GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE

  • Thread starter Dr. Jai Maharaj
  • Start date
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:V-6dnRSXG-NAOTranZ2dnUVZ_uednZ2d@comcast.com...
> And you're named Kerry.
>
> Folks hoping for a girl?


And you are still a dumb ****

http://www.babynamenetwork.com/baby_names/detail.cfm?name=Kerry&gender=Male
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Kerry
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kerry_(name)
http://www.babiesonline.com/babynames/index.asp?name=Kerry


> "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
> news:47a78996$0$25055$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>> robw, the top posting retard wrote:
>>
>> > Not what you inferred before there.

>>
>> I've always inferred that you were a retard.
>> >
>> >
>> > "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
>> > news:47a77fd7$0$25048$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>> >
>> >>robw wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>My right was taken away.....when?
>> >>
>> >>Your right to maintain a brain,, the day after your birth!
>> >
>> >
>> >

>
>
 
robw the top posting retard wrote:

> Talk to Lou's Pawn Shop and get back to me.


Why?

If they broke the law, then they should be shut down.
You have a problem with that?
 
robw the top posting retard wrote:

> Let's see, I sell 120 guns to illegal buyers.


Why would you do that?
Federal laws "prevent" that... don't they?

The more you spew your imaginary thoughts, the more you PROVE how much
of a jackasss you are.

Stop watching TV!
 
robw, the top post retard wrote:

> Thank you, you asshole because if the anti-gun ever does win it will be
> because of morons like you.
> "I want!"
>
> Yeah, meanwhile,the NRA tells us oh so how much they want responsible gun
> owners.
>
> You;re liars.
>
> You want to be able to buy guns and screw the consequences.
>
> You;re such a f cing fraud.


Thanks for PROVING just how stupid you have become.
 
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1_Sdnfb2e5qWODranZ2dnUVZ_oOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Post it.
> Post when I said that.
>
> Bring it.


From: "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 15:49:48 -0500

Limit the sale of hand guns to one a month.

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.indian/msg/339cf4b0a5d607d9?dmode=source

Proof presented.


> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:pdMpj.2659$xE.1355@trnddc01...
>>
>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:zvidnaygLpbGzzranZ2dnUVZ_gqdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> > Not true.

>>
>> Really? So you aren't asking that EVERYONE be limited to purchasing only

> one
>> gun a month?
>>
>> Odd, I seem to recall someone using your handle making that assertion.
>>
>>
>> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9A3A6E194264CSandman@216.196.97.136...
>> >> Magus <nope@noway.net> wrote in news:Zfwpj.65706$Mu4.23945
>> >> @bignews7.bellsouth.net:
>> >>
>> >> > RD (The Sandman) wrote:
>> >> >> "harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in
>> >> >> news:47a5fe4b$0$4049$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a gun,

> he
>> >> >>> would not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life
>> >> >>> lvoing productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax

> cuts
>> >> >>> possible that gun nuts on the other hands so love to have.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I would bet that his possession of a firearm was illegal. Wanna
>> >> >> bet?
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd even be willing to bet that he was a convicted felon too.
>> >> >
>> >> > Illegal for him to own a firearm.
>> >> > Illegal for him to possess a firearm.
>> >> > Illegal for him to use a firearm anywhere, let alone in Chicago and
>> >> that
>> >> > mall.
>> >> >
>> >> > Murder is also illegal, that didn't stop him five instances.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Exactly, but all these anti gunners want to take guns from the folks

> who
>> >> didn't do it.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> RD (The Sandman)
>> >>
>> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
>> >> to terrorism is much, much worse
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>
 
robw the top posting retard wrote:

> You;re not going to change my mind.


That's the beauty of it all!
YOU don't have a working mind to change.
 
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:NeednXtd6_S9ODranZ2dnUVZ_q2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> You're not changing my mind.


Let it never be said that facts can change your mind.


> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:M%Lpj.46127$K%.22349@trnddc04...
>>
>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:h4SdnY8oBZ4izzranZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> > That is absolutely not true.
>> >
>> > Check out the law that was proposed in Philly.

>>
>> Which only proves RD's point.
>>
>>
>> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9A3A6DCC5192BSandman@216.196.97.136...
>> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
>> >> news:kIadnf_wgohZ9DvanZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com:
>> >>
>> >> > If the gun was illegal it's only more **** to smear in your face.
>> >>
>> >> Not at all. I am as much against illegal possession of a firearm as

> you
>> >> should be. However, all the attempts of your ilk to pass gun control

> is
>> >> directed at the honest citizen not assholes like the one in Lane

> Bryant.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> RD (The Sandman)
>> >>
>> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
>> >> to terrorism is much, much worse
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>
 
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:UsadnX_R8obKOzranZ2dnUVZ_oudnZ2d@comcast.com...
> 50 yards.
>
> You want a gun or a knife to make the kill?


How about a nice crossbow. Silent, Deadly, and all but impossible to trace.

Oh, that's right we're suppose to assume that criminals would be limited to
your fantasy limitation of choices.


> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:gfMpj.6905$M71.4141@trnddc08...
>>
>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:s-2dnWlsdeLl7DranZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@comcast.com...
>> > My thinking is that if the guy didn't have access to the gun he
>> > probably
>> > wouldn't have shot and killed people.

>>
>> Perhaps, but the issue is, would they still be alive, or would he simply
>> have killed them and possibly more by another means.
>>
>> Are you worried about saving lives, or just making sure they don't use

> guns?
>>
>>
>> > "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
>> > news:47a766e1$0$25018$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>> >> robw, the top postin retard wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Smiling that this is another gun event that we'll stuff down your
>> > throat?
>> >>
>> >> it wasn't a "gun event", you mental midget.
>> >> It was a MURDER EVENT.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Yeah asshole, you keep smiling.
>> >>
>> >> I just smiled at your ignorance of what happened.
>> >>
>> >> YOU LAUGHED just because a gun was used by a retard like you, not
>> >> because innocent UNARMED PEOPLE were murdered.
>> >>
>> >> YOU still don't care, or understand.
>> >> :(
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>
 
robw, the top posting retard wrote:

> And you're named Kerry.
>
> Folks hoping for a girl?


BWAAAAHAHAHAHAAAAA!

Wow! Sharp as a sack of wet mice, eh?

You make Nancy Luft look brilliant!
 
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:24ednZ278INVOjranZ2dnUVZ_hudnZ2d@comcast.com...
> People who are collectors.


Which isn't everyone. Hence everyone else, almost all of whom are NOT
criminals shall be restricted because of your vain attempt to regulate
illegal guns. As if criminals are going to obey the law.

> Who sell them? Asshole.


Criminals.

> Make a living that way, asshole???


Sure, they make money selling illegal drugs, and they also make money
selling illegal guns. Oddly, the term "Black Market" was coined to express
the fact that criminals can buy stuff which the law says isn't allowed.
Weird. Criminals find ways to get what they want even if it's illegal.

> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:z_Mpj.2749$xE.1784@trnddc01...
>>
>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:2pKdnakv2-DxBTranZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> > The proposal wouldn't have effected collectors.

>>
>> Really? Every lawful citizen is a gun collector?
>>
>> If not, then you have yet to address the point made.
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Your next point ?

>>
>>
>> That you couldn't address the point about Philly, a topic you brought to

> the
>> table, BTW.
>>
>> > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
>> > news:l0Mpj.46128$K%.20160@trnddc04...
>> >>
>> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> >> news:TYSdnR5SR9CkzzranZ2dnUVZ_rWdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> >> > Im "get it" that morons like you have no regard for limiting illegal
>> > guns.
>> >>
>> >> How? By limiting legal guns like was proposed in Philly?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in
>> >> > message
>> >> > news:Xns9A3A6DEEB9FC1Sandman@216.196.97.136...
>> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
>> >> >> news:9-idnZPN-aPEHjvanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > I'm not opposed to guns.
>> >> >> > I'm opposed to illegal guns.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So are we opposed to illegal possession of guns. Do you get it
>> >> >> now,
>> >> >> asshole?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> RD (The Sandman)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
>> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>
 
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KqKdncSXBeVvOjranZ2dnUVZ_tidnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Oh, you live in the sticks?


Currently. I like it better. Fewer assholes like you.


> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:e2Npj.17272$hF2.2949@trnddc02...
>>
>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:kpqdnfNprPrEBzranZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> > wanna come up to Philly and I'll buy a drink with that 8k????

>>
>> I doubt he wants a drink of sewer water.
>>
>>
>> > "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
>> > news:47a78ae2$0$25036$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>> >> robw, thr top[ posting retard wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > If I legally buy 60 guns a month and sell them to criminals.....and

> now
>> > I
>> >> > can only buy one gun a month...
>> >>
>> >> That would be a federal crime, you jackass.
>> >> Have you EVER paid attention?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Ya' wanna buy stock in my company?????
>> >>
>> >> You aren't smart enough to own a company.
>> >> Hells bells!
>> >>
>> >> You also lied when you said you won 8k on the Superbowl.
>> >>
>> >> Your so full of ****, you make your brown eye blue!
>> >>
>> >
>> >

>>
>>

>
>
 
"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:WNydne8sVKMELzranZ2dnUVZ_jednZ2d@comcast.com...
>I don't waver,


You are always stupid.

> "KerryHatch" <OingoBoingo@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
> news:47a7a739$0$25040$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>> robw wrote:
>>
>> > The proposal wouldn't have effected collectors.
>> >
>> > Your next point ?

>>
>> What is your "proposal" again?
>>
>> Oh yeah..eleminate/Disinvent all guns.

>
>
 
"harmony" <aka@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:47a5fe4b$0$4049$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net:

> if guns were illegal in public places, and he did not have a gun, he
> would not have ben able to kill so many wonderful, taxpaying, life lvoing
> productive innocent citizens who would have made the tax cuts possible
> that gun nuts on the other hands so love to have.
>
>
><usenet@mantra.com and/or www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)> wrote in
> message news:20080202ZYzQG5qmvDfpr4fEP63k57A@ZUoU3...
>> Five women killed in Chicago-area store shooting
>>
>> By John Gress
>> Reuters
>> Saturday, February 2, 2008
>>
>> Tinley Park, Illinois (Reuters) - Five women were shot and
>> killed inside a clothing store at a suburban Chicago
>> shopping center on Saturday in what police said appeared to
>> be a robbery.
>>
>> Police were searching for a lone gunman spotted outside the
>> store by a witness, but said they had not identified him.
>>
>> The victims were all found in the back of the Lane Bryant
>> women's clothing store in an area not frequented by
>> customers, Tinley Park Police Sgt. T.J. Grady told reporters.
>>
>> It appeared to be a robbery that "went rather poorly," he added.
>>
>> Grady declined to say whether the victims were customers or
>> employees of the store, located at the Brookside
>> Marketplace shopping center in a southwestern suburb of
>> Chicago.
>>
>> Police said they received a call at 10:44 a.m. CST
>> reporting multiple gunshot victims inside the store.
>>
>> The suspect had fled and they issued an alert for a man
>> wearing black jeans, a black waist-length winter coat and a
>> black knit cap, police said.
>>
>> (Additional reporting by Michael Conlon and Chris Stebbins;
>> Editing by Eric Beech)
>>
>> More at:
>> http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0244670020080203
>>
>> Jai Maharaj
>> http://tinyurl.com/24fq83
>> http://www.mantra.com/jai
>> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
>> Om Shanti
>>
>> Hindu Holocaust Museum
>> http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
>>
>> Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy http://www.hindu.org
>> http://www.hindunet.org
>>
>> The truth about Islam and Muslims
>> http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
>>
>> DISCLAIMER AND CONDITIONS
>>
>> o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
>> educational
>> purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may
>> not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion
>> of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the
>> exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
>> o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
>> considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
>> current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
>> o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
>> are
>> not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the
>> article.
>>
>> FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use
>> of which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the
>> copyright owner. This material is being made available in efforts to
>> advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights,
>> economic, democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It
>> is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted
>> material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In
>> accordance with Title
>> 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
>> profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
>> included information for research, comment, discussion and educational
>> purposes by subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For
>> more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
>> If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes
>> of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from
>> the copyright owner.

>
>
>


Axes? Knives? Bombs? Gasoline bomb? Do you ever read a newspaper?

Frank
 
robw wrote:
> The one gun question.....
>
> Let's see..... I'm a legal buyer who sells the guns to criminals.
>


Hypothesis accepted. However, what you're describing is NOT a "straw"
sale/purchase.

> Thugs, as you all so "with it" morons like to refer it to.
>


Does it make you feel superior to denigrate others?

Why do you feel the need to play the insult card? Because I'm
questioning your preconceptions?

> If I'm buying 30 guns a month and selling them at 30 bucks [ profit ] I'm making 900
> bucks a month.
> (you following this?)
>


Seemingly much better than you are.

> If I can only buy one handgun a month my profits kinda go down.
>
> Any questions?
>


So the felon working the straw-purchase scheme recruits more people to
buy guns for him, increasing the number of criminals and amount of crime.

>
>
>
>
> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> news:s1Mpj.91016$L%6.45696@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>> robw wrote:
>>> So what is your definition and you might want to pas it along to Lou of
>>> Lou's pawn Shop [ Lou's Loans ] who got closed for such sales.
>>>

>> Someone gives you the money and you buy a gun for them is a straw
>> purchase. Doesn't matter if it's one gun or several.
>>
>> In a straw-purchase scheme, a felon, barred by law from buying guns,
>> recruits someone who can legally buy guns. The intermediary fills out
>> forms, passes a background check, purchases the guns, then gives them to
>> the felon, who uses them to commit crimes or illegally resells them for
>> a big profit.
>>
>> Lou's Loans lost its license because of a multitude of violations of
>> federal gun laws, some of those violations were straw
>> sales/purchases--also there were illegal purchases and selling multiple
>> guns to a person without notifying the ATF in violation of the Federal
>> Multiple Handgun Reporting program.
>>
>> How does one gun a month eliminate "straw purchases"?
>>
>>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
>>> news:ToLpj.90999$L%6.70175@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>>>> robw wrote:
>>>>> Well, let's see.......
>>>>>
>>>>> If a legal purchaser buys many guns a month and sells them to people

> who
>>> are
>>>>> not legal to own.......vs. that same person only being able to buy one
>>> gun a
>>>>> month?
>>>>>
>>>> That is not, by definition, a straw sale.
>>>>
>>>> Back to the original situation and question, how does 'one gun a month'
>>>> prevent straw buys?
>>>>
>>>>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:J3Lpj.90990$L%6.70634@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>>>>>> robw wrote:
>>>>>>> Limit the sale of hand guns to one a month.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> How exactly does this prevent straw purchases?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The final recipient of the gun is not the one buying it from the
>>> dealer.
>>>>>> Also, currently there is a Federal Multiple Handgun Reporting

> program.
>>>>>> Current federal law requires dealers to report to ATF any "multiple
>>>>>> sales" of two or more handguns that occur within five consecutive
>>>>>> business days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And before you even start, this would not include people with
>>>>> collector's
>>>>>>> licenses.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a current requirement to obtain a "collector's license"? Or
>>>>>> would this be a new requirement?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:dmKpj.60271$k27.3858@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>>>>>>>> robw wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Eliminating straw buys would be a great start.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Straw buys are currently illegal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you propose to eliminate them?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:bEJpj.90928$L%6.33472@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>>>>>>>>>> robw wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> If you want a legal carry law in Chicago, knock yourself out.
>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to legally own a million guns, so be it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I just want illegal guns reduced to nothing.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How do you suggest that be accomplished?
>>>

>
>
 
robw wrote:
> Do the math and get back to me.
>


Math? What math?

Straw sales are illegal behavior, you advocate a law that doesn't
address 'straw' sales/purchases.



>
> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> news:zfMpj.91023$L%6.28591@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>> robw wrote:
>>> If I legally buy 60 guns a month and sell them to criminals.....and now

> I
>>> can only buy one gun a month...
>>>

>> Which is not "straw" sales. It is a violation of federal law--dealing in
>> firearms without a license though and as such is already illegal.
>>
>> And if those 60 guns are handguns, then those sales also get reported to
>> the ATF in accordance with current federal law.
>>
>>
>>> Ya' wanna buy stock in my company?????
>>>

>> I have no desire to participate in your conspiracy to violate federal
>> firearms laws.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
>>> news:_wLpj.91004$L%6.53375@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
>>>> RD (The Sandman) wrote:
>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:ZdOdnRpL9
>>>>> _P65zranZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Limit the sale of hand guns to one a month.
>>>>> And will eliminate straw purchases....how????
>>>>>
>>>> It won't.
>>>>
>>>> If you read his reply to me when I asked nearly the identical question,
>>>> he states "If a legal purchaser buys many guns a month and sells them

> to
>>>> people who are not legal to own.......vs. that same person only being
>>>> able to buy one gun a month?"
>>>>
>>>> What he describes is not "straw sales" nor "straw buys".
>>>

>
>
 
robw wrote:
> Let's see, I sell 120 guns to illegal buyers.
>


And each instance of you doing so is a felony.

> Now I can only sell one.
>


No, now you can only buy one from a FFL dealer.

> You investing?????
>
>
> "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:s3Npj.84358$ds2.38614@trnddc05...
>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:v-SdnYIoNbMQBzranZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Do the math and get back to me.

>> Ok, You engage in 120 federal felonies every month. The state passes a

> minor
>> law and suddenly you change your ways, seek God, and now only commit 2
>> federal felonies each month.
>>
>> Right, and pigs fly.
>>
>>

>
>
 
And we want to limit those buys.


"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:ZpOpj.6633$qI.4194@trnddc03...
>
> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:Te-dnXVI-pRyPzranZ2dnUVZ_uydnZ2d@comcast.com...
> > There is no such thing as legal buyers selling to criminals????

>
> Nope, it's a crime.
>
> > Why don't you ask Lou's Pawnshop in Philly.

>
> Yea, and I note he's in jail.
>
> > Get back to me, won't ya'???

>
> Don't have to get back to you. It's a federal crime to engage in staw

sales,
> or to purchase a gun with the intent of transfering it to a prohibited
> person.
>
> Hence there are no legal buyers of guns for sell to criminals.
>
>
> > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> > news:T0Npj.6613$qI.164@trnddc03...
> >>
> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >> news:m-Gdna1FPsD7BDranZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> > The one gun question.....
> >> >
> >> > Let's see..... I'm a legal buyer who sells the guns to criminals.
> >>
> >> Sorry, but there is no such thing.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thugs, as you all so "with it" morons like to refer it to.
> >> >
> >> > If I'm buying 30 guns a month and selling them at 30 bucks I'm making

> > 900
> >> > bucks a month.
> >> > (you following this?)
> >> >
> >> > If I can only buy one handgun a month my profits kinda go down.
> >>
> >> I see, so you are willing to engage in federal crimes which for each
> >> purchase/sale carries a mandatory minimum of 10 years in the federal

pen,
> >> and you think some piddly ass state statute is suddenly going to matter
> >> to
> >> you? I thought you were a criminal who didn't care about the law? So

why
> > are
> >> you suggesting that you would suddenly start obeying this particular

law
> >> when you've already ignored all the others. For that matter why would

any
> >> other criminal?
> >>
> >>

> >
> >

>
>
 
Not at all.


"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:pqOpj.84243$U12.68735@trnddc06...
>
> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:hr6dnQc-pL2GPjranZ2dnUVZ_qCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> > Talk to Lou's Pawn Shop and get back to me.

>
> So it's your contention that Lou's Pawn Shop represents every resident of
> Philly?
>
> How did all those people manage to fit into that little bitty building?
>
>
> > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> > news:I1Npj.46139$K%.27628@trnddc04...
> >>
> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >> news:dpKdnbObuusmBDranZ2dnUVZ_tOdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> > No. In Philly the people buying the guns are selling them to the
> >> > criminals.
> >>
> >> Proof please that eveyone who buys a gun in Philly is engaged in straw
> >> sales.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > you don't live in a major city, do you?
> >>
> >> I have, and still didnt' see what you blindly assert.
> >>
> >> > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:U9Mpj.19896$Ou1.19084@trnddc07...
> >> >>
> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:aPGdnX5Qx_BHHDranZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> >> > Well, let's see.......
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If a legal purchaser buys many guns a month and sells them to

people
> >> >> > who
> >> >> > are
> >> >> > not legal to own.......vs. that same person only being able to buy

> > one
> >> > gun
> >> >> > a
> >> >> > month?
> >> >>
> >> >> Then you have eliminated a major indicator to the ATF that an
> >> > investigation
> >> >> may be called for. Further, as occured here, what simply happened is

> > you
> >> > had
> >> >> fleets of people buying guns turning them over to this middleman who

> > then
> >> >> sold them to the criminals. End result as far as criminal access to

> > guns?
> >> >> Zip, Nada, Nothing, Zilch, Zero. The ATF, however, now find it a lot
> >> > harder
> >> >> to indentify and track such strawsales since they now generate no

> > special
> >> >> paperwork as occured before.
> >> >>
> >> >> I will simply note that your 'solution' involves restricting legal

> > guns.
> >> >> Something you said you weren't interested in.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:J3Lpj.90990$L%6.70634@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> >> >> >> robw wrote:
> >> >> >> > Limit the sale of hand guns to one a month.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> How exactly does this prevent straw purchases?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The final recipient of the gun is not the one buying it from the
> >> > dealer.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Also, currently there is a Federal Multiple Handgun Reporting

> > program.
> >> >> >> Current federal law requires dealers to report to ATF any

"multiple
> >> >> >> sales" of two or more handguns that occur within five consecutive
> >> >> >> business days.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > And before you even start, this would not include people with
> >> >> > collector's
> >> >> >> > licenses.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Is there a current requirement to obtain a "collector's license"?
> >> >> >> Or
> >> >> >> would this be a new requirement?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >> > news:dmKpj.60271$k27.3858@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
> >> >> >> >> robw wrote:
> >> >> >> >>> Eliminating straw buys would be a great start.
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >> Straw buys are currently illegal.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> How do you propose to eliminate them?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >>> news:bEJpj.90928$L%6.33472@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> >> >> >> >>>> robw wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>> If you want a legal carry law in Chicago, knock yourself

out.
> >> >> >> >>>>> If you want to legally own a million guns, so be it.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> I just want illegal guns reduced to nothing.
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>> You?
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> How do you suggest that be accomplished?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>

> >
> >

>
>
 
Where am I going to get the guns if I'm limited to one a month?


"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:CrOpj.84289$U12.53993@trnddc06...
>
> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:DqidnWVjs4nrPjranZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> > Let's see, I sell 120 guns to illegal buyers.
> >
> > Now I can only sell one.

>
> Really? You're going to suddenly start obeying the law you have been
> ignoring because I pass a new law?
>
> You must be a rather stupid criminal.
>
> > You investing?????
> >
> >
> > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> > news:s3Npj.84358$ds2.38614@trnddc05...
> >>
> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >> news:v-SdnYIoNbMQBzranZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> > Do the math and get back to me.
> >>
> >> Ok, You engage in 120 federal felonies every month. The state passes a

> > minor
> >> law and suddenly you change your ways, seek God, and now only commit 2
> >> federal felonies each month.
> >>
> >> Right, and pigs fly.
> >>
> >>

> >
> >

>
>
 
When?


"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
news:MrOpj.84299$U12.34469@trnddc06...
>
> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:UbednWtJ0rcXPjranZ2dnUVZ_radnZ2d@comcast.com...
> > Did I say I was a criminal???

>
> Yes.
>
>
>
> > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> > news:_5Npj.46140$K%.45823@trnddc04...
> >>
> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >> news:Rc-dnZ16iIVfBzranZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> > Where have I ever said I was a criminal?
> >>
> >> "sell them to criminals"
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> > "Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:ClMpj.6414$qI.4566@trnddc03...
> >> >>
> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >> >> news:b9mdnbZRr8VmGjranZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> >> > If I legally buy 60 guns a month and sell them to

criminals.....and
> > now
> >> > I
> >> >> > can only buy one gun a month...
> >> >>
> >> >> Sorry, but how exactly does this law mean you can only buy 1 gun a

> > month?
> >> > I
> >> >> thought you were a criminal and not constrained to obeying the law,

or
> >> >> did
> >> > I
> >> >> misunderstand you?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:_wLpj.91004$L%6.53375@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> >> >> >> RD (The Sandman) wrote:
> >> >> >> > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in news:ZdOdnRpL9
> >> >> >> > _P65zranZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Limit the sale of hand guns to one a month.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > And will eliminate straw purchases....how????
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It won't.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If you read his reply to me when I asked nearly the identical
> >> >> >> question,
> >> >> >> he states "If a legal purchaser buys many guns a month and sells

> > them
> >> > to
> >> >> >> people who are not legal to own.......vs. that same person only

> > being
> >> >> >> able to buy one gun a month?"
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> What he describes is not "straw sales" nor "straw buys".
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>

> >
> >

>
>
 
Back
Top