Three more American lives wasted in bush,jr's fiasco: U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

In article <Bexsi.3361$2v5.1203@bignews2.bellsouth.net>,
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
> > In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> > "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >> August 2, 2007
> >> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>
> >> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
> >> military have died...
> >
> >
> > Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow Wilson,
> > Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >
> >
> > <snnicker>
>
> That was then this is now...more die for nothing...every day...



....in traffic accidents.
 
In article <Kwxsi.55196$mg2.48829@fe13.usenetserver.com>,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote:




Oooooooooh, looks like I have an imitator.
 
In article <byDsi.881$zp5.459@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
> > "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> > news:5gxsi.3363$2v5.2110@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>> In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> August 2, 2007
> >>>>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >>>>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
> >>>>>> military have died...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >>>>> Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >>>>
> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
> >>> lives lost in those fiascos.
> >>
> >> You'll do anything,
> >> say anything to distract and
> >> divert from the disaster for
> >> America that bush,jr created in Iraq
> > So would you in my position.
>
> Your position: Beaten bloody about the head by defending bush,jr failures
> every day.


Ah, the idiot Sid9 has been fooled by a cheap substitute.
 
In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:tvxsi.55191$mg2.24490@fe13.usenetserver.com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>
> >> You'll do anything,
> >> say anything to distract and
> >> divert from the disaster for
> >> America that bush,jr created in Iraq
> > So would you in my position.
>
>
> no he wouldn't,
>
> 1st because he wouldn't be stuck in an unending series of
> hopeless ****ups like you stupid hillbillies are
>
> and 2nd because liberals have the decency and integrity
> to admit when they've made a mistake,
>
> something you low class, low self esteem, no self respect
> hillbillies can never do in a million years



Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.
 
In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
>
> > In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Harold Burton wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>August 2, 2007
> >>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>>>
> >>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S. military
> >>>>have died...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow Wilson,
> >>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >>
> >> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >
> >
> >
> > Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American lives
> > lost in those fiascos.
>
> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his predecessor
> was the democrat FDR.
>
> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA level
> at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000, 33,000?
>
> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves left to
> engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is $450
> billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
> repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off into
> the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One Trillion
> dollars.
>
> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a fiasco?
> But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!



You didn't answer my question.
 
In article <5gxsi.3363$2v5.2110@bignews2.bellsouth.net>,
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
> > In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> August 2, 2007
> >>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>>>
> >>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
> >>>> military have died...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >>> Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >>
> >> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >
> >
> > Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American lives
> > lost in those fiascos.
>
> You'll do anything,
> say anything to distract and
> divert from the disaster for
> America that bush,jr created in Iraq


You couldn't answer the question, eh?
 
Harold Burton wrote:

> In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>August 2, 2007
>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>>>>>
>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S. military
>>>>>>have died...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow Wilson,
>>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>>>
>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American lives
>>>lost in those fiascos.
>>
>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his predecessor
>>was the democrat FDR.
>>
>> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA level
>>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000, 33,000?
>>
>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves left to
>>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is $450
>>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off into
>>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One Trillion
>>dollars.
>>
>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a fiasco?
>>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
>
>
>
>
> You didn't answer my question.

You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue at hand.

But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no answers,
then a diversion it is.

I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been fiascos, I
think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have been
uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war has
misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection of them.

So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?

And your anwswer is but Woodrow Wilson...

Jeff
 
In article <f8vgtk$9jf$1@news.albasani.net>,
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-4E0D1D.23070402082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <1186109638.920376.80850@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
> > BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Aug 2, 7:48 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > In article <dSvsi.762$zp5....@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >> >
> >> > "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> > > August 2, 2007
> >> > > U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >> > > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> > > Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >> >
> >> > > As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
> >> > > U.S. military
> >> > > have died...
> >> >
> >> > Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >> > Wilson,
> >> > Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >> >
> >> > <snicker>
> >>
> >> YEP IS SURE BEATS THE RECORDS THAT BUSH IS SETTING...
> >
> >
> > That was my point. Funny how you seem to have no problem with the
> > orders of magnitude greater American deaths brought to you by
> > DemocRATs
> > Wilson, Truman and Johnson.
>
> Different day, same old irrelevant strawmen.

You wish.
 
In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
>
> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Harold Burton wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
> >>>>>>military
> >>>>>>have died...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow Wilson,
> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >>>>
> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American lives
> >>>lost in those fiascos.
> >>
> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his predecessor
> >>was the democrat FDR.
> >>
> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA level
> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000, 33,000?
> >>
> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves left to
> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is $450
> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off into
> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One Trillion
> >>dollars.
> >>
> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a fiasco?
> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > You didn't answer my question.
>
> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue at hand.
>
> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no answers,
> then a diversion it is.
>
> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been fiascos, I
> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have been
> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war has
> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection of them.
>
> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?


If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-4C232F.12395103082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <f8vgtk$9jf$1@news.albasani.net>,
> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
>
>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hal.i.burton-4E0D1D.23070402082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> > In article <1186109638.920376.80850@e16g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
>> > BushRuinsTheWorldandtheUSA <bongblaster54@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Aug 2, 7:48 pm, Harold Burton <hal.i.bur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > In article <dSvsi.762$zp5....@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>> >> >
>> >> > "Sid9" <s...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >> > > August 2, 2007
>> >> > > U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>> >> > > By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >> > > Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>> >> >
>> >> > > As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
>> >> > > U.S. military
>> >> > > have died...
>> >> >
>> >> > Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>> >> > Wilson,
>> >> > Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>> >> >
>> >> > <snicker>
>> >>
>> >> YEP IS SURE BEATS THE RECORDS THAT BUSH IS SETTING...
>> >
>> >
>> > That was my point. Funny how you seem to have no problem with the
>> > orders of magnitude greater American deaths brought to you by
>> > DemocRATs
>> > Wilson, Truman and Johnson.
>>
>> Different day, same old irrelevant strawmen.
>
> You wish.

The last resort of bush,jr defenders: Wilson, Truman, Johnson...and above
all Clinton,Clinton,Clinton,Clinton,Clinton,
 
Harold Burton wrote:
> In article <byDsi.881$zp5.459@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>>> news:5gxsi.3363$2v5.2110@bignews2.bellsouth.net...
>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>> In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>>>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> August 2, 2007
>>>>>>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>>>>>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
>>>>>>>> U.S. military have died...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>>>>>>> Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
>>>>> lives lost in those fiascos.
>>>>
>>>> You'll do anything,
>>>> say anything to distract and
>>>> divert from the disaster for
>>>> America that bush,jr created in Iraq
>>> So would you in my position.
>>
>> Your position: Beaten bloody about the head by defending bush,jr
>> failures every day.
>
>
> Ah, the idiot Sid9 has been fooled by a cheap substitute.


The last gasp of a bush,jr Republican defender
 
Harold Burton wrote:
> In article <5gxsi.3363$2v5.2110@bignews2.bellsouth.net>,
> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>> In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> August 2, 2007
>>>>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>>>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
>>>>>> military have died...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>>>>> Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>>>
>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>>>
>>>
>>> Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
>>> lives lost in those fiascos.
>>
>> You'll do anything,
>> say anything to distract and
>> divert from the disaster for
>> America that bush,jr created in Iraq
>
>
> You couldn't answer the question, eh?


Totally irrelevant smokescreen to avoid reality...the bush,jr Republican
debacle
 
Harold Burton wrote:
> In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>
>>> In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>>>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> August 2, 2007
>>>>>>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>>>>>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
>>>>>>>> U.S. military
>>>>>>>> have died...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>>>>>>> Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
>>>>> lives lost in those fiascos.
>>>>
>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>>>> predecessor was the democrat FDR.
>>>>
>>>> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA
>>>> level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
>>>> 10,000, 33,000?
>>>>
>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
>>>> left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war
>>>> so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs
>>>> as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been
>>>> pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in
>>>> excess of One Trillion dollars.
>>>>
>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>>>> fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World
>>>> War I!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You didn't answer my question.
>>
>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue
>> at hand.
>>
>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>> answers, then a diversion it is.
>>
>> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>> fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think
>> any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this
>> war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost
>> exclusive collection of them.
>>
>> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>
>
> If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
> fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.


Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship
 
Sid9 wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
>
>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007
>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
>>>>>>>>>U.S. military
>>>>>>>>>have died...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.
>>>>>
>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.
>>>>>
>>>>> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA
>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
>>>>>10,000, 33,000?
>>>>>
>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war
>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs
>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been
>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in
>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World
>>>>>War I!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You didn't answer my question.
>>>
>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue
>>>at hand.
>>>
>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>>>answers, then a diversion it is.
>>>
>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think
>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this
>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost
>>>exclusive collection of them.
>>>
>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>>
>>
>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>
>
>
> Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship
>
>
He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing in
Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.

Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a huge
success as there was not a single loss.

Jeff
 
In article <A_Isi.1178$gM5.742@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:


> The last resort of bush,jr defenders...


You're very confused, no one's defending Bush, Jr.
 
In article <C1Jsi.1184$gM5.525@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
> > In article <5gxsi.3363$2v5.2110@bignews2.bellsouth.net>,
> > "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>> In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> August 2, 2007
> >>>>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >>>>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
> >>>>>> military have died...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >>>>> Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >>>>
> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
> >>> lives lost in those fiascos.
> >>
> >> You'll do anything,
> >> say anything to distract and
> >> divert from the disaster for
> >> America that bush,jr created in Iraq
> >
> >
> > You couldn't answer the question, eh?
>
>
> Totally irrelevant smokescreen to avoid reality...the bush,jr Republican
> debacle


You couldn't answer the question, eh?
 
In article <z2Jsi.1186$gM5.777@bignews5.bellsouth.net>,
"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Harold Burton wrote:
> > In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >>>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >>>>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> August 2, 2007
> >>>>>>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >>>>>>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>>>>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
> >>>>>>>> U.S. military
> >>>>>>>> have died...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >>>>>>> Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
> >>>>> lives lost in those fiascos.
> >>>>
> >>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
> >>>> predecessor was the democrat FDR.
> >>>>
> >>>> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA
> >>>> level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
> >>>> 10,000, 33,000?
> >>>>
> >>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
> >>>> left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war
> >>>> so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs
> >>>> as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been
> >>>> pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in
> >>>> excess of One Trillion dollars.
> >>>>
> >>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
> >>>> fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World
> >>>> War I!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> You didn't answer my question.
> >>
> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue
> >> at hand.
> >>
> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
> >> answers, then a diversion it is.
> >>
> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
> >> fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think
> >> any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this
> >> war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost
> >> exclusive collection of them.
> >>
> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
> >
> >
> > If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
> > fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>
>
> Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship

It seems to leave you stumped.
 
In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,
Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:

> Sid9 wrote:
>
> > Harold Burton wrote:
> >
> >>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> >>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> >>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007
> >>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
> >>>>>>>>>U.S. military
> >>>>>>>>>have died...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
> >>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
> >>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA
> >>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
> >>>>>10,000, 33,000?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
> >>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war
> >>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs
> >>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been
> >>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in
> >>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
> >>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World
> >>>>>War I!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>You didn't answer my question.
> >>>
> >>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue
> >>>at hand.
> >>>
> >>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
> >>>answers, then a diversion it is.
> >>>
> >>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
> >>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think
> >>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this
> >>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost
> >>>exclusive collection of them.
> >>>
> >>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
> >>
> >>
> >>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
> >>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
> >
> >
> >
> > Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship
> >
> >
> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing in
> Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.
>
> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a huge
> success as there was not a single loss.


Wrong.
 
In article <hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
hal.i.burton@hotmail.com says...
>
>
>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>
>> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
>> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
>> >>>>>>military
>> >>>>>>have died...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow Wilson,
>> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American lives
>> >>>lost in those fiascos.
>> >>
>> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his predecessor
>> >>was the democrat FDR.
>> >>
>> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA level
>> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000, 33,000?
>> >>
>> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves left to
>> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is $450
>> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off into
>> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One Trillion
>> >>dollars.
>> >>
>> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a fiasco?
>> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > You didn't answer my question.
>>
>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue at hand.
>>
>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no answers,
>> then a diversion it is.
>>
>> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been fiascos, I
>> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have been
>> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war has
>> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection of
them.
>>
>> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>
>
>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.


Sheesh! At least get your history straight. Wilson did not start WWI. The
Korean War was a UN "Police Acrion." Johnson did not strta the Vietnam War.
Eisenhower did, Johnson escalated it and Nixon waged it and enlraged it for
five more years. Every death matters, but not to you it seems.
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>
>> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
>> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
>> >>>>>>U.S.
>> >>>>>>military
>> >>>>>>have died...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>> >>>>>Wilson,
>> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
>> >>>lives
>> >>>lost in those fiascos.
>> >>
>> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>> >> predecessor
>> >>was the democrat FDR.
>> >>
>> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a
>> >> KIA level
>> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000,
>> >>33,000?
>> >>
>> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
>> >> left to
>> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far
>> >>is $450
>> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off
>> >>into
>> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
>> >>Trillion
>> >>dollars.
>> >>
>> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>> >> fiasco?
>> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > You didn't answer my question.
>>
>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue
>> at hand.
>>
>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>> answers,
>> then a diversion it is.
>>
>> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>> fiascos, I
>> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have
>> been
>> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war
>> has
>> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection
>> of them.
>>
>> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>
>
> If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than
> the
> fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

It is the worst foreign policy blunder in our country's history
courtesy of RepubLICKans.
 

Similar threads

Y
Soldier Killed in Iraq Raid Belonged to Delta Force
Replies
0
Views
21
Yahoo! News
Y
Y
American soldier found dead at U.S. Army base in South Korea
Replies
0
Views
20
Yahoo! News
Y
Y
Suspect in slaying of U.S. Marines made 2014 trip to Mideast
Replies
0
Views
24
Yahoo! News
Y
WorldNews
U.S. allies conduct 18 air strikes in Syria, Iraq: military
Replies
0
Views
20
WorldNews
WorldNews
S
US Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 943
Replies
15
Views
35
robw
R
Back
Top