woodyloveslinkin
aka Gloomy Mushroom
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2004
- Location
- Lithgow Australia
I was having an interesting discussion about this topic with one of my philosophy friends the other day about this highly controversial topic as it was part of his assignment and decided to ask my view on it.
I am with it, as I am pro-abortonist.
Because of several reasons.
It's a personal choice not a political debate.
Yes I am aware that some people do abuse this privilage but what happens in cases of rape and incest then? I don't know from personal experiences from that, but one of my ex besties fell pregnant with her ex-bf's child who was African and she was Caucasian. Now. The surprise pregnancy shocked her and rocked her up even more, as the abortion did. Because she had no choice because she didn't want a living replica of her ex who she found out was cheating on her. Same goes with rape. I've posed this question many a time through various arguements on this topic on different forums, but why would you want to go through with a pregnancy that originally started with being violated?
Who are politicians (predominately male at that) to tell women they can't have abortions?
Here's some statistics I found about Australian abortions.
I raised a question about having the pregnancy terminated because of the endangerment to the mother if that was to occur. Soon, I discovered that in El Salvador, that abortion is only allowed under these circumstances. But I got a different reply from my friend.
"Is it an eye for an eye? Just because the mother is in danger, does that giver her the automatic right to murder another being, just one that hasn't been brought into the world?"
Opinions.
Keep the flaming to a minimilisitic ZERO.
I am with it, as I am pro-abortonist.
Because of several reasons.
It's a personal choice not a political debate.
Yes I am aware that some people do abuse this privilage but what happens in cases of rape and incest then? I don't know from personal experiences from that, but one of my ex besties fell pregnant with her ex-bf's child who was African and she was Caucasian. Now. The surprise pregnancy shocked her and rocked her up even more, as the abortion did. Because she had no choice because she didn't want a living replica of her ex who she found out was cheating on her. Same goes with rape. I've posed this question many a time through various arguements on this topic on different forums, but why would you want to go through with a pregnancy that originally started with being violated?
Who are politicians (predominately male at that) to tell women they can't have abortions?
Here's some statistics I found about Australian abortions.
Almost two-thirds of all Australians (65%, up 8% since February 1996) approve of surgical abortion to terminate unwanted pregnancies, while 25% (down 8%) disapprove and 10% (unchanged) are undecided, the Bulletin-Morgan Poll finds.
On the issue of whether abortion laws should be changed, 47% of Australians believe the laws should be changed to make it easier to obtain an abortion, while 38% believe the laws should be left as they are. Only 10% believe it should be made harder to obtain an abortion and 5% are undecided.
I raised a question about having the pregnancy terminated because of the endangerment to the mother if that was to occur. Soon, I discovered that in El Salvador, that abortion is only allowed under these circumstances. But I got a different reply from my friend.
"Is it an eye for an eye? Just because the mother is in danger, does that giver her the automatic right to murder another being, just one that hasn't been brought into the world?"
Opinions.
Keep the flaming to a minimilisitic ZERO.