Gladiatorial Punishment

Humchuckninny

New member
so Orleans, are you implying that the only three types of people are the insane, the weak and the National Socialists. No, that's not meant as a question. You are implying that. Nice try.

Because we're not ******* bushmen
I like your line of reasoning. When you grow some ***** and some brains, come back with some real arguments, and maybe I'll consider replying to them.

 

RoyalOrleans

New member
Nice try.
Nice try?

I'm not the one wanting to implement gladiatorial battles for the sake of justice. If you want to support a type of punishment that would continue to send our nation's ethics and moral standards down the *******, go ahead. Me? I'll support more civil actions.

Besides, one of your gladiators might get seriously hurt and have to live off of our tax dollar until he heals up enough to fight another day. Sounds like a waste of time and my money. ******' fucktard.

 
I like your line of reasoning. When you grow some ***** and some brains, come back with some real arguments, and maybe I'll consider replying to them.

Yep. Being against gladitoral tournaments for the sake of justice and human sacrifice and all that other **** shows a lack of brains. Bringing us back to the dark ages is such a smart idea.

 

Humchuckninny

New member
To: Orleans - I didn't mean that as an insult. I repsect your intelligence, as you legitimately argue (even though this last one was on the harsh side, it's cool because I can see how I provoked it. Sorry bro, I didn't mean to, it was all in good fun).

However, "Komrade," you offer no line of reasoning. It's one thing to say "yeah that's a ****** idea" and another thing to say "yeah that's a ****** idea BECAUSE..." it wasn't being against it that showed a lack of brains - Orleans is against it and I think he's pretty smart. It was the idea that myself and others have already addressed the ideas you've brought up - so address THEM and introduce NEW arguments into the thread! :p

 
Top Bottom