America about to get bigger.

[Gallytuck]

After the American performance in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, there's not a whole lot of fear of the American military. The US has the ability to occupy but she just can't seem to take. Besides, who do you think trains your soldiers in Arctic combat?

Britain secretly still detests America. If America ever attacked Canada there'd be a lot of international **** flying. I can't see many nations backing American aggression towards other First World nations.

It wouldn't be pretty.

 

[ToriAllen]

After the American performance in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan, there's not a whole lot of fear of the American military. The US has the ability to occupy but she just can't seem to take. Besides, who do you think trains your soldiers in Arctic combat?
Britain secretly still detests America. If America ever attacked Canada there'd be a lot of international **** flying. I can't see many nations backing American aggression towards other First World nations.

It wouldn't be pretty.

America has never wanted to take. Besides we are not talking about a war, we are talking about a voluntary induction. We would not be attacking anyone, but, then again, you aren't exactly known for having all the facts are you?

 

[snafu]

I am aware that there are others that know more then I do about politics; however, I still firmly believe that Bush is a delusional neocon douchbag who should be removed office. He is NOT a Republican. He is a neocon ******* who worships a pagan ***. It its a proven fact that he is a member of a secret society and that he holds the rank of "Magog".
Bush represents the very worst of this country and he needs to be removed from office and ANY AND ALL decisions he's made need to be examined.

Explain to me what makes you think Bush is a neocon? And that he worships a pagan ***.

A lot of name calling with nothing to back it up. That's hilarious at best.

 

[phreakwars]

Explain to me what makes you think Bush is a neocon? And that he worships a pagan ***.A lot of name calling with nothing to back it up. That's hilarious at best.

From wikpedia:

Neoconservatism (or neocon) refers to the political movement, ideology, and public policy goals of "new conservatives" in the United States, that are relatively unopposed to "big government" principles and believe in limited restrictions on social spending.


In the context of United States foreign policy, neoconservative has another, narrower definition. Critics [citation needed] define it as interventionist with hawkish views on foreign policy. Supporters define it as advocating the use of military force, unilaterally if necessary, to replace autocratic regimes with democratic ones. This view competes with liberal internationalism, realism, and non-interventionism.


The prefix "neo" can denote that many of the movement's founders, originally liberals, Democrats or from socialist backgrounds, were new to conservatism, but can also refer to the comparatively recent emergence of this "new wave" of conservative thought, which coalesced in the early 1970s from a variety of intellectual roots in the decades following World War II. It also serves to distinguish the ideology from the viewpoints of "old" or traditional American conservatism.


Modern neoconservatism is associated with periodicals such as Commentary and The Weekly Standard and some of the foreign policy initiatives of think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). Neoconservative journalists, pundits, policy analysts, and politicians, often dubbed "neocons" by supporters and critics alike, have been credited with (or blamed for) their influence on U.S. foreign policy, especially under the administrations of Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) and George W. Bush (2001-present). The term "neocon", while increasingly popular in recent years, is somewhat controversial and is rejected by many to whom the label is applied, who claim it lacks a coherent definition.

Then there is THIS link: http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n1398.cfm

.

.

 

[Gallytuck]

America has never wanted to take. Besides we are not talking about a war, we are talking about a voluntary induction. We would not be attacking anyone, but, then again, you aren't exactly known for having all the facts are you?

You've got me confused with someone else. Voluntary induction will never happen. You must define "never" as meaning within the last 100 years.

 

[TerroristHater]

Explain to me what makes you think Bush is a neocon? And that he worships a pagan ***.A lot of name calling with nothing to back it up. That's hilarious at best.

Bush is known to be a member of the Skull and Bones club. This fact is not in dispute. Bush's choices for the Supreme Court and for the Secretary of the Treasury have all been far rightest-neocon ********. Non-neocon Republicans DO NOT nominate these individuals.

You are free to go on believing George "Adloph Hitler" Bush and his lies if you wish; however, it is my sincere hope that you will open your eyes and see right through George W Neocon's bullshit.

The far right is a group of shitbag scum-suckers who need to be banned from holding office at all costs. These idiots believe they need to "RULE" American...not govern it. This makes them a threat to freedom and the American way of life.

This link: http://zfacts.com/p/253.html accurately describes the neocons and thier unrealistic agenda. Not suprisingly GEORGE BUSH IS ON THE COVER PAGE.

Check this out:

Cause of Iraq War: Bush or Cheney?

When elected, Bush was opposed to "nation building.," but **** Cheney brought in eight fellow neocons who advocated "regime change" and re-building Iraq. This was before 9/11 and had nothing to do with Bush's war on terrorism.

Cheney's group all belonged to PNAC. or IASPS.. IASPS advocated regime change to increase Israeli security, while PNAC focused on our Middle East allies but named only Israel. Using 9/11, Cheney and the neocons convinced Bush to go against the long-standing conservative principles he held when elected. The 9 Iraq-War Planners Surrounding Bush

and their PNAC / IASPS backgrounds

View attachment 933

Now.... If there are no more questions, we can go on and find ways to keep neocon ******** out of public office.

 

[ToriAllen]

You've got me confused with someone else. Voluntary induction will never happen.

I already said it would never happen...In fact, I said that in my first post on this thread.

You must define "never" as meaning within the last 100 years.

Forgive me, but was this comment

 

[snafu]

Bush is known to be a member of the Skull and Bones club. This fact is not in dispute. Bush's choices for the Supreme Court and for the Secretary of the Treasury have all been far rightest-neocon ********. Non-neocon Republicans DO NOT nominate these individuals.
You are free to go on believing George "Adloph Hitler" Bush and his lies if you wish; however, it is my sincere hope that you will open your eyes and see right through George W Neocon's bullshit.

The far right is a group of shitbag scum-suckers who need to be banned from holding office at all costs. These idiots believe they need to "RULE" American...not govern it. This makes them a threat to freedom and the American way of life.

This link: http://zfacts.com/p/253.html accurately describes the neocons and thier unrealistic agenda. Not suprisingly GEORGE BUSH IS ON THE COVER PAGE.

Check this out:

Cause of Iraq War: Bush or Cheney?

When elected, Bush was opposed to "nation building.," but **** Cheney brought in eight fellow neocons who advocated "regime change" and re-building Iraq. This was before 9/11 and had nothing to do with Bush's war on terrorism.

Cheney's group all belonged to PNAC. or IASPS.. IASPS advocated regime change to increase Israeli security, while PNAC focused on our Middle East allies but named only Israel. Using 9/11, Cheney and the neocons convinced Bush to go against the long-standing conservative principles he held when elected. The 9 Iraq-War Planners Surrounding Bush

and their PNAC / IASPS backgrounds

View attachment 934

Now.... If there are no more questions, we can go on and find ways to keep neocon ******** out of public office.

You keep calling everybody a necon. Do you even know what one is? I think your the neocon.

http://www.answers.com/neocon&r=67

You wont be happy no matter who the **** is in office.

 

[snafu]

I