W
WF Peifer
Guest
"Daniel" <sabot120mm@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1171400610.465495.294160@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT YOU WON THE ELECTION!!!
> >
> > > I can still give my opinion, jerk.
> >
> > It's the very fact that the Democrats won that election that insures
that we
> > are ALL still entitled to our own opinions . . . a right that was in
> > jeopardy until the elections removed many of the legislators who
supported
> > Emperor Dumbya, and his "my way or the highway" approach to governing.
He
> > no longer gets a rubber-stamp from Congress when he tries to play "The
> > Decider". Other opinions and alternate points of view are once again
> > allowed.
>
> Wow, talk about reading something into nothing.
Hardly "nothing". SyVyN11 stated that he/she was entitled to his/her own
opinion. I simply pointed out that the very right to have an opinion of
ones own had been threatened, but that the election of November of 2006
restored the "checks and balances" in our government, thus removing much of
that threat.
Right-wingers, in general, are adamant about the fact that they have a right
to form their own opinions, and then opine that the world would be better
off if nobody EXCEPT them had that right, often calling or wishing for that
right to be rescinded when it comes to opinions that don't coincide with
theirs. SyVyN11 is a classic example of such a person.
news:1171400610.465495.294160@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > > IT DOESN'T MATTER THAT YOU WON THE ELECTION!!!
> >
> > > I can still give my opinion, jerk.
> >
> > It's the very fact that the Democrats won that election that insures
that we
> > are ALL still entitled to our own opinions . . . a right that was in
> > jeopardy until the elections removed many of the legislators who
supported
> > Emperor Dumbya, and his "my way or the highway" approach to governing.
He
> > no longer gets a rubber-stamp from Congress when he tries to play "The
> > Decider". Other opinions and alternate points of view are once again
> > allowed.
>
> Wow, talk about reading something into nothing.
Hardly "nothing". SyVyN11 stated that he/she was entitled to his/her own
opinion. I simply pointed out that the very right to have an opinion of
ones own had been threatened, but that the election of November of 2006
restored the "checks and balances" in our government, thus removing much of
that threat.
Right-wingers, in general, are adamant about the fact that they have a right
to form their own opinions, and then opine that the world would be better
off if nobody EXCEPT them had that right, often calling or wishing for that
right to be rescinded when it comes to opinions that don't coincide with
theirs. SyVyN11 is a classic example of such a person.