I don't know where your getting all this Sarah for big goverment stuff but I think your dead wrong along with the commie comment.
Sarah is not for big Government, she has been the very picture of conservative values and a lifetime of fighting establishment.
Hugo is stuck on the sale of oil from Alaska to the big oil companies and the people benefitting from that sale as somehow bad. My question is, who owns the oil? Politicians in office or the people of Alaska? Politicians come and go, while the people are still there paying the price for the decisions made by those politicians.
Wasn't Rand Paul connected to people with very racist attitudes and such? I believe I read something about that somewhere. His associations will bite him in the azz when running for public office.
He will most likely end up in a bathroom tapping someone's foot, lol.
My point about being willing to vote for Sarah is she is one of the very few honest people who has demonstrated real conservative values. Say what you want Hugo, she would never put forth legislation like the Bush amnesty attempt.
The question should not be who is the most strict conservative, because we have to be able to get that person into office and there is no way that will ever happen without a certain level of popular acceptance.
Obama won his election not because of his technical knowledge of government, or politics, or even science, but instead by showing a master's manipulation of public opinion.
As I said before, the vast majority of independants voted for Obama, but these same independants mostly preach conservative values and smaller Government so you tell me Hugo, why did these groups vote for someone who does not represent even one of the values they normally preach about?
Because even the independants are fooled by charisma.
This brings to mind a quote from the movie "training day" where Alonzo says, "The ****'s chess, it ain't checkers".