The Lack Of Character Inside The Democrat Party

I've been happy with myself the last thirty years.


<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189273155.034766.5550@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > My mistake, I thought they might be the modern version of the Missouri
> > Synod.

>
> That's not really a mistake, is it? You may not have know what the
> Evangelical Lutheran Church in America stood for, but you knew that
> you didn't know.
>
> While not knowing a thing about the ELCA, you felt comfortable
> dismissing the organization as "the Nazi Lutherans" for no other
> reason that you had a keyboard in front of you, and you wished to
> insult a perfect stranger.
>
> When completely jusitified objections were raised, you pretended to be
> well versed with all things Lutheran. After information was presented
> which demolished your position, you then did a 180 where you admitted
> that you had no idea what the Lutherans had done for the past three
> decades.
>
> You may wish to look into your soul, and see if you like the person
> you've become in these past thirty years.
>
>
>
 
That's a great story.
Hat's off to those who did it.


<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189273456.566895.262160@r34g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > My mistake, I thought they might be the modern version of the Missouri
> > > Synod.

>
> > Nah, The Missouri Synod is still alive and doing well. That is my

affiliation.
> > You ought to check us out, perhaps you will find something you like.

>
> I'm in Hollywood - I'm lucky to find a Lutheran Church at all. One
> thing in particular my church did really appeals to my conservative/
> romantic side. When the church was burned down by persons
> "unknown" (my pastor is loath to reveal who did it) a hundred members
> shifted through the ashes, cleared out the lot, and built a gigantic
> sandcastle recreation of Jerusalem. They sold tickets, and raised
> enough for a down payment to rebuild the church.
>
 
I didn't write that last line.

I'll stand by the one I wrote, though.


<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189273526.945316.61540@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> .
> > >> Because I don't like conservative Lutherans.

> .
> > > Why?

> .
> > Because they took the Christ out of Christianity.>

>
> How so?
>
>
 
I use that as a "trigger" word, at times.


<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189273589.878198.170840@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 7, 8:03 pm, "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > I didn't write the last part.

> .
> .
> > > >>> Because I don't like conservative Lutherans.
> > > >> Why?

> .
> > > > Because they took the Christ out of Christianity.

> .
> > > Please explain.

>
> > I didn't write the last part.

>
> No, you simply accused them of being Nazis.
>
>
 

> > > My mistake, I thought they might be the modern version of the Missouri Synod.

.
> > That's not really a mistake, is it? You may not have know what the
> > Evangelical Lutheran Church in America stood for, but you knew that
> > you didn't know.

.
> > While not knowing a thing about the ELCA, you felt comfortable
> > dismissing the organization as "the Nazi Lutherans" for no other
> > reason that you had a keyboard in front of you, and you wished to
> > insult a perfect stranger.

.
> > When completely jusitified objections were raised, you pretended to be well versed with all things Lutheran. After information was presented which demolished your position, you then did a 180 where you admitted that you had no idea what the Lutherans had done for the past three decades.>>

..
> > You may wish to look into your soul, and see if you like the person
> > you've become in these past thirty years.

..
>I've been happy with myself the last thirty years. >


Well, that explains your lack of emotional growth, doesn't it?
 

> I use that as a "trigger" word, at times.


By "trigger word", do you mean a flat out lie that you said to insult
perfect strangers for no Earthly reason?
 
Thanks for the link.
I sent them an e-mail congratulating them on their strength.

thanks again.


<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189297884.030920.234150@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > That's a great story.

>
> Thank you.
>
> > Hat's off to those who did it.

>
> They're the Hope Lutheran Church of Hollywood.
>
> http://hopelutheranchurch.net/
>
 
You know, I showed graciousness when you told me the story about the church
that rebuilt.

But if you still want to f ck with me, we can do handle that.

Try showing some graciousness yourself.


<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189297983.749159.248850@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I use that as a "trigger" word, at times.

>
> By "trigger word", do you mean a flat out lie that you said to insult
> perfect strangers for no Earthly reason?
>
 
This is your last chance.


<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189297758.640880.264890@57g2000hsv.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > My mistake, I thought they might be the modern version of the

Missouri Synod.
> .
> > > That's not really a mistake, is it? You may not have know what the
> > > Evangelical Lutheran Church in America stood for, but you knew that
> > > you didn't know.

> .
> > > While not knowing a thing about the ELCA, you felt comfortable
> > > dismissing the organization as "the Nazi Lutherans" for no other
> > > reason that you had a keyboard in front of you, and you wished to
> > > insult a perfect stranger.

> .
> > > When completely jusitified objections were raised, you pretended to be

well versed with all things Lutheran. After information was presented which
demolished your position, you then did a 180 where you admitted that you
had no idea what the Lutherans had done for the past three decades.>>
> .
> > > You may wish to look into your soul, and see if you like the person
> > > you've become in these past thirty years.

> .
> >I've been happy with myself the last thirty years. >

>
> Well, that explains your lack of emotional growth, doesn't it?
>
>
>
 

> You know, I showed graciousness when you told me the story about the church that rebuilt.


Thank you.

..
> Try showing some graciousness yourself. > >


I was gracious - I have you an opportuity to admit that you were
wrong. Instead, you tried to brush away some truly awful behavior by
giving it a cute name, "trigger word". Pastor Mark has dedicated his
life helping others, and he doesn't deserve to be called a "Nazi"
simply because you like tossing around "trigger words".
..
> But if you still want to f ck with me, we can do handle that.>


You're in your fifities, right? Amazing.
 
<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189350694.168233.215850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > You know, I showed graciousness when you told me the story about the

church that rebuilt.
>
> Thank you.
>
> .
> > Try showing some graciousness yourself. > >

>
> I was gracious - I have you an opportuity to admit that you were
> wrong. Instead, you tried to brush away some truly awful behavior by
> giving it a cute name, "trigger word". Pastor Mark has dedicated his
> life helping others, and he doesn't deserve to be called a "Nazi"
> simply because you like tossing around "trigger words".
> .
> > But if you still want to f ck with me, we can do handle that.>

>
> You're in your fifities, right? Amazing.
>
 
When I say "f ck with me" it's metaphorical. I'm a pacifist, but I am a
Philly kid and can have an attitude. You'd last two minutes here.

And I used the "nazi" word, like what, two weeks ago. And not since.

I sent an e-mail to the church congratulating them on their spirit and
accomplishment.

What is your problem?




<bvallely@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1189350694.168233.215850@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > You know, I showed graciousness when you told me the story about the

church that rebuilt.
>
> Thank you.
>
> .
> > Try showing some graciousness yourself. > >

>
> I was gracious - I have you an opportuity to admit that you were
> wrong. Instead, you tried to brush away some truly awful behavior by
> giving it a cute name, "trigger word". Pastor Mark has dedicated his
> life helping others, and he doesn't deserve to be called a "Nazi"
> simply because you like tossing around "trigger words".
> .
> > But if you still want to f ck with me, we can do handle that.>

>
> You're in your fifities, right? Amazing.
>
 
bvallely@aol.com wrote:

> Yeah, where are the WMD? We know that Saddam had them (he openly
> bragged that he did - not to mention that he used them against
> civilians.)


That's not really much of a surprise considering that you also KNOW that
after you die you will be physically reincarnated by Jesus to fight a
great war against Islam and the rest of the non-Christians.

--
And that's why all those soliders you don't care about have to die
tonight in the desert - shrieking in mortal agony.
 
On Sep 9, 7:00 pm, Sanders Kaufman <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
> bvall...@aol.com wrote:
> > Yeah, where are the WMD? We know that Saddam had them (he openly
> > bragged that he did - not to mention that he used them against
> > civilians.)

>
> That's not really much of a surprise considering that you also KNOW that
> after you die you will be physically reincarnated by Jesus to fight a
> great war against Islam and the rest of the non-Christians.


1. I never said anything which remotely resembles that remark.
2. Are you saying that Saddam DIDN'T have WMD? Are you saying that
he DIDN'T use them against his own people?
 
bvallely@aol.com wrote:
> On Sep 9, 7:00 pm, Sanders Kaufman <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
>> bvall...@aol.com wrote:
>>> Yeah, where are the WMD? We know that Saddam had them (he openly
>>> bragged that he did - not to mention that he used them against
>>> civilians.)

>>
>> That's not really much of a surprise considering that you also KNOW
>> that after you die you will be physically reincarnated by Jesus to
>> fight a great war against Islam and the rest of the non-Christians.

>
> 1. I never said anything which remotely resembles that remark.
> 2. Are you saying that Saddam DIDN'T have WMD? Are you saying that
> he DIDN'T use them against his own people?



Saddam did not have WMD
when bush,jr attacked.

This war, this mess, this
fiasco was NOT necessary.

Now there's no good way out
 
bvallely@aol.com wrote:
> On Sep 9, 7:00 pm, Sanders Kaufman <bu...@kaufman.net> wrote:
>> bvall...@aol.com wrote:


>> That's not really much of a surprise considering that you also KNOW that
>> after you die you will be physically reincarnated by Jesus to fight a
>> great war against Islam and the rest of the non-Christians.

>
> 1. I never said anything which remotely resembles that remark.


My bad. When you said you were a "Lutheran", I assumed you meant that
you were a Christian and that you believed in the Christian bible.

I didn't realize you were a cafeteria-christian - picking and choosing
parts of the bible to believe in, and dismissing others.




> 2. Are you saying that Saddam DIDN'T have WMD? Are you saying that
> he DIDN'T use them against his own people?


Are you saying that he had a fleet of nuqulure robot rockets and super
anthrax muslims that he was going to launch against us in holy jihad?
 
Back
Top