Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The easiest way of telling what is flame and what is not is if you look at who is still talking about the topic.
My comment to you was you running away from the topic, all of this your doing is to escape the topic you can't stand up to.
Try to say that really fast 3 times in a rowa faggoty, little, c0cksucking, male ballet dancer. B)
Try to say that really fast 3 times in a row
Ohhh... how mightily he strives to garner respect from people that he continuously puts down. A shame really.
Palin's record is more liberal than GW Bush's was when he was governor of Texas. In 2000 conservative Republicans voted overwhelmingly for GW and we ended up with 8 years of reckless spending and government growth. I'll vote for someone in 2012 who believes in limited government. That ain't Palin.
I ain't even talking about independents. There are Republicans that actually believe in limited government and are not simply political opportunists jumping on the bandwagon, ie Sarah Palin. Y'all gonna vote for a commie just cuz she's cute with her makeup on.
Conversing with TJ is like continually petting a dog that you know damn well is going to eventually nip you...it's craziness! Pure craziness.
Any other kind of system would be unstable, unfair, unsustainable and vulnerable to anarchy.
I'm not into politics but I do agree with your assessments of Palin and Bush. So I say "yeah"Regardless of Sarah Palin's and Dubya's supposed 'belief systems', they are both bone-chillingly stupid / incompetent and not the kind of people you'd want in government.
Yeah?
Yeah?
Yeah?
Please say yeah. All of you.
Also, I don't understand how anyone can support any kind of system other than one that might actually work, ie: a socialism based (taxed & managed) system where basic needs are met by government + individual innovation is rewarded (capitalism) + potential damage to the system (eg, pollution and unsustainable use of resources) is regulated via a fair economic paradigm (ecological economics).
Any other kind of system would be unstable, unfair, unsustainable and vulnerable to anarchy.
I don't think that is fair Ali, me and you have had our issues but I am really working hard to try and be better at getting along without having to give up on my beliefs that things like personal responsibility are whar make America great while the lack is what tears us apart.
What I said was not a flame, it was a description and it was on topic with RO dodging a question. I asked you one time to help me be better so help me Ali, if you asked someone a direct question and they dodged it, what would be a nicer way of being firm and getting them to answer the question?
You should work harder, TJ.
This time make it believable.
I don't remember you coming in to referee the Chi-bashing parties and call "foul" on the others. Why would you bring her up unless you are trying to divert attention off your gross inequities as a man?
As far as the flames are concerned, I took considerable heat because I gave back what I got, I undetrstand now the mess only gets worse by feeding into the flames by giving it back, but at the same time I am not going to be a punching bag. Flames are not supposed to be a part of the forum anyway and yes I know, your staff so you can choose not to enforce the rule on yourself but in reality it is a very good rule. So being as I am not one to just be a punching bag, and this is a great rule even if it will not be enforced, I will simply point it out when it happens instead of joining in as I used to do.
My responding to flames made by other people was not wrong RO.
But it was garbage the rest of the forum got tired of seeing so even though I was not really wrong to respond in kind, I was still not being fair to my forum mates by adding to the mess. So, from now on when someone flames I will try to not respond with more flames but instead simply point them out instead. There really is no excuse for flames anyway.
Your bias is showing RO. I am sure you will delete this again but if your allowing other people to flame, I will reply not with returned flames but simply to defend myself and point out the flames for what they are. Post #39 in Right or Wrong
But my point is valid and that is why your running away from it like a scared little girl.
Another concept comes to mind, you could have just answered the question instead of running away in the first place, and then no comment from me about running away at all...........right?
I think everyone knows I'm not TJ's #1 fan.. but I think it's rather ridiculous to "moderate" him to try to force him to admit something.. Or to just plain f ck with him.. Sounds exactly like something TJ would do if he could.. why stoop? I don't want someone else deciding what of TJ's I can and can't read.. or someone deciding who I can or can't interact with if I choose. We're all adults here. If I can't take it, I can leave.. simple enough.