M
mimus
Guest
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:18:29 -0500, mimus wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:07:08 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:33:08 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:19:15 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:29:22 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:04:49 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:32:25 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:20:17 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:16:22 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:22:05 +0000, knoxy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <Hd6dnQEqDYVNKYDUnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@giganews.com>, tinmimus99
>>>>>>>>>> @hotmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:38:02 +0000, knoxy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t66dncibO4Y3VITUnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d@giganews.com>, tinmimus99
>>>>>>>>>>>> @hotmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:47:17 -0500, david hillstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:31:12 +0000, metro-golden-meower
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <metro-golden-meower@meowdot.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:46:10 -0500, david hillstrom <dave@meow.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:33:56 +0000, metro-golden-meower
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <metro-golden-meower@meowdot.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:22:54 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:35:04 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:54:40 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:32:29 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is now clean and uncluterd. it took two days to do that! i had to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shift a big pile of guitar mags, more dvd spindles than i realized i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own. two motherboard boxes. lots of pc parts and godd knows what else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amazingly there where no books.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now after cleaning the actual desk, my back herts like ******* crazy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and standing is very painfull. i think i shall go use my tenz machine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow i have to put stuff on the desk and arange it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pathetic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i agree. only the trapped nerves in my back don't. maybe you and i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should gang up on them and give them a good hard thrashing back into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shape?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. Shall I bring a baseball bat or a galvanized pipe?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you the ******** that destroyed my mail-box?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That should be "who" destroyed your mailbox. Since I'm a person and not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, "who" instead of "that" is the correct term to use. For example, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could say, "I am the person who destroyed your mailbox." But, I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying I did, just giving an example of the proper use of the pronoun "who",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given that I'm a person and not a thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignorabimus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, let us investigate this mailbox issue deeper. Can you provide us with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more details of exactly what happened to your beloved mailbox?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I didn't have an autopsy done, but it got folded in the middle by a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blow from something _very much like_ a baseball bat or galvanized pipe . . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just as i susspected it would, this has now turned into CSI mimus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i wanna date the hot chick in the lab!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do realize that is mimus in drag?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no way, hes the hot chick that checks out the scene of the crime. its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right there in the script.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not reading any of this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Too busy in the lab?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <coldly:>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We don't talk about the lab. (Zhnunununun!)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh come on, you can tell me. I wont tell anyone else.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Loose lips lead to Guantanamo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> silly swedeboll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <still more coldly:>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't call me a "swedeboll". WeverTF that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> in english it'd be 'swede ball', for some reason i was thinking of
>>>>>> dave when i said that. <scratches head in puzzlement about that>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> everyone knows that its 'loose lips sink ships.'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not for the last six years or so, although that may come back in style
>>>>>>> here shortly, as prison-carriers in international waters become all the
>>>>>>> rage . . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i've been laughing at the news this week of modern piracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> They're gonna have to go to the convoy system. And blow **** outa
>>>>> anything that gets close. And some punitive shellings/bombings, or
>>>>> maybe
>>>>
>>>> that's so close to what is conciderd the american sterotype, it may as
>>>> well be it.
>>>
>>> I don't think the Americans invented any of the above.
>>
>> probably not, but they did give the raw material for the stereotype.
>>
>>> It's all even, like, in international law.
>>
>> it reminds me of the eppisode of the simpson with the gambling trip
>> and the pirates.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Barbary_War
>
> Note it was an Anglo-Dutch fleet that shelled Tripoli for nine hours in
> the wind-up of the Second Barbary War.
>
> Note too the Koranic justification of piracy of non-Moslems (there's a
> similar justification in the Bible about "the faithful" having a
> right to "the goods" of non-Jews or non-Christians, I forget which).
Speaking of Deuteronomy, did anyone else see PBS' _Nova_ episode "The
Bible's Buried Secrets"? it was stunning, even to me, in that, even though
it was all spun in terms of admiration for the somewhat long-drawn-out
creation of a new communal origin-myth for the "Israelites" (Canaanite
proletarians, post-revolution), it made it quite clear that archaeological
evidence proves that the Biblical "histories" of "Exodus" and
"Deuteronomy" are absolutely false:
Viz., there was no "Exodus" from Egypt, etc.
That's absolutely staggering.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bible/
--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
This is part of the eternal wonder of the universe
as man forages out to discover in the womb of time
the nascence of his individuality in the motherhood of possibility.
< Malzberg
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:07:08 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:33:08 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:19:15 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:29:22 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:04:49 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:32:25 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:20:17 +0000, metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:16:22 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:22:05 +0000, knoxy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In article <Hd6dnQEqDYVNKYDUnZ2dnUVZ_jadnZ2d@giganews.com>, tinmimus99
>>>>>>>>>> @hotmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:38:02 +0000, knoxy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <t66dncibO4Y3VITUnZ2dnUVZ_qjinZ2d@giganews.com>, tinmimus99
>>>>>>>>>>>> @hotmail.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:47:17 -0500, david hillstrom wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:31:12 +0000, metro-golden-meower
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <metro-golden-meower@meowdot.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 10:46:10 -0500, david hillstrom <dave@meow.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:33:56 +0000, metro-golden-meower
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <metro-golden-meower@meowdot.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:22:54 -0500, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:35:04 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:54:40 +0000, Tim Weaver wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:32:29 +0000 (UTC), Tim Weaver
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <tmw99999@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metro-golden-meower wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is now clean and uncluterd. it took two days to do that! i had to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shift a big pile of guitar mags, more dvd spindles than i realized i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> own. two motherboard boxes. lots of pc parts and godd knows what else.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amazingly there where no books.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now after cleaning the actual desk, my back herts like ******* crazy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and standing is very painfull. i think i shall go use my tenz machine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomorrow i have to put stuff on the desk and arange it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pathetic.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i agree. only the trapped nerves in my back don't. maybe you and i
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should gang up on them and give them a good hard thrashing back into
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shape?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds good. Shall I bring a baseball bat or a galvanized pipe?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you the ******** that destroyed my mail-box?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That should be "who" destroyed your mailbox. Since I'm a person and not a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thing, "who" instead of "that" is the correct term to use. For example, I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could say, "I am the person who destroyed your mailbox." But, I'm not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> saying I did, just giving an example of the proper use of the pronoun "who",
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given that I'm a person and not a thing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignorabimus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, let us investigate this mailbox issue deeper. Can you provide us with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more details of exactly what happened to your beloved mailbox?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, I didn't have an autopsy done, but it got folded in the middle by a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blow from something _very much like_ a baseball bat or galvanized pipe . . . .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just as i susspected it would, this has now turned into CSI mimus.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> i wanna date the hot chick in the lab!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you do realize that is mimus in drag?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no way, hes the hot chick that checks out the scene of the crime. its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> right there in the script.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not reading any of this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Too busy in the lab?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> <coldly:>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> We don't talk about the lab. (Zhnunununun!)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Oh come on, you can tell me. I wont tell anyone else.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Loose lips lead to Guantanamo.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> silly swedeboll.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <still more coldly:>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't call me a "swedeboll". WeverTF that is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> in english it'd be 'swede ball', for some reason i was thinking of
>>>>>> dave when i said that. <scratches head in puzzlement about that>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> everyone knows that its 'loose lips sink ships.'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not for the last six years or so, although that may come back in style
>>>>>>> here shortly, as prison-carriers in international waters become all the
>>>>>>> rage . . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i've been laughing at the news this week of modern piracy.
>>>>>
>>>>> They're gonna have to go to the convoy system. And blow **** outa
>>>>> anything that gets close. And some punitive shellings/bombings, or
>>>>> maybe
>>>>
>>>> that's so close to what is conciderd the american sterotype, it may as
>>>> well be it.
>>>
>>> I don't think the Americans invented any of the above.
>>
>> probably not, but they did give the raw material for the stereotype.
>>
>>> It's all even, like, in international law.
>>
>> it reminds me of the eppisode of the simpson with the gambling trip
>> and the pirates.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Barbary_War
>
> Note it was an Anglo-Dutch fleet that shelled Tripoli for nine hours in
> the wind-up of the Second Barbary War.
>
> Note too the Koranic justification of piracy of non-Moslems (there's a
> similar justification in the Bible about "the faithful" having a
> right to "the goods" of non-Jews or non-Christians, I forget which).
Speaking of Deuteronomy, did anyone else see PBS' _Nova_ episode "The
Bible's Buried Secrets"? it was stunning, even to me, in that, even though
it was all spun in terms of admiration for the somewhat long-drawn-out
creation of a new communal origin-myth for the "Israelites" (Canaanite
proletarians, post-revolution), it made it quite clear that archaeological
evidence proves that the Biblical "histories" of "Exodus" and
"Deuteronomy" are absolutely false:
Viz., there was no "Exodus" from Egypt, etc.
That's absolutely staggering.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bible/
--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
This is part of the eternal wonder of the universe
as man forages out to discover in the womb of time
the nascence of his individuality in the motherhood of possibility.
< Malzberg
\ smeeter #6