GUN NUT MASSACRES 5 WOMEN IN CHICAGO CLOTHING STORE

[robw]

Yeah, your intelligence is really fierce.


"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9A3E8B0A39DFFSandman@216.196.97.136...
> "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in
> news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08:
>
> > I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1
> > gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. (Which
> > is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like disscussions with "The
> > Weasle".
>
> Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter.
>
>
>
>
> --
> RD (The Sandman)
>
> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> to terrorism is much, much worse

 

[robw]

What do you think my "stance" is?


"Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
news:ki3rj.93654$K27.23909@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> RD (The Sandman) wrote:
> > "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@verizon.net> wrote in
> > news:LJ%qj.28$r03.0@trnddc08:
> >
> >> I asked him point blank if that is what he was proposing (1
> >> gun/mo/dealer), and was told to go read the previous postings. (Which
> >> is why I was asking the question.) Kinda like disscussions with "The
> >> Weasle".
> >
> > Not really. The weasel is a magnitude smarter.
> >
> >
>
> The intelligence might be different, but it's no contest in the honesty
> department.
>
> As much as I disagree with robw's logic, he's up front in stance.

 

[robw]

You don't know how city people talk, do you?

I thought you were so urban?


"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9A3E8B5ECA008Sandman@216.196.97.136...
> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:O6KdnaefrsuKATHanZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
> > Hint: the Philly proposal would.
>
> No, it wouldn't. You can't even define the term "dealer" much less
> understand how dealers work in the real world.
>
>
> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9A3E5F6F04A13Sandman@216.196.97.136...
> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >> news:lcidnVUV7ucayjfanZ2dnUVZ_o2dnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >>
> >> > The other side of the counter would only be able to buy one handgun
> a
> >> > month.
> >>
> >> ROFLMAO!!! You don't even know what one gun a month legislation
> >> addresses. Hint, it doesn't limit dealers to one gun a month.
> >>
> >>
> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in
> message
> >> > news:Xns9A3C993D58E65Sandman@216.196.97.136...
> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >> >> news:2rudndTQSP0gbjTanZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> > If you're a dealer who has been able to by x amount of guns from
> a
> >> >> dealer
> >> >> > and now that number is one.......
> >> >>
> >> >> But it isn't. If they were already breaking the law, passing one
> gun
> >> >> a month won't change that.
> >> >>
> >> >> FWIW, dealers buy guns from distributors not other dealers.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> RD (The Sandman)
> >> >>
> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse
>
>
> --
> RD (The Sandman)
>
> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> to terrorism is much, much worse

 

[robw]

I'll take your word, but quite frankly, it's not real evident.


"RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9A3E8B779CA4ASandman@216.196.97.136...
> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:GKqdnR3tLuMKATHanZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
> > In or near the cities?
>
> Both
>
> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9A3E5F96D48B4Sandman@216.196.97.136...
> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >> news:eridnaaJrbTDxTfanZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >>
> >> > Never lived in a metropolitan city, have you?
> >>
> >> Only Miami, Chicago, Phoenix and LA.
> >>
> >>
> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in
> message
> >> > news:Xns9A3C9B4516729Sandman@216.196.97.136...
> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >> >> news:fc2dnS3OHZIsaDTanZ2dnUVZ_t- dnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >> >>
> >> >> > You;re from where and lived where?
> >> >>
> >> >> Too numerous to list and as you have noted, you really don't care
> >> >> what I think anyway so why would you really be interested in where
> I
> >> >> have lived? The truth is that you aren't. So why ask?
> >> >>
> >> >> > "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in
> >> >> > message news:Xns9A3C693C023BASandman@216.196.97.136...
> >> >> >> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >> >> >> news:f5idndmLHJASAjXanZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Name calling is a Philly thing.
> >> >> >> > An urban thing.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > I thought you knew about urban life???
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Where I'm from and in places I have lived it can get you killed.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> RD (The Sandman)
> >> >>
> >> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> >> >> to terrorism is much, much worse
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> RD (The Sandman)
> >>
> >> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> >> to terrorism is much, much worse
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> RD (The Sandman)
>
> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> to terrorism is much, much worse

 

[DerekSmalls]

RD (The Sandman) wrote:

> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:YsOdnXRZSoegBjHanZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>
>
>>You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are
>>upstairs while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One
>>of the kids picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses
>>it resulting in the drapes catching fire.
>>
>>What would you do first?
>>
>>Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours?
>>
>>Thank you.
>
>
> I don't have any kids at home.

I would never leave the children of other parents alone, unless I could
they were toddlers, and locked safely in my closet.

I would demand that THEY supervise each and every movement of those
brats in the same room that WE are in... hancuffed to the crib they
bought with them.
But then again, I would never have dinner with friends that brought
their rugrats over in the first place.

I hate children... unless ya add lots of garlic-n-chives.

 

[Magus]

robw wrote:
> Nice try, but I'm not for banning guns. There's not one thing I've said to
> that effect.
>
> If I really believed that all guns should be banned I'd be part of a group
> that wants to do that. As I've explained, I've been offered a chance to join
> such groups and turned them down.
>
> You really need to dial 1-800-Clue.
>

I run that hotline, you should call it sometime.

We're not the ones equating children and matches with criminals and guns.


>
> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> news:I53rj.93637$K27.56485@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> robw wrote:
>>> You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are
> upstairs
>>> while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One of the kids
>>> picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses it resulting
> in
>>> the drapes catching fire.
>>>
>>> What would you do first?
>>>
>> Put out the fire, I wouldn't try to ban matches.
>>
>>> Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours?
>>>
>> After putting out the fire then educate the child in correct behavior.
>> Maybe tell the child to not touch matches, I wouldn't tell everyone in
>> the house that they were not to touch matches.
>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>> Find an example that supports your position.
>>
>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9A3E5E3F4B53ESandman@216.196.97.136...
>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
>>>> news:qKidndnK_bxxyTfanZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>>>
>>>>> Waking up and not having to read another story about a six year old
> kid
>>>>> getting caught in the crossfire of illegal guns will make me very
>>>> happy.
>>>>> Yes.
>>>> It would make me happy too. So why not address the problem of the
>>>> criminal?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:Xns9A3C99E765AEASandman@216.196.97.136...
>>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
>>>>>> news:mbWdnYEJ7JX5ZDTanZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One handgun a month.
>>>>>> Nice trite saying. The words themselves must really make you feel
>>>>>> comfortable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> RD (The Sandman)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
>>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> RD (The Sandman)
>>>>
>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse
>>>
>
>

 

[DerekSmalls]

robw wrote:

> Prove me wrong.

Again?

 

[DerekSmalls]

robw wrote:

> I'll answer any question that you'd like.

Why are you a moron?

 

[DerekSmalls]

robw, the top posting retard wrote:

> Guns out of their hands will stop the killings.

Define "their".

 

[DerekSmalls]

robw, the top posting retard wrote:

> Penis's?????

Wow! Your dual dopler GAYTAR locked on that right swiftly!

>
> You like to "swordfight"????
>
> Are you f ckijng gay?

I noticed how you avoided everything but the original questions.
Why is that?


>
>
> "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
> news:47acc11e$0$7853$607ed4bc@cv.net...
>
>>RD (The Sandman) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote like the top posting retard he is:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I read many essays on criminals and their relation to culture, etc. And
>>>>while I'm reading people are getting killed in West Philly.
>>>>
>>>>Guns out of their hands first, correct the situation next.
>>
>>>I see you agree that your plan on gun regulation won't correct the
>>>situation. Why don't you work on something that will?
>>
>>Why doesn't Robweetard want to correct the situation(the real problem!)
>>first?
>> Guns can't possibly "cause" or promote problems, after all.
>>I have a few firearms and other forms of weapons, and they never caused
>>any problems.
>>
>> Even he said "Their hands".
>>
>> Who is this "their" that ROBW finally admitted to acknowledging to
>>being the real problem?
>>
>>Guns, penis's, fists, knives, bludgeoning "weapons"( and other tools)
>>aren't the issue.

 

[Magus]

robw wrote:
> Well the law would have to be in place for that to happen now, wouldn't it?
>

That wasn't your assertion when you said "I've shown you repeatedly."



>
> "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> news:L83rj.93639$K27.47374@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
>> robw wrote:
>>> Yes, it would.
>>> I've shown you repeatedly.
>>>
>> You've asserted it's the solution, you haven't demonstrated it would
>> actually work.
>>
>>
>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9A3E5E708F33Sandman@216.196.97.136...
>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
>>>> news:NbqdndjJyYLOyDfanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com:
>>>>
>>>>> The law would hinder the supply.
>>>> No, it wouldn't. It only addresses the legal supply not the illegal
>>>> one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> RD (The Sandman)
>>>>
>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse
>>>
>
>

 

[DerekSmalls]

robw, thr top posting retard wrote:

> What do you think my "stance" is?

To be the most stupid person in the US?

What did I win?

 

[robw]

Knock yourself out.


"DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
news:47acdc6a$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> robw wrote:
>
> > Prove me wrong.
>
> Again?

 

[robw]

Simple answer, I'm not.


"DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
news:47acdc97$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> robw wrote:
>
> > I'll answer any question that you'd like.
>
> Why are you a moron?

 

[robw]

I guess you didn't do well on those "what word doesn't belong" tests.

And the problem in Philly is guns.

Your answer.


"DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
news:47acde68$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> robw, the top posting retard wrote:
>
> > Penis's?????
>
> Wow! Your dual dopler GAYTAR locked on that right swiftly!
>
> >
> > You like to "swordfight"????
> >
> > Are you f ckijng gay?
>
> I noticed how you avoided everything but the original questions.
> Why is that?
>
>
> >
> >
> > "DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
> > news:47acc11e$0$7853$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> >
> >>RD (The Sandman) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote like the top posting retard he is:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I read many essays on criminals and their relation to culture, etc.
And
> >>>>while I'm reading people are getting killed in West Philly.
> >>>>
> >>>>Guns out of their hands first, correct the situation next.
> >>
> >>>I see you agree that your plan on gun regulation won't correct the
> >>>situation. Why don't you work on something that will?
> >>
> >>Why doesn't Robweetard want to correct the situation(the real problem!)
> >>first?
> >> Guns can't possibly "cause" or promote problems, after all.
> >>I have a few firearms and other forms of weapons, and they never caused
> >>any problems.
> >>
> >> Even he said "Their hands".
> >>
> >> Who is this "their" that ROBW finally admitted to acknowledging to
> >>being the real problem?
> >>
> >>Guns, penis's, fists, knives, bludgeoning "weapons"( and other tools)
> >>aren't the issue.

 

[robw]

Criminals who use guns.

There are criminals who don't use guns you know.


"DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
news:47acdcf1$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> robw, the top posting retard wrote:
>
> > Guns out of their hands will stop the killings.
>
> Define "their".
>
>

 

[robw]

"crib they bought them in"???

I said they were downstairs playing XBox.

You read much?


"DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
news:47acd43f$0$7886$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> RD (The Sandman) wrote:
>
> > "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> > news:YsOdnXRZSoegBjHanZ2dnUVZ_uSdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >
> >
> >>You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are
> >>upstairs while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One
> >>of the kids picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses
> >>it resulting in the drapes catching fire.
> >>
> >>What would you do first?
> >>
> >>Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours?
> >>
> >>Thank you.
> >
> >
> > I don't have any kids at home.
>
> I would never leave the children of other parents alone, unless I could
> they were toddlers, and locked safely in my closet.
>
> I would demand that THEY supervise each and every movement of those
> brats in the same room that WE are in... hancuffed to the crib they
> bought with them.
> But then again, I would never have dinner with friends that brought
> their rugrats over in the first place.
>
> I hate children... unless ya add lots of garlic-n-chives.
>

 

[robw]

So you came up small too, huh?


"Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
news%4rj.82499$rc2.77280@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> robw wrote:
> > Nice try, but I'm not for banning guns. There's not one thing I've said
to
> > that effect.
> >
> > If I really believed that all guns should be banned I'd be part of a
group
> > that wants to do that. As I've explained, I've been offered a chance to
join
> > such groups and turned them down.
> >
> > You really need to dial 1-800-Clue.
> >
>
> I run that hotline, you should call it sometime.
>
> We're not the ones equating children and matches with criminals and guns.
>
>
> >
> > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> > news:I53rj.93637$K27.56485@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> >> robw wrote:
> >>> You have friends over for dinner who have two kids. The adults are
> > upstairs
> >>> while the kids are down in the family room playing XBox. One of the
kids
> >>> picks up a pack of matches, lights one, freaks and tosses it resulting
> > in
> >>> the drapes catching fire.
> >>>
> >>> What would you do first?
> >>>
> >> Put out the fire, I wouldn't try to ban matches.
> >>
> >>> Put out the fire or explore and correct the behaviours?
> >>>
> >> After putting out the fire then educate the child in correct behavior.
> >> Maybe tell the child to not touch matches, I wouldn't tell everyone in
> >> the house that they were not to touch matches.
> >>
> >>> Thank you.
> >>>
> >> Find an example that supports your position.
> >>
> >>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:Xns9A3E5E3F4B53ESandman@216.196.97.136...
> >>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >>>> news:qKidndnK_bxxyTfanZ2dnUVZ_qOdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Waking up and not having to read another story about a six year old
> > kid
> >>>>> getting caught in the crossfire of illegal guns will make me very
> >>>> happy.
> >>>>> Yes.
> >>>> It would make me happy too. So why not address the problem of the
> >>>> criminal?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in
message
> >>>>> news:Xns9A3C99E765AEASandman@216.196.97.136...
> >>>>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >>>>>> news:mbWdnYEJ7JX5ZDTanZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> One handgun a month.
> >>>>>> Nice trite saying. The words themselves must really make you feel
> >>>>>> comfortable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> RD (The Sandman)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> >>>>>> to terrorism is much, much worse
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> RD (The Sandman)
> >>>>
> >>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> >>>> to terrorism is much, much worse
> >>>
> >
> >

 

[robw]

No, because you've shown me nothing.


"Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
news:ja5rj.82505$rc2.64740@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> robw wrote:
> > Well the law would have to be in place for that to happen now, wouldn't
it?
> >
>
> That wasn't your assertion when you said "I've shown you repeatedly."
>
>
>
> >
> > "Magus" <nope@noway.net> wrote in message
> > news:L83rj.93639$K27.47374@bignews6.bellsouth.net...
> >> robw wrote:
> >>> Yes, it would.
> >>> I've shown you repeatedly.
> >>>
> >> You've asserted it's the solution, you haven't demonstrated it would
> >> actually work.
> >>
> >>
> >>> "RD (The Sandman)" <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote in message
> >>> news:Xns9A3E5E708F33Sandman@216.196.97.136...
> >>>> "robw" <noddy093@comcast.net> wrote in
> >>>> news:NbqdndjJyYLOyDfanZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d@comcast.com:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The law would hinder the supply.
> >>>> No, it wouldn't. It only addresses the legal supply not the
illegal
> >>>> one.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> RD (The Sandman)
> >>>>
> >>>> War is absolute hell.....but to give in
> >>>> to terrorism is much, much worse
> >>>
> >
> >

 

[robw]

A cookie.
Enjoy!


"DerekSmalls" <SpinalTap@Bass.gov.> wrote in message
news:47acdf22$0$7881$607ed4bc@cv.net...
> robw, thr top posting retard wrote:
>
> > What do you think my "stance" is?
>
> To be the most stupid person in the US?
>
> What did I win?