My problem with the way that American's - not all but enough to cause a stink, deal with Islam is that they really make it seem as though we have something to proove.
Everyone, everything, every group, every country, etc. have something to prove. Prove it already and go on!
Yes, what was done and is being done by terrorist groups is a horible thing... But
I am really sick of the appologists, I'm sick of the
but attached to every single logical observation made about that pig-**** religion. The religion itself calls for the murder of appostates. It teaches hate, death and destruction. So...
but noithing! It's high time the pig-**** religion was irradicated already.
lets not be two faced about it.
Two faced? Like the one face of islam in constant jihad against the west and anything else non-islamic, and thge other face telling us it's really peaceful?
The United States has been war mongering for a long time before the 9-11 attacks or any of the attrocities commited.
Blanket statements are superfulous. Back up your rhetoric with some facts, even oppinions must be based on some kind of fact.
and If you need examples, just look at our history. A ****** past that is full of prejudice, pretentiousnous, lies, theft, and welll... War Mongering.
So we should just lay down and die? What kind of nincompoop are you?
Druing World War Two Japan bombed Pearl Harbour right? A military base. What was the reaction of the U.S.? We bombed thier civilians.
Bombing civilians was nessessary in WWII. They (the civilians) were very much part of the war machine in Japan, the US, England, Germany, Italy and Russia. The allies bombed the living **** out of all the industrial complexes it possibly could, killing many, many civilians. This is military science 101, "Destroying the enemy's ability to make war." That is about the stupidest example I have ever seen.
Now, while I am sure as glad as everyone else that ti ended the war...
somehow, I doubt this statement. You seem to be one of those retarded liberals that believe the US should have saccrificed 1 million plus US servicemen invading the Japanease mainland rather than killl 160,000 japanease civilians with atomic bombs (even though at the time, they were enemy combatants... face it, as long as you are building the war machine, you are a combatant!)
Lets look at it rationally.
I also doubt you can look at anything rationally...
How much power do We as Americans have over the military decisions of our government?
None! and thank *** for it, by the time a crucial decision got out of committe (especially with a bleeding heart idiot like you on it) the war would be lost ages ago.
How much power did the Japanese public have?
War is ****, but I'm not going to lay down my life or liberty because I'm worried about an enemy combatant! **** for that matter, The japanease soldiers had zero say in the military decisions of Japan... Should we have just thrown down our arms because of it? Grow up!
So we have been invading the Middle East for decades,
Horeshit! We have never "invaded" any part of the middle east prior to 2002. We have never "invaded" unprovoked.
WTF??? You're going loony!
placing new people in power and then deciding we don't want the one put in power there anymore, so we rip it down and staert over.
The US does not (it is physically impossible) to just set up any one in power they want to, If they did they wouldn't put a guy named "Mohammed", "Moamar", or "Sadaam" in power.. They'd put guys named "Bill", "Paul" or "John".
What they do is manipulate already established political factions. The one deemed more peaceful and pro-west is the guy who gets the support. So when guy A is a blood-thirsty canibal who hates the US and has sworn an oath to produce a dirty bomb and detonate it in times square somehow, and guy B is a blood thirsty canibal who really doesn't give a **** about the west.. The US will train, fund and help guy B.
Years later, vermin like you will point their fingers at the US and say "The US put a blood-thirsty canibal in power in country X" When Guy B starts spouting the same anti west slogans and guy C comes along later who is pro west and despises human flesh... guy C starts getting support.
Don't be so naive!
How long did you think they were going to put up with it before they fought back?
Put up with what? All of the "military invasions", if we were invading, the time to fight would be then, not years later in the form of terrorism
Don't you all think that they had a right to ******?
Absolutely NOT! ****** about what? Sadaam wasn't alowed to keep Kuwait? ****** because Israel didn't let Egypt wipe them out?
Sure, they could have handled it peacefully, but would we have listened? I doubt it. It takes a really LOUD bomb-explosion-catastrophe to get our attention.
Here you go excusing their actions with your "but". ... they should have just kept on ******* their camels.
As far as the religious angle, lets look at it this way. Christianity was responsible for the Spanish Inquisition. How many innocents died in the name of that fiasco? And did Christianity DIE. No, it thrived. Despite the fact that it was "Cleansing" the world of Jews, Muslims, and any other religion it deemed "AntiChristian" which was well... Pretty much every religion. So where is the difference between what Christianity did, and what the Muslim Extremeists are doing? And yet, we don't blame the Christians solely because it was a Political Move on part of the Spanish regime. Do we say that ALL Christians were to blame then? No, because they weren't. And yet, how many of them stood up to defend what they thought was right? Not very many I assure you. They didn't want to be hanged or left to die in a prison.
Apples and Oranges, If the Spanish inquisition was going on today, I'd listen to this argument.. It is NOT...