Re: OT: Good news for lubricant companies

D

dave hillstrom

Guest
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:22:16 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
wrote:

>
>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>news:r441t2hqepguj92c30s02lqfp3aetdd0i7@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:14:26 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:07:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:249ps25h7llu6o61u5jqpt9i9f2s4btujl@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:27:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:17:34 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:s97ps2dqf4gl2a19dg3dtb00b7ifj4keqs@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:56:45 -0500, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Fassinating article for interested usenetters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Over time, statistics on anal sex indicate a substantial increase
>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>people reporting anal sex, from a low of 9% in the Kinsey data
>>>>>>>>>(collected from 1938 to 1963) to a high of 34% of men in a national
>>>>>>>>>survey in 2002. But it's impossible to know if this increase is an
>>>>>>>>>actual rise in anal sex, or simply a rise in how often anal sex is
>>>>>>>>>asked about and how often subjects respond honestly.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Is Heterosexual Anal Sex More Popular, or Just More Acceptable?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>This is a key question, and one that statistics can never fully
>>>>>>>>>answer. Anal sex statistics do indicate that a generational change
>>>>>>>>>has
>>>>>>>>>occurred, where people born in the 1980s and later may be more
>>>>>>>>>comfortable admitting to having anal sex, or more interested in
>>>>>>>>>having
>>>>>>>>>anal sex.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Surveys done prior to 1980 showed that younger people were more
>>>>>>>>>likely
>>>>>>>>>to have had anal sex, and as age increased, the likelihood of having
>>>>>>>>>had anal sex decreased. This is usually explained as a generational
>>>>>>>>>effect, where older research subjects were raised in a time when
>>>>>>>>>anal
>>>>>>>>>sex was less prevalent (either as a topic or a sexual behavior).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>More recent surveys, conducted in the late 1990s and in 2002 show a
>>>>>>>>>very different age effect. In these surveys, younger people (under
>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>age of 25) were less likely to have had anal sex, and as research
>>>>>>>>>subjects' ages went up, the likelihood that they had tried anal sex
>>>>>>>>>also increased.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>While there is no way of knowing for certain, what all this likely
>>>>>>>>>points to is a fundamental shift at the very least in the social
>>>>>>>>>acceptability of reporting anal sex, if not actually engaging in
>>>>>>>>>it."
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>http://sexuality.about.com/od/sexualhealthqanda/f/anal_sex_common.htm
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> so, jade, could you tell me why you seem so interested in anal sex,
>>>>>>>> hmmm?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this signature is NOT for mimus. so there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That is why Jade is called, ANUS! :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>are you ~still~ around? sheesh.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where else would he go?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jade
>>>>
>>>>Still spouting your childish shite, ANUS!
>>>
>>>well, hes consistent, if extremely boring and repetitive.

>>
>> And also a delusional woman hating loser. He's really got a lot going
>> for him.

>
>A lot more than you do, Loser!


MCP should be the poster child for alt.flame's lamers.

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

this signature is NOT for mimus. so there.

but it is for hatchetmama and shirley.
 
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:42:47 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:22:16 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>>news:r441t2hqepguj92c30s02lqfp3aetdd0i7@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:14:26 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:07:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>>>>>news:249ps25h7llu6o61u5jqpt9i9f2s4btujl@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:27:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:17:34 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:s97ps2dqf4gl2a19dg3dtb00b7ifj4keqs@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:56:45 -0500, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Fassinating article for interested usenetters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"Over time, statistics on anal sex indicate a substantial increase
>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>people reporting anal sex, from a low of 9% in the Kinsey data
>>>>>>>>>>(collected from 1938 to 1963) to a high of 34% of men in a national
>>>>>>>>>>survey in 2002. But it's impossible to know if this increase is an
>>>>>>>>>>actual rise in anal sex, or simply a rise in how often anal sex is
>>>>>>>>>>asked about and how often subjects respond honestly.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Is Heterosexual Anal Sex More Popular, or Just More Acceptable?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>This is a key question, and one that statistics can never fully
>>>>>>>>>>answer. Anal sex statistics do indicate that a generational change
>>>>>>>>>>has
>>>>>>>>>>occurred, where people born in the 1980s and later may be more
>>>>>>>>>>comfortable admitting to having anal sex, or more interested in
>>>>>>>>>>having
>>>>>>>>>>anal sex.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Surveys done prior to 1980 showed that younger people were more
>>>>>>>>>>likely
>>>>>>>>>>to have had anal sex, and as age increased, the likelihood of having
>>>>>>>>>>had anal sex decreased. This is usually explained as a generational
>>>>>>>>>>effect, where older research subjects were raised in a time when
>>>>>>>>>>anal
>>>>>>>>>>sex was less prevalent (either as a topic or a sexual behavior).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>More recent surveys, conducted in the late 1990s and in 2002 show a
>>>>>>>>>>very different age effect. In these surveys, younger people (under
>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>age of 25) were less likely to have had anal sex, and as research
>>>>>>>>>>subjects' ages went up, the likelihood that they had tried anal sex
>>>>>>>>>>also increased.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>While there is no way of knowing for certain, what all this likely
>>>>>>>>>>points to is a fundamental shift at the very least in the social
>>>>>>>>>>acceptability of reporting anal sex, if not actually engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>it."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://sexuality.about.com/od/sexualhealthqanda/f/anal_sex_common.htm
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> so, jade, could you tell me why you seem so interested in anal sex,
>>>>>>>>> hmmm?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> this signature is NOT for mimus. so there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That is why Jade is called, ANUS! :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>are you ~still~ around? sheesh.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Where else would he go?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jade
>>>>>
>>>>>Still spouting your childish shite, ANUS!
>>>>
>>>>well, hes consistent, if extremely boring and repetitive.
>>>
>>> And also a delusional woman hating loser. He's really got a lot going
>>> for him.

>>
>>A lot more than you do, Loser!

>
>MCP should be the poster child for alt.flame's lamers.


Heh! Funny you should say that because last year I crossposted some of
his gems to AF and suggested he should be their flamer of teh year.

I got no support. I ddin't get flamed either.

Jade
 
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:07:00 -0500, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
wrote:

>On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:42:47 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:22:16 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>>>news:r441t2hqepguj92c30s02lqfp3aetdd0i7@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:14:26 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:07:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:249ps25h7llu6o61u5jqpt9i9f2s4btujl@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:27:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:17:34 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:s97ps2dqf4gl2a19dg3dtb00b7ifj4keqs@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:56:45 -0500, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Fassinating article for interested usenetters.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>"Over time, statistics on anal sex indicate a substantial increase
>>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>>people reporting anal sex, from a low of 9% in the Kinsey data
>>>>>>>>>>>(collected from 1938 to 1963) to a high of 34% of men in a national
>>>>>>>>>>>survey in 2002. But it's impossible to know if this increase is an
>>>>>>>>>>>actual rise in anal sex, or simply a rise in how often anal sex is
>>>>>>>>>>>asked about and how often subjects respond honestly.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Is Heterosexual Anal Sex More Popular, or Just More Acceptable?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>This is a key question, and one that statistics can never fully
>>>>>>>>>>>answer. Anal sex statistics do indicate that a generational change
>>>>>>>>>>>has
>>>>>>>>>>>occurred, where people born in the 1980s and later may be more
>>>>>>>>>>>comfortable admitting to having anal sex, or more interested in
>>>>>>>>>>>having
>>>>>>>>>>>anal sex.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Surveys done prior to 1980 showed that younger people were more
>>>>>>>>>>>likely
>>>>>>>>>>>to have had anal sex, and as age increased, the likelihood of having
>>>>>>>>>>>had anal sex decreased. This is usually explained as a generational
>>>>>>>>>>>effect, where older research subjects were raised in a time when
>>>>>>>>>>>anal
>>>>>>>>>>>sex was less prevalent (either as a topic or a sexual behavior).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>More recent surveys, conducted in the late 1990s and in 2002 show a
>>>>>>>>>>>very different age effect. In these surveys, younger people (under
>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>age of 25) were less likely to have had anal sex, and as research
>>>>>>>>>>>subjects' ages went up, the likelihood that they had tried anal sex
>>>>>>>>>>>also increased.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>While there is no way of knowing for certain, what all this likely
>>>>>>>>>>>points to is a fundamental shift at the very least in the social
>>>>>>>>>>>acceptability of reporting anal sex, if not actually engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>it."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>http://sexuality.about.com/od/sexualhealthqanda/f/anal_sex_common.htm
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> so, jade, could you tell me why you seem so interested in anal sex,
>>>>>>>>>> hmmm?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> this signature is NOT for mimus. so there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>That is why Jade is called, ANUS! :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>are you ~still~ around? sheesh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where else would he go?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jade
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Still spouting your childish shite, ANUS!
>>>>>
>>>>>well, hes consistent, if extremely boring and repetitive.
>>>>
>>>> And also a delusional woman hating loser. He's really got a lot going
>>>> for him.
>>>
>>>A lot more than you do, Loser!

>>
>>MCP should be the poster child for alt.flame's lamers.

>
>Heh! Funny you should say that because last year I crossposted some of
>his gems to AF and suggested he should be their flamer of teh year.
>
>I got no support. I ddin't get flamed either.


teehee

--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj

this signature is NOT for mimus. so there.

but it is for hatchetmama and shirley.
 
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 11:57:21 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
wrote:

>On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:07:00 -0500, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:42:47 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:22:16 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>>>>news:r441t2hqepguj92c30s02lqfp3aetdd0i7@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:14:26 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 12:07:18 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Daedalus" <jade@netk0o0oks.org> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:249ps25h7llu6o61u5jqpt9i9f2s4btujl@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 11:27:22 -0500, dave hillstrom <DaVe@MeOw.OrG>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:17:34 GMT, "MCP" <gf010w5035@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>"dave hillstrom" <DaVe@MeOw.OrG> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>news:s97ps2dqf4gl2a19dg3dtb00b7ifj4keqs@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 10:56:45 -0500, Daedalus <jade@netk0o0oks.org>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Fassinating article for interested usenetters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>"Over time, statistics on anal sex indicate a substantial increase
>>>>>>>>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>>>>>people reporting anal sex, from a low of 9% in the Kinsey data
>>>>>>>>>>>>(collected from 1938 to 1963) to a high of 34% of men in a national
>>>>>>>>>>>>survey in 2002. But it's impossible to know if this increase is an
>>>>>>>>>>>>actual rise in anal sex, or simply a rise in how often anal sex is
>>>>>>>>>>>>asked about and how often subjects respond honestly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Is Heterosexual Anal Sex More Popular, or Just More Acceptable?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>This is a key question, and one that statistics can never fully
>>>>>>>>>>>>answer. Anal sex statistics do indicate that a generational change
>>>>>>>>>>>>has
>>>>>>>>>>>>occurred, where people born in the 1980s and later may be more
>>>>>>>>>>>>comfortable admitting to having anal sex, or more interested in
>>>>>>>>>>>>having
>>>>>>>>>>>>anal sex.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Surveys done prior to 1980 showed that younger people were more
>>>>>>>>>>>>likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>to have had anal sex, and as age increased, the likelihood of having
>>>>>>>>>>>>had anal sex decreased. This is usually explained as a generational
>>>>>>>>>>>>effect, where older research subjects were raised in a time when
>>>>>>>>>>>>anal
>>>>>>>>>>>>sex was less prevalent (either as a topic or a sexual behavior).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>More recent surveys, conducted in the late 1990s and in 2002 show a
>>>>>>>>>>>>very different age effect. In these surveys, younger people (under
>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>age of 25) were less likely to have had anal sex, and as research
>>>>>>>>>>>>subjects' ages went up, the likelihood that they had tried anal sex
>>>>>>>>>>>>also increased.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>While there is no way of knowing for certain, what all this likely
>>>>>>>>>>>>points to is a fundamental shift at the very least in the social
>>>>>>>>>>>>acceptability of reporting anal sex, if not actually engaging in
>>>>>>>>>>>>it."
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://sexuality.about.com/od/sexualhealthqanda/f/anal_sex_common.htm
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> so, jade, could you tell me why you seem so interested in anal sex,
>>>>>>>>>>> hmmm?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> dave hillstrom mhm15x4 zrbj
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> this signature is NOT for mimus. so there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>That is why Jade is called, ANUS! :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>are you ~still~ around? sheesh.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where else would he go?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jade
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Still spouting your childish shite, ANUS!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>well, hes consistent, if extremely boring and repetitive.
>>>>>
>>>>> And also a delusional woman hating loser. He's really got a lot going
>>>>> for him.
>>>>
>>>>A lot more than you do, Loser!
>>>
>>>MCP should be the poster child for alt.flame's lamers.

>>
>>Heh! Funny you should say that because last year I crossposted some of
>>his gems to AF and suggested he should be their flamer of teh year.
>>
>>I got no support. I ddin't get flamed either.

>
>teehee


Wheeeeee!

Jade
 

Similar threads

C
Replies
0
Views
55
Carl Wilson
C
C
Replies
1
Views
80
LongRodSilver
L
C
Replies
4
Views
63
david hillstrom
D
Back
Top