The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party

bvallely@aol.com wrote:

> And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
> listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
> Administration.

Daily Kos is only one of THOUSANDS of media outlets that have turned
against Bush - and that's just here in the US.
 
On Sep 3, 12:22 pm, "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Sep 3, 6:42 am, Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 3, 7:28 am, "Harry Dope" <H...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > > The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party
> .
> > You know, Harry here reminds me of all that is wrong with the
> > Republicans.
> .
> > The "Grand Old Party" really ought to be renamed to the Grand Ostrich
> > Party.
> > They are so very good at sticking their heads in the sand and ignoring
> > everything around them.
>
> And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
> listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
> Administration.
>
> Ostrich, indeed.


Wouldn't know, I don't read the "Daily KOS" nor do I listen to
Democrat
talking points.

A "very real scandal"? What PLANET are you on?

Matt
 
Matt wrote:
> On Sep 3, 12:22 pm, "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
>> On Sep 3, 6:42 am, Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 3, 7:28 am, "Harry Dope" <H...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party
>> .
>>> You know, Harry here reminds me of all that is wrong with the
>>> Republicans.
>> .
>>> The "Grand Old Party" really ought to be renamed to the Grand
>>> Ostrich Party.
>>> They are so very good at sticking their heads in the sand and
>>> ignoring everything around them.
>>
>> And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
>> listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
>> Administration.
>>
>> Ostrich, indeed.
>
>
> Wouldn't know, I don't read the "Daily KOS" nor do I listen to
> Democrat
> talking points.
>
> A "very real scandal"? What PLANET are you on?
>
> Matt

If you don't listen to
both sides of an
argument you are
uninformed and
ignorant.

You have let others
tell you what to think
and have had no
critical input to the crap
you spout
 
On Sep 3, 4:20 pm, "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 12:22 pm, "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> On Sep 3, 6:42 am, Matt <matttel...@sprynet.com> wrote:
>
> >>> On Sep 3, 7:28 am, "Harry Dope" <H...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party
> >> .
> >>> You know, Harry here reminds me of all that is wrong with the
> >>> Republicans.
> >> .
> >>> The "Grand Old Party" really ought to be renamed to the Grand
> >>> Ostrich Party.
> >>> They are so very good at sticking their heads in the sand and
> >>> ignoring everything around them.
>
> >> And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
> >> listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
> >> Administration.
>
> >> Ostrich, indeed.
>
> > Wouldn't know, I don't read the "Daily KOS" nor do I listen to
> > Democrat
> > talking points.
>
> > A "very real scandal"? What PLANET are you on?
>
> > Matt
>
> If you don't listen to
> both sides of an
> argument you are
> uninformed and
> ignorant.
>
> You have let others
> tell you what to think
> and have had no
> critical input to the crap
> you spout


Its a valid point, however, I prefer to listen to points made by those
that
have no axe to grind.

Matt
 
Sid9 wrote:

> If you don't listen to
> both sides of an
> argument you are
> uninformed and
> ignorant.

Uninformed, maybe.
But not ignorant.

One need not actually listen to al Jazeera, or the 700 club, to know
that we'd all be better off if bin Laden and Pat Robertson would shoot
each other.

I know. I wasted that time. I listened to both, hoping that either or
both may have something sensible to say.

I was right They don't. I want my hours back.

Unless you are a media network, you cannot rely upon a media network.
 

> > And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
> > listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
> > Administration.

> Daily Kos is only one of THOUSANDS of media outlets that have turned
> against Bush - and that's just here in the US.

Great men are almost always surrounded by squealing mediocritizes.
 
On Sep 3, 8:11 pm, "bvall...@aol.com" <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> > > And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
> > > listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
> > > Administration.
> > Daily Kos is only one of THOUSANDS of media outlets that have turned
> > against Bush - and that's just here in the US.
>
> Great men are almost always surrounded by squealing mediocritizes.

Is it your assertion that George W Bush is a great man?

BLP
 

> Uninformed, maybe.
> But not ignorant.
..
> One need not actually listen to al Jazeera, or the 700 club, to know
> that we'd all be better off if bin Laden and Pat Robertson would shoot
> each other.

I'm curious - other than his unforgiveable sin of daring to state
opinions you disagreement, what has Pat Robinson done which forced you
to support his murder?
 
bvallely@aol.com wrote:
>> Uninformed, maybe.
>> But not ignorant.
> .
>> One need not actually listen to al Jazeera, or the 700 club, to know
>> that we'd all be better off if bin Laden and Pat Robertson would
>> shoot each other.
>
> I'm curious - other than his unforgiveable sin of daring to state
> opinions you disagreement, what has Pat Robinson done which forced you
> to support his murder?

Obviously you know little about this faker
 
bvallely@aol.com wrote:
>>> And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
>>> listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
>>> Administration.
>
>> Daily Kos is only one of THOUSANDS of media outlets that have turned
>> against Bush - and that's just here in the US.
>
> Great men are almost always surrounded by squealing mediocritizes.

Now there's a premise built on vapor
 
"Richardson-Obama in 08" <NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:F8SdnW8vvplN2UHbnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> "David Hartung" <dhart1ng@quixnet.net> wrote in message
> news:26-dnVAyxrSKgUHbnZ2dnUVZ_vDinZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Matt wrote:
>> > On Sep 3, 7:28 am, "Harry Dope" <H...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party
>> >
>> > You know, Harry here reminds me of all that is wrong with the
>> > Republicans.
>> >
>> > The "Grand Old Party" really ought to be renamed to the Grand Ostrich
>> > Party.
>> > They are so very good at sticking their heads in the sand and ignoring
>> > everything
>> > around them.
>> >
>> > Global warming? No such thing.
>> > Iraq? Everything is going great.
>> > The economy is fabulous.
>> > The mortgage system is doing great with a "few small easily fixable
>> > problems".
>>
>> None of which has anything to do with Hillary Clinton's shady activities.
>
> I'll take Hillary's "shady" activities in preference over Bush & Cheney's
> blatantly "Dark Side" activities, any day. I still hope she won't win the
> Democratic nomination, but she's far better than the best the GOP has to
> offer.
>
She's the Republicans' preference. Maybe they'll sink her, and a real
progressive will replace her in poll standings, thus cutting of their noses
to spite their jizz covered faces.
 
bvallely@aol.com wrote:

>
>> > And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
>> > listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
>> > Administration.
>
>> Daily Kos is only one of THOUSANDS of media outlets that have turned
>> against Bush - and that's just here in the US.
>
> Great men are almost always surrounded by squealing mediocritizes.
So are pretenders.
--
There are only two kinds of Republicans: Millionaires and fools.
 
<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1188871898.338838.251720@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > And yet, you responded to a very real scandal in the Clinton camp by
> > > listing dreary Daily Kos talking points against the Bush
> > > Administration.
>
> > Daily Kos is only one of THOUSANDS of media outlets that have turned
> > against Bush - and that's just here in the US.
>
> Great men are almost always surrounded by squealing mediocritizes.

And village idiots are almost always surrounded by people laughing at them.
I suspect that applies as fully to you as it does to George Duhbya Bush.
 
bvallely@aol.com wrote:

>> One need not actually listen to al Jazeera, or the 700 club, to know
>> that we'd all be better off if bin Laden and Pat Robertson would shoot
>> each other.
>
> I'm curious - other than his unforgiveable sin of daring to state
> opinions you disagreement, what has Pat Robinson done which forced you
> to support his murder?

It's not murder, it's regicide.
And more directly to your question, because he energized the base.

I'm perfectly fine with him believing that Muslims should die. And I'm
perfectly fine with him saying so out loud. But when doing so causes
Muslims to die - he should suffer that fate himself.

The same goes for Osama and George Bush and any other chicken-****
Evangelical who promotes this War Against Islam.

.... but you already knew that. It's just that, in typical evangelical
fashion, you ask an insincere question, hoping nobody will hear the answer.

--
And that's why all those US soldiers have to die tonight in the
desert... alone, far from home, bodies shredded, and screaming in mortal
agony.
 
Richardson-Obama in 08 wrote:

> In the end it will make little difference. The worst of the Democratic
> field . . . in my personal opinion that would be Mike Gravel . . . is far
> better than the best the Republicans can offer.

That's easy for you to say.

But for the heroin dealers, weapons manufacturers, arms traffickers, and
preachers - the Republicans are a guarantee of good fortune.

What - don't they get a say?
 
"theloneranger100@aol.com" <Screen.Ranger100@aol.com> wrote in message
news:YH3Di.85637$1x1.6708@fe187.usenetserver.com...
>
> "Richardson-Obama in 08" <NoThanks@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
> news:F8SdnW8vvplN2UHbnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> > "David Hartung" <dhart1ng@quixnet.net> wrote in message
> > news:26-dnVAyxrSKgUHbnZ2dnUVZ_vDinZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> Matt wrote:
> >> > On Sep 3, 7:28 am, "Harry Dope" <H...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> >> The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party
> >> >
> >> > You know, Harry here reminds me of all that is wrong with the
> >> > Republicans.
> >> >
> >> > The "Grand Old Party" really ought to be renamed to the Grand Ostrich
> >> > Party.
> >> > They are so very good at sticking their heads in the sand and
ignoring
> >> > everything
> >> > around them.
> >> >
> >> > Global warming? No such thing.
> >> > Iraq? Everything is going great.
> >> > The economy is fabulous.
> >> > The mortgage system is doing great with a "few small easily fixable
> >> > problems".
> >>
> >> None of which has anything to do with Hillary Clinton's shady
activities.
> >
> > I'll take Hillary's "shady" activities in preference over Bush &
Cheney's
> > blatantly "Dark Side" activities, any day. I still hope she won't win
the
> > Democratic nomination, but she's far better than the best the GOP has to
> > offer.
> >
> She's the Republicans' preference. Maybe they'll sink her, and a real
> progressive will replace her in poll standings, thus cutting of their
noses
> to spite their jizz covered faces.

In the end it will make little difference. The worst of the Democratic
field . . . in my personal opinion that would be Mike Gravel . . . is far
better than the best the Republicans can offer.
 
"David Hartung" <dhart1ng@quixnet.net> wrote in message
news:26-dnVAyxrSKgUHbnZ2dnUVZ_vDinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Matt wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 7:28 am, "Harry Dope" <H...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party
> >
> > You know, Harry here reminds me of all that is wrong with the
> > Republicans.
> >
> > The "Grand Old Party" really ought to be renamed to the Grand Ostrich
> > Party.
> > They are so very good at sticking their heads in the sand and ignoring
> > everything
> > around them.
> >
> > Global warming? No such thing.
> > Iraq? Everything is going great.
> > The economy is fabulous.
> > The mortgage system is doing great with a "few small easily fixable
> > problems".
>
> None of which has anything to do with Hillary Clinton's shady activities.

Since Kenneth Starr completely investigated the Clintons, maybe you could
list those "shady activities".

I get so tired of hearing that your same stupid bullshit over and over. Get
a new line, would you? Get up to date, we have a ****ing TRAVESTY for an
administration going on and you completely ignore it. How STUPID are you?
 
No traction.


"David Hartung" <dhart1ng@quixnet.net> wrote in message
news:26-dnVAyxrSKgUHbnZ2dnUVZ_vDinZ2d@comcast.com...
> Matt wrote:
> > On Sep 3, 7:28 am, "Harry Dope" <H...@aol.com> wrote:
> >> The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party
> >
> > You know, Harry here reminds me of all that is wrong with the
> > Republicans.
> >
> > The "Grand Old Party" really ought to be renamed to the Grand Ostrich
> > Party.
> > They are so very good at sticking their heads in the sand and ignoring
> > everything
> > around them.
> >
> > Global warming? No such thing.
> > Iraq? Everything is going great.
> > The economy is fabulous.
> > The mortgage system is doing great with a "few small easily fixable
> > problems".
>
> None of which has anything to do with Hillary Clinton's shady activities.
 
> She's not the candidate
> yet and the Republican
> "Swift Boat" innuendos
> and lies start!

Only one problem with that plan:

The GOP has never and will never field a candidate against the
Clintons.

General election: Hillary by 15 points.


Bret Cahill
 

Similar threads

A
The Higher-Self Alignment 2024 Calendar
Replies
0
Views
63
Andrewimmix
A
A
The Higher-Self Alignment 2024 Calendar
Replies
0
Views
25
Andrewimmix
A
A
Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
Replies
0
Views
343
avyea
A
M
XEVIL 6: the best software for captcha solving is available !!
Replies
0
Views
125
MaryIntork0176
M
Y
Podcast host blames 'embarrassment' for why she didn't admit to Ozempic use earlier: 'My decision to not share was rooted in a little bit of shame'
Replies
0
Views
38
Yahoo News
Y
Back
Top