timesjoke

Actually that was a wink, pay attention

Well it is like Clinton going to church, the liberals try to use religion for appearances sake, but do not really understand it very well. So they make a few mistakes in their attempts to invoke it, lol.

Everyone loves me RO, I am just that adorable

That is because the mixture is toxic, next time mix in a little baby seal and you will be fine

But this is not a first amandment case or example, it is just another azzhole blowing up at the police without justification.

The ACLU says the exact same thing all the time, so hugo is now in the same league as the ACLU, another socialist group. The first amanedment does not protect disturbing of the peace, the officer was doing his job, at no time did the officer ever behave in a disrespectful way but the professor still cast verbal abuse on the officer without cause. Then the out of control and disrespectful professor took his abuse out into the public, where the officer was forced to act. The one person who could have avoided everything was the professor, but instead the professor decided to abuse someone who was only doing his job. hugo is saying anything done to a Government official, no matter how unwarrented is fair and reasonable because he hates the police, just like these other socialists he is defending.

Or the socialist at heart tries to use irrelivant analogies to change the subject where the smart man keeps on topic. I ask you again, would Milton Friedman ever be seen acting in such a dispicable way as this professor was to an officer hugo? And of course his book will sell millions of copies, this is one of the core reasons race pimps like him and Obama do these things, to make massive amounts of money. And people like you support their socialist agenda by wanting to offer them support and protection of their antics. Makes you one of them hugo.

What the hell are you talking about hugo? I was not complaining in the slightest, I even offered you an example of a hunting leopard but your seeing what you want to see I suppose instead of what I really said. Your blinding yourself hugo, and that is a sign of being a socialist my friend. Oh, I did complain about the favors from local governments, that was the politics part I mentioned in the second post, your getting as bad as Bender in failing to actually read and comprehend what people say.

What the hell is that supposed to be saying Hugo? You can't keep trying to divert attention away from the only person who is responsible for what happened Hugo, nice try but I will not let you get away with that. The first responsibility each of us has is to ourselves. If this man could not respect himself enough to not cause this kind of out of control public display, that is his fault, not the cop's. You want to blams the cop for the person acting like an Azz, I am sorry but responsibility and even respect is a two way street. Both parties must be equally responsible and respectful of each other or the void will be balanced by the other. In this case the professor did not meet to his responsibility, so the officer had to provide the balance. Imagine how much better everything would have been if the Professor had been more responsible for himself.

I just posted your own words saying exactly that Bender, Too bad you can't keep track of what you say, but I remember very well. I did read it Bender, so if this is about rate hikes, why does it say things like : "issuer offering such coverage" If they are offering coverage, it is not already in effect..........You fail my friend, not me. Um, "EVERY" poll, including the severely liberal slanted polls all show that most Americans do not want Obamacare. Even your 60 vote majority you were crowing about not that long ago is no longer there for Obama because many of his own liberals are standing up against him. The Blue Dogs mostly but many others are comming away from their trips home with massive doubts and an earful from their voters who do not want them to pass this garbage. In many ways it would be good for Republicans if Obama uses the back door method to get this passed even against his own party members because that will prove beyond any shadow of doubt that Obama is an elitist who refuses to listen to the people.

Sounds good, I might substitute some ground venison for the hamburger though, I grind it with some beef fat when I package it.

Nice try back at you, that is exactly what it says, too bad your going through life with your Obama God glasses on and cannot let yourself to see reality. I like your need to call me dumb though, when it clearly common sense that if the Government offers insurance at severely lower rates (remember they do not have to make a profit) that it will drive out the competition. Also, you said it yourself that the private insurance companies would be screwed, why are you now trying to change what you said? Well Bender, all polling data shows that the people do not want Obama care.........do you want what the people want or are you an elitist socialist and say the people do not count? . .

Don't forget all the trips he is making around the world and all over America in campaign mode to push Obamacare. There is no way he can be doing much managing of things, and that is exactly what most of the experts said about Obama during the election process. Even his Vice and his Secretary Of State both said he was too nieve and inexperienced to be President.

But in a gunfight with police, an officer could have been hurt too. As much as a dead cop would have made Hugo happy, I prefer that this scumbag saw himself as so pathetic that even he wanted to kill him.

If anyone is a socialist it is you Hugo, not me. I do not hate Wal-Mart, just becuase I point out their business model that does not mean I do not support their right to do what they do. Consider it like describing how a leopard hunts and kills, it may 'sound' grusome but it is just part of nature. If I were to say there is anything wrong with how Wal-Mart operates it is their manipulation of the politics to their favor. That is not a normal part of free enterprise and adds a lot of dishonesty to their actions but they are just swimming in the waters that the Government has made.

Well your most likely right, I have been a big fan of his for many years. My point to Hugo is Friedman was the very definition of anti-big government and yet he conducted himself with logic and dignity at all times. He never gave anyone the chance to say he was ever in the wrong. I have watched many debates he had where people were not happy with his words but his self-control and calm logic kept those who were very unhappy with him calm as well. You cannot act like a madman and suddenly get upset when your treated like the madman your behaving like.

Who had the most power Hugo? The cop or the racist black man with a racist President in his pocket? Responsibility is responsibility Hugo, you cannot hold one accountable and the other not becuase as in this case, it was the irresponsibility of person, not the cop that put the dominos in motion. My point is responsibility, responsibility to "NOT" start crap that the officer must now have to deal with. Only the professor was acting from hate, but you seem to support hatred of the police. You like to parise Milton Friedman a lot, do you think he would have even been cought screaming at a cop on his front porch?

Your fast to claim the officer had a responsibility to let the unruly person show his Azz, but you do not address the responsibility of the person to not loose his cool with the officer in the first place. Responsibility swings both ways but you only see responsibility from one side, that makes you sound like a socialist Hugo. You admitted that up to the time of the arrest the officer did nothing wrong and was instead doing the job he is paid to do. So the entire time the officer is taking this verbal abuse, you do not place any blame on the guy tossing the abuse. Incredible.

I guess it all depends on what you call success Bender. To me the failure to account for the proper funding, the failure to prepare dealers and processors "before" the program went into effect, the failure to process the applications in a timely way, all in a short term program proves to me that if they can't get something this very simple right, what makes anyone believe they can run healthcare? We already ocvered this Bender, page 16 says you cannot have healthcare of your choosing once this legislation goes into effect. The Government will be offering healthcare without having to make a profit. Let me describe it to you in a way even a Liberal should be able to undersatand it: Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart does not own all the other businesses but they drive small businesses out of business because they cannot compete. Many States have worked very hard to keep Wal-Mart out because they kill all other smaller businesses. Here in Florida they have been fighting a State law that does not allow anyone to sell gassoline below what they pay for it. Wal-Mart wants to sell below cost so they can run other gas stations out of business. Obamacare is designed using Wal-Mart tactics.

Exactly, I have been 'preaching' the same thing for over ten years. At best the Federal Government can only set guidelines and rules for certain things, the second they try to actively "RUN" something, they fail miserably. What highly skilled manager would work for the Government when he can make ten times the money in the private sector? Anyone who the Government can get to run things would be an idiot. So even if our elected officials could design a 'perfect' system (never going to happen) they still could not put it into action because there is nobody who works for the Government with the ability to put it in action without screwing it up.

Sometimes you depress me OS

Heyyyyyy what a thought.

Well said RO, if these much smaller programs are beyond the skills of the Obama administration, what makes anyone believe they can design a good healthcare program? I would not trust either party to do this, the Government does not possess the skilled workers to run anything like this.

You have to look between the lines sometimes to see the truth. He first admits to not knowing the details of his friends arrest but he is also compelled to speak out against the white cops. This was not a surprise question as originally thought, he knew he was going to get this question before the thing started so his reply was rehersed and deliberate. His deep seated hate of whites of power is clear, this is the basis of his desire for a private military, one that is not white. Peopel who still believe his lies about not knowing the true nature of Reverand Wright are fools, birds of a feather flock together. I agree, I rarely even turn on the television. The problem is not really the information though, it is a lack of caring. IMHO

A woman in a hot-air balloon realized she was lost.. She lowered her altitude and spotted a man in a boat below. She shouted to him, "Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don't know where I am." The man consulted his portable GPS and replied, "You're in a hot air balloon, approximately 30 feet above a ground elevation of 2,346 feet above sea level. You are at 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100 degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude. "She rolled her eyes and said, "You must be a Republican." "I am," replied the man. "How did you know?" "Well," answered the balloonist, "everything you told me is technically correct. But I have no idea what to do with your information, and I'm still lost. Frankly, you've not been much help to me." The man smiled and responded, "You must be an Obama Democrat." "I am," replied the balloonist. "How did you know?" "Well," said the man, "you don't know where you are or where you are going.. You've risen to where you are, due to a large quantity of hot air. You made a promise you have no idea how to keep, and you expect me to solve your problem. You're in exactly the same position you were in before we met, but somehow, now it's my fault."