I don't see how his post' date=' aside from its chopiness, makes no sense. I read it and understood it just fine.[/quote']
I agree with Clogz that although Link's post was rather choppy, it was completely comprehendable. As for my opinion on whether Terry Schiavo should be kept alive or die, I think she should be kept alive. It does not matter that she is in a vegetative state or not. She is a human being and has every right in the world to have a chance to live. I think that by becoming intimately involved with another woman while his legal wife was incapacitated denies Michael Schiavo any right to determine what is best for Terry. I believe that the decision of life support or no life support should be made by Terry's parents. I also think that the United States Government completely and inappropriatley overstepped their bounds in this case. There is no reason why one soul's life/death situation should be publicized and exploited in the court system as much as this case has. The government should have issued a court order to Terry Schiavo's parents and Michael Schiavo stating that the two parties come to an agreement the first time this was brought to a government official's attention. However, it has been publicized into a civil rights case. And as a result of all this publicity, when the next presidential election comes around, there will almost certainly be a Pro-Life campaign feeding off of this. It makes me sick to even think that someone might stoop that low just to win an election, regardless of whether it be presidential or the elction for your city mayor. It's completely barbaric.