Invade and annex Mexico to the United States

R

Raymond

Guest
Invade and annex Mexico to the United States

Mexico is the fifth largest country in the Western Hemisphere and is
rich in natural resources such as petroleum and natural gas. Mexico's
efforts to develop and modernize its economy-one of the 15 largest in
the world-have been slowed by the nation's rugged terrain, limited
farmland, a rapidly growing population, and a series of economic
crises. The potential importance of natural resources for the
livelihood of poor rural households has long
been recognized but seldom quantified and analyzed. This would not be
a problem for the United States to easily
overcome.

The country's enormous petroleum reserves rank it among the top ten
countries in the world. Mexico is a major exporter of crude oil and
remains one of the top producers and exporters of silver, a mineral
resource that has been important since colonial times. Although
petroleum dominated the economy in the 1960s and 1970s, recent
governments have encouraged economic diversification. Manufacturing,
tourism, and assembly industries in northern Mexico are now important
sectors of the economy. Mexico's economy is also of major importance
to the United States, not only because of formal links through
economic agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), but also because Mexico is one of the largest trading
partners of the United States. In turn, Mexico's largest trading
partner is the United States.

Besides, The Neo-Cons Could REALLY Use a New War Right Now!!

Mexico could be next. It's close to home and has oil

Q. What country should the oil terrorists in the White House invade
next?

A. MEXICO:
It's close to home. Lots of whore houses to serve the troops and they
could have their R&R in Crawford, Texas where they could visit their
drunken leader at the ranch.

Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.

Oil is often the secret motive behind America's foreign policy.(Even
with Mexico)

The American Standard Oil Co controlled the Mexican oil production
(stole it) until Mexico nationalized their known oil assets in 1938.
Since then the big oil bandits in the US have been secretly trying to
figure how to regain the underground black gold in Mexico, the fifth
largest oil reserve on earth.
[ And Mexico's oil is conveniently right next door.]

A majority of Mexicans believe the United States invaded Iraq simply
to acquire its valuable oil reserves. They are also
beginning to suspect that the powers that run America have
designs on Mexico's oil as well.

The former President, Vicente Fox of the right wing PAN (National
Action Party) attempted to privatize Pemex, along with other public
properties, early in his administration, but has been forced by public
resistance to repeatedly declare that "Pemex is not for sale," and has
reiterated it a couple of times since May 8. Apparently not satisfied
with Fox's vehemence after the latest incident, Rosario Robles,
leader of the leftist Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) told the
cowboy-boot-wearing, macho Fox to "hitch up your trousers and defend
our petroleum."

CEO of PEMEX to Speak on Future of Mexican Oil Industry - Press ...
The conglomerate was established in 1938 when Mexico nationalized oil
operations, taking control out of foreign hands. Mexico has resisted
most foreign ...
http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/news/pressreleases/pemex.asp

AlterNet: It's About (Mexico's) Oil
Posted June 3, 2003. US capitalists have their sights set on Mexico's
nationalized oil wealth.
http://www.alternet.org/story/16046

But more important. And something "Oily Dick" Cheney would be in favor
of : " Mexico is a prime target. In addition to its 1% of global
generating capacity, Mexico has two added benefits: a common border
with the United States and hugh oil and gas deposits. Mexico is the
world's
fifth largest oil producer, with reserves of some 28 billion barrels
and crude oil production of about 3 million barrels a day ( compared
to 21 billion and 6 million barrels, respectively for the United
States ). It exports $10.4 billion worth of oil a year, 93% of which
goes to the United States. The nation also has 30 trillion cubic feet
of natural gas reserves...

"The problem in Mexico, from the standpoint of pirates, is that
energy is largely controlled by the national government. The Mexican
oil industry was nationalized in 1938, and is controlled via the state-
owned oil company, Petroleous de Mexico ( Premex )."

Prior to nationalization, and one of the reasons for doing so, was
because American oil companies ( Standard Oil and others ) were
stealing the oil. When the Mexican government nationalized, the US
government responded with harsh economic sanctions that hurt Mexico to
this day.

Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.

To better understand see: Prospecting For Oil?
Look In An Asteroid Crater
.. http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/asteroid_oil_991213...

Chicxulub Scientific drilling Program
http://www.icdp-online.de/

Geologists Elated
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/deepimpact-02c.html

Oil Companies Will Lead
http://www.seg.org/meetings/past/seg2000/events/applied.shtml

Gas and Oil Connections
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/h_ntl_left.htm

For more on the subject Search Chicxulub

Ay, Here's the rub:
Mexico's oil is nationalized . It's part of their Constitution and
as soon as we AGAIN get control of their government and rewrite their
constitution (like in Iraq) to privatize the oil
reserves, we will have all the oil we need.

US politicians use immigration reform as a political tool and
bargaining chip -- or in this case, what the head of the Mexican
Catholic Church, Cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera calls simply,
"blackmail."

What more could the US government do, apart from standing on the
rooftops and shouting to the four corners of the world, that when it
comes to "human rights," it is indeed, all about oil. And, one way or
another, American oil companies will get Mexico's oil

See:
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/051103_mexico_oil.html

May 11, 2003, 0100 PDT (FTW) --Mexico passed its peak of oil
production in the 1980s. Its nationalized oil company, Pemex, controls
both the oil and natural gas resources of our Southern neighbor. Soon
Mexico will not have enough natural gas to meet even its own needs,
let alone exporting it to the US. As the Empire's oil reserves shrink
and as its natural gas reserves approach empty, with Canadian tar
sands development proving to be an economic and ecological disaster,
the realities of diminishing hydrocarbon energy supplies are starting
to hit home. Once more the American Empire's fig leaf is removed as
the House International Relations Committee tells Mexico, "If you
want
better immigration laws, give us control of your fossil fuels." The
Sense of Congress resolution needs to be approved by both houses and
is sure to stir up a fight. But, in the context of Peak Oil, it will
be perhaps the kindest, gentlest move the Empire makes to obtain
control of Mexico's oil.

The argument that it's only fair because the Mexican immigrants, only
too welcome by employers seeking cheap labor, will use the energy here
don't wash. They will use far less oil and gas here than US investment
intends to appropriate through ownership.

The signs of Peak Oil are all around us. And now they are showing up
close to home.

Halliburton CEO and GOP Vice President Dick Cheney, is heavily
invested in Mexican oil. Oil & Politics Do Mix
http://www.lossless-audio.com/usa/index0.php?page=986217641.htm

MEXICO PRIVATIZATION `REFORMS'
Cheney's Pirates: `Stand and Deliver,
Or We'll Sink You
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3040cheney_pirates.html

Bush-Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World's Oil
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0113-01.htm

SEE:
Bush's Energy Pirates Are in Global Grab
Intelligence Review
by John Hoefle

HoustonChronicle.com
This and other massive pressures on Pemex, created after Mexico
nationalized the oil industry in 1938, are part of a laundry list of
challenges facing a ...
http://www.hubbertpeak.com/mx/Houston905260_20010509.htm

MEXICO PUTS OIL ON TRADE TABLE
.... nationalized petroleum sector is causing an enormous scandal in
Mexico. ... Mexico's willingness to put oil on the negotiating table
illustrates both ...
http://www.rcwhalen.com/doc/joc_mexico_puts_oil_on_trade_table.doc

Si ?
Raymondo
 
On Aug 25, 1:52?pm, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:
> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>
> Mexico is the fifth largest country in the Western Hemisphere and is
> rich in natural resources such as petroleum and natural gas. Mexico's
> efforts to develop and modernize its economy-one of the 15 largest in
> the world-have been slowed by the nation's rugged terrain, limited
> farmland, a rapidly growing population, and a series of economic
> crises. The potential importance of natural resources for the
> livelihood of poor rural households has long
> been recognized but seldom quantified and analyzed. This would not be
> a problem for the United States to easily
> overcome.
>
> The country's enormous petroleum reserves rank it among the top ten
> countries in the world. Mexico is a major exporter of crude oil and
> remains one of the top producers and exporters of silver, a mineral
> resource that has been important since colonial times. Although
> petroleum dominated the economy in the 1960s and 1970s, recent
> governments have encouraged economic diversification. Manufacturing,
> tourism, and assembly industries in northern Mexico are now important
> sectors of the economy. Mexico's economy is also of major importance
> to the United States, not only because of formal links through
> economic agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
> (NAFTA), but also because Mexico is one of the largest trading
> partners of the United States. In turn, Mexico's largest trading
> partner is the United States.
>
> Besides, The Neo-Cons Could REALLY Use a New War Right Now!!
>
> Mexico could be next. It's close to home and has oil
>
> Q. What country should the oil terrorists in the White House invade
> next?
>
> A. MEXICO:
> It's close to home. Lots of whore houses to serve the troops and they
> could have their R&R in Crawford, Texas where they could visit their
> drunken leader at the ranch.
>
> Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.
>
> Oil is often the secret motive behind America's foreign policy.(Even
> with Mexico)
>
> The American Standard Oil Co controlled the Mexican oil production
> (stole it) until Mexico nationalized their known oil assets in 1938.
> Since then the big oil bandits in the US have been secretly trying to
> figure how to regain the underground black gold in Mexico, the fifth
> largest oil reserve on earth.
> [ And Mexico's oil is conveniently right next door.]
>
> A majority of Mexicans believe the United States invaded Iraq simply
> to acquire its valuable oil reserves. They are also
> beginning to suspect that the powers that run America have
> designs on Mexico's oil as well.
>
> The former President, Vicente Fox of the right wing PAN (National
> Action Party) attempted to privatize Pemex, along with other public
> properties, early in his administration, but has been forced by public
> resistance to repeatedly declare that "Pemex is not for sale," and has
> reiterated it a couple of times since May 8. Apparently not satisfied
> with Fox's vehemence after the latest incident, Rosario Robles,
> leader of the leftist Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) told the
> cowboy-boot-wearing, macho Fox to "hitch up your trousers and defend
> our petroleum."
>
> CEO of PEMEX to Speak on Future of Mexican Oil Industry - Press ...
> The conglomerate was established in 1938 when Mexico nationalized oil
> operations, taking control out of foreign hands. Mexico has resisted
> most foreign ...http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/news/pressreleases/pemex.asp
>
> AlterNet: It's About (Mexico's) Oil
> Posted June 3, 2003. US capitalists have their sights set on Mexico's
> nationalized oil wealth.http://www.alternet.org/story/16046
>
> But more important. And something "Oily Dick" Cheney would be in favor
> of : " Mexico is a prime target. In addition to its 1% of global
> generating capacity, Mexico has two added benefits: a common border
> with the United States and hugh oil and gas deposits. Mexico is the
> world's
> fifth largest oil producer, with reserves of some 28 billion barrels
> and crude oil production of about 3 million barrels a day ( compared
> to 21 billion and 6 million barrels, respectively for the United
> States ). It exports $10.4 billion worth of oil a year, 93% of which
> goes to the United States. The nation also has 30 trillion cubic feet
> of natural gas reserves...
>
> "The problem in Mexico, from the standpoint of pirates, is that
> energy is largely controlled by the national government. The Mexican
> oil industry was nationalized in 1938, and is controlled via the state-
> owned oil company, Petroleous de Mexico ( Premex )."
>
> Prior to nationalization, and one of the reasons for doing so, was
> because American oil companies ( Standard Oil and others ) were
> stealing the oil. When the Mexican government nationalized, the US
> government responded with harsh economic sanctions that hurt Mexico to
> this day.
>
> Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.
>
> To better understand see: Prospecting For Oil?
> Look In An Asteroid Crater
> .http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/asteroid_oil_991213...
>
> Chicxulub Scientific drilling Programhttp://www.icdp-online.de/
>
> Geologists Elatedhttp://www.spacedaily.com/news/deepimpact-02c.html
>
> Oil Companies Will Leadhttp://www.seg.org/meetings/past/seg2000/events/applied.shtml
>
> Gas and Oil Connectionshttp://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/h_ntl_left.htm
>
> For more on the subject Search Chicxulub
>
> Ay, Here's the rub:
> Mexico's oil is nationalized . It's part of their Constitution and
> as soon as we AGAIN get control of their government and rewrite their
> constitution (like in Iraq) to privatize the oil
> reserves, we will have all the oil we need.
>
> US politicians use immigration reform as a political tool and
> bargaining chip -- or in this case, what the head of the Mexican
> Catholic Church, Cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera calls simply,
> "blackmail."
>
> What more could the US government do, apart from standing on the
> rooftops and shouting to the four corners of the world, that when it
> comes to "human rights," it is indeed, all about oil. And, one way or
> another, American oil companies will get Mexico's oil
>
> See:http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/051103_mexico_oil.html
>
> May 11, 2003, 0100 PDT (FTW) --Mexico passed its peak of oil
> production in the 1980s. Its nationalized oil company, Pemex, controls
> both the oil and natural gas resources of our Southern neighbor. Soon
> Mexico will not have enough natural gas to meet even its own needs,
> let alone exporting it to the US. As the Empire's oil reserves shrink
> and as its natural gas reserves approach empty, with Canadian tar
> sands development proving to be an economic and ecological disaster,
> the realities of diminishing hydrocarbon energy supplies are starting
> to hit home. Once more the American Empire's fig leaf is removed as
> the House International Relations Committee tells Mexico, "If you
> want
> better immigration laws, give us control of your fossil fuels." The
> Sense of Congress resolution needs to be approved by both houses and
> is sure to stir up a fight. But, in the context of Peak Oil, it will
> be perhaps the kindest, gentlest move the Empire makes to obtain
> control of Mexico's oil.
>
> The argument that it's only fair because the Mexican immigrants, only
> too welcome by employers seeking cheap labor, will use the energy here
> don't wash. They will use far less oil and gas here than US investment
> intends to appropriate through ownership.
>
> The signs of Peak Oil are all around us. And now they are showing up
> close to home.
>
> Halliburton CEO and GOP Vice President Dick Cheney, is heavily
> invested in Mexican oil. Oil & Politics Do Mixhttp://www.lossless-audio.com/usa/index0.php?page=986217641.htm
>
> MEXICO PRIVATIZATION `REFORMS'
> Cheney's Pirates: `Stand and Deliver,
> Or We'll Sink Youhttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3040cheney_pirates.html
>
> Bush-Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World's Oilhttp://www.commondreams.org/views04/0113-01.htm
>
> SEE:
> Bush's Energy Pirates Are in Global Grab
> Intelligence Review
> by John Hoefle
>
> HoustonChronicle.com
> This and other massive pressures on Pemex, created after Mexico
> nationalized the oil industry in 1938, are part of a laundry list of
> challenges facing a ...http://www.hubbertpeak.com/mx/Houston905260_20010509.htm
>
> MEXICO PUTS OIL ON TRADE TABLE
> ... nationalized petroleum sector is causing an enormous scandal in
> Mexico. ... Mexico's willingness to put oil on the negotiating table
> illustrates both ...http://www.rcwhalen.com/doc/joc_mexico_puts_oil_on_trade_table.doc
>
> Si ?
> Raymondo


PAGE II
Prospecting for Oil? Look In an Asteroid Crater
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/asteroid_oil_991213

Yucatan Crater May Harbor Clues to Dinosaur Extinction
Chicxulub had been known of since the 1950s, thanks to oil wells sunk
by Pemex, Mexico's national oil company. However, it was not widely
connected to the extinction event until earlier this decade.

Some now think whatever created Chicxulub was the largest object to
strike Earth in the last billion years. Other craters found in our
solar system that have a similar size and structure include the Mead
and Klenova craters on the planet Venus.

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/asteroid_oil_991213...

Oil Refining, Storage, and Distribution In Mexico - May 2006
Market Research Report
http://www.internationalbusinessstr...rrer=gad0605&gclid=COzGztihkY4CFVB1OAodaiuFFA
 
> US politicians use immigration reform as a political tool and
> bargaining chip -- or in this case, what the head of the Mexican
> Catholic Church, Cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera calls simply,
> "blackmail."


It's probably naive to believe D.C. would put pressure on D.F. to give
all Mexicans a role in the economy.

They don't want that here.

.. . .

> ... nationalized petroleum sector is causing an enormous scandal in
> Mexico. ... Mexico's willingness to put oil on the negotiating table
> illustrates both ...http://www.rcwhalen.com/doc/joc_mexico_puts_oil_on_trade_table.doc
>
> Si ?


An invasion isn't necessary. Just call up Mexico City and tell them
Baja belongs to the U. S. and the residents are U. S. citizens.


Bret Cahill
 
On Aug 25, 11:52 am, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:
> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>
> Mexico is the fifth largest country in the Western Hemisphere and is
> rich in natural resources such as petroleum and natural gas. Mexico's
> efforts to develop and modernize its economy-one of the 15 largest in
> the world-have been slowed by the nation's rugged terrain, limited
> farmland, a rapidly growing population, and a series of economic
> crises. The potential importance of natural resources for the
> livelihood of poor rural households has long
> been recognized but seldom quantified and analyzed. This would not be
> a problem for the United States to easily
> overcome.
>
> The country's enormous petroleum reserves rank it among the top ten
> countries in the world. Mexico is a major exporter of crude oil and
> remains one of the top producers and exporters of silver, a mineral
> resource that has been important since colonial times. Although
> petroleum dominated the economy in the 1960s and 1970s, recent
> governments have encouraged economic diversification. Manufacturing,
> tourism, and assembly industries in northern Mexico are now important
> sectors of the economy. Mexico's economy is also of major importance
> to the United States, not only because of formal links through
> economic agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
> (NAFTA), but also because Mexico is one of the largest trading
> partners of the United States. In turn, Mexico's largest trading
> partner is the United States.
>
> Besides, The Neo-Cons Could REALLY Use a New War Right Now!!
>
> Mexico could be next. It's close to home and has oil
>
> Q. What country should the oil terrorists in the White House invade
> next?
>
> A. MEXICO:
> It's close to home. Lots of whore houses to serve the troops and they
> could have their R&R in Crawford, Texas where they could visit their
> drunken leader at the ranch.
>
> Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.
>
> Oil is often the secret motive behind America's foreign policy.(Even
> with Mexico)
>
> The American Standard Oil Co controlled the Mexican oil production
> (stole it) until Mexico nationalized their known oil assets in 1938.
> Since then the big oil bandits in the US have been secretly trying to
> figure how to regain the underground black gold in Mexico, the fifth
> largest oil reserve on earth.
> [ And Mexico's oil is conveniently right next door.]
>
> A majority of Mexicans believe the United States invaded Iraq simply
> to acquire its valuable oil reserves. They are also
> beginning to suspect that the powers that run America have
> designs on Mexico's oil as well.
>
> The former President, Vicente Fox of the right wing PAN (National
> Action Party) attempted to privatize Pemex, along with other public
> properties, early in his administration, but has been forced by public
> resistance to repeatedly declare that "Pemex is not for sale," and has
> reiterated it a couple of times since May 8. Apparently not satisfied
> with Fox's vehemence after the latest incident, Rosario Robles,
> leader of the leftist Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) told the
> cowboy-boot-wearing, macho Fox to "hitch up your trousers and defend
> our petroleum."
>
> CEO of PEMEX to Speak on Future of Mexican Oil Industry - Press ...
> The conglomerate was established in 1938 when Mexico nationalized oil
> operations, taking control out of foreign hands. Mexico has resisted
> most foreign ...http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/news/pressreleases/pemex.asp
>
> AlterNet: It's About (Mexico's) Oil
> Posted June 3, 2003. US capitalists have their sights set on Mexico's
> nationalized oil wealth.http://www.alternet.org/story/16046
>
> But more important. And something "Oily Dick" Cheney would be in favor
> of : " Mexico is a prime target. In addition to its 1% of global
> generating capacity, Mexico has two added benefits: a common border
> with the United States and hugh oil and gas deposits. Mexico is the
> world's
> fifth largest oil producer, with reserves of some 28 billion barrels
> and crude oil production of about 3 million barrels a day ( compared
> to 21 billion and 6 million barrels, respectively for the United
> States ). It exports $10.4 billion worth of oil a year, 93% of which
> goes to the United States. The nation also has 30 trillion cubic feet
> of natural gas reserves...
>
> "The problem in Mexico, from the standpoint of pirates, is that
> energy is largely controlled by the national government. The Mexican
> oil industry was nationalized in 1938, and is controlled via the state-
> owned oil company, Petroleous de Mexico ( Premex )."
>
> Prior to nationalization, and one of the reasons for doing so, was
> because American oil companies ( Standard Oil and others ) were
> stealing the oil. When the Mexican government nationalized, the US
> government responded with harsh economic sanctions that hurt Mexico to
> this day.
>
> Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.
>
> To better understand see: Prospecting For Oil?
> Look In An Asteroid Crater
> .http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/asteroid_oil_991213...
>
> Chicxulub Scientific drilling Programhttp://www.icdp-online.de/
>
> Geologists Elatedhttp://www.spacedaily.com/news/deepimpact-02c.html
>
> Oil Companies Will Leadhttp://www.seg.org/meetings/past/seg2000/events/applied.shtml
>
> Gas and Oil Connectionshttp://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/h_ntl_left.htm
>
> For more on the subject Search Chicxulub
>
> Ay, Here's the rub:
> Mexico's oil is nationalized . It's part of their Constitution and
> as soon as we AGAIN get control of their government and rewrite their
> constitution (like in Iraq) to privatize the oil
> reserves, we will have all the oil we need.
>
> US politicians use immigration reform as a political tool and
> bargaining chip -- or in this case, what the head of the Mexican
> Catholic Church, Cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera calls simply,
> "blackmail."
>
> What more could the US government do, apart from standing on the
> rooftops and shouting to the four corners of the world, that when it
> comes to "human rights," it is indeed, all about oil. And, one way or
> another, American oil companies will get Mexico's oil
>
> See:http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/051103_mexico_oil.html
>
> May 11, 2003, 0100 PDT (FTW) --Mexico passed its peak of oil
> production in the 1980s. Its nationalized oil company, Pemex, controls
> both the oil and natural gas resources of our Southern neighbor. Soon
> Mexico will not have enough natural gas to meet even its own needs,
> let alone exporting it to the US. As the Empire's oil reserves shrink
> and as its natural gas reserves approach empty, with Canadian tar
> sands development proving to be an economic and ecological disaster,
> the realities of diminishing hydrocarbon energy supplies are starting
> to hit home. Once more the American Empire's fig leaf is removed as
> the House International Relations Committee tells Mexico, "If you
> want
> better immigration laws, give us control of your fossil fuels." The
> Sense of Congress resolution needs to be approved by both houses and
> is sure to stir up a fight. But, in the context of Peak Oil, it will
> be perhaps the kindest, gentlest move the Empire makes to obtain
> control of Mexico's oil.
>
> The argument that it's only fair because the Mexican immigrants, only
> too welcome by employers seeking cheap labor, will use the energy here
> don't wash. They will use far less oil and gas here than US investment
> intends to appropriate through ownership.
>
> The signs of Peak Oil are all around us. And now they are showing up
> close to home.
>
> Halliburton CEO and GOP Vice President Dick Cheney, is heavily
> invested in Mexican oil. Oil & Politics Do Mixhttp://www.lossless-audio.com/usa/index0.php?page=986217641.htm
>
> MEXICO PRIVATIZATION `REFORMS'
> Cheney's Pirates: `Stand and Deliver,
> Or We'll Sink Youhttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3040cheney_pirates.html
>
> Bush-Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World's Oilhttp://www.commondreams.org/views04/0113-01.htm
>
> SEE:
> Bush's Energy Pirates Are in Global Grab
> Intelligence Review
> by John Hoefle
>
> HoustonChronicle.com
> This and other massive pressures on Pemex, created after Mexico
> nationalized the oil industry in 1938, are part of a laundry list of
> challenges facing a ...http://www.hubbertpeak.com/mx/Houston905260_20010509.htm
>
> MEXICO PUTS OIL ON TRADE TABLE
> ... nationalized petroleum sector is causing an enormous scandal in
> Mexico. ... Mexico's willingness to put oil on the negotiating table
> illustrates both ...http://www.rcwhalen.com/doc/joc_mexico_puts_oil_on_trade_table.doc
>
> Si ?
> Raymondo


Bravo Raymond, spoken like a true leftist Nazi. When should
the Blitzkrieg begin?
 
"Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States


The Democrats would never stand for that! It seems that most Mexicans
believe in God and they don't have anywhere NEAR enough abortions.
Religious non-aborters...Democrats' worst nightmare!
 
On Aug 25, 4:04 pm, jose <josefsop...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Aug 25, 11:52 am, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Invade and annex Mexico to the United States

>
> > Mexico is the fifth largest country in the Western Hemisphere and is
> > rich in natural resources such as petroleum and natural gas. Mexico's
> > efforts to develop and modernize its economy-one of the 15 largest in
> > the world-have been slowed by the nation's rugged terrain, limited
> > farmland, a rapidly growing population, and a series of economic
> > crises. The potential importance of natural resources for the
> > livelihood of poor rural households has long
> > been recognized but seldom quantified and analyzed. This would not be
> > a problem for the United States to easily
> > overcome.

>
> > The country's enormous petroleum reserves rank it among the top ten
> > countries in the world. Mexico is a major exporter of crude oil and
> > remains one of the top producers and exporters of silver, a mineral
> > resource that has been important since colonial times. Although
> > petroleum dominated the economy in the 1960s and 1970s, recent
> > governments have encouraged economic diversification. Manufacturing,
> > tourism, and assembly industries in northern Mexico are now important
> > sectors of the economy. Mexico's economy is also of major importance
> > to the United States, not only because of formal links through
> > economic agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
> > (NAFTA), but also because Mexico is one of the largest trading
> > partners of the United States. In turn, Mexico's largest trading
> > partner is the United States.

>
> > Besides, The Neo-Cons Could REALLY Use a New War Right Now!!

>
> > Mexico could be next. It's close to home and has oil

>
> > Q. What country should the oil terrorists in the White House invade
> > next?

>
> > A. MEXICO:
> > It's close to home. Lots of whore houses to serve the troops and they
> > could have their R&R in Crawford, Texas where they could visit their
> > drunken leader at the ranch.

>
> > Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> > deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.

>
> > Oil is often the secret motive behind America's foreign policy.(Even
> > with Mexico)

>
> > The American Standard Oil Co controlled the Mexican oil production
> > (stole it) until Mexico nationalized their known oil assets in 1938.
> > Since then the big oil bandits in the US have been secretly trying to
> > figure how to regain the underground black gold in Mexico, the fifth
> > largest oil reserve on earth.
> > [ And Mexico's oil is conveniently right next door.]

>
> > A majority of Mexicans believe the United States invaded Iraq simply
> > to acquire its valuable oil reserves. They are also
> > beginning to suspect that the powers that run America have
> > designs on Mexico's oil as well.

>
> > The former President, Vicente Fox of the right wing PAN (National
> > Action Party) attempted to privatize Pemex, along with other public
> > properties, early in his administration, but has been forced by public
> > resistance to repeatedly declare that "Pemex is not for sale," and has
> > reiterated it a couple of times since May 8. Apparently not satisfied
> > with Fox's vehemence after the latest incident, Rosario Robles,
> > leader of the leftist Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) told the
> > cowboy-boot-wearing, macho Fox to "hitch up your trousers and defend
> > our petroleum."

>
> > CEO of PEMEX to Speak on Future of Mexican Oil Industry - Press ...
> > The conglomerate was established in 1938 when Mexico nationalized oil
> > operations, taking control out of foreign hands. Mexico has resisted
> > most foreign ...http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/news/pressreleases/pemex.asp

>
> > AlterNet: It's About (Mexico's) Oil
> > Posted June 3, 2003. US capitalists have their sights set on Mexico's
> > nationalized oil wealth.http://www.alternet.org/story/16046

>
> > But more important. And something "Oily Dick" Cheney would be in favor
> > of : " Mexico is a prime target. In addition to its 1% of global
> > generating capacity, Mexico has two added benefits: a common border
> > with the United States and hugh oil and gas deposits. Mexico is the
> > world's
> > fifth largest oil producer, with reserves of some 28 billion barrels
> > and crude oil production of about 3 million barrels a day ( compared
> > to 21 billion and 6 million barrels, respectively for the United
> > States ). It exports $10.4 billion worth of oil a year, 93% of which
> > goes to the United States. The nation also has 30 trillion cubic feet
> > of natural gas reserves...

>
> > "The problem in Mexico, from the standpoint of pirates, is that
> > energy is largely controlled by the national government. The Mexican
> > oil industry was nationalized in 1938, and is controlled via the state-
> > owned oil company, Petroleous de Mexico ( Premex )."

>
> > Prior to nationalization, and one of the reasons for doing so, was
> > because American oil companies ( Standard Oil and others ) were
> > stealing the oil. When the Mexican government nationalized, the US
> > government responded with harsh economic sanctions that hurt Mexico to
> > this day.

>
> > Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> > deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.

>
> > To better understand see: Prospecting For Oil?
> > Look In An Asteroid Crater
> > .http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/asteroid_oil_991213...

>
> > Chicxulub Scientific drilling Programhttp://www.icdp-online.de/

>
> > Geologists Elatedhttp://www.spacedaily.com/news/deepimpact-02c.html

>
> > Oil Companies Will Leadhttp://www.seg.org/meetings/past/seg2000/events/applied.shtml

>
> > Gas and Oil Connectionshttp://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/h_ntl_left.htm

>
> > For more on the subject Search Chicxulub

>
> > Ay, Here's the rub:
> > Mexico's oil is nationalized . It's part of their Constitution and
> > as soon as we AGAIN get control of their government and rewrite their
> > constitution (like in Iraq) to privatize the oil
> > reserves, we will have all the oil we need.

>
> > US politicians use immigration reform as a political tool and
> > bargaining chip -- or in this case, what the head of the Mexican
> > Catholic Church, Cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera calls simply,
> > "blackmail."

>
> > What more could the US government do, apart from standing on the
> > rooftops and shouting to the four corners of the world, that when it
> > comes to "human rights," it is indeed, all about oil. And, one way or
> > another, American oil companies will get Mexico's oil

>
> > See:http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/051103_mexico_oil.html

>
> > May 11, 2003, 0100 PDT (FTW) --Mexico passed its peak of oil
> > production in the 1980s. Its nationalized oil company, Pemex, controls
> > both the oil and natural gas resources of our Southern neighbor. Soon
> > Mexico will not have enough natural gas to meet even its own needs,
> > let alone exporting it to the US. As the Empire's oil reserves shrink
> > and as its natural gas reserves approach empty, with Canadian tar
> > sands development proving to be an economic and ecological disaster,
> > the realities of diminishing hydrocarbon energy supplies are starting
> > to hit home. Once more the American Empire's fig leaf is removed as
> > the House International Relations Committee tells Mexico, "If you
> > want
> > better immigration laws, give us control of your fossil fuels." The
> > Sense of Congress resolution needs to be approved by both houses and
> > is sure to stir up a fight. But, in the context of Peak Oil, it will
> > be perhaps the kindest, gentlest move the Empire makes to obtain
> > control of Mexico's oil.

>
> > The argument that it's only fair because the Mexican immigrants, only
> > too welcome by employers seeking cheap labor, will use the energy here
> > don't wash. They will use far less oil and gas here than US investment
> > intends to appropriate through ownership.

>
> > The signs of Peak Oil are all around us. And now they are showing up
> > close to home.

>
> > Halliburton CEO and GOP Vice President Dick Cheney, is heavily
> > invested in Mexican oil. Oil & Politics Do Mixhttp://www.lossless-audio.com/usa/index0.php?page=986217641.htm

>
> > MEXICO PRIVATIZATION `REFORMS'
> > Cheney's Pirates: `Stand and Deliver,
> > Or We'll Sink Youhttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3040cheney_pirates.html

>
> > Bush-Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World's Oilhttp://www.commondreams.org/views04/0113-01.htm

>
> > SEE:
> > Bush's Energy Pirates Are in Global Grab
> > Intelligence Review
> > by John Hoefle

>
> > HoustonChronicle.com
> > This and other massive pressures on Pemex, created after Mexico
> > nationalized the oil industry in 1938, are part of a laundry list of
> > challenges facing a ...http://www.hubbertpeak.com/mx/Houston905260_20010509.htm

>
> > MEXICO PUTS OIL ON TRADE TABLE
> > ... nationalized petroleum sector is causing an enormous scandal in
> > Mexico. ... Mexico's willingness to put oil on the negotiating table
> > illustrates both ...http://www.rcwhalen.com/doc/joc_mexico_puts_oil_on_trade_table.doc

>
> > Si ?
> > Raymondo

>
> Bravo Raymond, spoken like a true leftist Nazi. When should
> Gringos Invade Mexico!?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


Gringos Invade Mexico! The invasion has been under way for many years.
The Baby-Boomers Head South

"Small opportunities are often the beginning of great enterprises"
--- Demosthenes:

What few people - at least, outside of Mexico - have bothered to
notice is that while all the nannies, cooks, and maids have been
heading north to tend the luxury lifestyles of irate Republicans, the
Gringo hordes have been rushing south to enjoy glorious budget
retirements and affordable second homes under the Mexican sun.

Over the last decade, the U.S. State Department estimates that the
number of Americans living in Mexico has soared from 200,000 to 1
million (or one-quarter of all U.S. expatriates). Remittances from the
United States to Mexico have risen dramatically from $9 billion to
$14.5 billion in just two years. Though initially interpreted as
representing a huge spike in illegal workers (who send parts of their
salaries across the border to family), it turns out to be mainly money
sent by Americans to themselves in order to finance Mexican homes and
retirement

Indeed, according to the Wall Street Journal, "The land rush is
occurring at the beginning of a demographic tidal wave. With more than
70 million American baby boomers expected to retire in the next two
decades... some experts predict a vast migration to warmer - and cheaper
- climates. Often such buyers purchase a property 10 to 15 years
before retirement, use it as a vacation home, and then eventually move
there for most of the year. Developers increasingly are taking
advantage of the trend, building gated communities, condominiums, and
golf courses."

Indeed, the first two stages of informal annexation have already
occurred.

Under the banner of NAFTA, Southern California has exported hundreds
of its sweatshops and toxic industries to the maquiladora zones of
Tijuana and Mexicali. The Pacific Maritime Association, representing
the West Coast's major shipping companies, has joined forces with
Korean and Japanese corporations to explore the construction of a vast
new container port at Punta Colonel, 150 miles south of Tijuana, which
would undercut the power of longshore unionism in San Pedro and San
Francisco.

Secondly, tens of thousands of gringo retirees and winter-residents
are now clustered at both ends of the peninsula. Along the northwest
coast from Tijuana to Ensenada, a recent advertisement for a real-
estate conference at UCLA boasts that "there are presently over 57
real-estate developments... with over 11,000 homes/condos with an
inventory value of over $3 billion... all of them geared for the U.S.
market."

CONT'D
http://www.yucatanliving.com/news/gringos-invade-mexico.htm

And finally we are told (too briefly, however) how the American oil
interests invaded Mexico.

U.S. military moves into Mexico. The US Militarization of Mexico
Mexico has a history of resisting US military aid. But from 1982-1990,
Mexico received more military aid from the US than in the previous 30
years. Why is the US now involved in helping the Mexican government
chase its own citizens around the jungles of Chiapas?

An infamous Chase Bank memo, dated January 13, 1995, warned Mexican
officials that "the government will need to eliminate the Zapatistas
to demonstrate their effective control of the national territory and
security policy." The memo made it clear that the real object of US
military and economic aid to Mexico was to maintain political
stability (no matter the severity of the methods or the threat to
Mexico's sovereignty) so that investor confidence could be guaranteed.
On February 9, 1995 - within weeks of the Chase Bank memo- Mexico's
military launched a surprise offensive into the Zapatista region,
breaking a year-long truce. The army has occupied the territory since
then.
A June 1996 US Government Accounting Office report disclosed that US
helicopters were used to transport Mexican troops to the site of a
peasant uprising in violation of the transfer agreement. Many
campesinos were killed during those operations.
In 1996, the Mexican government acknowledged for the first time that
it was allowing US security agencies to fly over Mexican territory.
Zapatista commanders say they have seen men wearing US military
insignia working with the Mexican military and paramilitary groups.
Unmasking the Drug War
An October 1989 US State Department Bulletin identified Mexico as the
primary entry point for drugs coming into the US and the second most
important source of petroleum, strontium and fluorspar (from which
fluorine compounds are produced).
The war on drugs is simply a convenient cover, a time-worn excuse to
mount counterinsurgency operations. As Col. Warren D. Hall, Staff
Judge Advocate to Gen. Barry McCaffrey when McCaffrey was SOUTHCOM
Commander, admitted in an internal memo: "It is unrealistic to expect
the military to limit use of the equipment to operations against
narcotraffickers.... The light infantry skills US Special Operations
forces teach during counter-drug deployments... can be used [in]...
counter-insurgency as well."
The arrest of Mexico's drug czar, General Jesus Gutierrez Rebollo,
exposes how Mexico's drug cartels have penetrated the highest ranks of
Mexico's anti-narcotics and political institutions. The extent of
corruption is understandable: Drugs funnel as much as $30 billion/year
into Mexico's economy.
The drug trade is facilitated by wealthy Mexican families located in
central (Morelos, Jalisco) and northern (Sonora, Sinaloa, Durango,
Chihuahua and Tamaulipas) states and the northern border cities of
Tijuana and Ciudad Juarez.
These states lie far north of the areas of active indigenous
insurgencies. Nonetheless, Harold Wankel, then-operations chief of the
US Drug Enforcement Administration, revealed in 1996 that the US had
installed anti-drug teams in Chiapas, 2,000 miles south of the US
border.
While indigenous farming communities are active in insurgencies, they
are not suspected of involvement in the drug trade. Central and
northern Mexico might be appropriate arenas for anti-drug efforts:
Chiapas is not.
"Free Market" Poverty
In 1982, Mexico began the process of privatization, deregulation and
spending cuts. The result has been a massive transfer of resources
from the salaried workforce to the owners and controllers of capital -
and from public control and accountability to a small number of
private elite. Over the past decade, the gap between Mexico's rich and
poor has increased.
Under President Salinas (1988-1994) the number of Mexican billionaires
rose from 2 to 24, while nearly a fifth of the population (more than
17 million) made less than $350 per person per year.
Half of Mexico's 93 million people live in poverty. Malnutrition now
afflicts 40 to 65 percent of the population. In impoverished
indigenous communities, malnutrition approaches 85 percent. During the
1980-1992 economic restructuring, infant deaths due to malnutrition
tripled.
The diet of half of Mexico's inhabitants falls below the minimum daily
nutritional standard (2340 calories) established by the World Health
Organization. Each day 433 Mexican children under 5 years of age die
from diseases related to malnutrition-158,000 children each year.
Chiapas has a population of about 3.5 million. Half lack potable water
and two-thirds have no sewer system. A mere 20 of Chiapas' families
own 18.4 million acres. The majority of indigenous campesinos own less
than two acres each.
Chiapas is the poorest of Mexico's 31 states. In terms of resources,
however, Chiapas is considered Mexico's richest state. Mexico's
national oil company, Pemex, has nearly 100 wells in Chiapas. More
than half of all hydroelectric power comes from Chiapas (while only a
third of the local houses have electricity). Thirty five percent of
Mexico's coffee and significant amounts of beef, wood and corn also
come from Chiapas.
Repression In Mexico
In 1992, President Salinas pushed through Article 27, which amended
the Mexican Constitution and repudiated land reform-one of the
founding ideals of the Mexican Republic.
Salinas' amendment legalized the private sale of ejido land-the
communal farms established after the Mexican Revolution. Prior to
Salinas' amendment, 70 percent of all Mexican farmers worked on ejido
land, much of it supporting subsistence rather than commercial
farming. Following the passage of North American Free Trade Agreement,
the vast majority of Mexico's small farmers can no Ionger compete with
cheap imported US food.
The NAFTA-driven economy is delivering a final knockout blow to the
ancient self-sufficient, small corn-farming economy of Mexico's
indigenous communities. Indigenous land is vulnerable to corporate and
elite buy-outs. Economists predict that as many as 10 million Mexican
farmers could be displaced by the year 2004.

According to the UN's Economic Commission for Latin America and the
Caribbean, there is an inverse relationship between investment and
employment in Mexico. The more investment, the fewer jobs. The
Zapatistas understand this. That is why they resist free trade and
seek to engage Mexico, and the world, in a dialogue about "neo-
liberalism."

A US Plan to Invade Mexico?
Since the January 1, 1994 Zapatista uprising, Mexico's military budget
has increased forty-fold. Meanwhile, evidence is mounting that the US
is considering scenarios for direct military intervention in Mexico.
A 1994 Pentagon briefing paper, declassified under the Freedom Of
Information Act, predicted that it was "deployment of US troops to
Mexico would be received favorably if the Mexican government were to
confront the threat of being overthrown as a result of widespread
economic and social chaos."
According to Donald E. Schultz, professor of National Security at the
US Army's War College, "A hostile government could put the US
investments in Mexico in danger, jeopardize access to oil, produce a
flood of political refugees and economic migrants to the north."
In the book, The Next War, former US Defense Secretary Caspar
Weinberger envisions a war with Mexico in the year 2003, resulting
from massive, out-of control migrations prompted by social unrest in
Mexico. Weinberger's scenario outlines a rapid three-pronged military
invasion, nicknamed "Operation Aztec," designed to control domestic
unrest and stem the influx of millions of immigrants.

S. Brian Willson was an officer in the Vietnam War. In 1987, he lost
his legs when he was run over by a military train while attempting to
nonviolently block a shipment of weapons to Central America. Willson
can be reached c/o 33 Portola Ave., Monterey, CA 93940, (408)
644-0111.
 
"Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>
> Mexico is the fifth largest country in the Western Hemisphere and is
> rich in natural resources such as petroleum and natural gas. Mexico's
> efforts to develop and modernize its economy-one of the 15 largest in
> the world-have been slowed by the nation's rugged terrain, limited
> farmland, a rapidly growing population, and a series of economic
> crises. The potential importance of natural resources for the
> livelihood of poor rural households has long
> been recognized but seldom quantified and analyzed. This would not be
> a problem for the United States to easily
> overcome.
>
> The country's enormous petroleum reserves rank it among the top ten
> countries in the world. Mexico is a major exporter of crude oil and
> remains one of the top producers and exporters of silver, a mineral
> resource that has been important since colonial times. Although
> petroleum dominated the economy in the 1960s and 1970s, recent
> governments have encouraged economic diversification. Manufacturing,
> tourism, and assembly industries in northern Mexico are now important
> sectors of the economy. Mexico's economy is also of major importance
> to the United States, not only because of formal links through
> economic agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
> (NAFTA), but also because Mexico is one of the largest trading
> partners of the United States. In turn, Mexico's largest trading
> partner is the United States.
>
> Besides, The Neo-Cons Could REALLY Use a New War Right Now!!


I think the addition of millions of maleable, undereducated peasants would
be a dream come true for the democrats.
>

snip
 
"Tom Gardner" <tom(nospam)@ohiobrush.com> wrote in message
news:k20Ai.21357$eY.13278@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net...
>
> "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States

>
> The Democrats would never stand for that! It seems that most Mexicans
> believe in God and they don't have anywhere NEAR enough abortions.
> Religious non-aborters...Democrats' worst nightmare!

Most Mexicans are undereducated and used to following oppressive regimes. I
believe it would be a bonus for the democrats.
>
 
On Aug 25, 4:28?pm, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Aug 25, 4:04 pm, jose <josefsop...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 25, 11:52 am, Raymond <Bluerhy...@aol.com> wrote:

>
> > > Invade and annex Mexico to the United States

>
> > > Mexico is the fifth largest country in the Western Hemisphere and is
> > > rich in natural resources such as petroleum and natural gas. Mexico's
> > > efforts to develop and modernize its economy-one of the 15 largest in
> > > the world-have been slowed by the nation's rugged terrain, limited
> > > farmland, a rapidly growing population, and a series of economic
> > > crises. The potential importance of natural resources for the
> > > livelihood of poor rural households has long
> > > been recognized but seldom quantified and analyzed. This would not be
> > > a problem for the United States to easily
> > > overcome.

>
> > > The country's enormous petroleum reserves rank it among the top ten
> > > countries in the world. Mexico is a major exporter of crude oil and
> > > remains one of the top producers and exporters of silver, a mineral
> > > resource that has been important since colonial times. Although
> > > petroleum dominated the economy in the 1960s and 1970s, recent
> > > governments have encouraged economic diversification. Manufacturing,
> > > tourism, and assembly industries in northern Mexico are now important
> > > sectors of the economy. Mexico's economy is also of major importance
> > > to the United States, not only because of formal links through
> > > economic agreements, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
> > > (NAFTA), but also because Mexico is one of the largest trading
> > > partners of the United States. In turn, Mexico's largest trading
> > > partner is the United States.

>
> > > Besides, The Neo-Cons Could REALLY Use a New War Right Now!!

>
> > > Mexico could be next. It's close to home and has oil

>
> > > Q. What country should the oil terrorists in the White House invade
> > > next?

>
> > > A. MEXICO:
> > > It's close to home. Lots of whore houses to serve the troops and they
> > > could have their R&R in Crawford, Texas where they could visit their
> > > drunken leader at the ranch.

>
> > > Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> > > deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.

>
> > > Oil is often the secret motive behind America's foreign policy.(Even
> > > with Mexico)

>
> > > The American Standard Oil Co controlled the Mexican oil production
> > > (stole it) until Mexico nationalized their known oil assets in 1938.
> > > Since then the big oil bandits in the US have been secretly trying to
> > > figure how to regain the underground black gold in Mexico, the fifth
> > > largest oil reserve on earth.
> > > [ And Mexico's oil is conveniently right next door.]

>
> > > A majority of Mexicans believe the United States invaded Iraq simply
> > > to acquire its valuable oil reserves. They are also
> > > beginning to suspect that the powers that run America have
> > > designs on Mexico's oil as well.

>
> > > The former President, Vicente Fox of the right wing PAN (National
> > > Action Party) attempted to privatize Pemex, along with other public
> > > properties, early in his administration, but has been forced by public
> > > resistance to repeatedly declare that "Pemex is not for sale," and has
> > > reiterated it a couple of times since May 8. Apparently not satisfied
> > > with Fox's vehemence after the latest incident, Rosario Robles,
> > > leader of the leftist Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) told the
> > > cowboy-boot-wearing, macho Fox to "hitch up your trousers and defend
> > > our petroleum."

>
> > > CEO of PEMEX to Speak on Future of Mexican Oil Industry - Press ...
> > > The conglomerate was established in 1938 when Mexico nationalized oil
> > > operations, taking control out of foreign hands. Mexico has resisted
> > > most foreign ...http://www.mccombs.utexas.edu/news/pressreleases/pemex.asp

>
> > > AlterNet: It's About (Mexico's) Oil
> > > Posted June 3, 2003. US capitalists have their sights set on Mexico's
> > > nationalized oil wealth.http://www.alternet.org/story/16046

>
> > > But more important. And something "Oily Dick" Cheney would be in favor
> > > of : " Mexico is a prime target. In addition to its 1% of global
> > > generating capacity, Mexico has two added benefits: a common border
> > > with the United States and hugh oil and gas deposits. Mexico is the
> > > world's
> > > fifth largest oil producer, with reserves of some 28 billion barrels
> > > and crude oil production of about 3 million barrels a day ( compared
> > > to 21 billion and 6 million barrels, respectively for the United
> > > States ). It exports $10.4 billion worth of oil a year, 93% of which
> > > goes to the United States. The nation also has 30 trillion cubic feet
> > > of natural gas reserves...

>
> > > "The problem in Mexico, from the standpoint of pirates, is that
> > > energy is largely controlled by the national government. The Mexican
> > > oil industry was nationalized in 1938, and is controlled via the state-
> > > owned oil company, Petroleous de Mexico ( Premex )."

>
> > > Prior to nationalization, and one of the reasons for doing so, was
> > > because American oil companies ( Standard Oil and others ) were
> > > stealing the oil. When the Mexican government nationalized, the US
> > > government responded with harsh economic sanctions that hurt Mexico to
> > > this day.

>
> > > Today, Mexico may be sitting on some of the world's largest oil
> > > deposits on earth in the Chicxulub fields.

>
> > > To better understand see: Prospecting For Oil?
> > > Look In An Asteroid Crater
> > > .http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth/asteroid_oil_991213...

>
> > > Chicxulub Scientific drilling Programhttp://www.icdp-online.de/

>
> > > Geologists Elatedhttp://www.spacedaily.com/news/deepimpact-02c.html

>
> > > Oil Companies Will Leadhttp://www.seg.org/meetings/past/seg2000/events/applied.shtml

>
> > > Gas and Oil Connectionshttp://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/h_ntl_left.htm

>
> > > For more on the subject Search Chicxulub

>
> > > Ay, Here's the rub:
> > > Mexico's oil is nationalized . It's part of their Constitution and
> > > as soon as we AGAIN get control of their government and rewrite their
> > > constitution (like in Iraq) to privatize the oil
> > > reserves, we will have all the oil we need.

>
> > > US politicians use immigration reform as a political tool and
> > > bargaining chip -- or in this case, what the head of the Mexican
> > > Catholic Church, Cardinal Norberto Rivera Carrera calls simply,
> > > "blackmail."

>
> > > What more could the US government do, apart from standing on the
> > > rooftops and shouting to the four corners of the world, that when it
> > > comes to "human rights," it is indeed, all about oil. And, one way or
> > > another, American oil companies will get Mexico's oil

>
> > > See:http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/051103_mexico_oil.html

>
> > > May 11, 2003, 0100 PDT (FTW) --Mexico passed its peak of oil
> > > production in the 1980s. Its nationalized oil company, Pemex, controls
> > > both the oil and natural gas resources of our Southern neighbor. Soon
> > > Mexico will not have enough natural gas to meet even its own needs,
> > > let alone exporting it to the US. As the Empire's oil reserves shrink
> > > and as its natural gas reserves approach empty, with Canadian tar
> > > sands development proving to be an economic and ecological disaster,
> > > the realities of diminishing hydrocarbon energy supplies are starting
> > > to hit home. Once more the American Empire's fig leaf is removed as
> > > the House International Relations Committee tells Mexico, "If you
> > > want
> > > better immigration laws, give us control of your fossil fuels." The
> > > Sense of Congress resolution needs to be approved by both houses and
> > > is sure to stir up a fight. But, in the context of Peak Oil, it will
> > > be perhaps the kindest, gentlest move the Empire makes to obtain
> > > control of Mexico's oil.

>
> > > The argument that it's only fair because the Mexican immigrants, only
> > > too welcome by employers seeking cheap labor, will use the energy here
> > > don't wash. They will use far less oil and gas here than US investment
> > > intends to appropriate through ownership.

>
> > > The signs of Peak Oil are all around us. And now they are showing up
> > > close to home.

>
> > > Halliburton CEO and GOP Vice President Dick Cheney, is heavily
> > > invested in Mexican oil. Oil & Politics Do Mixhttp://www.lossless-audio.com/usa/index0.php?page=986217641.htm

>
> > > MEXICO PRIVATIZATION `REFORMS'
> > > Cheney's Pirates: `Stand and Deliver,
> > > Or We'll Sink Youhttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2003/3040cheney_pirates.html

>
> > > Bush-Cheney Energy Strategy: Procuring the Rest of the World's Oilhttp://www.commondreams.org/views04/0113-01.htm

>
> > > SEE:
> > > Bush's Energy Pirates Are in Global Grab
> > > Intelligence Review
> > > by John Hoefle

>
> > > HoustonChronicle.com
> > > This and other massive pressures on Pemex, created after Mexico
> > > nationalized the oil industry in 1938, are part of a laundry list of
> > > challenges facing a ...http://www.hubbertpeak.com/mx/Houston905260_20010509.htm

>
> > > MEXICO PUTS OIL ON TRADE TABLE
> > > ... nationalized petroleum sector is causing an enormous scandal in
> > > Mexico. ... Mexico's willingness to put oil on the negotiating table
> > > illustrates both ...http://www.rcwhalen.com/doc/joc_mexico_puts_oil_on_trade_table.doc

>
> > > Si ?
> > > Raymondo

>
> > Bravo Raymond, spoken like a true leftist Nazi. When should
> > Gringos Invade Mexico!?- Hide quoted text -

>
> > - Show quoted text -

>
> Gringos Invade Mexico! The invasion has been under way for many years.
> The Baby-Boomers Head South
>
> "Small opportunities are often the beginning of great enterprises"
> --- Demosthenes:
>
> What few people - at least, outside of Mexico - have bothered to
> notice is that while all the nannies, cooks, and maids have been
> heading north to tend the luxury lifestyles of irate Republicans, the
> Gringo hordes have been rushing south to enjoy glorious budget
> retirements and affordable second homes under the Mexican sun.
>
> Over the last decade, the U.S. State Department estimates that ...
>
> read more - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


UNION PACIFIC, OIL, MEXICO, and CHENEY:

During role as governor of Texas, George W. Bush met with Mexican
President Ernesto Zedillo on multiple occassions. Incidentally, 2001,
Zedillo appointed to Union Pacific's Board of Directors, now has a
seat on boards of Alcoa and Procter & Gamble corporations and resume
very similar to VP Dick Cheney. Dick Cheney also served on the Board
of Directors for Proctor & Gamble and served on Union Pacific's Board
during Zedillo's presidency. What are the odds? Zedillo bailed out by
Clinton Administration to save his administration.

The Coup
Conditions of the bailout required Mexico to deposit all of its export
oil revenues as collateral in the Wall Street branch of the U.S.
Federal Reserve.

This gave the NWO (NEW WORLD ORDER) oil cabal even more control over
the world's oil supply. Zedillo advises Council on Foreign Relations,
the UN, & David Rockefeller's Trilaterals. Union Pacifics/TTX Cheney
Connection: friend of Cheney's on Board of Directors, Mr. Robert M.
Knight, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Union Pacific. They worked together when Cheney was on the Board of
Union Pacific as well.

---- FEMA's NAFTA-wide police state: & Bush/Cheney connections in its
railcar contracts & lines

author: the truth will not be televised, so learn to read

IN SHORT: Bush and Cheney have been shown to have ties to KCS, Union
Pacific, Trinity Rail Car, The Chamberlain Group, and The Greenbrier
Companies, after only a small amount of internet research. Imagine
what you could learn if you followed up on this.

http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/10/300277.shtml
 
Bret Cahill wrote:

> An invasion isn't necessary. Just call up Mexico City and tell them
> Baja belongs to the U. S. and the residents are U. S. citizens.


It'll be a cakewalk. They'll welcome us as liberators.
 
"Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>



Are you nutz?
The entire population would be on welfare.
The US would be bankrupt in weeks.
Let them revel in their own squalor.



Jim E
 
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:38:17 -0700, "Jim E" <YD639275@SVN.net> wrote
this crap:

>
>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>>

>Are you nutz?
>The entire population would be on welfare.
>The US would be bankrupt in weeks.
>Let them revel in their own squalor.



But my lawn would look good.



Horvath@Horvath.net

My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
ultimate power in the universe."
 
On Aug 26, 7:28?pm, Horvath <Horv...@Horvath.nospam.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:38:17 -0700, "Jim E" <YD639...@SVN.net> wrote
> this crap:
>
>
>
> >> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States

>
> >Are you nutz?
> >The entire population would be on welfare.
> >The US would be bankrupt in weeks.
> >Let them revel in their own squalor.

>
> But my lawn would look good.


Buy a Goat.

> Horv...@Horvath.net
>
> My T-shirt says, "This shirt is the
> ultimate power in the universe."
 
Jim E wrote:
> "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>>

>
>
> Are you nutz?
> The entire population would be on welfare.
> The US would be bankrupt in weeks.


To late Dim.
Saddam may be dead but he's laughing at goober from wherever he ended up.


--
John R. Carroll

www.machiningsolution.com
 
"J Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
news:4woAi.12089$3x.9832@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> Jim E wrote:
>> "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
>> news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>>>

>>
>>
>> Are you nutz?
>> The entire population would be on welfare.
>> The US would be bankrupt in weeks.

>
> To late Dim.
> Saddam may be dead but he's laughing at goober from wherever he ended up.
>
>



Put the pipe down
Pick up a gun and start killing illegals.



Jim E
 
In article <5jevmkF3scdmaU1@mid.individual.net>, Jim E at YD639275
@SVN.net says...
>
> "J Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
> news:4woAi.12089$3x.9832@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> > Jim E wrote:
> >> "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> >>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Are you nutz?
> >> The entire population would be on welfare.
> >> The US would be bankrupt in weeks.

> >
> > To late Dim.
> > Saddam may be dead but he's laughing at goober from wherever he ended up.
> >
> >

>
>
> Put the pipe down
> Pick up a gun and start killing illegals.
>
>
>
> Jim E
>


I saw you speeding yesterday, Jim E.


Pow!


There really ought to be a law against bigotry and fascism.
 
"Desmond and Molly Jones" <dmj@spamspamspamspam.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.213bfaec78a70a46989f31@netnews.mchsi.com...
> In article <5jevmkF3scdmaU1@mid.individual.net>, Jim E at YD639275
> @SVN.net says...
>>
>> "J Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
>> news:4woAi.12089$3x.9832@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>> > Jim E wrote:
>> >> "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> >>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Are you nutz?
>> >> The entire population would be on welfare.
>> >> The US would be bankrupt in weeks.
>> >
>> > To late Dim.
>> > Saddam may be dead but he's laughing at goober from wherever he ended
>> > up.
>> >
>> >

>>
>>
>> Put the pipe down
>> Pick up a gun and start killing illegals.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jim E
>>

>
> I saw you speeding yesterday, Jim E.
>
>
> Pow!
>



Take your best shot, you anti gun, unarmed, liberal, capitulating loser.
I live in Washington state, concealed carry is a given.
I prefer a M1917Colt.
Sometimes I carry a M1911, just for the reduced profile.
Catch me if you can.


Jim E


Jim E


Jim E
 
That would be the political equivalent of eating a can of botoulism
contaminated chili because the can burst open and you're tired of the
stink in your kitchen.
 
In article <5jf3avF3t651fU1@mid.individual.net>, Jim E at YD639275
@SVN.net says...
>
> "Desmond and Molly Jones" <dmj@spamspamspamspam.org> wrote in message
> news:MPG.213bfaec78a70a46989f31@netnews.mchsi.com...
> > In article <5jevmkF3scdmaU1@mid.individual.net>, Jim E at YD639275
> > @SVN.net says...
> >>
> >> "J Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
> >> news:4woAi.12089$3x.9832@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> >> > Jim E wrote:
> >> >> "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> >> >>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Are you nutz?
> >> >> The entire population would be on welfare.
> >> >> The US would be bankrupt in weeks.
> >> >
> >> > To late Dim.
> >> > Saddam may be dead but he's laughing at goober from wherever he ended
> >> > up.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Put the pipe down
> >> Pick up a gun and start killing illegals.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jim E
> >>

> >
> > I saw you speeding yesterday, Jim E.
> >
> >
> > Pow!
> >

>
>
> Take your best shot, you anti gun, unarmed, liberal, capitulating loser.
> I live in Washington state, concealed carry is a given.
> I prefer a M1917Colt.
> Sometimes I carry a M1911, just for the reduced profile.
> Catch me if you can.
>
>
> Jim E
>
>
> Jim E
>
>
> Jim E


Jim E. Another coward who thinks he is a big man because he has a gun.
 
"Desmond and Molly Jones" <dmj@spamspamspamspam.org> wrote in message
news:MPG.213c87b8b31c276b989f37@netnews.mchsi.com...
> In article <5jf3avF3t651fU1@mid.individual.net>, Jim E at YD639275
> @SVN.net says...
>>
>> "Desmond and Molly Jones" <dmj@spamspamspamspam.org> wrote in message
>> news:MPG.213bfaec78a70a46989f31@netnews.mchsi.com...
>> > In article <5jevmkF3scdmaU1@mid.individual.net>, Jim E at YD639275
>> > @SVN.net says...
>> >>
>> >> "J Carroll" <jcarroll@machiningsolution.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:4woAi.12089$3x.9832@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
>> >> > Jim E wrote:
>> >> >> "Raymond" <Bluerhymer@aol.com> wrote in message
>> >> >> news:1188064323.849103.165220@r23g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> >> >>> Invade and annex Mexico to the United States
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Are you nutz?
>> >> >> The entire population would be on welfare.
>> >> >> The US would be bankrupt in weeks.
>> >> >
>> >> > To late Dim.
>> >> > Saddam may be dead but he's laughing at goober from wherever he
>> >> > ended
>> >> > up.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Put the pipe down
>> >> Pick up a gun and start killing illegals.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jim E
>> >>
>> >
>> > I saw you speeding yesterday, Jim E.
>> >
>> >
>> > Pow!
>> >

>>
>>
>> Take your best shot, you anti gun, unarmed, liberal, capitulating loser.
>> I live in Washington state, concealed carry is a given.
>> I prefer a M1917Colt.
>> Sometimes I carry a M1911, just for the reduced profile.
>> Catch me if you can.
>>
>>
>> Jim E
>>
>>
>> Jim E
>>
>>
>> Jim E

>
> Jim E. Another coward who thinks he is a big man because he has a gun.
>
>


No, just an average size guy, with a gun.
An armed society is a polite society.



Jim E
 
Back
Top