100 days of Obama: Turning peril into possibility

[RoyalOrleans]

Here's something to think about ... how many of these acts or bills or plans do anything to decrease the size, scope or spending of the federal government? Another question ... which one of these great and glorious accomplishments actually enhance freedom in America? The answer would be none. Obama's greatest accomplishments have been promising change and growing our government. For a liberal, this probably makes Obama a very accomplished president. Obama isn't the only person out there who believes that America's greatness comes from government.

The people who are going to be most affected by Obama's first 100 days in office are people who are not in a position to comment on the job he's done thus far. These people are your children and your grandchildren. Save all of these articles and columns praising Obama for his rock star status and "hipness" ... let them see how cool future generations think it is to be paying of a massive debt brought on by a inexperienced bit-government leader who gained power on the basis of a slogan.

 

[snafu]

Well.. perhaps the American people would be well served to know what the f ck they want and what the f ck they're doing and had/have the common f cking sense to see how decisions made 30/40/50 years ago would/will affect life 30/40/50 years down the road and beyond instead of blindly following one of two political parties that vary in name only because they're too stupid to know any better and only give a f ck about themselves.

Some idiots out there still think Ronnie Reagan was actually for small government and less government interference in our lives. Good one..

What.. aint liking the end results of Reagonomics we be experiencing right now?

That's right.. he had no effect on anything after he left office. It's Obama's first 100 days that made the economy go belly up, not a Reagan and 2 Bushes with a side order of Clinton ..

What you did yesterday affects today.. wakey uppy..

last 28 years.. 8 Republican.. 4 Republican.. 8 Democrat.. 8 Republican..

so.. simple math says 20 years Republican.. 8 years Democrat..

Sup?

F ck.. if only McCain woulda won, eh..

There are fundamentals that both parties do agree on. We are in fact all Americans and I would hope we all want whats best for the country as we continue to strive for bipartisan decisions. So yeah in some area's it wouldn't matter who's president. Just like Obama's Lie about Iraq. He knew we couldn't just pull out and McCain knew we would have to cut the troops and eventually pull out. They both catered to their sides but in the end it wouldn't have mattered who became president.

But.. Obama has gone completely to the left. He's destroying everything we've worked for. I truly think he's the enemy from within. What leader of any other country would cut military defense a week after a known terrorist state launches an outer ballistic missile? Hmm? And he's kissing to many *****!

 

[ImWithStupid]

The Road to Serfdom

Illustrated Explanation

by Friedrich Hayek

The Illustrated Road to Serfdom

...form your own comparisons/conclusions

 

[hugo]

Here's something to think about ... how many of these acts or bills or plans do anything to decrease the size, scope or spending of the federal government? Another question ... which one of these great and glorious accomplishments actually enhance freedom in America? The answer would be none. Obama's greatest accomplishments have been promising change and growing our government. For a liberal, this probably makes Obama a very accomplished president. Obama isn't the only person out there who believes that America's greatness comes from government.

?I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution or that have failed their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed'' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for neglecting my constituents "interests,'' I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am doing the very best I can.?

Barry Goldwater

We need to dig Barry up and run him in 2012.

 

[ImWithStupid]

?I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce its size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution or that have failed their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed'' before I have first determined whether it is constitutionally permissible. And if I should later be attacked for neglecting my constituents "interests,'' I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is liberty and that in that cause I am doing the very best I can.? Barry Goldwater

We need to dig Barry up and run him in 2012.

View attachment 2308