builder
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2005
phreakwars mentioned:
The same thoughts have been hanging at the back of my mind.
Conspiracies seem to be the order of the day, ATM.
If Osama was responsible, they would have timed it better. The bombs went off late.
If the Zionists were responsible, they timed it correctly.
If Osama is over his pneumonia, and plotting the end of the world again, he would have had more impact. Compared to the WTC, this "attack" was lame.
Perhaps the non-apologist liars that are leading the lame coalition against terror are feeling the public ire about their bullshit ****ing excuses, and decided to pre-empt again. Who ****ing knows?
Personally, I think stating that the bomb used was an al Qaeda type bomb is a MISINFORMATION of PROPAGANDA caliber.
Even though I do not doubt it was more then likely al Qaeda, the presented evidence to the public, to me, is WEAK at best. Its only speculation
The same thoughts have been hanging at the back of my mind.
Conspiracies seem to be the order of the day, ATM.
If Osama was responsible, they would have timed it better. The bombs went off late.
If the Zionists were responsible, they timed it correctly.
If Osama is over his pneumonia, and plotting the end of the world again, he would have had more impact. Compared to the WTC, this "attack" was lame.
Perhaps the non-apologist liars that are leading the lame coalition against terror are feeling the public ire about their bullshit ****ing excuses, and decided to pre-empt again. Who ****ing knows?