Its ******* funny....then again...i dont care what they are called' date=' i'll still listen to the ones i like[/quote']Amen! *bows*
I think in general it's stupid to put band in genres...I agree with you thoughTo split this genre into "Early Post-Grunge", "Second Wave Post-Grunge" and "Modern Post-Grunge" is so stupid. Labelling bands into different catagories because of the years when they released albumns or were popular or whatever...wtf...that's stupid labelling...I mean...Staind seem to be "Early Post-Grunge" and "Modern Post-Grunge", despite them releasing albumns consistently from 1999 to 2005. Seemed to skip that "Second Wave Post-Grunge"...
some of the bands I like seem to be in this genre...pfft, screw that.
In that point you are right...but I still don't like it...because a lot of bands get labled wrong...^^ I have said it before, its easier to class radio stations, clubs and gigs by using genre terms, they are hardly gonna go out n explain the exact details of the music on a leaflet for a club 'its a night that plays that type of music that bands such as Kasabian, Foo Fighters, Red Hot Chili Peppers, QOTSA & The Coral play' o yea of course they could just say 'Indie/Rock night with DJ whatever, drinks promotion'
Genres also make it easier to sort n organise music.