Illegal Apartheid Fascist Israel:a Mass Murderer/crimes Against Humanity In Lebanon

H

Hamza123

New member
You're not serious are you? Because if you are, you will never be worth debating with in my eyes again. How do we know the photographs you submitted were actually Muslim victims of US and Jewish attacks? What if they are propaganda photos? I could ask you the exact same thing.
Click to expand...
Easy there bud.

All those photos are confirmed by AP or CNN.

 
Phantom

Phantom

New member
Actually the majority of Muslims are moderate. Only a few tenths of a percentage are etxreme.
Click to expand...
Still not buying it. Furthermore, if the moderates do out-number the extremists, then it's time for them to grab the bull by the horns. I can't imagine a 10% vs. 90% battle resulting in the 10% winning.

And if you don't believe in any 9/11 conspiracy...
Click to expand...
**** straight I don't. Anyways, you're starting to bore me now. You aren't answering my questions and seem to be skirting the issue for the most part. It's not my thing to engage in circular debates.

 
H

Hamza123

New member
Still not buying it. Furthermore, if the moderates do out-number the extremists, then it's time for them to grab the bull by the horns. I can't imagine a 10% vs. 90% battle resulting in the 10% winning.
Click to expand...
Okay. So there are many Silent Moderate Muslims. But in no way is that because they support extremism. Some don't care, others don't have time, and some don't feel as extremism is a threat. I think the threat of Islamic Extremism isn't a threat but Violent Islamic Extremism along with un-stable governments is dangerous and threatens the freedom of many people, mostly Muslims.

A leading intellectual figure and stalwart fighter in America's confrontation with radical Islam, Daniel Pipes is perhaps best known for his idea that "radical Islam is the problem, moderate Islam is the solution." As Pipes argues, radical Islam, though currently the dominant political force in the Muslim world, is supported by only 10 to 15 percent of Muslims worldwide, while moderate Islam represents the great, though so far mostly silent, majority of Muslims. He further points out that radical Islam, also known as militant Islam or Islamism, is a very recent phenomenon, having more in common with modern totalitarian ideologies than with true, historic Islam. While he warns that militant Islam aims to overthrow the West and regain lost Islamic glory, he insists with equal conviction that traditional, moderate Islam is fully capable of living at peace with the rest of the world.
Click to expand...

**** straight I don't. Anyways, you're starting to bore me now. You aren't answering my questions and seem to be skirting the issue for the most part. It's not my thing to engage in circular debates.
Click to expand...

Typical from many people here to make it seem like I am trying to slip through the cracks of your interogation... Bring it on.

Ask any questions you want... It's been done but I will be glad to answer them to the best of my ability. I won't regard you to the Qur'an or a Sheikh...

 
eisanbt

eisanbt

New member
Still not buying it. Furthermore, if the moderates do out-number the extremists, then it's time for them to grab the bull by the horns. I can't imagine a 10% vs. 90% battle resulting in the 10% winning..
Click to expand...

You'ld rather rely on a collection of pictures than the actual numbers?

Are figures only reliable when they support your side of the argument? I would stop disagreeing with the war on Islam (Note the difference between the war on Islam [A sparcly connected mass of people accross the globe] and the war on Isreal [A state founded on religion/invasion and using religious texts as their proof of superiority and land claim] ).

People on both sides are dying, and although tomaust is a bit of a zealot about Islam, you must cut through the BS and the pictures and the heart tearing stories (All are things present in any war) and just look at the simple numbers. If the Isrealies are inflicting more civilian casualities, a tremendous amount from what was presented to us, than perhaps there is something to question there eh? (I don't intend that as a stand alone question but one to exemplify such occasions here people ignore the facts in favor of their own predispositions.)

If you wonder why the 90% of of moderate normal people (AKA Muslums) aren't ALL taking up arms against the 10% of nutcases(AKA terrorists), than perhaps you should think about some occasions in history where people havn't been passive about what isn't having immediate and direct effects on them. You will find very few. Like almost everyother human being on the planet, most of the islamic population is just concerned about the day to day worries of their lives. If you yourself are so worried about muslums than why aren't you or MRIH out in the streets playing vigilante and massicreing the innocent folk?

 
Phantom

Phantom

New member
Okay, I have no idea what you just said. The only reason I posted pics was because the orignal poster had. OBVIOUSLY Both sides as well as the innocent are dying.

I'm also not talking about "taking up arms." I'm talking about outspoken outrage.

 
hugo

hugo

New member
People on both sides are dying, and although tomaust is a bit of a zealot about Islam, you must cut through the BS and the pictures and the heart tearing stories (All are things present in any war) and just look at the simple numbers. If the Isrealies are inflicting more civilian casualities, a tremendous amount from what was presented to us, than perhaps there is something to question there eh? (I don't intend that as a stand alone question but one to exemplify such occasions here people ignore the facts in favor of their own predispositions.)
Click to expand...
That could be because the Isrealis do not use their civilians as human shields.

 
eisanbt

eisanbt

New member
That could be because the Isrealis do not use their civilians as human shields.
Click to expand...

No human shield could stop a high explisive dropped from the sky which takes out a good city block or more when all is said and done. And when the areas bombed are not targeted because theres reports of enemies there, but because mass slaughter is easier than finding the actual enemy than it is those dropping the bombs that must be held responsible.

If a building is taken over by hostage takers in say Houston, than people would go apeshit if the police just blew up the whole ******* thing so they could be sure the badguys within were gone too. Thats assuming that their goal is to get rid of the bad guys in the first place.

 
hugo

hugo

New member
No human shield could stop a high explisive dropped from the sky which takes out a good city block or more when all is said and done. And when the areas bombed are not targeted because theres reports of enemies there, but because mass slaughter is easier than finding the actual enemy than it is those dropping the bombs that must be held responsible. If a building is taken over by hostage takers in say Houston, than people would go apeshit if the police just blew up the whole ******* thing so they could be sure the badguys within were gone too. Thats assuming that their goal is to get rid of the bad guys in the first place.
Click to expand...
So, do you believe the air raids over Japan and Germany in WWII were wrong?

 
Lethalfind

Lethalfind

New member
So, do you believe the air raids over Japan and Germany in WWII were wrong?
Click to expand...
I personally don't...but then again I'm an American...not someone from another country trying to justify Muslim extremist hatred for a country that KNOW they will never dominate...just like Japan or Germany didn't have a prayer of dominating.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom