timesjoke
Active Members
So you made one attempt, failed, and now what are you doing? Licking your wounds and feeling "safe" sucking on the teat?I'm not "way, way too old" to be living at home, dipshit. I moved out when I turned 18 and lived out of my parents' house for about a year and a half or so.
Mind you, it's really not your place to judge my life, and it had nothing to do with the debate.
Do you plan to try again or just keep playing it safe with mommy and daddy?
So yu tried and failed and gave up......you never figured out how to live on your own, this is my point, all you did was get out there, run out of money, and run home to the boobie.You assume I mismanaged my finances. I was working a different job and didn't have the finances. Again, not your place to judge, Times.
Now if you had got a second job, moved to a less expensive place, got a roomy, or figured out how to reduce some bills, then you would have learned something, but all you learned was how to give up and run back to the tittie.
Reality? The policy of not responding to a fire unless the address is registered as paying their $75 is cut and dry. You are the idiot trying to make up **** that is not there, not me.About the "value of life thing", you're still ignoring reality. There was nobody in the building, so you have no point. You're making things up to help your argument. As it turns out, "made-up sh t" isn't valid evidence to support your cause.
The fire department's decision to let the home burn was "incredibly irresponsible," said the president of an association representing firefighters.
"Professional, career firefighters shouldn’t be forced to check a list before running out the door to see which homeowners have paid up," Harold Schaitberger, International Association of Fire Fighters president, said in a statement. "They get in their trucks and go."
I'm not making anything up, it is their policy that dispatch will not pass a call through to the fire department if the address is not on their list of who has paid for fire services. I am talking about the policy, you are the guy trying to make **** up to try and paint the Government in a better light because you believe in and worship government as always right, I don't.I'm trying to make sh t up? Neither of us know their policy on rescuing people from fires. You're insinuating they would let people die.
Let's go back to the quote I used to again make the best point:
The fire department's decision to let the home burn was "incredibly irresponsible," said the president of an association representing firefighters.
"Professional, career firefighters shouldn’t be forced to check a list before running out the door to see which homeowners have paid up," Harold Schaitberger, International Association of Fire Fighters president, said in a statement. "They get in their trucks and go."
I want fire fighters to be firefighters and buracrats to be buracrats.
Public safety is one place we should not be picking and choosing who to help in times of emergencies....IMHO.