M
monkey_cartman@yahoo.com
Guest
HarryNadds wrote:
> On Apr 7, 1:42�pm, Zeno <Z...@home.kom> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 22:50:37 -0700 (PDT), "This is your brain on Fox
> >
> > News." <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >There is no doubt that there are terrorists around the world who wish
> > >to attack the United States any way they can. �I don't think any
> > >serious person is arguing otherwise. �What the debate is or should be
> > >is what do we do? �
> >
> > Governments that support terrorism is THE problem.
> >
> >
> >
> > >Do we invade every country that has a terrorist
> > >cell? �Every nation on earth has at least a small group of people who
> > >could do serious damage to America so shall we invade every country?
> >
> > >Why not, instead, make it very difficult to get into this country?
> > >All of the illegal aliens here prove that anyone can get in without
> > >much trouble. �Our fighting them over there isn't really keeping them
> > >over there. �That nonsensical approach is so logically flawed that
> > >anyone who can think can see the flaws.
> >
> > >Why not, instead of attacking people and thus creating more people who
> > >hate us, we try to resolve our problems diplomatically? �Why are the
> > >terrorists attacking us? �It's not because they hate freedom,
> > >democracy, and all of the other nonsense spewed by the rightwing.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted
>
> Correct.The reason the Clinton's did'nt go after the terrorists
> after the first attempt on the WTC
Yet they sit ion SuperMax prison in Florence Colorado??
Stupid piece of ****.
was because he (they) was too
> worried about his "legacy". GW Bush knows NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES the
> liberal media and leftist kooks will try and crucify him.He does'nt
> seem to be too concerned about his legacy
duhhh
Obviously not,
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't
care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
> and does'nt make his
> decisions on focus groups or poll results.The only problem Bush faces
> is his stance on the borders and sucking up to Mexico.
Bush is like a junky, shits on everybody he who comes in contact with
him, ****s up everything he touches and has no mental capacity to
realize how he affects peoples lives in suck a negative manner. Then
there are the enablers, you know, political **** like you.
> On Apr 7, 1:42�pm, Zeno <Z...@home.kom> wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 22:50:37 -0700 (PDT), "This is your brain on Fox
> >
> > News." <goofin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >There is no doubt that there are terrorists around the world who wish
> > >to attack the United States any way they can. �I don't think any
> > >serious person is arguing otherwise. �What the debate is or should be
> > >is what do we do? �
> >
> > Governments that support terrorism is THE problem.
> >
> >
> >
> > >Do we invade every country that has a terrorist
> > >cell? �Every nation on earth has at least a small group of people who
> > >could do serious damage to America so shall we invade every country?
> >
> > >Why not, instead, make it very difficult to get into this country?
> > >All of the illegal aliens here prove that anyone can get in without
> > >much trouble. �Our fighting them over there isn't really keeping them
> > >over there. �That nonsensical approach is so logically flawed that
> > >anyone who can think can see the flaws.
> >
> > >Why not, instead of attacking people and thus creating more people who
> > >hate us, we try to resolve our problems diplomatically? �Why are the
> > >terrorists attacking us? �It's not because they hate freedom,
> > >democracy, and all of the other nonsense spewed by the rightwing.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted
>
> Correct.The reason the Clinton's did'nt go after the terrorists
> after the first attempt on the WTC
Yet they sit ion SuperMax prison in Florence Colorado??
Stupid piece of ****.
was because he (they) was too
> worried about his "legacy". GW Bush knows NO MATTER WHAT HE DOES the
> liberal media and leftist kooks will try and crucify him.He does'nt
> seem to be too concerned about his legacy
duhhh
Obviously not,
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't
care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
> and does'nt make his
> decisions on focus groups or poll results.The only problem Bush faces
> is his stance on the borders and sucking up to Mexico.
Bush is like a junky, shits on everybody he who comes in contact with
him, ****s up everything he touches and has no mental capacity to
realize how he affects peoples lives in suck a negative manner. Then
there are the enablers, you know, political **** like you.