**** the UN

Skaterdude409

New member
True all empires fall. But the US has a long time to go before power starts slipin. and with the everyone versus us, USA vs world = everything dead. Hundreds of people have the authority to launch nukes in times of war. So you better hope that the US is around for a long time, calls when we fall, we'll go out with a bang
 

TheJenn88

New member
True all empires fall. But the US has a long time to go before power starts slipin. and with the everyone versus us, USA vs world = everything dead. Hundreds of people have the authority to launch nukes in times of war. So you better hope that the US is around for a long time, calls when we fall, we'll go out with a bang
Yeah, it will take a long time for the US to fall. But maybe not necessarily by war. It could be so gradual because of another power emerging, or other reason. Or it could be a total economic collapse. I didn't mean USA vs. World just as a war thing.

As for America going out with a bang and ending the world, that just proves only idiots use nuclear weapons. Sure, it would take 2+ sides to wage war, won't deny that.

 

snafu

New member
The way I see the U.N. is the middleman, a mediator. He tries to stop the fight. But the middleman fails. He should know when do get the **** out of the way so we can take care of the matter. But they won't. **** them! We send our troops there with both uniforms. And as long as everything is going good, they can stay in the U.N fatigues. When **** hits the fan, we **** can the U.N. fatigues and have our troops change into

'A class uniforms'. :D

 

lashton

New member
getusout.org
Theirs plenty support of pulling out of the UN. Bottom line, the US is a superpower and what we say goes. I didnt see the UN stoping us in iraq becuase they cant do **** to us. The UN is not above us remember that. We dont bow before the UN. This is why i like John Bolton. He thinks that if its not in our interests, then **** it.
OK, how arrogant can you get skaterdude, china is a super power, the UK is a super power and if putin has his way Russia will be a super power, btw the UN did say "we will not invade Iraq" they also advised tyou against it, saying "you will be on your own" this is because the UN tends to THINK before invading countrys unlike bush who was up-showed by iraq and not having weapons of mass distruction, its not the out of control iraqis the world fears with nuclear weapons, its the US the world fears, because ignorant people like you think the US is the be all and end all, open your eyes its NOT!

did you know the Ueropean union (wether you like it or not) is the most powerfull union/organisation in the world!

 

snafu

New member
btw the UN did say "we will not invade Iraq" they also advised tyou against it, saying "you will be on your own" this is because the UN tends to THINK before invading countrys unlike bush who was up-showed by iraq and not having weapons of mass distruction, its not the out of control iraqis the world fears with nuclear weapons, its the US the world fears, because ignorant people like you think the US is the be all and end all, open your eyes its NOT!
WRONG!

Read your history before you spout ****. The U.N. voted unanimously on resolution 1441. What do you think "serious consequences" meant? Another resouution? Your ******* U.N. "thought" 17 ******* times before we attaced Iraq. That means the United States waited also. ******* pantie wastes didn't want to do anything because they new we would.

Your a complete moron if you believe Saddam didn't have WMD's. I'll let someone else tear into your *** on that one.

 

jokersarewild

New member
WRONG!Read your history before you spout ****. The U.N. voted unanimously on resolution 1441. What do you think "serious consequences" meant? Another resouution? Your ******* U.N. "thought" 17 ******* times before we attaced Iraq. That means the United States waited also. ******* pantie wastes didn't want to do anything because they new we would.

Your a complete moron if you believe Saddam didn't have WMD's. I'll let someone else tear into your *** on that one.
Then where are they?

Your comment made you sound like a brainwashed, non-thinking American...I mean, Classic American.

 

sixes

New member
WRONG!Read your history before you spout ****. The U.N. voted unanimously on resolution 1441. What do you think "serious consequences" meant? Another resouution? Your ******* U.N. "thought" 17 ******* times before we attaced Iraq. That means the United States waited also. ******* pantie wastes didn't want to do anything because they new we would.

Your a complete moron if you believe Saddam didn't have WMD's. I'll let someone else tear into your *** on that one.
note to self ,don't **** snafu off~! ,LOL I just read the UN article on the UN votes for this. Snafu is dead on the money. ****! I want to see anyones retort on that!!haha

 

Skaterdude409

New member
OK, how arrogant can you get skaterdude, china is a super power, the UK is a super power and if putin has his way Russia will be a super power, btw the UN did say "we will not invade Iraq" they also advised tyou against it, saying "you will be on your own" this is because the UN tends to THINK before invading countrys unlike bush who was up-showed by iraq and not having weapons of mass distruction, its not the out of control iraqis the world fears with nuclear weapons, its the US the world fears, because ignorant people like you think the US is the be all and end all, open your eyes its NOT!did you know the Ueropean union (wether you like it or not) is the most powerfull union/organisation in the world!

TOTAL BULLSHIT. If the their are other countries that are superpowers, it leads back to america being a hyperpower. Bottom line, no one not even the EU is up to par to american military strength.

1. The EU has a language barrier. Not to mention their still seperate countries which means their militaries are not coordinated as well as the US which answers to one hiarchy.

2. Are technology is still more advanced although sometimes equal to the EU.

3. US forces have major combat experience. Over 500,000 differnt personal were rotated through Iraq. No other military in the world currently has so many combat experienced soldiers.

In full out war the EU would lose. for crying out loud, we still occupy germany.

 

snafu

New member
Then where are they?
Your comment made you sound like a brainwashed, non-thinking American...I mean, Classic American.
We new he had WMDS. Nobody has ever refuted this fact. He gassed the Kurds remember? He was supposed to destroy everything and let the U.N. verify the destruction. He never allowed this.

So I ask you were did it go?

Most of it went to Syria. We had Satellite photos of the convoy going into Syria. Saddam set up his own guard when this convoy went through. Most of the boarder guards could not be trusted as they would take bribes from people to cross. Plus they didn’t want them to see anything.

http://www.2la.org/syria/iraq-wmd.php

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/01/25/1074965423080.html

He dumped a lot of chemical weapons in the rivers.

He had his scientist bury centrifuge parts in their yards. We did find one warhead with residue but it was inconclusive

There’s so much evidence it isn’t funny. But the liberals want a smoking gun as they put it. Do you want it shoved up your *** before you concede that they not only existed but were never disposed of?

If you add everything up you have your somking gun.

 
Top Bottom