Three more American lives wasted in bush,jr's fiasco: U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659

In article <f8vqj1$1ng$1@news.albasani.net>,
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
> >> >>>>>>U.S.
> >> >>>>>>military
> >> >>>>>>have died...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >> >>>>>Wilson,
> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
> >> >>>lives
> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
> >> >>
> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
> >> >> predecessor
> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a
> >> >> KIA level
> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000,
> >> >>33,000?
> >> >>
> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
> >> >> left to
> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far
> >> >>is $450
> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off
> >> >>into
> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
> >> >>Trillion
> >> >>dollars.
> >> >>
> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
> >> >> fiasco?
> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You didn't answer my question.
> >>
> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue
> >> at hand.
> >>
> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
> >> answers,
> >> then a diversion it is.
> >>
> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
> >> fiascos, I
> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have
> >> been
> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war
> >> has
> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection
> >> of them.
> >>
> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
> >
> >
> > If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than
> > the
> > fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>
> It is the worst foreign policy blunder in our country's history
> courtesy of RepubLICKans.

No, freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan was the
worst blunder, brought to you by DemocRAT FDR at a cost of only 418,000
American deaths.
 
In article <sN2dnVzJXrBI-y7bnZ2dnUVZ_vXinZ2d@bway.net>,
Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu.ie> wrote:

> In article <hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> hal.i.burton@hotmail.com says...
> >
> >
> >In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
> >> >>>>>>military
> >> >>>>>>have died...
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
> >> >>>>>Wilson,
> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American lives
> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
> >> >>
> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his predecessor
> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA level
> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000, 33,000?
> >> >>
> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves left to
> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is $450
> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off into
> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One Trillion
> >> >>dollars.
> >> >>
> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a fiasco?
> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > You didn't answer my question.
> >>
> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue at
> >> hand.
> >>
> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no answers,
> >> then a diversion it is.
> >>
> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been fiascos, I
> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have been
> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war has
> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection of
> them.
> >>
> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
> >
> >
> >If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
> >fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>
>
> Sheesh! At least get your history straight. Wilson did not start WWI.


He the one who got us into it. Care to explain why it was so important
for us to get into a European struggle at a cost of 117,000 American
lives?
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-74022D.14405803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <f8vqj1$1ng$1@news.albasani.net>,
> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
>
>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> > In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
>> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of
>> >> >>>>>>the
>> >> >>>>>>U.S.
>> >> >>>>>>military
>> >> >>>>>>have died...
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs
>> >> >>>>>Woodrow
>> >> >>>>>Wilson,
>> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and
>> >> >>>> Vietnam?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those
>> >> >>>American
>> >> >>>lives
>> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>> >> >> predecessor
>> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a
>> >> >> KIA level
>> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
>> >> >>10,000,
>> >> >>33,000?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no
>> >> >> reserves
>> >> >> left to
>> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so
>> >> >>far
>> >> >>is $450
>> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed
>> >> >>off
>> >> >>into
>> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
>> >> >>Trillion
>> >> >>dollars.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>> >> >> fiasco?
>> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War
>> >> >>I!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > You didn't answer my question.
>> >>
>> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the
>> >> issue
>> >> at hand.
>> >>
>> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>> >> answers,
>> >> then a diversion it is.
>> >>
>> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>> >> fiascos, I
>> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any
>> >> have
>> >> been
>> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every
>> >> war
>> >> has
>> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive
>> >> collection
>> >> of them.
>> >>
>> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>> >
>> >
>> > If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller
>> > than
>> > the
>> > fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>>
>> It is the worst foreign policy blunder in our country's history
>> courtesy of RepubLICKans.
>
> No, freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan was
> the
> worst blunder, brought to you by DemocRAT FDR at a cost of only
> 418,000
> American deaths.

lol

Google "worst foreign policy blunder" and get back to us.
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-6A06FC.14425503082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <sN2dnVzJXrBI-y7bnZ2dnUVZ_vXinZ2d@bway.net>,
> Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu.ie> wrote:
>
>> In article
>> <hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
>> hal.i.burton@hotmail.com says...
>> >
>> >
>> >In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
>> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of
>> >> >>>>>>the U.S.
>> >> >>>>>>military
>> >> >>>>>>have died...
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs
>> >> >>>>>Woodrow
>> >> >>>>>Wilson,
>> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and
>> >> >>>> Vietnam?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those
>> >> >>>American lives
>> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>> >> >> predecessor
>> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a
>> >> >> KIA level
>> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
>> >> >>10,000, 33,000?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no
>> >> >> reserves left to
>> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so
>> >> >>far is $450
>> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed
>> >> >>off into
>> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
>> >> >>Trillion
>> >> >>dollars.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>> >> >> fiasco?
>> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War
>> >> >>I!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > You didn't answer my question.
>> >>
>> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the
>> >> issue at
>> >> hand.
>> >>
>> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>> >> answers,
>> >> then a diversion it is.
>> >>
>> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>> >> fiascos, I
>> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any
>> >> have been
>> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every
>> >> war has
>> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive
>> >> collection of
>> them.
>> >>
>> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>> >
>> >
>> >If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than
>> >the
>> >fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>>
>>
>> Sheesh! At least get your history straight. Wilson did not start
>> WWI.
>
>
> He the one who got us into it. Care to explain why it was so
> important
> for us to get into a European struggle at a cost of 117,000 American
> lives?

Perhaps it had to do with Germans sinking our merchant ships. Or
maybe it had to do with a German proposal to Mexico to join the war as
Germany's ally against us. Small **** like that.
 
In article <f8vt65$o9p$1@news.albasani.net>,
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-74022D.14405803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <f8vqj1$1ng$1@news.albasani.net>,
> > "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> > In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
> >> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of
> >> >> >>>>>>the
> >> >> >>>>>>U.S.
> >> >> >>>>>>military
> >> >> >>>>>>have died...
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs
> >> >> >>>>>Woodrow
> >> >> >>>>>Wilson,
> >> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and
> >> >> >>>> Vietnam?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those
> >> >> >>>American
> >> >> >>>lives
> >> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
> >> >> >> predecessor
> >> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a
> >> >> >> KIA level
> >> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
> >> >> >>10,000,
> >> >> >>33,000?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no
> >> >> >> reserves
> >> >> >> left to
> >> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so
> >> >> >>far
> >> >> >>is $450
> >> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
> >> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed
> >> >> >>off
> >> >> >>into
> >> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
> >> >> >>Trillion
> >> >> >>dollars.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
> >> >> >> fiasco?
> >> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War
> >> >> >>I!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You didn't answer my question.
> >> >>
> >> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the
> >> >> issue
> >> >> at hand.
> >> >>
> >> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
> >> >> answers,
> >> >> then a diversion it is.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
> >> >> fiascos, I
> >> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any
> >> >> have
> >> >> been
> >> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every
> >> >> war
> >> >> has
> >> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive
> >> >> collection
> >> >> of them.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller
> >> > than
> >> > the
> >> > fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
> >>
> >> It is the worst foreign policy blunder in our country's history
> >> courtesy of RepubLICKans.
> >
> > No, freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan was
> > the
> > worst blunder, brought to you by DemocRAT FDR at a cost of only
> > 418,000
> > American deaths.
>
> lol
>
> Google "worst foreign policy blunder"...

That's how I found

Freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan

or entering WWI

or joining the UN.


> ... and get back to us.


I just did.
 
In article <f8vtdi$p4h$1@news.albasani.net>,
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-6A06FC.14425503082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <sN2dnVzJXrBI-y7bnZ2dnUVZ_vXinZ2d@bway.net>,
> > Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu.ie> wrote:
> >
> >> In article
> >> <hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
> >> hal.i.burton@hotmail.com says...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
> >> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of
> >> >> >>>>>>the U.S.
> >> >> >>>>>>military
> >> >> >>>>>>have died...
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs
> >> >> >>>>>Woodrow
> >> >> >>>>>Wilson,
> >> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and
> >> >> >>>> Vietnam?
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those
> >> >> >>>American lives
> >> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
> >> >> >> predecessor
> >> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a
> >> >> >> KIA level
> >> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
> >> >> >>10,000, 33,000?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no
> >> >> >> reserves left to
> >> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so
> >> >> >>far is $450
> >> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
> >> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed
> >> >> >>off into
> >> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
> >> >> >>Trillion
> >> >> >>dollars.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
> >> >> >> fiasco?
> >> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War
> >> >> >>I!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You didn't answer my question.
> >> >>
> >> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the
> >> >> issue at
> >> >> hand.
> >> >>
> >> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
> >> >> answers,
> >> >> then a diversion it is.
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
> >> >> fiascos, I
> >> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any
> >> >> have been
> >> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every
> >> >> war has
> >> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive
> >> >> collection of
> >> them.
> >> >>
> >> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than
> >> >the
> >> >fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
> >>
> >>
> >> Sheesh! At least get your history straight. Wilson did not start
> >> WWI.
> >
> >
> > He the one who got us into it. Care to explain why it was so
> > important
> > for us to get into a European struggle at a cost of 117,000 American
> > lives?
>
> Perhaps it had to do with Germans sinking our merchant ships....

....which were carrying arms to the Entente Powers, in violation of our
alleged neutrality.

> Or
> maybe it had to do with a German proposal to Mexico to join the war as
> Germany's ally against us.


....which was a non-starter as everyone with any smarts knew.


> Small **** like that.


Exactly, sure worth every one of those 117,000 American deaths.
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-B946C0.15070303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <f8vt65$o9p$1@news.albasani.net>,
> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
>
>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hal.i.burton-74022D.14405803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> > In article <f8vqj1$1ng$1@news.albasani.net>,
>> > "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> news:hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> >> > In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Harold Burton wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>> >> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
>> >> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>> >> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>> >> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of
>> >> >> >>>>>>the
>> >> >> >>>>>>U.S.
>> >> >> >>>>>>military
>> >> >> >>>>>>have died...
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>
>> >> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs
>> >> >> >>>>>Woodrow
>> >> >> >>>>>Wilson,
>> >> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>> >> >> >>>>
>> >> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and
>> >> >> >>>> Vietnam?
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>
>> >> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those
>> >> >> >>>American
>> >> >> >>>lives
>> >> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>> >> >> >> predecessor
>> >> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is
>> >> >> >> there a
>> >> >> >> KIA level
>> >> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
>> >> >> >>10,000,
>> >> >> >>33,000?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no
>> >> >> >> reserves
>> >> >> >> left to
>> >> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so
>> >> >> >>far
>> >> >> >>is $450
>> >> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as
>> >> >> >>equipment
>> >> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been
>> >> >> >>pushed
>> >> >> >>off
>> >> >> >>into
>> >> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of
>> >> >> >>One
>> >> >> >>Trillion
>> >> >> >>dollars.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has
>> >> >> >> been a
>> >> >> >> fiasco?
>> >> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World
>> >> >> >>War
>> >> >> >>I!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > You didn't answer my question.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the
>> >> >> issue
>> >> >> at hand.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have
>> >> >> no
>> >> >> answers,
>> >> >> then a diversion it is.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>> >> >> fiascos, I
>> >> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any
>> >> >> have
>> >> >> been
>> >> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war.
>> >> >> Every
>> >> >> war
>> >> >> has
>> >> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive
>> >> >> collection
>> >> >> of them.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller
>> >> > than
>> >> > the
>> >> > fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and
>> >> > Johnson.
>> >>
>> >> It is the worst foreign policy blunder in our country's history
>> >> courtesy of RepubLICKans.
>> >
>> > No, freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan
>> > was
>> > the
>> > worst blunder, brought to you by DemocRAT FDR at a cost of only
>> > 418,000
>> > American deaths.
>>
>> lol
>>
>> Google "worst foreign policy blunder"...
>
> That's how I found
>
> Freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan
>
> or entering WWI
>
> or joining the UN.
>
>
>> ... and get back to us.
>
>
> I just did.

You must have just overlooked the 600,000 references to Iraq.
 
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote in message
news:f8vtdi$p4h$1@news.albasani.net...
>
> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-6A06FC.14425503082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> In article <sN2dnVzJXrBI-y7bnZ2dnUVZ_vXinZ2d@bway.net>,
>> Gogarty <Gogarty@Clongowes.edu.ie> wrote:
>>
>>> In article
>>> <hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
>>> hal.i.burton@hotmail.com says...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
>>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Harold Burton wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>>> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>>> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
>>> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>> >> >>>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
>>> >> >>>>>>U.S.
>>> >> >>>>>>military
>>> >> >>>>>>have died...
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>
>>> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>>> >> >>>>>Wilson,
>>> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>> >> >>>>
>>> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
>>> >> >>>lives
>>> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>>> >> >> predecessor
>>> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA
>>> >> >> level
>>> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000,
>>> >> >>33,000?
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
>>> >> >> left to
>>> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is
>>> >> >>$450
>>> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>>> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off
>>> >> >>into
>>> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
>>> >> >>Trillion
>>> >> >>dollars.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>>> >> >> fiasco?
>>> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > You didn't answer my question.
>>> >>
>>> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue at
>>> >> hand.
>>> >>
>>> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>>> >> answers,
>>> >> then a diversion it is.
>>> >>
>>> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been fiascos,
>>> >> I
>>> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have
>>> >> been
>>> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war
>>> >> has
>>> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection
>>> >> of
>>> them.
>>> >>
>>> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
>>> >fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sheesh! At least get your history straight. Wilson did not start WWI.
>>
>>
>> He the one who got us into it. Care to explain why it was so important
>> for us to get into a European struggle at a cost of 117,000 American
>> lives?
>
> Perhaps it had to do with Germans sinking our merchant ships. Or maybe it
> had to do with a German proposal to Mexico to join the war as Germany's
> ally against us. Small **** like that.
>

You're letting him succeed
in changing the subject away
from loser bush,jr /Cheney/ Gonzales/ Republican
failed government in both
domestic and foreign policy.
 
Harold Burton wrote:
> In article <f8vt65$o9p$1@news.albasani.net>,
> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
>
>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hal.i.burton-74022D.14405803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>> In article <f8vqj1$1ng$1@news.albasani.net>,
>>> "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>>>>> In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>>>>>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>> "Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> August 2, 2007
>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>>>>>>>>>>> By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>>>>>>>> Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> U.S.
>>>>>>>>>>>> military
>>>>>>>>>>>> have died...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs
>>>>>>>>>>> Woodrow
>>>>>>>>>>> Wilson,
>>>>>>>>>>> Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and
>>>>>>>>>> Vietnam?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those
>>>>>>>>> American
>>>>>>>>> lives
>>>>>>>>> lost in those fiascos.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>>>>>>>> predecessor
>>>>>>>> was the democrat FDR.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a
>>>>>>>> KIA level
>>>>>>>> at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
>>>>>>>> 10,000,
>>>>>>>> 33,000?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no
>>>>>>>> reserves
>>>>>>>> left to
>>>>>>>> engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so
>>>>>>>> far
>>>>>>>> is $450
>>>>>>>> billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>>>>>>>> repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed
>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>> the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One
>>>>>>>> Trillion
>>>>>>>> dollars.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>>>>>>>> fiasco?
>>>>>>>> But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War
>>>>>>>> I!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You didn't answer my question.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the
>>>>>> issue
>>>>>> at hand.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>>>>>> answers,
>>>>>> then a diversion it is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>>>>>> fiascos, I
>>>>>> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> been
>>>>>> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every
>>>>>> war
>>>>>> has
>>>>>> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive
>>>>>> collection
>>>>>> of them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller
>>>>> than
>>>>> the
>>>>> fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>>>>
>>>> It is the worst foreign policy blunder in our country's history
>>>> courtesy of RepubLICKans.
>>>
>>> No, freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan was
>>> the
>>> worst blunder, brought to you by DemocRAT FDR at a cost of only
>>> 418,000
>>> American deaths.
>>
>> lol
>>
>> Google "worst foreign policy blunder"...
>
> That's how I found
>
> Freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan
>
> or entering WWI
>
> or joining the UN.
>
>
>> ... and get back to us.
>
>
> I just did.

1. bush,jr's "Axis of Evil Speech"
2 bush,jr's lies that took us to war in Iraq

This weekend bush,jr's
staff will be creating a
deception to explain his
pullback in Iraq
 
In article <f8vurc$sd6$1@news.albasani.net>,
"Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-B946C0.15070303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <f8vt65$o9p$1@news.albasani.net>,
> > "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:hal.i.burton-74022D.14405803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> > In article <f8vqj1$1ng$1@news.albasani.net>,
> >> > "Lamont Cranston" <Lamont.Cranston@NeoConEvilFighter.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> news:hal.i.burton-C663EA.12412303082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> >> > In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> >> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> >> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
> >> >> >> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
> >> >> >> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
> >> >> >> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
> >> >> >> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of
> >> >> >> >>>>>>the
> >> >> >> >>>>>>U.S.
> >> >> >> >>>>>>military
> >> >> >> >>>>>>have died...
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >> >> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs
> >> >> >> >>>>>Woodrow
> >> >> >> >>>>>Wilson,
> >> >> >> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and
> >> >> >> >>>> Vietnam?
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those
> >> >> >> >>>American
> >> >> >> >>>lives
> >> >> >> >>>lost in those fiascos.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
> >> >> >> >> predecessor
> >> >> >> >>was the democrat FDR.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is
> >> >> >> >> there a
> >> >> >> >> KIA level
> >> >> >> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
> >> >> >> >>10,000,
> >> >> >> >>33,000?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no
> >> >> >> >> reserves
> >> >> >> >> left to
> >> >> >> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so
> >> >> >> >>far
> >> >> >> >>is $450
> >> >> >> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as
> >> >> >> >>equipment
> >> >> >> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been
> >> >> >> >>pushed
> >> >> >> >>off
> >> >> >> >>into
> >> >> >> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of
> >> >> >> >>One
> >> >> >> >>Trillion
> >> >> >> >>dollars.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has
> >> >> >> >> been a
> >> >> >> >> fiasco?
> >> >> >> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World
> >> >> >> >>War
> >> >> >> >>I!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > You didn't answer my question.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the
> >> >> >> issue
> >> >> >> at hand.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have
> >> >> >> no
> >> >> >> answers,
> >> >> >> then a diversion it is.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
> >> >> >> fiascos, I
> >> >> >> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any
> >> >> >> have
> >> >> >> been
> >> >> >> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war.
> >> >> >> Every
> >> >> >> war
> >> >> >> has
> >> >> >> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive
> >> >> >> collection
> >> >> >> of them.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller
> >> >> > than
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and
> >> >> > Johnson.
> >> >>
> >> >> It is the worst foreign policy blunder in our country's history
> >> >> courtesy of RepubLICKans.
> >> >
> >> > No, freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan
> >> > was
> >> > the
> >> > worst blunder, brought to you by DemocRAT FDR at a cost of only
> >> > 418,000
> >> > American deaths.
> >>
> >> lol
> >>
> >> Google "worst foreign policy blunder"...
> >
> > That's how I found
> >
> > Freezing Japanese funds and placing an oil embargo on Japan
> >
> > or entering WWI
> >
> > or joining the UN.
> >
> >
> >> ... and get back to us.
> >
> >
> > I just did.


> You must have just overlooked the 600,000 whines about Iraq.



<snicker>
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-0973DE.07213603082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <jbzsi.1196$qa3.273@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:
>
>
>> you're a sorry maggot burton, a real hillbilly work
>
>
>
>
> Would you like some cheese with that whine?

wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,

can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
>
> Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.

damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no
intelligent content
 
In article <GsSsi.12567$eY.269@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:


> wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,
>
> can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober


Would you like some cheese with that whine?
 
In article <QuSsi.12569$eY.672@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> >
> > Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.
>
> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no
> intelligent content

I also have the record for getting the most responses with no
intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-D1B4E7.23415003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <QuSsi.12569$eY.672@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:
>
>> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> > In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
>> >
>> > Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.
>>
>> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no
>> intelligent content
>
> I also have the record for getting the most responses with no
> intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.

LMAO,

you couldn't calculate an average with a super computer gomer,

you're more like that hertz donut faggot and his 142:1 American kill ratio

also, why is your fat, yellow ass not in iraq, and why haven't you died
to protect me yet,

I'm looking forward to seeing your hillbilly name on a KIA list

fewer hillbilly pigs feeding on us taxpayers funded troughs
 
"Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hal.i.burton-462713.23400003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> In article <GsSsi.12567$eY.269@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:
>
>
>> wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,
>>
>> can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober
>
>
> Would you like some cheese with that whine?

and then the stupid gomer repeats it and proves me wrong,

I admit, I was wrong, you can get more ignorant
 
Harold Burton wrote:

> In article <13b6ocpmm8v23ed@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>
>
>>Sid9 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>>>>>>>>Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>>>>>>>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>August 2, 2007
>>>>>>>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>>>>>>>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>>>>>>>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the
>>>>>>>>>>>U.S. military
>>>>>>>>>>>have died...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
>>>>>>>>>>Wilson, Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
>>>>>>>>lives lost in those fiascos.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his
>>>>>>>predecessor was the democrat FDR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA
>>>>>>>level at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000,
>>>>>>>10,000, 33,000?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves
>>>>>>>left to engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war
>>>>>>>so far is $450 billion dollars, this does not include such costs
>>>>>>>as equipment repair/replacement and other expenses which have been
>>>>>>>pushed off into the future. The final total will probably be in
>>>>>>>excess of One Trillion dollars.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a
>>>>>>>fiasco? But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World
>>>>>>>War I!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You didn't answer my question.
>>>>>
>>>>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue
>>>>>at hand.
>>>>>
>>>>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no
>>>>>answers, then a diversion it is.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been
>>>>>fiascos, I think some would have been best avoided but I don't think
>>>>>any have been uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this
>>>>>war. Every war has misjudgements, no other war has been an almost
>>>>>exclusive collection of them.
>>>>>
>>>>>So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
>>>>fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Another last gasp of the sinking bush,jr Republican ship
>>>
>>>
>>
>> He ranks fiascos by the number of dead. So the fiasco is growing in
>>Iraq but has years to go before it reaches the fiasco level of WWII.
>>
>> Well, then we know he must consider Bill Clintons Kosovo War a huge
>>success as there was not a single loss.
>
>
>
> Wrong.

I suppose it's rediculous to ask why as you haver given any reasons for
any of your other statements.

We'll just sum up your logic to George W Bush good (it's what you
hear on hate radio), Clinton bad, Truman bad, FDR bad, and that ultimate
evil doer, Woodrow Wilson bad.

You're a real piece of work Harold.

Jeff
 
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net>
Spat the Words

>
> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-462713.23400003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
>> In article <GsSsi.12567$eY.269@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
>> "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> wow, how typical, unoriginal, stupid hillbilly,
>>>
>>> can't get much more ignorant hillbilly than that goober
>>
>>
>> Would you like some cheese with that whine?
>
> and then the stupid gomer repeats it and proves me wrong,
>
> I admit, I was wrong, you can get more ignorant

Haliburton Harold Burton gives you that evil cheney sneer and
hopes you'll be intimidated.
 
After Much Chewing of Cud and Cogitation, Harold Burton
<hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> Spat the Words

> In article <13b6m91ota3dm52@corp.supernews.com>,
> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>
>> Harold Burton wrote:
>>
>> > In article <13b59h516viu5ed@corp.supernews.com>,
>> > Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>In article <13b56b48jhg1s4f@corp.supernews.com>,
>> >>> Jeff <dont_bug_me@all.uk> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>>Harold Burton wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>In article <dSvsi.762$zp5.520@bignews6.bellsouth.net>,
>> >>>>>"Sid9" <sid9@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>August 2, 2007
>> >>>>>>U.S. Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 659
>> >>>>>>By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
>> >>>>>>Filed at 9:16 p.m. ET
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>As of Thursday, Aug. 2, 2007, at least 3,659 members of the U.S.
>> >>>>>>military
>> >>>>>>have died...
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>Yep that 3,659 sure beats the records set by DemocRATs Woodrow
Wilson,
>> >>>>>Harry Truman, and Lyndon Johnson.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So you oppose the US participation in WWI, WWII and Vietnam?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>Change WWII to Korea and explain why you like all those American
lives
>> >>>lost in those fiascos.
>> >>
>> >> Harry Truman was president when the bomb fell, and his predecessor
>> >>was the democrat FDR.
>> >>
>> >> So, you are not opposed to the fisaco in Iraq? Or is there a KIA
level
>> >>at which you will declare it to be fiasco? Is it 5,000, 10,000,
33,000?
>> >>
>> >> 70% of all armored vehicles are in Iraq. Ther are no reserves left
to
>> >>engage in another conflict. The admitted cost of the war so far is
$450
>> >>billion dollars, this does not include such costs as equipment
>> >>repair/replacement and other expenses which have been pushed off into
>> >>the future. The final total will probably be in excess of One Trillion
>> >>dollars.
>> >>
>> >> Just what does it take for you to admit this war has been a fiasco?
>> >>But you have the most rediculous answer to date, but World War I!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > You didn't answer my question.
>>
>> You didn't have one. All you had was a diversion from the issue at
hand.
>>
>> But when your Iraq is clearly such a fiasco, and you have no answers,
>> then a diversion it is.
>>
>> I don't think any of the other wars we have fought have been fiascos, I
>> think some would have been best avoided but I don't think any have been
>> uniformly as poorly managed (not even close) as this war. Every war has
>> misjudgements, no other war has been an almost exclusive collection of
them.
>>
>> So, you think Iraq is not a fiasco?
>
>
> If it's a fiasco it's one several orders of magnitude smaller than the
> fiascos brought to you by DemocRATs Wilson, Truman, and Johnson.

I'm sure it would grow by several orders of magnitude if you were
to have a personal stake in it. Am I right Haliburton ?

You just need a little incentive to get a proper perspective on this
whole war thing.
 
In article <4eTsi.12584$eY.7784@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
"Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:

> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hal.i.burton-D1B4E7.23415003082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> > In article <QuSsi.12569$eY.672@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net>,
> > "Al E. Gator" <ho.ho@yahoo.net> wrote:
> >
> >> "Harold Burton" <hal.i.burton@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:hal.i.burton-4BB911.11225803082007@comcast.dca.giganews.com...
> >> > In article <Adzsi.1197$qa3.511@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> >> >
> >> > Ah, Al E. Gator has been fooled by a cheap substitute.
> >>
> >> damn goober, you still have the record for the most posts with no
> >> intelligent content
> >
> > I also have the record for getting the most responses with no
> > intelligent content. Yours just upped my average.
>
> LMAO,
>
> you couldn't calculate an average with a super computer gomer,
>
> you're more like that hertz donut faggot and his 142:1 American kill ratio
>
> also, why is your fat, yellow ass not in iraq, and why haven't you died
> to protect me yet,
>
> I'm looking forward to seeing your hillbilly name on a KIA list
>
> fewer hillbilly pigs feeding on us taxpayers funded troughs

You've upped it again.
 

Similar threads

Y
Soldier Killed in Iraq Raid Belonged to Delta Force
Replies
0
Views
21
Yahoo! News
Y
Y
American soldier found dead at U.S. Army base in South Korea
Replies
0
Views
20
Yahoo! News
Y
Y
Suspect in slaying of U.S. Marines made 2014 trip to Mideast
Replies
0
Views
24
Yahoo! News
Y
WorldNews
U.S. allies conduct 18 air strikes in Syria, Iraq: military
Replies
0
Views
20
WorldNews
WorldNews
S
US Military Deaths in Iraq at 3, 943
Replies
15
Views
35
robw
R
Back
Top