Clinton News Network-Utube Charade of a GOP Debate

MioMyo wrote:
> <mordacpreventor@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:333f9c62-d7ae-4645-ade9-0950c6903775@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Nov 29, 6:53 pm, "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote:
>>> I suppose liberals will opine that it's fair for liberals to ask
>>> question at
>>> a democrat utube debate while it's also fair to have dems ask
>>> questions at a
>>> Republican debate.
>>>
>>> That obviously makes perfect sense to the DailyKos crowd.
>>>
>>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7099.html
>>>
>>> The retired general who quizzed Republican presidential candidates
>>> about gays and lesbians in the military was not the only person
>>> linked to a Democratic presidential candidate who got to ask a
>>> question at Wednesday's
>>> CNN/YouTube debate.
>>>
>>> CNN also aired questions from supporters of Democratic candidates
>>> John Edwards and Barack Obama.
>>>
>>> And that's fine by the network, which is standing by its question
>>> selection
>>> process and lashing out at critics who say the debate demonstrated
>>> CNN's liberal bias.

>>
>>
>> If they can't face Democrat's questions how can they face Bin Laden?

>
> They did, you ****-ass and they did so just fine. But that's not the
> point and you know it since the dems received snowman and
> diamond/pearl softball questions & you know butt-wipe. The point is,
> since it went way over your head was the primaries, and said
> Republican debates are for Republicans to decide, not for dems &
> their crony Liberal Media cohorts to stage a mockery production.
>
> I notice you conveniently avoided my CHALLENGE to have Conservatives
> ask your wimpy candidates rhetorical got-cha questions which speaks
> volumes of their inability to deal with the tyrants around the globe!


The debate was a disaster for
these Republican candidates.

Not one of them will be able
to unite the Republican party

So what will be the party line?

Simply tune in to Limbo.

The party line is: Attack CNN!

By the way, who do you think was the winner?
 
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:yO34j.20988$K27.2455@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> MioMyo wrote:
>> <mordacpreventor@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:333f9c62-d7ae-4645-ade9-0950c6903775@a35g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Nov 29, 6:53 pm, "MioMyo" <USA_Patr...@Somewhere.com> wrote:
>>>> I suppose liberals will opine that it's fair for liberals to ask
>>>> question at
>>>> a democrat utube debate while it's also fair to have dems ask
>>>> questions at a
>>>> Republican debate.
>>>>
>>>> That obviously makes perfect sense to the DailyKos crowd.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1107/7099.html
>>>>
>>>> The retired general who quizzed Republican presidential candidates
>>>> about gays and lesbians in the military was not the only person
>>>> linked to a Democratic presidential candidate who got to ask a
>>>> question at Wednesday's
>>>> CNN/YouTube debate.
>>>>
>>>> CNN also aired questions from supporters of Democratic candidates
>>>> John Edwards and Barack Obama.
>>>>
>>>> And that's fine by the network, which is standing by its question
>>>> selection
>>>> process and lashing out at critics who say the debate demonstrated
>>>> CNN's liberal bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> If they can't face Democrat's questions how can they face Bin Laden?

>>
>> They did, you ****-ass and they did so just fine. But that's not the
>> point and you know it since the dems received snowman and
>> diamond/pearl softball questions & you know butt-wipe. The point is,
>> since it went way over your head was the primaries, and said
>> Republican debates are for Republicans to decide, not for dems &
>> their crony Liberal Media cohorts to stage a mockery production.
>>
>> I notice you conveniently avoided my CHALLENGE to have Conservatives
>> ask your wimpy candidates rhetorical got-cha questions which speaks
>> volumes of their inability to deal with the tyrants around the globe!

>
> The debate was a disaster for
> these Republican candidates.
>
> Not one of them will be able
> to unite the Republican party


I'm sure that was the intent of the Clinton News Network!

> So what will be the party line?
>
> Simply tune in to Limbo
> The party line is: Attack CNN!


Whose Liberal Partisan Bias is now undeniably obvious!


> By the way, who do you think was the winner?
>
 
"MioMyo" <USA_unpatriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:MES3j.4689$4q5.2306@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> "SyLieVa11" <robhorine711@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:fioiuq$tc5$1@news.albasani.net...
> >
> > "dum E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote in message
> > news:5r9miqF13en5bU1@mid.individual.net...
> >>
> >> "MioMyo" <USA_unpatriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
> >> news:MWK3j.21626$4V6.9087@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net...
> >>>I suppose liberals will opine that it's fair for liberals to ask

question
> >>>at a democrat utube debate while it's also fair to have dems ask
> >>>questions at a Republican debate.
> >>>
> >>> That obviously makes perfect sense to the DailyKos crowd.


> >> Notice how all the libloons are ashamed to respond to you post.

> >
> > I know, their silence speaks loud and clear.
> >
> > They need a day or two to find new talking points.

>
> The drum beat has already started with, "well we agree that there should
> have been disclosure, but the questions were all fair game and should be
> answered for the American people to make informed decisions."


This kind of rightarded nonsense is why you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons
can't win elections.
 
"SyLieVa11" <robhorine711@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fip2iv$4b0$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> "MioMyo" <USA_unpatriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
> news:MES3j.4689$4q5.2306@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
> >
> > The drum beat has already started with, "well we agree that there should
> > have been disclosure, but the questions were all fair game and should be
> > answered for the American people to make informed decisions."

>
> you and I both know it's bullshit! This was meant for the Clinton News
> Network to embarass the Republicans, they coulda find out these people ID,
> and I'm gonna say THEY DID KNOW!!
>
> Fact is that this was a republican debate for undecided republican voters,
> not meant for dems.
>
> I hope this debacale puts the youtube debate format like a broken horse on
> the racetrack, shot between the eyes.


This kind of rightarded nonsense is why you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons
can't win elections.
 
"MioMyo" <USA_unpatriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:VqU3j.2605$NY.785@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...
>
> "SyLieVa11" <robhorine711@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:fip2iv$4b0$1@news.albasani.net...
> >
> > "MioMyo" <USA_unpatriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
> > news:MES3j.4689$4q5.2306@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
> >>
> >> The drum beat has already started with, "well we agree that there

should
> >> have been disclosure, but the questions were all fair game and should

be
> >> answered for the American people to make informed decisions."

> >
> > you and I both know it's bullshit! This was meant for the Clinton

News
> > Network to embarass the Republicans, they coulda find out these people

ID,
> > and I'm gonna say THEY DID KNOW!!
> >
> > Fact is that this was a republican debate for undecided republican

voters,
> > not meant for dems.
> >
> > I hope this debacale puts the youtube debate format like a broken horse

on
> > the racetrack, shot between the eyes.

>
>
> As a turn of fair-play, I'd like to see the dems do a utube self-anointing
> production debate allowing Rush Limbaugh, Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity and
> other Conservative partisans ask the questions, not that they ever would.
> Still, the upside is, at least Republicans can face the rhetorical left's
> fire.
>
> Notably the left is too chicken-**** and couldn't deal with even doing a

Fox
> News format. Makes one wonder, what would any of the dem candidates would

do
> when dealing with Putin, Hugo or OBL, **** their pants and give in to any
> lop-sided negotiation deal they might demand?


This kind of rightarded nonsense is why you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons
can't win elections.
 
"SyLieVa11" <robhorine711@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fipt3g$7ap$1@news.albasani.net...

> Faggot, bloggers found out their political and campaign affilations within

a
> hour. Keep on being in the tank for the Clinton News Network, all you
> have left are you far left kooks that will support and watch CNN.


This kind of rightarded nonsense is why you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons
can't win elections.
 
"SyLieVa11" <robhorine711@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:fipt4n$7cn$1@news.albasani.net...

> and the nazi youth leader speaks.


So you admit that all of you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons are nothing but
a bunch of rightarded racist bigots.
 
"MioMyo" <USA_unpatriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:hn34j.66369$RX.43311@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...

> They did, you ****-ass and they did so just fine. But that's not the point
> and you know it since the dems received snowman and diamond/pearl softball
> questions & you know butt-wipe. The point is, since it went way over your
> head was the primaries, and said Republican debates are for Republicans to
> decide, not for dems & their crony Liberal Media cohorts to stage a

mockery
> production.
>
> I notice you conveniently avoided my CHALLENGE to have Conservatives ask
> your wimpy candidates rhetorical got-cha questions which speaks volumes of
> their inability to deal with the tyrants around the globe!


This kind of rightarded nonsense is why you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons
can't win elections.
 
"MioMyo" <USA_unpatriot@Somewhere.com> wrote in message
news:E%34j.4574$AR7.445@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com...

> I'm sure that was the intent of the Clinton News Network!
>
> Whose Liberal Partisan Bias is now undeniably obvious!


This kind of rightarded nonsense is why you KKKrooKKKed lying repugnigoons
can't win elections.
 
Back
Top