September 11 Hijackers are Alive And Well

johnoneill wrote:

> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xIudnZlKH78aHgDanZ2dnUVZ_tyknZ2d@comcast.com...
>
>>"Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message
>>
>>
>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the
>>>>dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single,
>>>>erroneous BBC story,
>>
>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous',
>>
>>Interesting how it is found to be erroneous by every sane person with at least a two digit IQ.
>>
>>Are you saying you are far to undedicated and too severely mentally retarded to realize this BBC story was erroneous?
>
>
> Hold your horses, Johnnyboy.
>
> Yes, the report was erronous. I know that. But, I just enjoy seeing you
> jumping to conclusions and ranting like a little bitch about my 'low' IQ.
>
> Haha, poor Johnnyboy, fell right into my trap.
>
> Ok, Pindelski.
>
> Now that we've established that the BBC report was erronous, and that
> you're a ****ing retard... tell me, where did BBC get such information?
>
> Oh, yes... CNN too, Pindelski.
>
> Do you know? If you don't, wouldn't you like to know?
>
>
>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes
>>>before it actually did...
>>>That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski.
>>
>>What would be the cause of you believing something so moronic, do you also have attention deficit disorder? You seem
>>to have forgotten our discussions of the erroneous BBC report of the collapse of WTC 7.
>
>
> Oh, please, Pindelski... refresh my memory.
>
> Tell how is it possible for BBC and CNN to report the collapse of WTC7
> BEFORE it actually happened?
>
> Huh?

How is it possible for nearly every news agency in the country to report
the death of the Pope a full day before he died?
JOHN PAUL II WAS AN INSIDE JOB!
 
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:IKlnj.3001$7d1.1670@news01.roc.ny...
> johnoneill wrote:
>> "Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:q6cnj.2990$7d1.2684@news01.roc.ny...
>>
>>>johnoneill wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hijackers Alive And Well
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs
>>>>>>>taken of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC
>>>>>>>story,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous',
>>>>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes
>>>>>>before it actually did...
>>>>>
>>>>>Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Care to explain?
>>>
>>>They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed
>>>was obviously erroneous.
>>>
>>>Follow the logic, Einstein?
>>
>>
>> Yeah, Oppenheimer. I follow your logic. Too ****ing bad your 'logic' stops
>> there. And it is funny to see you 'making a point' and falling into my little trap,
>> Vandar.
>>
>> Ok.
>>
>> They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the
>> background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous.
>>
>> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer?
>
> The NWO, of course.

No, of course it wasn't 'NWO'. Don't jerk around, Vandar.

I asked you a serious question.

Are you telling me that you'll once again act as an evasive asshole when
pushed into a corner?
 
"Vandar" <vandar69@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:RMlnj.3002$7d1.2868@news01.roc.ny...
> johnoneill wrote:
>
>> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:xIudnZlKH78aHgDanZ2dnUVZ_tyknZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>>"Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message
>>>
>>>
>>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the
>>>>>dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single,
>>>>>erroneous BBC story,
>>>
>>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous',
>>>
>>>Interesting how it is found to be erroneous by every sane person with at least a two digit IQ.
>>>
>>>Are you saying you are far to undedicated and too severely mentally retarded to realize this BBC story was erroneous?
>>
>>
>> Hold your horses, Johnnyboy.
>>
>> Yes, the report was erronous. I know that. But, I just enjoy seeing you
>> jumping to conclusions and ranting like a little bitch about my 'low' IQ.
>>
>> Haha, poor Johnnyboy, fell right into my trap.
>>
>> Ok, Pindelski.
>>
>> Now that we've established that the BBC report was erronous, and that
>> you're a ****ing retard... tell me, where did BBC get such information?
>>
>> Oh, yes... CNN too, Pindelski.
>>
>> Do you know? If you don't, wouldn't you like to know?
>>
>>
>>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes
>>>>before it actually did...
>>>>That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski.
>>>
>>>What would be the cause of you believing something so moronic, do you also have attention deficit disorder? You seem
>>>to have forgotten our discussions of the erroneous BBC report of the collapse of WTC 7.
>>
>>
>> Oh, please, Pindelski... refresh my memory.
>>
>> Tell how is it possible for BBC and CNN to report the collapse of WTC7
>> BEFORE it actually happened?
>>
>> Huh?
>
> How is it possible for nearly every news agency in the country to report the death of the Pope a full day before he
> died?

Don't be an evasive asshole, Vandar.

Answer the damn question.

Oh, you don't know the answer?

> JOHN PAUL II WAS AN INSIDE JOB!

So, this is the way you deal with the bullshit you spew?

Priceless! It is priceless to see Vandar swimming in a pool of his own shite!
 
"Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message

> They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the
> background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous.

> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer?

Why do you think every time a reporter says something stupid, someone told
him or her to say it?

You've obviously never watched a live newscast in your life. At a time when
no one yet knows what's going on, it's extremely common there are erroneous
reports.

If you'd do some research, you find there were many erroneous reports in the
9/11 newscasts on 9/11.
 
"John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message news:ppSdnYXfOr-kZwDanZ2dnUVZ_rGhnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message
>
>> They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the
>> background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous.
>
>> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer?
>
> Why do you think every time a reporter says something stupid, someone told him or her to say it?

So, you're saying that those two reporters, from CNN and BBC, made it up?

Is that what you're saying, Pindelski?

Interesting how far will you go, and what kind of excuses you will find for
those two reporters, and funny enough how you find nothing interesting
or strange in the fact that Dick Cheney and GWB appeared together in
front of the 9/11 Commission, without being under oath and without any
transcript being made of their testimonies.

Indicative? Of course.

So, John Pindelski is selectively picking up thing he will 'defend' and present
as 'the truth'? Of course.

So, John Pindelski is a liar? Of course.

> You've obviously never watched a live newscast in your life. At a time when no one yet knows what's going on, it's
> extremely common there are erroneous reports.

Hahahaha, how little Johnnyboy is trying to find an excuse for CNN and BBC
reporters!

Hahahaha!

Unbeliveable!

> If you'd do some research, you find there were many erroneous reports in the 9/11 newscasts on 9/11.

Even if a reporter is standing right in front of the building that did not collapse,
although they are reporting that it has just collapsed?

Hahaha, Pindelski, Pindelski... are you aware of the fact how obvious you are?

When you lie? Ommit? Distort?

If you are, well... I can respect that.

Well, are you Pindelski?
 
"Ed" <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:e83654fd-3529-4416-a0e7-44cfd7d61d97@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 28, 8:16 am, "johnoneill" <johnone...@dmail.com> wrote:
> "Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:q6cnj.2990$7d1.2684@news01.roc.ny...
> > johnoneill wrote:
> >> "Animal02" <Wherewere...@Wednsday.com> wrote in messagenews:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
>
> >>>"johnoneill" <johnone...@dmail.com> wrote in messagenews:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org...
>
> >>>>"John P." <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote in messagenews:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> >>>>>"911review.org" <brad.te...@gmail.com> wrote in a message
>
> >>>>>>Hijackers Alive And Well
>
> >>>>>All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs.
>
> >>>>>In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs
> >>>>>taken of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead.
>
> >>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC
> >>>>>story,
>
> >>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous',
> >>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes
> >>>>before it actually did...
>
> >>>Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too.
>
> >> Care to explain?
>
> > They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed
> > was obviously erroneous.
>
> > Follow the logic, Einstein?
>
> Yeah, Oppenheimer. I follow your logic. Too ****ing bad your 'logic' stops
> there. And it is funny to see you 'making a point' and falling into my little trap,
> Vandar.
>
> Ok.
>
> They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the
> background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous.
>
> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer?
>
> Care to explain, brainiac?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I obviously don't have an exact name. But it would appear somone made
an announcement that WTC7 was in immenant (sp) danger of collapse and
the reporter thought it had happened already.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

So, the BBC reporter was standing right in front of WTC7, and I think
CNN reporter was ****ing LOOKING at WTC7 as he made that
report!

So, let me guess, EddieLiarboy... a 'coincidence'?

How indicative!
 
"Ed" <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:32fe69a0-0068-41dc-8421-020a41309662@v67g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 27, 10:22 pm, "johnoneill" <johnone...@dmail.com> wrote:
> "Animal02" <Wherewere...@Wednsday.com> wrote in messagenews:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
>
> > "johnoneill" <johnone...@dmail.com> wrote in messagenews:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org...
>
> >> "John P." <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote in messagenews:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >>> "911review.org" <brad.te...@gmail.com> wrote in a message
>
> >>>> Hijackers Alive And Well
>
> >>> All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs.
>
> >>> In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs
> >>> taken
> >>> of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead.
>
> >>> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC
> >>> story,
>
> >> Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous',
> >> but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes
> >> before it actually did...
>
> > Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too.
>
> Care to explain?

>Explain what? WTC7 was thought to be about to collapse. A BBC reporter
>got that information, misunderstood it and reported that it HAD
>collapsed.

Reheheheheheally? So, even if she was standing right in front of WTC7, she
'made a mistake'? Even the BBC anchor was ****ing looking at the goddamn
building, EddieLiarboy!!

Hahah, so it was just a 'mistake', or rather a 'coincidence' , is that what you're
saying EddieLiarboy?

Just like Towers 'seemed' to be destroyed in a controlled demolition, right?
Just like it 'seemed' that flight77 literally disappeared, right?
Just like it merely 'seemed' that flgiht93 also pulverized and disappeared, right?

****, EddiLiarboy... a lot of 'coincidences' happened on 9/11.

BTW, have you heard what mr. Mineta said about patterns and programs, Eddie?

> But, according to the firefighters own testimony,

Which ones? Those who toe the official line, or do you mean those that reported
explosions in WTC1 and WTC2 prior to their collapses?

Did you mean those firefighters too, EddieLiarboy?

they
>believed, through evidence of the buildings behavior, that WTC7 was
>preparing to collapse three hours before it actually did!

Not only 3, EddieLiarboy... they thoght WTC7 is going to 'progresivelly'
collapse at 11.30 that day.

No one who
>was there says the building was hale and hearty up to the moment of
>its collapse or that said collapse surprised anyone!

Really? So, all of the supporting elements in WTC7 failed simultaneously?

Is that what you're saying, EddieLiarboy?
 
johnoneill wrote:

> "Ed" <edrhodes@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:e83654fd-3529-4416-a0e7-44cfd7d61d97@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 28, 8:16 am, "johnoneill" <johnone...@dmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"Vandar" <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:q6cnj.2990$7d1.2684@news01.roc.ny...
>>
>>>johnoneill wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Animal02" <Wherewere...@Wednsday.com> wrote in messagenews:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
>>
>>>>>"johnoneill" <johnone...@dmail.com> wrote in messagenews:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org...
>>
>>>>>>"John P." <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote in messagenews:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>>>>>>>"911review.org" <brad.te...@gmail.com> wrote in a message
>>
>>>>>>>>Hijackers Alive And Well
>>
>>>>>>>All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs" are dead. That's how they became martyrs.
>>
>>>>>>>In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen alive. There have been no new photographs
>>>>>>>taken of the dead hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are anything but dead.
>>
>>>>>>>The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC
>>>>>>>story,
>>
>>>>>>Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be 'erronous',
>>>>>>but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20 minutes
>>>>>>before it actually did...
>>
>>>>>Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too.
>>
>>>>Care to explain?
>>
>>>They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the background. The report that it had collapsed
>>>was obviously erroneous.
>>
>>>Follow the logic, Einstein?
>>
>>Yeah, Oppenheimer. I follow your logic. Too ****ing bad your 'logic' stops
>>there. And it is funny to see you 'making a point' and falling into my little trap,
>>Vandar.
>>
>>Ok.
>>
>>They reported WTC 7 had collapsed. WTC 7 was seen still standing in the
>>background. The report that it had collapsed was obviously erroneous.
>>
>>Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer?
>>
>>Care to explain, brainiac?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> I obviously don't have an exact name. But it would appear somone made
> an announcement that WTC7 was in immenant (sp) danger of collapse and
> the reporter thought it had happened already.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> So, the BBC reporter was standing right in front of WTC7,

The BBC reporter was uptown from WTC 7, and it was behind her. She
wasn't standing right in front of it.

> and I think CNN reporter was ****ing LOOKING at WTC7 as he made that
> report!
>
> So, let me guess, EddieLiarboy... a 'coincidence'?
>
> How indicative!

Prior to 9/11, could you have picked WTC 7 out of the skyline?
 
On Jan 29, 8:26 am, Vandar <vanda...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Prior to 9/11, could you have picked WTC 7 out of the skyline?

No. But that's not going to stop his posting nonsense.
Silent explosives and non radiating nuclear devices should give an
indication as to his technical knowledge
 
"johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message
news:fnkl00$mms$2@aioe.org...
>
> "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message
> news:g5udnSX7rqfoygDanZ2dnUVZ_s6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
>>
>> "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fnjhml$7gk$1@aioe.org...
>>>
>>> "Animal02" <Wherewereyou@Wednsday.com> wrote in message
>>> news:rZidnQRWOMjs2wDanZ2dnUVZ_q6mnZ2d@wideopenwest.com...
>>>>
>>>> "johnoneill" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:fnjfsn$24c$1@aioe.org...
>>>>>
>>>>> "John P." <JohnP@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:joCdnXl7SegUqgDanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>>>>> "911review.org" <brad.team8@gmail.com> wrote in a message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hijackers Alive And Well
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All of the 19 hijackers in the Osama Bin Ladin video "The 19 Martyrs"
>>>>>> are dead. That's how they became martyrs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the 6+ years since 9/11, none of the dead hijackers has been seen
>>>>>> alive. There have been no new photographs taken of the dead
>>>>>> hijackers. There is no evidence any of the dead hijackers are
>>>>>> anything but dead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The very old 9/11 kook myth that some of the dead hijackers are still
>>>>>> alive was based on a single, erroneous BBC story,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting how John Pindelski finds that particular BBC story to be
>>>>> 'erronous',
>>>>> but the BBC story in which a BBC reporter reported WTC7 collapse 20
>>>>> minutes
>>>>> before it actually did...
>>>>
>>>> Hey clueless....that story was erroneous too.
>>>
>>> Care to explain?
>>
>> Only a cluless moron like yourself needs to have "they made an erroneous
>> report" explained.
>
> No, I understand what you said the first time, AnimalLiar.
>
> Now, I'd like you to figure out who told BBC reporter that WTC7
> has collapsed?

You aren't very bright are you?
Free hint for the clueless.......no one tod her, the information was muddled
as it passed from person to person

>
> Do you have such information?
>
>>>> Poor cluless kook
>>>
>>> Haha, look who's talking!!!
>>
>> You the kook.
>
> It lloks like you're more of a kook than I have ever was, or ever will be.

Only in your fantasies.


>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That does not catch the attention of our 'sane' John Pindelski.
>>>>>
>>>>> which indicated some people with
>>>>>> the same names as some of the dead hijackers were still alive. It's
>>>>>> true. Those people are, in fact, still alive, but none of them were
>>>>>> the dead hijackers from 9/11.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The story was based on the FBI's preliminary release of the hijackers
>>>>>> names, which did not include pictures. When the FBI released
>>>>>> photographs of the actual, dead hijackers, it became clear these were
>>>>>> not the same men. One of the key indicators was that these men were
>>>>>> alive, whereas the dead hijackers were dead - a clear and obvious
>>>>>> difference. Only someone with an extremely low IQ would not be able
>>>>>> to tell the difference between a living person, and a dead person
>>>>>> with the same name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Likewise, although Jim Smith died in 1964, the other thousands of Jim
>>>>>> Smith's are, miraculously to some, still alive. Additionally, there
>>>>>> is a Jim Smith Lake, which is also not dead, nor is it a living
>>>>>> human - it's a lake. Obviously, to some of the 9/11 chowderheads,
>>>>>> every Jim Smith is a lake.
>>>>>
>>>>> John Pindelski is telling the truth? He should be trusted?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, only if you were braindead.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
 
"Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message

>>> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer?

>> Why do you think every time a reporter says
>> something stupid, someone told him or her to say it?

> So, you're saying that those two reporters, from CNN and BBC, made it up?

Nope, you poor, illiterate moron. I wasn't saying anything. I was asking you
a question. The question is: Why do you think every time a reporter says
something stupid, someone told him or her to say it?

>> If you'd do some research, you find there were
>> many erroneous reports in the 9/11 newscasts on 9/11.

> Even if a reporter is standing right in front of the building that did not
> collapse,
> although they are reporting that it has just collapsed?

Even if? The fact that there were many erroneous reports on 9/11 will
continue to exist as a fact, "even if" monkeys start to fly out of your ass.
 
In article <gIidnc0w_pFTPwPanZ2dnUVZ_rKtnZ2d@comcast.com>,
JohnP@nospam.com says...
> "Dumbass" <johnoneill@dmail.com> wrote in a message
>
> >>> Who told them that WTC7 has collapsed, Vandar aka Oppenheimer?
>
> >> Why do you think every time a reporter says
> >> something stupid, someone told him or her to say it?
>
> > So, you're saying that those two reporters, from CNN and BBC, made it up?
>
> Nope, you poor, illiterate moron. I wasn't saying anything. I was asking you
> a question. The question is: Why do you think every time a reporter says
> something stupid, someone told him or her to say it?
>
> >> If you'd do some research, you find there were
> >> many erroneous reports in the 9/11 newscasts on 9/11.
>
> > Even if a reporter is standing right in front of the building that did not
> > collapse,
> > although they are reporting that it has just collapsed?
>
> Even if? The fact that there were many erroneous reports on 9/11 will
> continue to exist as a fact, "even if" monkeys start to fly out of your ass.
>
>
>

Now THAT would be a major youtube hit!

Not to mention it would make Aunt Flo famous, and isn't that what he
wants to be, special?

Not as in special Ed.

BDK
 

Similar threads

WorldNews
9/11 pilot's mother 'believes he is alive in Guantanamo'
Replies
0
Views
30
WorldNews
WorldNews
WorldNews
Afghan tourism bring reward as well as risk; government urges caution
Replies
0
Views
19
WorldNews
WorldNews
WorldNews
Cook, bookkeeper and 'worst of the worst' held at Guantanamo: report
Replies
0
Views
22
WorldNews
WorldNews
WorldNews
Blast kills five soldiers and wounds four in Mali: army
Replies
0
Views
23
WorldNews
WorldNews
Y
Arabs, Muslims can sue U.S. officials over post-9/11 jail treatment
Replies
0
Views
22
Yahoo! News
Y
Back
Top