2 Obama officials: No guarantee taxes won't go up

[ImWithStupid]

Instead of posting the " " icon, how about proving me wrong and give me a nice list of taxes Obama has raised..

.

Maybe because it was just a cartoon and fit the title of the thread.

 

[phreakwars]

Maybe because it was just a cartoon and fit the title of the thread.

Actually, it doesn't. Obama himself never said he thought taxes might need raised, this was said by his treasury secretary (as a possibility), when Obama was asked about it, he stated that this WAS NOT the case and that he was working towards the goals he had set. So he has, in fact, NOT flip flopped. That's not to say he won't propose a tax increase, he still could, you never know... but for the official record, he has NOT EVER flip flopped on that.

.

.

 

[snafu]

Actually, it doesn't. Obama himself never said he thought taxes might need raised, this was said by his treasury secretary (as a possibility), when Obama was asked about it, he stated that this WAS NOT the case and that he was working towards the goals he had set. So he has, in fact, NOT flip flopped. That's not to say he won't propose a tax increase, he still could, you never know... but for the official record, he has NOT EVER flip flopped on that..

.

He said no new taxes. He said anybody making less than $250,000 would not see any increases in taxes. He lied plain and simple.

 

[phreakwars]

He said no new taxes. He said anybody making less than $250,000 would not see any increases in taxes. He lied plain and simple.

How do you call something a lie if it hasn't happened yet? When did he sign this new tax law? Where was I? I missed it. Where is the original Bill proposal? I wanna look at the wording first.

.

.

 

[RoyalOrleans]

How do you call something a lie if it hasn't happened yet? When did he sign this new tax law? Where was I? I missed it. Where is the original Bill proposal? I wanna look at the wording first..

.

Right.

It's kind of hard to call someone out on something that has yet to happen.

 

[RoyalOrleans]

Hey, I'll at least give R.O. the credit for being a free thinker and admitting the flaws of the party he likes the most.

Save for a few individuals, I don't like the Republican Party at all. If I agree with the GOP, its by chance or circumstance and not by favoritism.

 

[snafu]

Yeah lord knows all the Dems are free thinkers.

 

[timesjoke]

Jesus, how many times do I have to say it. VISION. It's all about vision.
You take one path, and it puts you in a deep hole, do you keep taking that path or do you try another route even though the nay sayers are saying that route is even worse. I have to ask, how do the naysayers know, they have never taken that route. They don't know, all they have is a worn, tired argument about a political structure half way around the world over half a century old that they try to compare the new path with, and fall flat on their face.

That certainly is no visionary outlook for our futures. That's the usual fear and paranoia chicken little mentality.

.

.

So your an anarchist, that explains a lot about you, especially how you constantly ignore reality.

You want change for the sake of change, you don't really care what that change is as long as it is something different than what you saw before.........

I guess that is one way of living your life, but I prefer to plan things out better than blindly throwing money at problems and buying votes with more promises of Welfare.

How do we know something that has not been implimented yet will not work? It is called education. If you hold a loaded gun to your head and pull the trigger, will it most likely kill you? Yes. How do we know this to be true without actually doing it? Because we look to those who have done it before to see the results they got.

It is stupid to believe we can do the exact same things and get a different result.