phreakwars
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
Hell yeah, bitch fights are fun as hell to watch too !!
.
.
.
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tizz said:Just (for the love of god man) don't ever make me appear to be some wack job sicko femenist!!!!! PLEASE!!!!!!
But I will tell ya, I have been getting the strangest reactions to my funnies today!!!!
tizz said:See now that is where the big difference is!!! Men see it all in black and white logic. Women see all teh peripherals at the same time. We may come to the same conclusion on something but HOW we get there is sooooooooooo different. Women are generally constantly injecting empathy into every descision.
MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWphreakwars said:Hell yeah, bitch fights are fun as hell to watch too !!
.
.
tizz said:Women are not irrational at all. It is just that we use a different rationalization. We will still most likely come to the same conclusions though
tizz said:Oh there are few irrational men right here. SO don't go THERE LOL
ALLAH IS GREAT said:Women are more SENSITIVE than men.
Mr X said:Sensitive women list
1#Margeret"the iron lady" thatcher=gives greenlight to retake the falklands from the argentinians
2#Prime minister of sri lanka kumaratunga=gives green light to retake the jaffna peninsula from the tamil tigers(survives s/bomb attack)
3#Prime minister Indira gandhi=gives green light to storm the temple of amritsa from separatist sihks(dies in s/bomb attack)
4#Prime minister of pakistan (I've forgotten her name)..gives tacit approval to muslim insurgency in jammu/kasmir
etc etc etc etc
...women in power hmmm I really don't see if they would do anything different from what a man would do.
tizz said:Is there a possibility that women in power only go over the topas they do, In order to gain teh respect/fear of their male counterparts? What if the MAJORITY of power positions were held by women? Would THAT make a difference?
You gotta be kidding.........ALLAH IS GREAT said:Women are more SENSITIVE than men.
tizz said:Is there a possibility that women in power only go over the topas they do, In order to gain teh respect/fear of their male counterparts? What if the MAJORITY of power positions were held by women? Would THAT make a difference?
http://okimc.org/newswire.php?story_id=911&condense_comments=falseThe Iroquois confederation, known to its members as the Haudenosaunee, was probably the greatest indigenous polity north of the Rio Grande in the two centuries before Columbus and definitely the greatest in the two centuries after. A political and military alliance formed by the Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga, Oneida, Mohawk and, after about 1720, the Tuscarora, it dominated, at its height, an area from Kentucky to Lake Ontario and Lake Champlain. Its capital was Onondaga, a bustling small city of several thousand souls a few miles south of where Tocqueville stopped in modern Syracuse.
The Iroquois confederation was governed by a constitution, the Great Law of Peace, which established the league's Great Council: 50 male royaneh (religious-political leaders), each representing one of the female-led clans of the alliance's nations. What was striking to the contemporary eye was that the 117 codicils of the Great Law were concerned as much with constraining the Great Council as with granting it authority. "Their whole civil policy was averse to the concentration of power in the hands of any single individual," explained Lewis Henry Morgan, a pioneering ethnographer of the Iroquois.
So vivid were these examples of democratic self-government that some historians and activists have argued that the Great Law of Peace directly inspired the American Constitution. Taken literally, this assertion seems implausible. With its grant of authority to the federal government to supersede state law, its dependence on rule by the majority rather than consensus and its denial of suffrage to women, the Constitution as originally enacted was not at all like the Great Law. But in a larger sense the claim is correct. The framers of the Constitution, like most colonists in what would become the United States, were pervaded by Indian images of liberty.
Mr X said:Ok tizz...sure women have to prove themselves(and to their male counter-parts)...vital national security interests are at stake...these women knew this when they took on the job.The job comes with tough decisions that are life/death as well...so welcome to the real world.
Not sure tizz...about women holding positions of power..with the world configured as it is now...the difference could be even worse as women tend to strive for dominance as well.Women like men, have their personalities...now think back tizz when you were at school...which girl was popular?(and specific with who she interacted with)...which was a bully?..and imagine these girls years on in power.Don't assume all women think like you and would react like you...results might shock you.
tizz said:Hey now, I have purposely left my own answer out of the thread. How do you know how I think? I simply posing a challenge here. If oyu have ever taken a basic ethics class this was part of the study of male/female perspective. NO ONE on teh PLAANET thinks quite like me. Again, this is not about the answer to the question but the process of forming that answer and what path you get to the answer. Both genders will often come to the same conclusion, but a lot more factors into a woman's answer.
Cogito Ergo Sum said:If ever there was a moot topic, this is it.
Women will NEVER rule the world. They have the wrong crotch hardware.
They don't have the balls to hang tough in tight situations and slap up against the heads of those inferior to you.
They can't give people the big shaft when and where they need it.
They can't blow spuge up your ass and have you enjoying it and begging for more.
and most importantly in ruling the world...
Women haven't learned the fine art of **** 'Em and Forget 'Em. How else are you supposed to keep the masses happy?