Hatchetmama wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:23:09 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Hatchetmama wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:28:46 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
>>> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Hatchetmama wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:54:05 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
>>>>> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hatchetmama wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:34:02 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 00:35:30 -0800, pscissons wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Tim Weaver" <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:Xns9B84BEBE70620Z0thecheeseclub0Z0@aries.weretis.net...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "mimus" <tinmimus99@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:OLednQu5QtsNH8XUnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@giganews.com...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you ever noticed when cooking with rice how it seems to go
>>>>>>>>>>>> everywhere?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rice, among other substances, travels. As does toner, food
>>>>>>>>>>> coloring, and anything flavored with curry powder.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Avoid them all. Problem solved. You're welcome.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Scientific (confirmed by me) fact.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Proof?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You want proof? Wear something white and mess around with the
>>>>>>>>> above substances; you'll get your proof.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Smee
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think a small net, like for tropical fish, would be useful for the
>>>>>>>>rice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tim just refuses to learn.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I just asked for proof. You can't come into this place making all
>>>>>>sorts of wild claims and expect not to be challenged. I DEMAND
>>>>>>proof!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe you challenged Smee for proof and she said something like
>>>>> get it yourself.
>>>>> Challenging Smee. Grounds for a smackdown, I say.
>>>>
>>>>Actually, what she did was make a witty retort. If I choose to trade
>>>>whacks with Smee and she accepts, that's our business and you can keep
>>>>your schnozola out of it. Your "smackdown" comment is unimportant and
>>>>useless.
>>>
>>> Public forum, Tim.
>>
>>Really? Good to know.
>>
>>> Take it or leave it.
>>
>>I left it. It's back there if you want it.
>
> Yes, I realise that.
Well, are you going to get it or leave it there?
>>
>>> Jes sayin'.
>>
>>OK. You might consider working on your spelling.
>
> I spell like I talk when apostreph'ing.
> Can you handle that?
Apostrophes have handles? I didn't know that.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Did I tell you I got a new gun in my Dads will?
>>>>> Well, it's hardly new, but it's a Colt, Army issue, Marine model.
>>>>
>>>>Shove it up your ***. Any questions?
>>>>
>>>>> BTW a couple of the posters in this thread are long time posters in
>>>>> the flonk. respect, they've earned it.
>>>>
>>>>What the **** are you talking about? A "long time" poster is
>>>>"protected" (make sure to get those in quotes) from the torrents of
>>>>trolling and "naughty" language coming from others around them, in
>>>>which, all of whom, have chosen to take part and anyone can leave
>>>>anytime, at will?
>>>>
>>>>'Mama' Smee can handle herself just fine with no help from you or anyone
>>>>else, so you can take your respect comment and put it with your gun.
>>>
>>> I agree that Smee can handle things herself fine. Just one thing:
>>> Touchy?
>>
>>Sometimes. You?
>
> Sometimes a bit bitchy and mean, yes.
> Other times, I'm a sweetheart.
Then we agree.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> Come to my house, I'll show ya.
>>>>
>>>>Oh dear, a threat.
>>>
>>> Was it?
>>> Or did you just take it that way?
>>
>>In hindsight it reads more like a dare.
>
> Your hindsight is good.
> <smep>
Aw, shucks. Yeah, I know. I can't help it.
>>
>>>>
>>>><runs away squealing like a little girlie>
>>>
>
--
Tim Weaver
I know you believe you understand what you think I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not
what I meant.