M
mimus
Guest
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 02:26:56 -0400, mixed nuts wrote:
> mimus wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:07:58 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>
>>> mimus wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:12:38 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:29:06 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wavy G wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES
>>>>>>>> ( ) NO:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:30:31 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet Stats Poster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Top 500 Prolific Posters: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Share
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===============================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Tim Bruening......................................: 328
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 46.9 27.6% 2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nemo..............................................: 177
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25.3 14.9% 3. Bertie the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bunyip.................................: 150 21.4 12.6% 4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mimus.............................................: 64 9.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.4% 5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aratzio...........................................: 52 7.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.4% 6. Tim
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weaver........................................: 51 7.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.3% 7. dave hillstrom....................................:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 34 4.9
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.9% 8. Onideus Mad
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hatter................................:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 33 4.7 2.8% 9. Avoid normal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> situations...........................: 21 3.0 1.8% 10.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 2-Belo........................................: 21 3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8%
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on my way down again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm keeping up my plucky if low pace.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ratz too.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But Hillstrom is a luuUUser.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is nemo brain-dead or just another nym for Bruening?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't even remember reading one of his/it's posts. Perhaps
>>>>>>>>>> I've got him scored out. Need to check that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Indeed he is being scored out with a hardkill.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [^alt\.alien\.vampire\.flonk\.flonk\.flonk$]
>>>>>>>>> % Destroy flonk jerks!
>>>>>>>>> Score:: -9999
>>>>>>>>> From: dave hillstrom|Tim
>>>>>>>>> Bruening|nemo|honestjohn@centurytel\.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something happen between you and Hillstrom? (Sorry, I'm not
>>>>>>>> really a regular poster here, so I'm not really "current" on all
>>>>>>>> the "drama.")
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know what got up his rear end. He suddenly went off on me
>>>>>>> for, so he said, only talking to the women and acting like a
>>>>>>> stalker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, I think that was me that said that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And your comments in reply to Knoxy's announcement of her pregnancy
>>>>>> reminded me of that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "You deserve more snot and ****." "Turning into a fatty."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just remembered the tone, but had to go back and re-read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Affectionate comic sexual negativism can be a bit tricky. Easily
>>>>>> misunderstood, especially when persistent. And I've seen it morph
>>>>>> seemingly slippery-slope-wise into not so affectionate or comic
>>>>>> sexual negativism in RL. And then rupture.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, no, no. Hillstrom has been in the killfile since a month or so
>>>>> after I started posting here. This was long ago.
>>>>
>>>> Tsk.
>>>>
>>>>>>> He was constantly attacking me, either in reply to me or referring
>>>>>>> to me,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I vaguely recall that. A fine dog. Well, for area control.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so I just tossed him in the killfile. I don't have and never have
>>>>>>> had anything against him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Usenet Turns.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <ponder>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, now that you've mentioned having him in the killfile, you'd
>>>>>> better keep him on in for a bit longer . . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hell, you might want to toss me in by now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, you make your points, but you do it with clear intent and
>>>>> without petty name calling. I can deal with that all day long.
>>>>
>>>> The names come later, after proof of imperviousness to or disdain for
>>>> elementary logic . . . .
>>>>
>>>> See my .politics posts.
>>>
>>> I don't do politics or religion. Rarely, anyway. Endless argument
>>> and all that. You believe what you believe and neither of us will
>>> change the other's mind. It's an endless cycle of crap.
>>
>> But the discussion may help someone who simply reads it and thinks
>> about it in the quiet of h^h^its own mind.
>>
>> Not, of course, the debaters themselves. _Amours propres_ and all
>> that.
>>
>>> And since the news folks started talking about the '08 elections ONE
>>> FRICKIN' DAY after mid-term elections, I've had more than my fill of
>>> politics. At this point, I don't care. Just pick somebody and get
>>> back to some other news.
>>
>> It's easy and cost-effective to have "talking heads" sit around
>> chatting about party-politics, compared to actually covering world
>> news.
>>
>> That would seem to me to be business fraud, if one is pretending to be
>> a news-channel, but no-one seems to care.
>
> It's entertainment. The comedians deliver the real news, 'journalists'
> deliver entertainment. This is why outrageous bias and made-up crap go
> uncorrected and largely unchallenged.
>
> If you people were really with it, you'd do the Rocky Horror picture
> show thing during faux nooz (confetti, rice, costumes...) and discuss
> Colbert and Stewart in serious-minded community forumses.
>
> Sheesh.
"Now I don't know anything about politics, and I'm not going to pretend I
know ****ing **** about politics, and, Heaven knows, I'm not as smart as
our President, but WEREN'T THE IRANIANS THE BAD GUYS A LITTLE WHILE AGO?"
< Bobcat Goldthwait, contemporary commentary on Iran-Contra
--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
Don't be a baby--sell out!
< Lenny Bruce
> mimus wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:07:58 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>
>>> mimus wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 08:12:38 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 23:29:06 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Wavy G wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dear, "Tim Weaver": Do you like me? Please check a box ( ) YES
>>>>>>>> ( ) NO:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:30:31 -0500, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Usenet Stats Poster wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Top 500 Prolific Posters: Posts / Posts per Day / Percent
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Share
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ===============================================================
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Tim Bruening......................................: 328
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 46.9 27.6% 2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> nemo..............................................: 177
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25.3 14.9% 3. Bertie the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bunyip.................................: 150 21.4 12.6% 4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mimus.............................................: 64 9.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.4% 5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aratzio...........................................: 52 7.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.4% 6. Tim
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weaver........................................: 51 7.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.3% 7. dave hillstrom....................................:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 34 4.9
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.9% 8. Onideus Mad
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hatter................................:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 33 4.7 2.8% 9. Avoid normal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> situations...........................: 21 3.0 1.8% 10.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 2-Belo........................................: 21 3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.8%
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on my way down again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm keeping up my plucky if low pace.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ratz too.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But Hillstrom is a luuUUser.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is nemo brain-dead or just another nym for Bruening?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I don't even remember reading one of his/it's posts. Perhaps
>>>>>>>>>> I've got him scored out. Need to check that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Indeed he is being scored out with a hardkill.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [^alt\.alien\.vampire\.flonk\.flonk\.flonk$]
>>>>>>>>> % Destroy flonk jerks!
>>>>>>>>> Score:: -9999
>>>>>>>>> From: dave hillstrom|Tim
>>>>>>>>> Bruening|nemo|honestjohn@centurytel\.net
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Something happen between you and Hillstrom? (Sorry, I'm not
>>>>>>>> really a regular poster here, so I'm not really "current" on all
>>>>>>>> the "drama.")
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know what got up his rear end. He suddenly went off on me
>>>>>>> for, so he said, only talking to the women and acting like a
>>>>>>> stalker.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, I think that was me that said that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And your comments in reply to Knoxy's announcement of her pregnancy
>>>>>> reminded me of that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "You deserve more snot and ****." "Turning into a fatty."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just remembered the tone, but had to go back and re-read.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Affectionate comic sexual negativism can be a bit tricky. Easily
>>>>>> misunderstood, especially when persistent. And I've seen it morph
>>>>>> seemingly slippery-slope-wise into not so affectionate or comic
>>>>>> sexual negativism in RL. And then rupture.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, no, no. Hillstrom has been in the killfile since a month or so
>>>>> after I started posting here. This was long ago.
>>>>
>>>> Tsk.
>>>>
>>>>>>> He was constantly attacking me, either in reply to me or referring
>>>>>>> to me,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I vaguely recall that. A fine dog. Well, for area control.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so I just tossed him in the killfile. I don't have and never have
>>>>>>> had anything against him.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As Usenet Turns.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's about it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <ponder>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, now that you've mentioned having him in the killfile, you'd
>>>>>> better keep him on in for a bit longer . . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hell, you might want to toss me in by now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nah, you make your points, but you do it with clear intent and
>>>>> without petty name calling. I can deal with that all day long.
>>>>
>>>> The names come later, after proof of imperviousness to or disdain for
>>>> elementary logic . . . .
>>>>
>>>> See my .politics posts.
>>>
>>> I don't do politics or religion. Rarely, anyway. Endless argument
>>> and all that. You believe what you believe and neither of us will
>>> change the other's mind. It's an endless cycle of crap.
>>
>> But the discussion may help someone who simply reads it and thinks
>> about it in the quiet of h^h^its own mind.
>>
>> Not, of course, the debaters themselves. _Amours propres_ and all
>> that.
>>
>>> And since the news folks started talking about the '08 elections ONE
>>> FRICKIN' DAY after mid-term elections, I've had more than my fill of
>>> politics. At this point, I don't care. Just pick somebody and get
>>> back to some other news.
>>
>> It's easy and cost-effective to have "talking heads" sit around
>> chatting about party-politics, compared to actually covering world
>> news.
>>
>> That would seem to me to be business fraud, if one is pretending to be
>> a news-channel, but no-one seems to care.
>
> It's entertainment. The comedians deliver the real news, 'journalists'
> deliver entertainment. This is why outrageous bias and made-up crap go
> uncorrected and largely unchallenged.
>
> If you people were really with it, you'd do the Rocky Horror picture
> show thing during faux nooz (confetti, rice, costumes...) and discuss
> Colbert and Stewart in serious-minded community forumses.
>
> Sheesh.
"Now I don't know anything about politics, and I'm not going to pretend I
know ****ing **** about politics, and, Heaven knows, I'm not as smart as
our President, but WEREN'T THE IRANIANS THE BAD GUYS A LITTLE WHILE AGO?"
< Bobcat Goldthwait, contemporary commentary on Iran-Contra
--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
Don't be a baby--sell out!
< Lenny Bruce