DHS issued report on extremism despite concerns

Old Salt

New member
Wasnt' it something like 64 for Obama and 62 McCain?
What was the percentage of the popular vote? Of course, popular vote doesn't mean **** - it's the Electoral College that counts. This is what keeps California and New York from naming the President at the expense of the more sparsely populated (but just as important) states.
 

ImWithStupid

New member
What was the percentage of the popular vote? Of course, popular vote doesn't mean **** - it's the Electoral College that counts. This is what keeps California and New York from naming the President at the expense of the more sparsely populated (but just as important) states.
And that's why the Democrats want to get rid of the electoral college.

One party rule forever.

 

ImWithStupid

New member
Look at this. Aww, so cute. President Obama is naming his first political prisoner...

FBI's newest 'Most Wanted' terrorist is American
By DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writer Devlin Barrett, Associated Press Writer ? Tue Apr 21, 2:50 pm ET

WASHINGTON ? A fugitive animal rights activist believed to be hiding outside the United States has become the first domestic terror suspect named to the FBI's list of "Most Wanted" terrorists.

Daniel Andreas San Diego, a 31-year-old computer specialist from Berkeley, Calif., is wanted for the 2003 bombings of two corporate offices in California.

Authorities say San Diego has unusual tattoos, including one that shows a burning field and proclaims, "It only takes a spark."

FBI Assistant Director Michael Heimbach announced San Diego's addition to its "Most Wanted" terrorists list at a press conference Tuesday.
FBI's newest 'Most Wanted' terrorist is American

Translation: "Our polling shows that Americans are ****** about the DHS report so we'll put a left-wing guy, who we haven't heard from since 2003 on the FBI top 10 list to make it look good". :eek:

 

ImWithStupid

New member
OK eddo. This isn't funny anymore. You need to take this dumb ***** back to Arizona so she doesn't ruin the entire country.

Janet Napolitano said what?

By Michelle Malkin ? April 21, 2009 08:59 AM

She said this on CNN over the weekend:

KING: A lot of Democrats in Congress want to you investigate [Joe Arpaio]. They think he is over the line. He says he is just enforcing the law and the problem is the federal government.

NAPOLITANO: Well, you know, Sheriff Joe, he is being very political in that statement, because he knows that there aren?t enough law enforcement officers, courtrooms or jail cells in the world to do what he is saying.

What we have to do is target the real evil-doers in this business, the employers who consistently hire illegal labor, the human traffickers who are exploiting human misery.

And yes, when we find illegal workers, yes, appropriate action, some of which is criminal, most of that is civil, because crossing the border is not a crime per se. It is civil. But anyway, going after those as well.

Full transcript here.

Julie Kirchner gently reminds the DHS Secretary of what the law actually says:

ENTRY WITHOUT INSPECTION IS A CRIME: In fact, pursuant to
http://trac.syr.edu/laws/08/08USC01325.html8 U.S.C. 1325
http://trac.syr.edu/laws/08/08USC01325.html, crossing the border illegally is a crime?a misdemeanor for the first offense and a felony for the second and subsequent offenses. But of course, ignoring or mischaracterizing the law is a very convenient way for those in power to avoid the laws they find most inconvenient. Sadly, statements such as these are also a signal that Americans will have to wait a long time before their government articulates any credible immigration enforcement policy.

Jena McNeill at The Foundry sees through Napolitano?s parsing:

This ?interpretation? of the law by Secretary Napolitano seems to be the latest in an effort by the Obama Administration to scale back interior immigration enforcement efforts in the United States. As recently as March 28th, Napolitano made the decision to delay a series of immigration raids and other workplace actions aimed at finding illegal workers. At the same time, both President Obama and Secretary Napolitano have announced new initiatives intending to send the message that they take the issues at the southern border seriously. But the Administration cannot fight cartels while ignoring illegal immigration?people smuggling is part of the problem, not a separate issue. Legalization will only make matters worse. Granting the people here illegally asylum will only encourage more illegal border crossing. Likewise, failing to enforce workplace and immigration laws will only encourage more to ignore the law.
Michelle Malkin Janet Napolitano said what?
 

RoyalOrleans

New member
In 2006, as governor, Janet from another planet ordered additional National Guard troops down to the Arizona / Mexico border to stop the influx of illegal immigration. (Article: Governor OKs more troops for AZ border) Sending more troops, though a step in the right direction, was a band-aid on a dire and very real problem in the United States.

She says that we are not at war with Mexico. To the contrary we are, in a sense, at war with Mexico.

We're being invaded. Economically, that is, and the legal American worker is footing the bill.

Janet makes great strides to comply with the current administration's socialist agenda. I bet you, dollars to fukken doughnuts, that if McCain were in the White House, she would lean towards securing the border with a more adamant solution.

 

eddo

New member
Janet makes great strides to comply with the current administration's socialist agenda. I bet you, dollars to fukken doughnuts, that if McCain were in the White House, she would lean towards securing the border with a more adamant solution.
I dunno, McCain went pretty soft on border issues during the campaign.

 

ImWithStupid

New member
Is Napolitano just a complete idiot?

RCMP chief laments 9/11 'myths' about Canada

Tonda MacCharles

Ottawa bureau

OTTAWA ? It's "unfortunate" the top official in charge of American's homeland security wrongly suggested the 9/11 terrorists came from Canada, says Bill Elliott, commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

"My initial reaction frankly is I was a little bit surprised and somewhat disappointed that the secretary isn't better informed," Elliott told the Star, just before he was to testify at a parliamentary committee.

Elliott was responding to suggestions by Janet Napolitano, U.S. Secretary for Homeland Security, who commented in a CBC interview that the U.S. is concerned that "to the extent that terrorists have come into our country or suspected or known terrorists have entered our country across a border, it's been across the Canadian border. There are real issues there."

Asked if she was referring to the 9/11 perpetrators, which have been shown by an American commission to have entered the U.S. legally on visas ? mostly from Saudi Arabia, not Canada, Napolitano said: "Uh, not just those but others as well."
TheStar.com | Canada | RCMP chief laments 9/11 'myths' about Canada
 

eddo

New member
Ohhhh.... I completely vehemently, with a fukken passion, fukken concur. Janet Napolitano is Obama's worst cabinet appointment!
points and laughs, in best Nelson impression HA HA!

No you know why I was happy to get rid of her.

 

ImWithStupid

New member
Found in a Canadian newspaper article titled "The Border For Dummies"...

Can someone please tell us how U. S. Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano got her job? She appears to be about as knowledgeable about border issues as a late-night radio call-in yahoo.
The border for dummies

I wish I could tell you, but I can't figure it out myself. :(

 

RoyalOrleans

New member
No you know why I was happy to get rid of her.
No I don't know why you are happy to get rid of her? Sleep with her, eddo? Did you fall in love?

Please don't tell me she faked a diarrhea story and bolted for the exit! Please don't.

 

RoyalOrleans

New member
Can you believe that our Director of Homeland Security .. and the former Governor of Arizona ... didn't know this?

(a) Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts Any alien who

(1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or

(2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or

(3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
What a fukken moonbat!

 

snafu

New member
Can you believe that our Director of Homeland Security .. and the former Governor of Arizona ... didn't know this?


What a fukken moonbat!
Moonbat or ing that has agendas and reads what she wants to?

 

eddo

New member
No I don't know why you are happy to get rid of her? Sleep with her, eddo? Did you fall in love?
Please don't tell me she faked a diarrhea story and bolted for the exit! Please don't.
no, uhhh, that's not what happened at all...

...

...

....

dammit...

 
Top Bottom