Re: #flonk IRC chat

[Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce]

St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:

>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:16:20 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
><mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:
>
>>St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:
>>
>>>>>> And I feel that role-play (of sorts) is interesting.
>>>>>
>>>>> And any normal human being would consider that disgusting.
>>>>
>>>>And who's to say what's normal?
>>>
>>>Those of us who are satisfied with our existence as human beings, and
>>>do not wish we were tiny rodents or nonexistent winged monsters.
>>
>>Meow meow speak for yourself meow Kitty?
>
>Commandante! How's it going? How's the wife? How's the law practice?

How's the wife? Well it's a good thing I'm practicing law, if you catch my
drift!

 

[St. Raoul Xemblinosky]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:08:11 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
<mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:

>St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:
>
>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:16:20 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
>><mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:
>>>
>>>>>>> And I feel that role-play (of sorts) is interesting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And any normal human being would consider that disgusting.
>>>>>
>>>>>And who's to say what's normal?
>>>>
>>>>Those of us who are satisfied with our existence as human beings, and
>>>>do not wish we were tiny rodents or nonexistent winged monsters.
>>>
>>>Meow meow speak for yourself meow Kitty?
>>
>>Commandante! How's it going? How's the wife? How's the law practice?
>
>How's the wife? Well it's a good thing I'm practicing law, if you catch my
>drift!

Stay in - uh, touch - with Stewie and Staloff and the Pornpig?

---
Behold the .sig file of His AssHoliness, St. Raoul Xemblinosky mhm 15x12
http://www.experiencefestival.com/raoul_xemblinosky
http://memweb.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq

 

[Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce]

We have a report from the alt.flame Dynamics Officer that St. Raoul Xemblinosky
has exploded. Flight director confirms that:

>On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:08:11 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
><mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:
>
>>St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:
>>
>>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:16:20 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
>>><mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>>St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:
>>>>
>>>>>>>> And I feel that role-play (of sorts) is interesting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And any normal human being would consider that disgusting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And who's to say what's normal?
>>>>>
>>>>>Those of us who are satisfied with our existence as human beings, and
>>>>>do not wish we were tiny rodents or nonexistent winged monsters.
>>>>
>>>>Meow meow speak for yourself meow Kitty?
>>>
>>>Commandante! How's it going? How's the wife? How's the law practice?
>>
>>How's the wife? Well it's a good thing I'm practicing law, if you catch my
>>drift!
>
>Stay in - uh, touch - with Stewie and Staloff and the Pornpig?

I think they all run an Arby's outside of Cleveland now.




PS -- Susan was a lousy lay

 

[St. Raoul Xemblinosky]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:03:21 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
<mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:

>We have a report from the alt.flame Dynamics Officer that St. Raoul Xemblinosky
>has exploded. Flight director confirms that:
>
>>On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:08:11 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
>><mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:16:20 +0900, Commandante Meow Meow Matt Bruce
>>>><mlbruce@haavaad.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>St. Raoul Xemblinosky made you a cookie, but he eated it:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And I feel that role-play (of sorts) is interesting.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And any normal human being would consider that disgusting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>And who's to say what's normal?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Those of us who are satisfied with our existence as human beings, and
>>>>>>do not wish we were tiny rodents or nonexistent winged monsters.
>>>>>
>>>>>Meow meow speak for yourself meow Kitty?
>>>>
>>>>Commandante! How's it going? How's the wife? How's the law practice?
>>>
>>>How's the wife? Well it's a good thing I'm practicing law, if you catch my
>>>drift!
>>
>>Stay in - uh, touch - with Stewie and Staloff and the Pornpig?
>
>I think they all run an Arby's outside of Cleveland now.
>
>
>
>
>PS -- Susan was a lousy lay

Lucky for you you're still straight. Staloff ****ed her and it turned
him queer.

---
Behold the .sig file of His AssHoliness, St. Raoul Xemblinosky mhm 15x12
http://www.experiencefestival.com/raoul_xemblinosky
http://memweb.newsguy.com/~shpxurnq

 

[Timmay!]

gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem:
>> [...]
>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>>>
>>>Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you were
>>>any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your point,
>>>exactly?
>>
>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>
>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>
>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>
>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything else).

I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky.

Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about
that in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to
contend that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me.

[...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv")

Yeah right.

--
Timmay!

"I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's
No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in
<77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

 

[Tim Weaver]

Timmay! wrote:

> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem:
>>> [...]
>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
>>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
>>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>>>>
>>>>Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you were
>>>>any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your point,
>>>>exactly?
>>>
>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>
>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>
>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>
>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything else).
>
> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky.
>
> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about
> that in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to
> contend that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me.
>
> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv")
>
> Yeah right.

All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual spanking
you attempt on each other. Pathetic.
--
Tim Weaver

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."

- Gene Spafford, 1992

 

[mimus]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:

> Timmay! wrote:
>
>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>
>>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
>>>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
>>>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>>>>>
>>>>> Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you
>>>>> were any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's
>>>>> your point, exactly?
>>>>
>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>
>>>>> You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>
>>>>> @ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>> pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>> hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>> will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>>
>>> First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
>>> else).
>>
>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
>> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky.
>>
>> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about that
>> in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to contend
>> that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me.
>>
>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv")
>>
>> Yeah right.
>
> All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual
> spanking you attempt on each other. Pathetic.

It's all those virtual buttocks.

--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

Sir, your wife, under pretence of keeping a bawdy-house,
is a receiver of stolen goods.

< Johnson

 

[Tim Weaver]

mimus wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>
>> Timmay! wrote:
>>
>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and
with
>>>>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
>>>>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you
>>>>>> were any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your
>>>>>> point, exactly?
>>>>>
>>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>>
>>>>>> You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>>> pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>>> hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>>> will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>>>
>>>> First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
else).
>>>
>>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
>>> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky.
>>>
>>> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about that
>>> in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to contend
>>> that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me.
>>>
>>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv")
>>>
>>> Yeah right.
>>
>> All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual
spanking
>> you attempt on each other. Pathetic.
>
> It's all those virtual buttocks.

They could at least put on some virtual underpants.
--
Tim Weaver

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it."

- Gene Spafford, 1992

 

[gregvk]

Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in
news:s4bo54hj7ih9ku9bl2v43a71r8fb14cavc@4ax.com:
>>>
>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>
>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>
>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>
>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
>>else).
>
> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did

PPOSTFU, spankard.


TIA

 

[gregvk]

mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:YYCdncmZA67trsHVnZ2dnUVZ_jWdnZ2d@giganews.com:

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>
>> Timmay! wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv")
>>>
>>> Yeah right.
>>
>> All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual
>> spanking you attempt on each other. Pathetic.
>
> It's all those virtual buttocks.

Dimmy likes spankings because they're good for his butt-mushroom crop.

 

[K. A. Cannon]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver <tmw99999@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Timmay! wrote:
>
>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem:
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
>>>>>> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
>>>>>> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>>>>>
>>>>>Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you were
>>>>>any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your point,
>>>>>exactly?
>>>>
>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>
>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>
>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>>
>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything else).
>>
>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
>> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky.
>>
>> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about
>> that in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to
>> contend that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me.
>>
>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv")
>>
>> Yeah right.
>
>All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual spanking
>you attempt on each other. Pathetic.

Nice self-spank.

--
K. A. Cannon
kcannon at insurgent dot org
(change the orgy to org to reply)

COOSN-266-06-02374
Hammer of Thor, April 2005
PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER June 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle X 2
#9 People ruining UseNet lits.
#6 Top Assholes on the Net lits.
#5 Most hated Usenetizens of all time
#15 AUK psychos and felons lits
#5 Cog in the AUK Hate Machine

 

[Meat Plow]

On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:55:33 -0400, K.A.Cannon wrote:

> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:32:08 -0500, Tim Weaver <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Timmay! wrote:
>>
>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrotem:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and
>>>>>>> with at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except
>>>>>>> my posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Many of 'em are still active, too, as you would already know if you
>>>>>>were any more perceptive than a braindamaged vole. ...So what's your
>>>>>>point, exactly?
>>>>>
>>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
>>>>else).
>>>
>>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
>>> and that makes you a spankard by the alt.flame FAQ, spanky.
>>>
>>> Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about that
>>> in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to contend
>>> that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me.
>>>
>>> [...]("I'm not a spankard, honest guv")
>>>
>>> Yeah right.
>>
>>All of you people are pathetic. You and all your bizarre virtual
>>spanking you attempt on each other. Pathetic.
>
> Nice self-spank.

SPANK

--
#1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007
#1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007
#10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, May 2008
COOSN-266-06-25794

 

[Timmay!]

gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:

>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>
>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>
>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>>
>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
>>>else).
>>
>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
>
>PPOSTFU

Sure.

"There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>

If you want to prove you're not spanked, post a verifiable list of all
your nyms since you've been posting to alt.flame.

If you don't, then you've got something to hide and you're spanked.

Anyway, you're spanked by your own definition. We had a chat about
that in another thread and you decided it would be pertinent not to
contend that point any further and dropped the thread. Point to me.

Thanks for playing.

--
Timmay!

"You've followed me thread to thread, ng to ng (including those you
claim you don't read) for the last year, spanktoy." Paranoid Burton
imagines stalkers in <259v3uc2um3vbs74s9glrn2kgh22b4mfkj@4ax.com>

 

[Timmay!]

Tim Weaver <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:

>They could at least put on some virtual underpants.

We know you have a hairy sprout fetish, don't try and deny it.

--
Timmay!

"I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's
No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in
<77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

 

[gregvk]

Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in
news:38ar541q5jgks6tcdt3sttbk2fmfst13rr@4ax.com:

> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>
>>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>>
>>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>>>
>>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
>>>>else).
>>>
>>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
>>
>>PPOSTFU
>
> <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>

All that proves, at this point, is that you are easily trolled.

> If
[pitysnipped whining that Dimmy posted instead of proof]

You're the one claiming that there was a spankage, so the burden of proof
is on you.

Once again: PPOSTFU

> post a verifiable list of all
> your nyms since you've been posting to alt.flame.

You must already have such a list, if you can claim that one of them got
spanked.

Now, for the second time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame that
immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting under, and
the nym that disappeared.

 

[Timmay!]

gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
>>>>>>>hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
>>>>>>>will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.
>>>>>
>>>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
>>>>>else).
>>>>
>>>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody did
>>>
>>>PPOSTFU
>>
>> <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>
>All that proves, at this point, is that you are easily trolled.

"There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>

You're spanked.

>> If
>[pitysnipped whining that Dimmy posted instead of proof]

"Since pretty much all you could come back with, that time, was some
of the most pathetic snippage and evasion to hit the net in the past
decade, I'm gonna go ahead and claim SPANK right now."

You're spanked.

>You're the one claiming that there was a spankage, so the burden of proof
>is on you.
>
>Once again: PPOSTFU

"There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>

You're spanked.

>> post a verifiable list of all your nyms since you've been posting to alt.flame.
>
>You must already have such a list, if you can claim that one of them got
>spanked.

You can easily claim a spank if your target:

@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.

You're spanked.

>Now, for the second time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame that
>immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting under, and
>the nym that disappeared.

Post a verifiable list of your nyms and I'll do just that. Well?

--
Timmay!

"I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's
No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in
<77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

 

[gregvk]

Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote in
news:nec0645a44km1hdajt12nk8cjmt38u78j9@4ax.com:

> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>>>>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> From the alt.flame FAQ:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>@ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
>>>>>>>>pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a
>>>>>>>>single hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a
>>>>>>>>newbie. They will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence
>>>>>>>>shows otherwise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>First off, you have never made me change my identity (or anything
>>>>>>else).
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not claiming I spanked you out of alt.flame, but somebody
>>>>> did
>>>>
>>>>PPOSTFU
>>>
>>> <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>>
>>All that proves, at this point, is that you are easily trolled.
>
> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>
> You're spanked.

You're trolled.

>>> If
>>[pitysnipped whining that Dimmy posted instead of proof]
>
> "Since pretty much all you could come back with, that time, was some
> of the most pathetic snippage and evasion to hit the net in the past
> decade, I'm gonna go ahead and claim SPANK right now."
>
> You're spanked.

Uh, dumbass, that was me spanking you .

>>You're the one claiming that there was a spankage, so the burden of
>>proof is on you.
>>
>>Once again: PPOSTFU
>
> "There have been multiple nyms in the past 8-9 months alone, and with
> at least a couple of them I didn't change anything else except my
> posting style." <Xns9ABEA6AD0C20A01773E1E7C2A948@127.0.0.1>
>
> You're spanked.

You're trolled.

>>> post a verifiable list of all your nyms since you've been posting to
>>> alt.flame.
>>
>>You must already have such a list, if you can claim that one of them
>>got spanked.
>
> You can easily claim a spank if your target:
>
> @ changes identity and tries to return to usenet under false
> pretenses. ie: Your target gets a new ISP and doesn't give a single
> hint as to their past in the group, then claims to be a newbie. They
> will also lie profusely when caught, until evidence shows otherwise.

Too bad you can't show where anyone made that happen.

> You're spanked.
>
>>Now, for the second time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame
>>that immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting
>>under, and the nym that disappeared.
>
> Post a verifiable list of your nyms and I'll do just that.

In order to claim spankage, you already need to have such a list,

 

[Timmay!]

gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
>Timmay! <timmay@hell-flame-wars.net> wrote:
>> gregvk <greg@nospam.okthx> wrote:
[...]
>> "Since pretty much all you could come back with, that time, was some
>> of the most pathetic snippage and evasion to hit the net in the past
>> decade, I'm gonna go ahead and claim SPANK right now."
>>
>> You're spanked.
>
>Uh, dumbass, that was me spanking you .

Your criteria for that spank was snipping and evading, but now you're
snipping and evading you're obviously spanked by your own criteria

Problems understanding that, spanky?

[...]
>> You're spanked.
>>
>>>Now, for the second time: Let's see a link to a devastating flame
>>>that immediately preceded the disappearance of a nym I was posting
>>>under, and the nym that disappeared.
>>
>> Post a verifiable list of your nyms and I'll do just that.
>
>In order to claim spankage, you already need to have such a list,

I'm not claiming spank. I'm claiming you're a spankard. Your statement
verifies that you're a spankard. How many times do we have to go
through this until you understand it, spanky?

--
Timmay!

"I wonder if aft realises they're taking killfile advice from Usenet's
No.1 newsgroup invader?" Fifth-rate Suzieflame pays homage in
<77b0od$ub2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>