Schoolyard Taunting
- Thread starter snafu
- Start date
timesjoke
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
hugo said:
Hey hugo, your the guy who can't seem to be capable of answering a direct question, lol.
Of course we do know why Texans put their name on the back of their leather belts..........so on the rare occasion they pull their heads out of their azz they can look up to see what their name is.
hugo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
hugo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is, to use it as sparingly as possible; avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of peace to discharge the debts, which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burthen, which we ourselves ought to bear. The execution of these maxims belongs to your representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should cooperate. To facilitate to them the performance of their duty, it is essential that you should practically bear in mind, that towards the payment of debts there must be Revenue; that to have Revenue there must be taxes; that no taxes can be devised, which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant; that the intrinsic embarrassment, inseparable from the selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties), ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue, which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.
timesjoke
Active Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2007
snafu said:
lol, hugo has always copy/pasted other people's commentary as his sole method of conversation that does not involve providing false witness against people like Sarah Palin and the cop Obama decided was a racist.
If you pay attention, you will see that most of his rants tend to be against the same people Obama and his party is against.
Sarah Palin may or may not be a direct threat to Democrats on the Presidential ticket but she sure is a powerful figure for Conservatives to get attention for other people so the Liberals are scared of her, they try to diminish and belittle Palin so they can try and limit her influence......
And hugo is standing right next to Obama and company in this endever.
No, hugo is not a conservative.
ImWithStupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
hugo said:
That's the reason we will become a second rate nation. 2011 will mark the year the first of the baby boomers are able to get on social security and medicare.
Once this begins it will be all but impossible, under our system of government, to pass any kind of meaningful reform to those bloated entitlements.
hugo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2005
Of course, about 70% of the Republican Party are liberals who favor taxing oil companies and spreading the wealth as long as it is a Republican doing it. The fact Republicans have no principles is why Obama got elected. Not the less than 1/2 of 1% of the voters for Barr. Republicans believe government spending and fornicating is great as long as they are the ones doing it.
Kay Bailey Hutchison's defense when labeled a big spender Washingtonian by the Perry campaign was she did not vote for any of Obama's big spending programs. Sadly, she voted for all of GW's.
TJ's site:
http://www.republicansforobama.org/
