Fight! Fight! Fight!

[ImWithStupid]

Well as usual you jump on the bandwagon Joe, you did it at the Jungle all the time too.
The tread was fight, fight, fight, not debate, debate, debate.

You will also see mentions of blood if I were to be matched to Ali and she saying she would have to be smuggled to Mexico. Sure sounds like an altercation in a physical way to me long before my first post, but of course admitting that would not let you join in on the usual ******** now would it?

Everything you guys do is 100% justified because in your minds, I do not deserve fair treatment.

No bandwagon. I didn't even bother to read the **** from anyone involved. It's just funny that the post you are complaining about people getting off topic, was "off topic".

The Mexico thing was an obvious joke that she would end up murdering you if you spent time together and would need to flee the country.

It was a fukking joke. NOT a threat on your life and wasn't in this thread.

 

[Ahhlee]

Out of every single exchange we have had, I have "NEVER" instigated a personal attack Ali. Now I will admit to tossing a few slams back at you once you started it and that would be my part in keeping the flames fanned but if you had never started it, there would be nothing to fan.

Consider me a mirror, what you show me I give back, but then again, I have never attacked your loved ones while you have attacked mine so even as a response, there are lows you have traveled I will never stoop down to Ali.

Wrong.

Do you keep repeating that so that one day you'll actually believe your **** yourself?

Just wonderin'.

Sorry guys but I wouldn't feel right getting in the middle of any dispute. I would say we might try a poll but I would think the odds would be stacked against TJ. If you guys did start a debate and everybody throws in their two cents I would call out any bias attacks if that would help.

Fair enough, snaf. Don't worry about it.

And I would hate to put you into that spot but unfortunately your about the only person here who has not attacked me and Tami out of anger, even emkay has jumped on the bandwagon a couple time (but not as bad as most of the other regulars).
That said I would still gladly have any debate under the no personal flames rule, it would be the first time I have debated with Ali that she has not called me and Tami nasty names......even if everyone on the forum voted her as winning I would still feel a great deal of satisfaction from that.

Wrong again.

Good ***! I'm gone for one day and look at what happens.

You're right TJ it sure would be nice to see a real debate. It also sucks when people don't stay on topic.

You know like when someone goes on an "Off Topic" thread the is obviously designed to be humorous and takes it seriously on who could "beat up" who.

Who can beat up who? Are you serious? How old are you again?

In your defense I did notice that it wasn't until eddo's post #12 on page 2, that anyone used the "TJ humor/sarcasm disclaimer". So it's not completely on you that you were confused on the intent of the thread.

You noticed that, too? LOL

Well as usual you jump on the bandwagon Joe, you did it at the Jungle all the time too.
The tread was fight, fight, fight, not debate, debate, debate.

You will also see mentions of blood if I were to be matched to Ali and she saying she would have to be smuggled to Mexico. Sure sounds like an altercation in a physical way to me long before my first post, but of course admitting that would not let you join in on the usual ******** now would it?

Everything you guys do is 100% justified because in your minds, I do not deserve fair treatment.

Why in the **** do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

Why is that?

Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

 

[timesjoke]

No bandwagon. I didn't even bother to read the **** from anyone involved. It's just funny that the post you are complaining about people getting off topic, was "off topic".
The Mexico thing was an obvious joke that she would end up murdering you if you spent time together and would need to flee the country.

It was a fukking joke. NOT a threat on your life and wasn't in this thread.

So as usual you were just jumping on the bandwagon and putting me down without even reading the tread before you posted?

Now your trying to make other excuses to cover it?

I never said anything about a threat, in fact if you actually take the time to read my first post I asked her what she meant when she said fight, physical or debate. Your so ready to jump on the Ali bandwagon like the eddo robot you don't even know what was discussed.

I never mentioned blood, maybe you need to point that assumption finger at someone else.

 

[emkay64]

What the **** is a bandwagon anyways? Is it a large wagon with music and alcoholic libations? If it is...I'm jumping on.

If it's a crappy wagon toting elastic bands I'm out!

 

[Ahhlee]

What the **** is a bandwagon anyways? Is it a large wagon with music and alcoholic libations? If it is...I'm jumping on.
If it's a crappy wagon toting elastic bands I'm out!

If it's my band wagon, you know **** well it's going to have music, alcoholic libations and brownies. Lots and lots of brownies.

 

[emkay64]

Mmmmmmmm brownies.......

 

[timesjoke]

Wrong.

Do you keep repeating that so that one day you'll actually believe your **** yourself?

Just wonderin'.

Prove me wrong.

You even are flamming me in the perception thread, you can't help yourself but to be ugly all the time.

Wrong again.

Then why all the talk about *** and such in my perception thread? You could just not say anything but instead you find excuses to always make personal attacks.

You noticed that, too? LOL

IWS has been jumping on your bandwagon for a long time now, there has never been one time you were flammign me IWS did not join in with a girlish glee.

Why in the **** do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

Why is that?

Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

Even snaff agreed to it, do you think he is stupid too?

It is what it is Ali, your a bully at heart, I said before your a lot like an abusive husband who is all love and candy as long as your appeasing him and beating the **** out of you when your not.

I go back to the MrsK thing again to make this point, you acted this same way to her until she gave into you, now that she gave in, your best pals. You have to be in control. Everyone has seen you both send thoughtful gifts and rip into your enemies with ruthless abandon. It is almost like you have a dual personality, one sweet and kind and the other the most nasty human to ever post on the internet.

In all of this though I don't hate you, but you clearly hate me so I ask you why you feel you must hate me? You have done 100 times more nasty things to me than I have ever done to you and maybe I should hate you but I just can't find the spark that will let me hold anger over things said on the internet.

That is not to say I like it, but I can't hold this stuff so close to my heart the way you do.

 

[Ahhlee]

Prove me wrong.
You even are flamming me in the perception thread, you can't help yourself but to be ugly all the time.

I've yet to say anything about Tami since you have been back on BS. Funny how you like to claim I attack you and her ALL THE TIME. That is simply not true.

Have others made comments about her? Yes. I have not.

Go look and see if I'm right. I dare ya.

Then why all the talk about *** and such in my perception thread? You could just not say anything but instead you find excuses to always make personal attacks.

Sorry, you don't get to claim the monopoly on my *** jokes. I would say that to anyone. Hardly a personal attack.

Unless you have *** sucking issues, that is?

IWS has been jumping on your bandwagon for a long time now, there has never been one time you were flammign me IWS did not join in with a girlish glee.

That's not true, either.

It is what it is Ali, your a bully at heart, I said before your a lot like an abusive husband who is all love and candy as long as your appeasing him and beating the **** out of you when your not.

Answer my fukking question:

Why in the **** do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 


Why is that?

 


Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 


Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 


I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

 

[ImWithStupid]

So as usual you were just jumping on the bandwagon and putting me down without even reading the tread before you posted?

Now your trying to make other excuses to cover it?

I never said anything about a threat, in fact if you actually take the time to read my first post I asked her what she meant when she said fight, physical or debate. Your so ready to jump on the Ali bandwagon like the eddo robot you don't even know what was discussed.

I never mentioned blood, maybe you need to point that assumption finger at someone else.

Once again. The point was that you were off of topic in a thread that you complained about people going off topic, in a thread meant to be humorous that you were the only one taking it serious and the comment about Mexico by Ali wasn't even in this thread. It was in a completely different thread and was also understood to be "HUMOR".

Get over yourself. You aren't worth the effort for me to "gang up on". If I voice an opinion. It's mine.

 

[timesjoke]

I've yet to say anything about Tami since you have been back on BS. Funny how you like to claim I attack you and her ALL THE TIME. That is simply not true.

Have others made comments about her? Yes. I have not.

Go look and see if I'm right. I dare ya.

Actually you did, we had this discussion about a month ago and I posted it then, I am not going to keep going back just because you can't remember your own words.

But let's drop that and say you didn't, you certainly have not recently so I give you that but why do you feel the need to make any attacks? This comment your responding to was not about Tami at all, so why are you trying to deflect attention away from the point that your now flamming me in the perceptions thread?

Why do you act this way?

Sorry, you don't get to claim the monopoly on my *** jokes. I would say that to anyone. Hardly a personal attack.

Unless you have *** sucking issues, that is?

Again nice dodge but it was clearly a personal attack so why do you need to compensate so often with thise kinds of attacks?

That's not true, either.

Very true, even at the jungle IWS was there in every thread jumping on the bandwagon. He is always taking your side and he just admitted to not even reading the thread before again jumping on the bandwagon against me.

Answer my fukking question:

Why in the **** do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 


Why is that?

 


Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 


Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 


I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

I did answer your question, you just can't face the truth. You will brush aside anything I say so that is why I pointed out snaff agreed with me too so answer my question, do you think snaff is crazy and seeing things that are not there too?

You say you respect his opinion to be impartial, he said the same thing I said so now what? Ignore what you don't want to hear?

I know, what did RO say on the subject a little while back?

You and I may not see eye to eye on some things, but I will give credit when and where it is due.

 


Others just disagree with you because it seems like the fun thing to do.

 

[Ahhlee]

Actually you did, we had this discussion about a month ago and I posted it then, I am not going to keep going back just because you can't remember your own words.

What in the **** are you talking about?????

But let's drop that and say you didn't, you certainly have not recently so I give you that but why do you feel the need to make any attacks? This comment your responding to was not about Tami at all, so why are you trying to deflect attention away from the point that your now flamming me in the perceptions thread?

Why do you act this way?

Was it a snotty comment....sure, it was. I'll own that.

But my first comment wasn't a personal flame. It was a critique on your writing that you didn't like. Big difference....and you are incapable of seeing that.

Again nice dodge but it was clearly a personal attack so why do you need to compensate so often with thise kinds of attacks?

TJ...when you have been "personally attacked" by me, you will know it.

This other stuff is all forum/joking/snarky bullsh!t.

There IS a difference.

Very true, even at the jungle IWS was there in every thread jumping on the bandwagon. He is always taking your side and he just admitted to not even reading the thread before again jumping on the bandwagon against me.

Give IWS some credit, man. If he told me I was out of line or wrong, I'd respect his opinion. He's got a good head on his shoulders...he's so much more than just a glorious side ****.

His reactions to you are not being swayed in any way, shape or form by me.

I did answer your question, you just can't face the truth. You will brush aside anything I say so that is why I pointed out snaff agreed with me too so answer my question, do you think snaff is crazy and seeing things that are not there too?
You say you respect his opinion to be impartial, he said the same thing I said so now what? Ignore what you don't want to hear?

I know, what did RO say on the subject a little while back?

You and I may not see eye to eye on some things, but I will give credit when and where it is due.

 


Others just disagree with you because it seems like the fun thing to do.

You're not answering at all. You're deflecting, dodging and even trying to throw snaf under the bus to avoid my question, which was:

Why in the **** do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 


Why is that?

 


Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 


Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 


I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

 

[hugo]

Anna is the one who forces me to bring my A game. RO would if we ever disagreeed on anything.

 

[timesjoke]

What in the **** are you talking about?????

My point exactly, nice dodge.

Was it a snotty comment....sure, it was. I'll own that.

But my first comment wasn't a personal flame. It was a critique on your writing that you didn't like. Big difference....and you are incapable of seeing that.

You were being over critical because you were angry at me and wanted to take a shot, other people seem to be doing fine discussing the points I offer so I know you had the ability to understand but choose to pretend to not understand so you had an excuse to be nasty.

TJ...when you have been "personally attacked" by me, you will know it.

This other stuff is all forum/joking/snarky bullsh!t.

There IS a difference.

No there is not when it comes to you and whoever you happen to hate at the moment. It is always the same routine with you, once you hate, you can never let yourself see good in that person, well not till they bow down to you that is.

Give IWS some credit, man. If he told me I was out of line or wrong, I'd respect his opinion. He's got a good head on his shoulders...he's so much more than just a glorious side ****.

His reactions to you are not being swayed in any way, shape or form by me.

I didn't say you were controlling him, I said he jumps on every bandwagon, he is certainly doing that from his own hatred. Remember when he flamed my poem on the Jungle? Even you didn't flame my poem but he really tried to hurt my feelings with that. Then there is his lies about me being banned on dozzens of forums and claiming I was a member of child **** sites and such. Joe has been a constant source of hatred, more than even you show me.

You're not answering at all. You're deflecting, dodging and even trying to throw snaf under the bus to avoid my question, which was:

Why in the **** do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 


Why is that?

 


Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 


Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 


I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

I did answer your question Ali.

Do you think battered women's shelters are filled with women who like to play the victim Ali? Your either being unreasonable or your not and me pointing out your actions is not crying or playing a victim, it is what it is.

I offered what Snaf said as a point that it is not just me who is saying this so if even Snaf says the same thing, how can you claim it does not exist? Can you answer to that question?

Tell me something Ali, what does it really matter? Even this attempt to call me a crybaby is another example of how you are always trying to put me down on a personal level. Why do you need to put me down so badly Ali? What is it that is driving you to do these things?

Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

This is the real deal right there. In all that we see this little gem show the real Ali and how you really feel when your in attack mode....you are not really disputing you act this way, your saying your actions are justified.

You believe I have earned your wrath and I should just be silent and take my punnishment, lol.

 

[Hack]

(mercenary dream #128)

We are the official sponsor of the next world war

with concession stands on every corner.

Trinkets and doodads to take your money,

but you have to want it, son.

Work for it, son.

He told me once that truce is stranger than friction

and war is the natural state of the world.

Peace is a dream in these nightmare cities,

but you have to fight for it, son.

Kill for it, son.

There will be heavily advertised coverage,

anaesthetized and commercialized

doubly verified for your instant pleasure,

but you have to pay for it, son.

Pray for it, son.

Ya' gotta really need it,

son.

You have to keep a little death inside of you.

He said it with a smile.

Like spare change in your pocket

to feed the parking meters.

 

[Ahhlee]

Anna is the one who forces me to bring my A game. RO would if we ever disagreeed on anything.

You three are very good. Props to all of you.

My point exactly, nice dodge.

You're bringing up some exchange that we had months ago? Good Lord, I barely remember what I did an hour ago let alone something we discussed that long ago.

I hate to tell you this, but I don't recall every tiny little detail that revolves around you. In fact, I don't think much of our interactions at all, except that they are for the most part very unpleasant.

I have no fukking clue what you're talking about. Go find it yourself and link it if it's that ******* important for this discussion.

You were being over critical because you were angry at me and wanted to take a shot, other people seem to be doing fine discussing the points I offer so I know you had the ability to understand but choose to pretend to not understand so you had an excuse to be nasty.

I stand by my statement in that thread.

No there is not when it comes to you and whoever you happen to hate at the moment. It is always the same routine with you, once you hate, you can never let yourself see good in that person, well not till they bow down to you that is.

I've yet to see anyone on any forum I've ever been involved in bow down to me. It's all a matter of mutual respect....something I simply don't feel with you.

I didn't say you were controlling him, I said he jumps on every bandwagon, he is certainly doing that from his own hatred. Remember when he flamed my poem on the Jungle? Even you didn't flame my poem but he really tried to hurt my feelings with that. Then there is his lies about me being banned on dozzens of forums and claiming I was a member of child **** sites and such. Joe has been a constant source of hatred, more than even you show me.

NO, I don't remember him flaming your poem at the Jungle.

Jesus Christ, TJ....you dwell and dwell on all this **** from the past and then crinkle your face and bunch up your panties whenever anyone DARES to bring up something you've done or said.

You really do have NPD, don't you.

I did answer your question Ali.

No, you didn't. You dodged again so I will ask again.

Why in the **** do you love playing the victim so much? You're not! It amazes me that you think you don't or couldn't "get a fair shake" around here when it comes to me.

 


Why is that?

 


Is it because I'm SO mean and have so much "influence" that you think people at this site do whatever I tell them to do?

 


Or is it perhaps because your own actions have brought you to this point?

 


I'd love to hear your theory on that, Mr. Let's Get To The Root Of The Problem.

 

[hugo]

As far as physical confrontations, emkay got in a lucky punch in our first fight but I promise Emkay/ Hugo II: The Battle at Dave's Dive Bar will have a different ending.

I put timesjoke on ignore because Ali told me to.

 

[hugo]

Anna is the one who forces me to bring my A game. RO would if we ever disagreeed on anything.

I was primarily referring to economic issues here where it is clear Anna has done a little studying in the field.

 

[emkay64]

As far as physical confrontations, emkay got in a lucky punch in our first fight but I promise Emkay/ Hugo II: The Battle at Dave's Dive Bar will have a different ending.
I put timesjoke on ignore because Ali told me to.

You'll be drunk, and I have ninja skills...and if you call me fat again...it'll be a repeat performance I only beat up Hugo because Ali was egging me on, and she said she wouldn't be my friend if I didn't "MASH HIS FACE INTO A ****** PULP"!!!!

 

[hugo]

Emkay is a beast. I would not have signed up for Emkay/ HugoII if Ali had not told me to.

 

[Ahhlee]

As far as physical confrontations, emkay got in a lucky punch in our first fight but I promise Emkay/ Hugo II: The Battle at Dave's Dive Bar will have a different ending.
I put timesjoke on ignore because Ali told me to.

You'll be drunk, and I have ninja skills...and if you call me fat again...it'll be a repeat performance I only beat up Hugo because Ali was egging me on, and she said she wouldn't be my friend if I didn't "MASH HIS FACE INTO A ****** PULP"!!!!

Emkay is a beast. I would not have signed up for Emkay/ HugoII if Ali had not told me to.

Shhh, my minions! Shhhhhhhhhhh......