Owning or looking at 'Extreme' pornographic images to be outlawed in UK.

[Feckless Wench]

Abuse is abuse. It doesn’t matter if it's filmed or not. It's illegal to beat someone or sexually abuse them. So to film it would only incriminate yourself.

It's not illegal to beat someone with their consent. Or to indulge in what could be considered sexual abuse....as long as the 'abused' is consenting.

 

[snafu]

It's not illegal to beat someone with their consent. Or to indulge in what could be considered sexual abuse....as long as the 'abused' is consenting.

Yes it is. If the cops sees someone beating someone, it dosn't matter if the victim says its' ok. The state takes over and prosecutes.

 

[Feckless Wench]

Not in the Uk they don't. The person being beaten would need to press charges if they were not consenting. If the crown chose to prosecute the 'beater' then the 'beaten' could stop it right there by saying that they consented.

 

[timesjoke]

Not in the Uk they don't. The person being beaten would need to press charges if they were not consenting. If the crown chose to prosecute the 'beater' then the 'beaten' could stop it right there by saying that they consented.

In America there are laws where the prosecuter can file without the victim. Domestic violence and beating the elderly are two good examples.

I believe the point Snaf was going to make was how do we know for sure that the woman "liked" the acts? There could be a lot of reasons other than enjoyment for the woman to be involved in violent ***.

 

[Feckless Wench]

I believe the point Snaf was going to make was how do we know for sure that the woman "liked" the acts? There could be a lot of reasons other than enjoyment for the woman to be involved in violent ***.

If you're going to mention that the woman may not be consenting then how about the man?

 

[ImWithStupid]

Yes it is. If the cops sees someone beating someone, it dosn't matter if the victim says its' ok. The state takes over and prosecutes.

At the point that the person consents to the act, it isn't abuse.

I'm not talking about domestic violence, that's a different story, I mean more of spanking, whipping, candle wax on the nipples, etc... Stuff intended for sexual gratification.

Just as their are sadistic people out there who "get off" on hurting people, you also have masachistic people who "get off" on pain being inflicted on them. There are people who pay dominatrix type people a lot of money to be hurt, punished and/or treated like sh t.

 

[timesjoke]

If you're going to mention that the woman may not be consenting then how about the man?

If were going to talk about abuse, most of the time it is men abusing women. Sure, there are men out there getting abused, but they account for very few in comparison to women.

I even see the fashon industry as abusing women. They offer unrealistic and unhealthy goals for women to try and meet and many fall prey to eating disorders and such because of it.

Give me a woman with curves any day, preferably a cup size C or better

At the point that the person consents to the act, it isn't abuse.

That would depend on the reason they are consenting right?

*** with your wife because you bought her a new diamond tennis bracelet is okay, *** with a woman because you paid her 20 bucks is called prostitution, everything is about intent.

If the woman liked to get beat up to please her sexually, fine, I don't have issues with that but doing it for money or being pressured into it is something completely different.

If we see a video of a man beating the out of his wife but the woman says she wanted that beating after her husband told her to say that, how do we know the truth?

I'm not talking about domestic violence, that's a different story, I mean more of spanking, whipping, candle wax on the nipples, etc... Stuff intended for sexual gratification.

Just as their are sadistic people out there who "get off" on hurting people, you also have masachistic people who "get off" on pain being inflicted on them. There are people who pay dominatrix type people a lot of money to be hurt, punished and/or treated like sh t.

I believe the point it changes for most of us is when you are making video tapes and stuff. Most videos are made to sell, not keep for private use. The minute the *** becomes a public act, it changes.

Private is private, don't make videos about it and you never have to answer questions about the videos now do you?