanan>

Economic Left/Right: -0.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.18
 
Aratzio wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:51:01 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local>
> transparently proposed:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:44:19 +0000, Aratzio Has Frothed:
>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:56:34 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>> Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>, the painter of flag poles,
>>>> affirmed:
>>>
>>>>> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>>
>>>> k0oKSITE!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hrmm, Looney Maroon kookish?
>>
>> Looks like it to me. One has to be pretty "looney" to maintain a
>> haet page like that.
>
> (I was trying to be obtuse, I think KM meant the people on the page
> were kooks)

Well, it may be KMonster meant that also ;) but there's no denying that
Tim appears to have slipped the bonds of sanity.

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Ph
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:50:44 +0000, Aratzio Has Frothed:

> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 10:51:01 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local>
> transparently proposed:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:44:19 +0000, Aratzio Has Frothed:
>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:56:34 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <****-you.ya.****@kiss-my-big-black-ass.com> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>, the painter of flag poles,
>>>>affirmed:
>>>
>>>>> http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>>
>>>>k0oKSITE!!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Hrmm, Looney Maroon kookish?
>>
>>Looks like it to me. One has to be pretty "looney" to maintain a haet
>>page like that.
>
> (I was trying to be obtuse, I think KM meant the people on the page were
> kooks)

BWAAAAAA ok

--
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004

COOSN-266-06-25794
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:11:34 GMT, Grand Moff Robert Buchanan
<grandmoff@deathstar.galacticempire> wrote:

>I will now respond to a post accessible as
>news:eggeit$gl1$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com by dave hillstrom
><dAvE@MeOw.oRg>:
>
>> On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:28 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk00ks.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> includes you. I just wish that many of them could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand that it's possible to legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't believe you (which is different from "you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lying."). I mean, I believe the principle you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> espousing, but I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really are willing to give us the benefit of acknowledging
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application
>>>>>>>>>>>> of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to
>>>>>>>>>>>>"it's possible to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear
>>>>>>>>>>>>to me. I don't know if that's really what you meant, but
>>>>>>>>>>>>I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>and some
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>/Me bows...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued
>>>>>>accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling,
>>>>>>flaming
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like
>>>>>>it when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>>>>properly.
>>>>>
>>>>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>>>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>>>>
>>>>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>>>>
>>>>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think we need to do something.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke
>>>>>>The Loop and that whiner saur.
>>>>>
>>>>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once
>>>>>he realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>>>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to
>>>>>get him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be
>>>>>get...
>>>>>
>>>>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to
>>>>>call her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and
>>>>>she is busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>>>>
>>>>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>>>>
>>>>Flonk added.
>>>>
>>>>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>>>>
>>>><turns up volume>
>>>>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!
>>>
>>>I thought Daev was in there permanent like.
>>>
>>>Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
>>>more.
>>>
>>>Jade
>>
>> i got so under Skirges skin that hes permanently killfiled me, and he
>> didnt even want to admit it on his kooksite, killfile.org.
>>
>> so under his skin that when i morphed 4 or 5 times over two days to
>> poke at jayne and him, he sent EIGHT netkkkoping emails to my NSP
>> demanding i be censured, cancelled, terminated.
>>
>> i thought that was way, way funny.
>
>WHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA! What a DICK!
>
>BTW, I like his PJR page:
>
>"At heart, the problem is that Peter is upset because we created
>soc.religion.asatru, which he thinks is a Neo-Nazi group. I think that
>Jonathan's response still satisfies me - in short, Peter failed to show
>anything of the sort during the discussion period, and really he still
>hasn't. But he continues to use his impressions as a club."
>
>Jackass Skirvin ----> T0RLL3D!

pambo the jackson whale has NOTHING on skirvin, except shes louder and
more obvious in her kookings.

--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"Quotes can't be forced. They just come to you, like diarrhea."
-Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:54:45 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:34:54 -0400, dave hillstrom <dAvE@MeOw.oRg>
>transparently proposed:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:28 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk00ks.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>and some
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>/Me bows...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>>>>>of conspiracy and lying
>>>>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>>>>>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>>>>properly.
>>>>>
>>>>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>>>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>>>>
>>>>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>>>>
>>>>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think we need to do something.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>>>>>Loop and that whiner saur.
>>>>>
>>>>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
>>>>>realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>>>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
>>>>>him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...
>>>>>
>>>>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
>>>>>her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
>>>>>busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>>>>
>>>>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>>>>
>>>>Flonk added.
>>>>
>>>>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>>>>
>>>><turns up volume>
>>>>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!
>>>
>>>I thought Daev was in there permanent like.
>>>
>>>Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
>>>more.
>>>
>>>Jade
>>
>>i got so under Skirges skin that hes permanently killfiled me, and he
>>didnt even want to admit it on his kooksite, killfile.org.
>>
>>so under his skin that when i morphed 4 or 5 times over two days to
>>poke at jayne and him, he sent EIGHT netkkkoping emails to my NSP
>>demanding i be censured, cancelled, terminated.
>>
>>i thought that was way, way funny.
>
>He is funny in that schoolmarmish manner he has. He just never quite
>realizes how entertained by his antics we are.

see, that cluelessness is all part of his kookhood. im thinking he
must have sustained cranial trauma just before he was crowned chairman
of the b8mb. or possibly the crown was the blunt instrument what did
the damage.

--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"Quotes can't be forced. They just come to you, like diarrhea."
-Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4
 
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:51:02 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:20:28 -0400, Daedalus <jade@netk00ks.org>
>transparently proposed:
>
>>On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:09:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:00:45 -0700, Bob Officer
>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:50:53 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:25:51 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:20:09 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:43:12 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:24:54 GMT, in news.groups, Aratzio
>>>>>>>><a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Mon, 09 Oct 2006 04:25:38 -0700, Bob Officer
>>>>>>>>><bobofficers@127.0.0.7> transparently proposed:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 21:14:42 -0500, in news.groups,
>>>>>>>>>>tskirvin@killfile.org (Tim Skirvin) wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Brian Mailman <bmailman@sfo.invalid> writes:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Our detractors are not always wrong, Brian, and that includes you. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just wish that many of them could understand that it's possible to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> legitimately disagree.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could feel all warm and fuzzy now, but I can't. I don't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe you (which is different from "you're lying."). I mean, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe the principle you're espousing, but I don't believe the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application of it is actually extant in any form.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I, unfortunately, agree with what you're saying. I don't think
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that most of those that call themselves "detractors" really are willing to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> give us the benefit of acknowledging legitimate disagreement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Which again, is the reverse of what I wrote.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not, actually. "I don't believe the application of it is
>>>>>>>>>>>actually extant in any form", where "it" seems to refer to "it's possible
>>>>>>>>>>>to legitimately disagree", seems pretty clear to me. I don't know if
>>>>>>>>>>>that's really what you meant, but I'll go by your words.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>What you are proposing is inane...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>It is the same thing as fighting a war, for peace...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Why are you responding to Tim? You are back in the killfile.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Already...?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>Send some
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>more beer
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>would you please...
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>and some
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>>pretzels
>>>>>>>><bounce>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You are the first triple (or Tripel).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>/Me bows...
>>>>>
>>>>>Yep, you got 85 days, I got 82 days.
>>>>>
>>>>>http://www.killfile.org/dungeon/why/news.groups.html
>>>>># Bob Officer - 06 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (85 days) - namecalling,
>>>>>repetition, flaming, continued accusations of conspiracy and lying
>>>>># saur - 08 Oct 2006 - 07 Nov 2006 (30 days) - continued accusations
>>>>>of conspiracy and lying
>>>>># Aratzio - 09 Oct 2006 - 31 Dec 2006 (82 days) - namecalling, flaming
>>>>>
>>>>>I have it on good authority (not just my own, HEY ARI) I am not a
>>>>>flamer. So TIMMAY has only half right. I guess TIMMAY does not like it
>>>>>when I point out his hypocrisy and his inability to attribute
>>>>>properly.
>>>>
>>>>Timmay is just an immature little child, too bad he didn't get some
>>>>real world experience outside the ivory tower.
>>>>
>>>>He never did figure out why he wasn't liked in the dorm, did he?
>>>>
>>>>>Shall we roast, err, toast TIMMAY on the New Year for being such a
>>>>>cowardly little wanker.
>>>>
>>>>I think we need to do something.
>>>>
>>>>>Have to drag Sharon & PJR back in, besides you and me it just Nuke The
>>>>>Loop and that whiner saur.
>>>>
>>>>Saur is a fair cribbage player, and is funny and interesting, once he
>>>>realized you are ignoring him when he starts whining.
>>>>Nuke-loopy just sits in the corner and worries everyone is out to get
>>>>him... If you try talking to him, he thinks you are out to be get...
>>>>
>>>>Sharon doesn't read this group on a daily basis. I still have to call
>>>>her on that other matter... I just haven't had the time, and she is
>>>>busy trying to get ready her garden area for winter.
>>>
>>>SharonB was just over in the flonk playing whack The Hatter.
>>>
>>>Flonk added.
>>>
>>>Hey, maybe DAEV wants in on the lastest round of killfiling.
>>>
>>><turns up volume>
>>>HEY DAEV, TIMMAY IS KILLFILING!
>>
>>I thought Daev was in there permanent like.
>>
>>Timmay the prig wouldn't put me in last time so I'm not playing any
>>more.
>>
>>Jade
>
>They want to create news.groups.moderated

you have GOT to be kidding me.

dont these Very Knowledgable People in the B8MB know how to use
killfiles? are they succumbing to the soc.men disorder?

who started the idea, anyway?

>I blame us .

well, yeah. HAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA


my prediction: if ngm is created, 4 weeks later bowtie will crack the
mod keys and all moderation around usenet will then fall in another 6
weeks. yay!!

--
Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
"Quotes can't be forced. They just come to you, like diarrhea."
-Dave Hillstrom mhm15x4
 

Similar threads

A
Re: Lilly Munster Sings!
Replies
2
Views
136
Bob Officer
B
D
Re: Big Eight hierarchy management transition
Replies
1
Views
22
Aratzio
A
A
Re: Nomination: Pierre Sallinger HL&S: Russ Allberry & The Big 8 Management Board
Replies
18
Views
146
Aratzio
A
?
Re: RFD: soc.web.blog.livejournal
Replies
10
Views
30
-
?
A
Re: Nomination: CotM - Tim Skirvin Chairman of the B8MB
Replies
7
Views
110
Dave Balderstone
D
Back
Top