Harriet Miers...George Bush's Never Ending Stupidity ****** Me Off

Cogito Ergo Sum

New member
Harriet Miers... What the ****!?! :eek:

Going from bad to worse, G.W. has now announced his nomination of Harriet Miers, his former personal lawyer and close personal friend, and his choice to replace Sandra Day O'Conner on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Has he completely lost his mind? I'm so sick of this idiot I just can't stand it anymore.

What are Mrs. Miers qualifications for a Supreme Court nomination?

SHE DOESN'T HAVE ANY!

She has never served as a judge...ANYWHERE!

Not even in traffic court!

WHAT A JOKE!

I hope that both Republicans and Democrats strike down this blatantly *** kissing return the favors nomination.

G.W., sit down, shut up, get some help from people who know something about judges and then please pick a reputable judge, with a long and respected track history; someone who has published opinions on the application of law so at least that way we would have some idea of what they are thinking. Surely there is a worthy judge somewhere!

****, I'm totally surprised that he didn't nominate some ******* from Halliburton!

What a ******* joke this idiot is! :mad:

 

daisypapaya

New member
That's for sure. This load of **** is just more Bu(ll)sh cronyism. If you're friends with Bush, you've got a job. It's so stupid. Bush is an idiot! He doesn't even read newspapers! The man is sheltered from reality by his wealth and stupidity. I've volunteered with kids who had severe mental retardation as part of my graduation requirement and they show more intelligence than this imbecile!
 

TheJenn88

New member
-pretends to give CES rep-

You've said it well enough, I agree. Maybe he's doing this for political impression reasons? Like, "ooh, I'm nominating a woman just to make myself look good, but i won't even bank on her getting put as a judge." that could be a tactic he's playing on. It's not like it hasn't been done before.

Oh, what am I evven saying. It's not like I'm a political strategist.

 
-pretends to give CES rep-
You've said it well enough, I agree. Maybe he's doing this for political impression reasons? Like, "ooh, I'm nominating a woman just to make myself look good, but i won't even bank on her getting put as a judge." that could be a tactic he's playing on. It's not like it hasn't been done before.

Oh, what am I evven saying. It's not like I'm a political strategist.
That is EXACTLY what I was thinking! He's going to stick an unqualified woman in the hot seat and make the dems look like a bunch of mesoginistic ******** and she'll get eliminated, the political flak will be so bad that he can usher in any ultra-conservative judge (not that that's a bad thing, mind you) he wants and the dems will have to confirm him/her. W is not nearly as dumb as everyone thinks!
 

snafu

New member
I honestly think he dose.

I stand by my statement that I think time will prove that he is one of the best presidents we've ever had.

 
I honestly think he dose. I stand by my statement that I think time will prove that he is one of the best presidents we've ever had.
You know, being president today is a lot being president during the civil war. Half the people in the US are willing to forget all about the islamic terrorists and believe we should stick our collective heads back in the sand (and are getting meaner about as we speak) and the other half wnat to extract all the revenge we can out of anyone who has even seen Osama Bin Laden. The diametrically opposed views are getting uglier and and uglier. Kudos to G.W. Bush for being able to handle it as well as he has.

 

Cogito Ergo Sum

New member
CES, as soon as your done hittin' on that crack pipe, maybe you can explain Bush's motivation.
The crack pipe smoking is by the gentlemen who posted their approval of Miers...Not me!

Explain his motiviation? Uh, cronyism...plain and simple. Did you really not see this?

The most hysterical aspect of this whole fiasco is his public claim that she is the most qualified candidate...

What a joke!

Patricia Owens is far more qualified than Harriet Miers. This is a fact.

 

Cogito Ergo Sum

New member
Well thank *** because this moronic ***** has bowed out! Mind you, not because of her desire to protect the Executive Branch as she claims (how trite), but because she didn't stand a chance at getting confirmed, especially with the significant Conservative Republican Senators whom didn't like her. Bye Bye H.M.! George Bush and his cronyism can lick my *****!
 

fullauto

New member
CES can lick MY *****!

I respect your opinions and regard you as a very fair man... USUALLY...

But I constantly find you on the same side of any argument... namely... what ever side Bush is NOT on!

You don't see how this blind adherence to ANYTHING can be dangerous?! Muslim's blind adherence to Sharia... Xtian blind adherence to the bible?! Even Bush's blind adherence to his own foreign policy!

I generally like Mr Bush... His heart is in the right place even when his brain and body take too many vacations... He's got the right idea, most of the time... Problem is, he's too much of an idealist... But I like him... Heart is where it's at...

But just because I like Him doesn't mean I can't question certain aspects of his ideals, or even AGREE WITH THE OTHER SIDE JUST TO SPITE HIM!

Christ... You don't see how Hypocritical that is!?

I will agree with you, on principal, that She was a BAD CHOICE... She might have been the ******* Messiah of Judges, but she didn't have a ******'s chance at the loan office of getting a clean nomination... Besides, you're right... She was never a judge... That's a little suspect!

See how it works... Just because I like Mr Bush, and most of his policies, doesn't mean that I have to pull the party lever on every single thing that happens! Nor do I have to call him stupid, blood-thirsty, war-monger, or any other name that Anti-Bush simps call him simply to bolster the fact that you don't like him...

Don't let your like or dislike of him cloud your judgement of his actions... I think Clinton was a fine president, and respect him for his ability to ride an economic wave as long as he did in an attempt to finally balance the fricken budget... I hated his foreign policy, but never resorted to calling him names... I hated all the republicans also for beating that blow-job deal into a frenzy, when it had nothing to do with the job he was doing, But I didn't give Mr Clinton a blank check to act however he wanted based on the fact that I disagreed with his enemies!

Think of it this way... in the early 80's, the US support a little known group of Islamic 'freedom fighters' called the Mujaheddin, and the Taliban simply because they were fighting an enemy of ours... Now who are we fighting?

All you anti-Bush people need to reassess where your loyalties are... Love for America is Patriotic, Not love for who ever isn't Bush!

 

Cogito Ergo Sum

New member
CES can lick MY *****!
I respect your opinions and regard you as a very fair man... USUALLY...

But I constantly find you on the same side of any argument... namely... what ever side Bush is NOT on!

You don't see how this blind adherence to ANYTHING can be dangerous?! Muslim's blind adherence to Sharia... Xtian blind adherence to the bible?! Even Bush's blind adherence to his own foreign policy!

I generally like Mr Bush... His heart is in the right place even when his brain and body take too many vacations... He's got the right idea, most of the time... Problem is, he's too much of an idealist... But I like him... Heart is where it's at...

But just because I like Him doesn't mean I can't question certain aspects of his ideals, or even AGREE WITH THE OTHER SIDE JUST TO SPITE HIM!

Christ... You don't see how Hypocritical that is!?

I will agree with you, on principal, that She was a BAD CHOICE... She might have been the ******* Messiah of Judges, but she didn't have a ******'s chance at the loan office of getting a clean nomination... Besides, you're right... She was never a judge... That's a little suspect!

See how it works... Just because I like Mr Bush, and most of his policies, doesn't mean that I have to pull the party lever on every single thing that happens! Nor do I have to call him stupid, blood-thirsty, war-monger, or any other name that Anti-Bush simps call him simply to bolster the fact that you don't like him...

Don't let your like or dislike of him cloud your judgement of his actions... I think Clinton was a fine president, and respect him for his ability to ride an economic wave as long as he did in an attempt to finally balance the fricken budget... I hated his foreign policy, but never resorted to calling him names... I hated all the republicans also for beating that blow-job deal into a frenzy, when it had nothing to do with the job he was doing, But I didn't give Mr Clinton a blank check to act however he wanted based on the fact that I disagreed with his enemies!

Think of it this way... in the early 80's, the US support a little known group of Islamic 'freedom fighters' called the Mujaheddin, and the Taliban simply because they were fighting an enemy of ours... Now who are we fighting?

All you anti-Bush people need to reassess where your loyalties are... Love for America is Patriotic, Not love for who ever isn't Bush!
I would lick your ***** except that you have none. You are speaking out of your *** on this one.

Furthermore, your assumptions about me are just plain WRONG; Nothing more.

I voted for our current President, twice. I believed in the Republican ideas, not Bush's ideas. I don't vote for politicians based upon what THEY think, I vote for them based upon their CLAIMS that they will represent and defend the IDEAS which I support.

The only Republican ideas I support are less government, lower taxes, less bureaucratic bullshit, limited foreign expenditures both financially and militarily, and a strong domestic military establishment. Bush has done NOTHING to foster any of this. In fact, he's done everything the opposite and got wrapped up in the whack job religious right prayer this and that bullshit and anti gay (legalized discrimination) rhetoric. Can you offer any examples to the contrary?

I supported his ideas he campaigned on and the platform of the Republican Party, not the bullshit actions he has effected since he was sworn in. Nobody in their right mind could claim that G.W. Bush follows Republican Party tenants. Quite the opposite.

F.Y.I. I don't disagree with everything about the man, that is simply untrue. I do however, speak loud and clear about that which I find fault in him with, and unfortunately, he has done quite little to praise him about.

I challenge you to list his "accomplishments" as President. He has next to none and nobody is more saddened by this than I.

AS to Harriet Miers, she was quite simply unqualified for the position, and there are far more dedicated and distinguished judges who DESERVE an appointment to the Supreme Court. That was just cronyism and EVERYBODY knew it, especially Meirs herself. She never had a chance.

I hate to burst your bubble, but she gave up because she lacked support more on the RIGHT of the aisle, than on the LEFT.

I'm also sick and tired of the distortion and propaganda of the so called "activist judges". There is no such thing, and in fact, more republican judges have acted in ways contrary to how Mr. Bush thinks they should than any democratic judge ever could. Don't think so, go look at

http://www.lambdalegal.org/cgi-bin/iowa/documents/record2.html?record=1451

and

http://www.lambdalegal.org/cgi-bin/iowa/documents/record2.html?record=1450

then we can talk some more about this if you wish.

You are the brainwashed one if you actually believe that to disagree with the President and his stupid policies, somehow qualifies as Un-American or Un-Patrioic! :eek:

Nothing could be further from the truth.

 
Top Bottom