Limbaugh encourages listeners to commit FELONIES - Why is this nut still on the air?

  • Thread starter Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDE
  • Start date
S

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDE

Guest
http://www.alternet.org/story/80392/

Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2008.

As Ohio election officials investigate illegal crossover voting in the
2008 primary, questions arise on Limbaugh's role.
As the board of election in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where Cleveland is
located, launches an investigation into illegal crossover voting in the
state's 2008 presidential primary, a big open question remains
unanswered: Will county officials go after the ringleaders of apparently
illegal electioneering where thousands of Republican voters swore --
under penalty of law -- allegiance to the Democratic Party in order to
vote for Hillary Clinton?

In case you missed it, Rush Limbaugh, the nation's top-rated talk radio
host, was urging Republicans in Texas and Ohio to skip their party's
primary on March 4 and instead cast a vote for Hillary Clinton in order
to prolong the fight between her and Barack Obama. And that Tuesday, as
media in both states reported, thousands of Republicans did just what
Limbaugh and others had suggested -- they changed parties to vote for
Clinton.

(snip)

While this all makes for great talk radio and sounds like fun, there is
one catch: What Limbaugh encouraged Republican voters to do in Ohio was a
fifth-degree felony in that state, punishable with a $2,500 fine and six
to 12 months in jail. That is because in order to change party
affiliation in Ohio, voters have to fill out a form swearing allegiance
to that party's principles "under penalty of election falsification."

On Thursday, March 20, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the
"Cuyahoga County Board of Election has launched an investigation that
could lead to criminal charges against voters who maliciously switched
parties for the March 4 presidential primary." According to the report,
"One voter scribbled the following addendum to his pledge as a new
Democrat: "For one day only."

"Such an admission amounts to voter fraud," the report continued,
attributing that conclusion to BOE member Sandy McNair, a Democrat.

(snip)
 
If democrats crossed party lines to insure that
the idiot republicans nominate the most mindless
moron to be the republican candidate, the
republicans would be pissed as hell.

For them to cross party lines and screw
with the democrat's nomination process
is just business as usual for the ****ing
republicans.

The funny part is...
The democrats don't need to cross party
lines to insure that the republicans nominate
the biggest idiot of the pack... The republicans
can be counted on to do that to America
all on their own!

I suggest McCain and Bush are sufficient
evidence as absolute proof that I'm telling
the truth!
 
"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dbd12dd3-b691-4756-90f1-54ede4a9e491@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 25, 1:31 pm, "Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net>
wrote:
> If democrats crossed party lines to insure that
> the idiot republicans nominate the most mindless
> moron to be the republican candidate, the
> republicans would be pissed as hell.
>
> For them to cross party lines and screw
> with the democrat's nomination process
> is just business as usual for the ****ing
> republicans.
>
> The funny part is...
> The democrats don't need to cross party
> lines to insure that the republicans nominate
> the biggest idiot of the pack... The republicans
> can be counted on to do that to America
> all on their own!
>
> I suggest McCain and Bush are sufficient
> evidence as absolute proof that I'm telling
> the truth!


Is it illegal for Hillary and the Obammy to try and encourage
republicans to cross party lines and vote for them??

/ /

A candidate encouraging voters to vote for them,
is not the same as when the ****ing republicans
maliciously cross party lines to screw with the
democrats nominating process.

Not that I would ever expect any ****ing
republican to have enough sense to understand
the difference.
 
On Mar 25, 11:31 am, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
<ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net> wrote:
> If democrats crossed party lines to insure that
> the idiot republicans nominate the most mindless
> moron to be the republican candidate, the
> republicans would be pissed as hell.


They did.

> For them to cross party lines and screw
> with the democrat's nomination process
> is just business as usual for the ****ing
> republicans.


It's Politics.

> The funny part is...
> The democrats don't need to cross party
> lines to insure that the republicans nominate
> the biggest idiot of the pack... The republicans
> can be counted on to do that to America
> all on their own!
>
> I suggest McCain and Bush are sufficient
> evidence as absolute proof that I'm telling
> the truth!


Most people think you are a liar.
 
On Mar 25, 11:40 am, HarryNadds <hoofhearte...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 1:31 pm, "Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > If democrats crossed party lines to insure that
> > the idiot republicans nominate the most mindless
> > moron to be the republican candidate, the
> > republicans would be pissed as hell.

>
> > For them to cross party lines and screw
> > with the democrat's nomination process
> > is just business as usual for the ****ing
> > republicans.

>
> > The funny part is...
> > The democrats don't need to cross party
> > lines to insure that the republicans nominate
> > the biggest idiot of the pack... The republicans
> > can be counted on to do that to America
> > all on their own!

>
> > I suggest McCain and Bush are sufficient
> > evidence as absolute proof that I'm telling
> > the truth!

>
> Is it illegal for Hillary and the Obammy to try and encourage
> republicans to cross party lines and vote for them??


No. Any one can ask any one to vote for them.
 
"znuybv" <thowilson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:09a61e31-4144-4063-93a6-af3253b3151e@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 25, 11:31 am, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
> <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net> wrote:
>> If democrats crossed party lines to insure that
>> the idiot republicans nominate the most mindless
>> moron to be the republican candidate, the
>> republicans would be pissed as hell.

>
> They did.



Are you telling us that you idiot ****ing
republicans didn't nominate a total
dip-**** like McCain all on your own?

There is no reason for the damn democrats
to cross party lines. They can already bank
on the fact that republicans will always
nominate the biggest ****-wit of the pack!

Just like they did with McCain and Bush!
 
"Grendel" <wsthomas@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:801fb764-14e3-47f0-b6c7-818bf5c3db9f@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 25, 1:25 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Why is this nut still on the air?


Because a lot of people listen to him. It's really that simple.
-----------

Less than 1% of America is pretty bad, really.
 
On Mar 25, 1:25 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"
<xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.alternet.org/story/80392/
>
> Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?
>
> By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2008.
>
> As Ohio election officials investigate illegal crossover voting in the
> 2008 primary, questions arise on Limbaugh's role.
> As the board of election in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where Cleveland is
> located, launches an investigation into illegal crossover voting in the
> state's 2008 presidential primary, a big open question remains
> unanswered: Will county officials go after the ringleaders of apparently
> illegal electioneering where thousands of Republican voters swore --
> under penalty of law -- allegiance to the Democratic Party in order to
> vote for Hillary Clinton?
>
> In case you missed it, Rush Limbaugh, the nation's top-rated talk radio
> host, was urging Republicans in Texas and Ohio to skip their party's
> primary on March 4 and instead cast a vote for Hillary Clinton in order
> to prolong the fight between her and Barack Obama. And that Tuesday, as
> media in both states reported, thousands of Republicans did just what
> Limbaugh and others had suggested -- they changed parties to vote for
> Clinton.
>
> (snip)
>
> While this all makes for great talk radio and sounds like fun, there is
> one catch: What Limbaugh encouraged Republican voters to do in Ohio was a
> fifth-degree felony in that state, punishable with a $2,500 fine and six
> to 12 months in jail. That is because in order to change party
> affiliation in Ohio, voters have to fill out a form swearing allegiance
> to that party's principles "under penalty of election falsification."
>
> On Thursday, March 20, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the
> "Cuyahoga County Board of Election has launched an investigation that
> could lead to criminal charges against voters who maliciously switched
> parties for the March 4 presidential primary." According to the report,
> "One voter scribbled the following addendum to his pledge as a new
> Democrat: "For one day only."
>
> "Such an admission amounts to voter fraud," the report continued,
> attributing that conclusion to BOE member Sandy McNair, a Democrat.
>
> (snip)


I'm Lovin It! Operation Chaos has got the commie/libs running in
circles!
Please tell me where it is a felony to crossover vote. I would love
to know since even in increasingly liberal Ohio, the liberals there
have not ruled against the issue and or Rush. But, you know so much,
so tell me where.
 
On Mar 25, 11:19�am, za...@construction-imaging.com wrote:
> On Mar 25, 3:04�pm, Trace <tracey12...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 1:25 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

>
> > <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >http://www.alternet.org/story/80392/

>
> > > Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?

>
> > > By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2008.

>
> > > As Ohio election officials investigate illegal crossover voting in the
> > > 2008 primary, questions arise on Limbaugh's role.
> > > As the board of election in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where Cleveland is
> > > located, launches an investigation into illegal crossover voting in the
> > > state's 2008 presidential primary, a big open question remains
> > > unanswered: Will county officials go after the ringleaders of apparently
> > > illegal electioneering where thousands of Republican voters swore --
> > > under penalty of law -- allegiance to the Democratic Party in order to
> > > vote for Hillary Clinton?

>
> > > In case you missed it, Rush Limbaugh, the nation's top-rated talk radio
> > > host, was urging Republicans in Texas and Ohio to skip their party's
> > > primary on March 4 and instead cast a vote for Hillary Clinton in order
> > > to prolong the fight between her and Barack Obama. And that Tuesday, as
> > > media in both states reported, thousands of Republicans did just what
> > > Limbaugh and others had suggested -- they changed parties to vote for
> > > Clinton.

>
> > > (snip)

>
> > > While this all makes for great talk radio and sounds like fun, there is
> > > one catch: What Limbaugh encouraged Republican voters to do in Ohio was a
> > > fifth-degree felony in that state, punishable with a $2,500 fine and six
> > > to 12 months in jail. That is because in order to change party
> > > affiliation in Ohio, voters have to fill out a form swearing allegiance
> > > to that party's principles "under penalty of election falsification."

>
> > > On Thursday, March 20, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the
> > > "Cuyahoga County Board of Election has launched an investigation that
> > > could lead to criminal charges against voters who maliciously switched
> > > parties for the March 4 presidential primary." According to the report,
> > > "One voter scribbled the following addendum to his pledge as a new
> > > Democrat: "For one day only."

>
> > > "Such an admission amounts to voter fraud," the report continued,
> > > attributing that conclusion to BOE member Sandy McNair, a Democrat.

>
> > > (snip)

>
> > I'm Lovin It! �Operation Chaos has got the commie/libs running in
> > circles!
> > Please tell me where it is a felony to crossover vote. �I would love
> > to know since even in increasingly liberal Ohio, the liberals there
> > have not ruled against the issue and or Rush. �But, you know so much,
> > so tell me where.

>
> A crossover vote, even a malicious one, isn't technically illegal. A
> malicious crossover vote is, IMHO, un-American.
>
> It is a felony to lie on an affidavit, which is actually what is being
> considered in Ohio.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


"But Yer Honner, I intended to Vote for a Democrat when I signed the
Affidavit. Then after a few days, I found out what SCUMBAGS Democrats
are and Changed My Mind"..............Heehee.........
 
On Mar 25, 11:46 am, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
<ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net> wrote:
> "znuybv" <thowil...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:09a61e31-4144-4063-93a6-af3253b3151e@c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Mar 25, 11:31 am, "Arizona Bushwhacker"
> > <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net> wrote:
> >> If democrats crossed party lines to insure that
> >> the idiot republicans nominate the most mindless
> >> moron to be the republican candidate, the
> >> republicans would be pissed as hell.

>
> > They did.

>
> Are you telling us that you idiot ****ing
> republicans didn't nominate a total
> dip-**** like McCain all on your own?
>
> There is no reason for the damn democrats
> to cross party lines. They can already bank
> on the fact that republicans will always
> nominate the biggest ****-wit of the pack!
>

Democrat cross overs played a part in the dip shits nomination.

> Just like they did with McCain and Bush!
 
On Mar 25, 3:29 pm, Jakthehammer <jakthh...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 25, 11:19�am, za...@construction-imaging.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 25, 3:04�pm, Trace <tracey12...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> > > On Mar 25, 1:25 pm, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS"

>
> > > <xeton2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > >http://www.alternet.org/story/80392/

>
> > > > Will Rush Limbaugh Be Indicted for Voter Fraud?

>
> > > > By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted March 21, 2008.

>
> > > > As Ohio election officials investigate illegal crossover voting in the
> > > > 2008 primary, questions arise on Limbaugh's role.
> > > > As the board of election in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, where Cleveland is
> > > > located, launches an investigation into illegal crossover voting in the
> > > > state's 2008 presidential primary, a big open question remains
> > > > unanswered: Will county officials go after the ringleaders of apparently
> > > > illegal electioneering where thousands of Republican voters swore --
> > > > under penalty of law -- allegiance to the Democratic Party in order to
> > > > vote for Hillary Clinton?

>
> > > > In case you missed it, Rush Limbaugh, the nation's top-rated talk radio
> > > > host, was urging Republicans in Texas and Ohio to skip their party's
> > > > primary on March 4 and instead cast a vote for Hillary Clinton in order
> > > > to prolong the fight between her and Barack Obama. And that Tuesday, as
> > > > media in both states reported, thousands of Republicans did just what
> > > > Limbaugh and others had suggested -- they changed parties to vote for
> > > > Clinton.

>
> > > > (snip)

>
> > > > While this all makes for great talk radio and sounds like fun, there is
> > > > one catch: What Limbaugh encouraged Republican voters to do in Ohio was a
> > > > fifth-degree felony in that state, punishable with a $2,500 fine and six
> > > > to 12 months in jail. That is because in order to change party
> > > > affiliation in Ohio, voters have to fill out a form swearing allegiance
> > > > to that party's principles "under penalty of election falsification."

>
> > > > On Thursday, March 20, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the
> > > > "Cuyahoga County Board of Election has launched an investigation that
> > > > could lead to criminal charges against voters who maliciously switched
> > > > parties for the March 4 presidential primary." According to the report,
> > > > "One voter scribbled the following addendum to his pledge as a new
> > > > Democrat: "For one day only."

>
> > > > "Such an admission amounts to voter fraud," the report continued,
> > > > attributing that conclusion to BOE member Sandy McNair, a Democrat.

>
> > > > (snip)

>
> > > I'm Lovin It! �Operation Chaos has got the commie/libs running in
> > > circles!
> > > Please tell me where it is a felony to crossover vote. �I would love
> > > to know since even in increasingly liberal Ohio, the liberals there
> > > have not ruled against the issue and or Rush. �But, you know so much,
> > > so tell me where.

>
> > A crossover vote, even a malicious one, isn't technically illegal. A
> > malicious crossover vote is, IMHO, un-American.

>
> > It is a felony to lie on an affidavit, which is actually what is being
> > considered in Ohio.- Hide quoted text -

>
> > - Show quoted text -

>
> "But Yer Honner,  I intended to Vote for a Democrat when I signed the
> Affidavit. Then after a few days, I found out what SCUMBAGS Democrats
> are and Changed My Mind"..............Heehee.........


How typical. You think breaking the law is funny. HEEHEE.
 
Where were Hillary and Obama doing that?
If it was here in Pa. it's legal.


"HarryNadds" <hoofhearted07@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:dbd12dd3-b691-4756-90f1-54ede4a9e491@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 25, 1:31 pm, "Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBushwhac...@cox.net>
wrote:
> If democrats crossed party lines to insure that
> the idiot republicans nominate the most mindless
> moron to be the republican candidate, the
> republicans would be pissed as hell.
>
> For them to cross party lines and screw
> with the democrat's nomination process
> is just business as usual for the ****ing
> republicans.
>
> The funny part is...
> The democrats don't need to cross party
> lines to insure that the republicans nominate
> the biggest idiot of the pack... The republicans
> can be counted on to do that to America
> all on their own!
>
> I suggest McCain and Bush are sufficient
> evidence as absolute proof that I'm telling
> the truth!


Is it illegal for Hillary and the Obammy to try and encourage
republicans to cross party lines and vote for them??
 

Similar threads

Back
Top